On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled
-
The mwm * iff«.^.H^ London vhh^^ ~^^ ^» ...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Over And Over Again In These Pages We
Driven sensational ¦ Out / headings " * The , Pirates such as have ? Home ruined Authors the > ,
Market , ! . & c . The authors iii Englaad are much better off in this respect ; but they must
look to their laurels : the taste for American literature is making headway on . this side , an < 3 [
the foreign authors are protected amongst us . There is far , more excitement about
copyright in America than there is here , but we question whether the authors in ^ merica . are
a sufficiently influential body _ tt ^ . mov e the legislature . Classes and masses have lines as
sharply defined in the Republic as . they are in monarchic England , and the strongest vote
must carry tfye day . Assuredly the prospects " of the young American author are exceedingly
gloomy at present — V . ~ " ^ v . ^ -The impracticable royalty-stamp proposal
brought forward bj Mr . Pearsall Smith was likely to prove a stumbling-block in the way of
the Copyright League which has recently been actively employed in furthering schemes for
promoting its obijects . We thought this stamp plan was long since forgotten until the
Nineteenth Gentwry resuscitated ifc , appending comments from English authors . Mr . Lowell
pointed this out at once : ' tt is only necessary to say of it , * he remarked , 'that it was
imanimousl mm y rejected * years ago by the British Commission which considered it , and it ii now
considered impracticable in this country by those competent to know through long
experience , both among authors and publishers . ' The Authors' Readings at New York , held
in the interests of the International Copyright Law , were very , successful , nearly 4 , 000 dollars
being placed at the disposal of the Council to carry on the campaign . On a reciprocity basis
we , wish all success to their spirited effort .
Ar00600
1800 The Publishers' Circular Pec- ^ iss ? ¦¦ ¦ i ii i- i- i - ¦ ¦ t ¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦ ¦ f ¦
The Mwm * Iff«.^.H^ London Vhh^^ ~^^ ^» ...
The iff London vhh School Board mbhhw + and
books mwm * « . ^ . —Several ^^ ~^^ ^» ^ ^»» ^^ " *» v publishers . *^^ *^^ »*^ - *—r - ^ mm <^ m ^ m , including * ^»«^^ mw ^ m ^ m ^^ mm ^» v mm M ^ Copy ^ essrs mmr ^^ r * m * ^ mm + . Blackie & SonsMessrs . Cassell & Co . ( Limited )
Messrs . T . Nelson , & Son & chave remon- , strated against the extraordinary , , proposal of
Aniong the Board letters to manufacture addressed its to school the members copy-books the .
following has appeared :- — Dear Sir- —My professional duties have
brought me into , contact recently with upwards of 400 teachersamongst whom there is a
common complaint * W m , that * ^ . the - « K ^ are already mm ' ^ much ^^ toohampered and restricted in their choice
of copy , -books . In Board schools the cause lies h with the Board a . s ; in other V Government _ - ^^^ . . ^
. action aided ^^ schools of the the Inspectors cause is ^ . generally The ( London in ^ the )
writing Board ' - s books recent , will step , assure if confirmed dly intensif as rega y this rds
grievance Until . a style and series shall be produced h ! ti ;
wnicn wnich admittedly admittedlv excel excel all all others othfirri , . ' how r » w . can « n ; fr ¦• ' - ¦ " " - — ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ . ¦ ¦ ¦ " l . ^
The Mwm * Iff«.^.H^ London Vhh^^ ~^^ ^» ...
^~ .. — — .., — — - ; . ¦ . - ' \ ' " , " . — -: g' ""^| f * BftM ^ i ^ H inflicted any Xi _ one a ^ 1 style and * " < series •_* . ¦ " thousarid 2 _^ - . be _ ^ : V acceptable -J . ^• of ^ -. i * : v-i .. *¦¦ . '¦ . ' ' ^ to or I
Where , as upou at present some , such _ diversity s of teachers opinion ] I I prevails ^ fa w t wuka . the V 4 « . o diBastrous utnuovxvuo cbnsequeiibes xsvruovu % a ¦ «? . u \/*? 0 of vj . deny Civil y - 1
without iittg teachers grave a ^^ choice apprehensions cannot be . And coht ^ tiot tuplated only I I soit is a serious infringement of a teacher ' I
recognised , prerogative . It is one factor the s I nrlnrft in in that f . haf . accumulation a « ftii ' imiiljLt . ir » Ti of of forces fnvn & n which xxrh 'inh is in I I
reducing rqore the True Educator ( now , unhappily , I almost entirely banished from our •* B & sults I
lowest Schools leve ) not l of to a a m true ere mechanical "Teacher even Instructor , but to . the It I
is aUo tending to change the . Scjipol Board into a vast' monopoly , ' a private publishing and manufirm since the
with facturing designs equal , comp h i | consi iles ; , stency and ¦ ¦ i produces m -m desi w same gn ¦ copy principl and -books produce f e will that ,
apparatus — — — —m - ^ — , —r text - ^— — ^ - book ~ —^ — w ^ ^^ - ^^^ « ^^^ ^^^ , of ^ - ^ - ^^^ every ^^ ^^^^^^^^ fc ^^ , ^^ ^^^^^ descri ^^^^^^^ ^^ " ^^^ ^ m ^^ ^^^^ ption ^^^^ ^^ 0 ^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^ * p - lans - - ~ a- buildings w-- ^^^^ food ¦ v and -- clothing - 1 ¦ . Bate VV - ,
pay ™ ^ — — ing — — , — publishers _ — — _ , ^ g , authors —* - — - _*~ - ^ ^^ ^ p . _^ - ^ , and ~^^ - ^^ - ^^ manufacturers ^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^ v ^^^^ S ^^ B ^^ . ^^^^^^ F ^ V ^^^ have good cause for protesting against the ,
fatall introduction strikes of ai a the scheme root that of fair strikes and , free and y , ~
competition in trade . : I submit that a question of such importance ,
been ana and pregnan Txresrnan referred t fc with with to the such such entire issues issues bod , , should should of Board iiare ha . v ? teachers ( as it is pre-eminently a y question of
matter education of , finance and ) , " onl and y that very it subordiriately should not have a
been of twenty sprun members g upon , a or s thereabouts mall Sub-Committee most of whom m ¦ ¦ as mt educationists - ^ v ^ v *^ mr or . w . experts tfv rf in , 49 bb
shi * " ^* ^~ p ^~ , ^* v ^^^ never , ^^^ v be ^^^ - ^^ atowjed w >^ ^^ ^» ^^ ^^ v ^^ ^ v ^*^ ^ an ^ ^^ hour ^^^ ^ v m ' s ^^^ ^^ thoug ^ f ^ ^ m * ^ BWm ht penman ^ t ^ ^^ on | j ^¦^^ the ^ v 4 A art of writing in their lives . The ' new
departure ambiguous ---- , ' looked ¦ aspect at from and the that outside this , amblgrnlty has v - ^ p ^^ v ^^ v a very
should ^^^ ——— be removed — * ^^ — m— — — -w ^ , ^^ no ' ^ — — ^^ one — - ^ ^^ ^^^^ sincerel ^^^^ ^^ v ^^ - ^ wpv ^ wv ^ v y ^^ p ^ interested v ^^ r ^^ v | ^ L ^ Xv ^^¦¦•^^ in - education —— — ~ - — — -w — ' — — —¦ pr w the — i Board i — ^^ -- ^ —^ — ^ '^ ^ s ^^^ well v » ^^^ - ^ v ^^ b ^ -being t- ^^ ^ v ^ r ^^^^^¦ h ^^^ m can i ^^ r ^ J ^^^^*^ for ^^^ ^^^ ^™
a moment d innovation doubt . Trusting most you careful will give atten the - propose tion tion . 1 I am am . raithiuJly faithful lv your yours vbtirs .
, , , An Intermediate Schoolmaster . Rights in Book Illustrations . —A lady
Miss Nicholl , has recently been complaining , to — — newspaper - ^ - ¦ ~~— — - » ¦— — — ^ - - ^ - ~ — " editors ~~ - ^— — —— — -- ¦ ^ - ^^ ^ - ^ ¦ respecting ' - — ' »^ Jk ^^ ^^ - ^^^¦^^ ^ ¦^ fc 7 the vaa ^^ - use ^^^^ 1 ^ ^^^ ^ made »^ 4 ^ ' ^« ^~ ^
the of illustrations late Mr . A . from Nicholl the . pencil < It is not of her fair father ' Miss , Nicholl writes , ' that his [ Mr . NicholPs ] , work should to other be publishers distributed for by other the . original books publishers for which
they quite m \ were sympathise m never «¦ m * with intended m m / Miss / jNich Of oll course ' s feelings , ^ we , . ^ ^
neous but practicall — — . — The ~ — - ^ itep n y - ~ r m << m her ^ l —— y w g ^*^ m iven ^^ ideas ^^ •^^^^ in w ^ v ^^^ are the ^ ip i ^»^ v ^^ r altogether Globe ^ ^ ^ rw ^^ ^^ ^ r ^^* regarding P ^ ^ ^ VBT ¦ M ^^^ V «<* erro ^^^ . ^»^— ' — { -
correct copyri w- -w b— s > - ^^ - - ^^ ght w that va « v in « w illustrative we v * ^«* - do - ^*» p ^^ ^ not W * V ^ ^ art hesitate ^^^ l ^ is dk U ^ . so ^ « # ^^ pointed to % /^^ quot ^ 1 1 , . 1 V ^ V e V ^ and it" ** .
the That terms paper on says which : 7- ' he Every [ the thing artist depends ] parted upon with his work . It is open ' to an + artint tfc to p ^ r ^*^ to a
' — ' - ^ - ^ " ^ - ' —~™~» ^ - ^ »^ r ^ - ^ ^ m ^~ ^^ -m ^ ^^ - ^ v ^ m ^^^ mmm ^* «* m ^ m ^^ ^^ say W ^^ ^ " ^ tor for publisher production Droduction : * ' I dispose in in such such--and of and these --such such drawings a a work worlr . and and to yon in in
connection no other . . Th ; * ey If are he not made to mr be such used an mtpmfm ^ in n ^ agreement any , other vimm ,
^ — ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ¦¦ ¦ *~*^ m * ^^ ^** v- ~ m ^ ^»^» ^ nv ^ w ^ w ^ B ^^ dv «^^ mmmWgniwm ^ ^^^ ^ mr mm ^^^ ™ " r the result would be obvious . But if Jie failed to come to any such understanding , and sold
he his or drawings his j ( jix representatives 4 / without to conditions wbuld have of any nb kind locu i / f * ,
standi - » * y vs « . in objec » . v | ji ^ . tig their vi * vo nviuu sale * or xtcv lolan vv ? jiiu for any »^^ .,
-
-
Citation
-
Publishers’ Circular (1880-1890), Dec. 15, 1887, page 1800, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/pc/issues/tec_15121887/page/6/
-