On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (7)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
10 TBS : rrUBEBS OP THE NATIONAL CHASTER V* 3 ^ AS SOCIATION.
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
j ' jmcos , —At aU times it has been mj to stand before jou in my real character ; ^ f ou ^ jndge of its Y&hie and of my consis-^ f in &ct flisre i 3 no person for whom I hare * Seftorong b . contempt than for the man who *^ s double character . ^ T je ^ peniiig of the question of ihe ExecntiTe in JlVeefc ' s Star , without say apparent ground , Ss I h&a hoped sad the people had thought thai * TLt -differences werenealed , has placed me in a
~^ Lj sination . On Monday 1 am found in eomf' ^ yjg ! James Leach , acting with him and j ^ L jag him , as I think his services deserre ; and ^ SiSiraay he is represented in the Northern Star * tnJh whom ne honest man wonld be associated f ^ ofieial capacity . I imagine that the * JL ( ag of chairman presiding OTer a meedng of Hj ^ g ^ is an official capacity , and I eongraihe meetin upohis ap pointment there
^ ed g n ; - f ^ jjsra Jisociited -with . Jame 3 Leach ; and as I fc la , at all timeSjto be consisienl it now becomes my jrrtT to lay before yon the part that I have taken ths disputes relative to the Balance Sheet of the SjgcaHTe , aud the mode resorted to by Mr . Hvll , in .. . jjpaiatT of Editor of the Northern Star , in i jj ^ pag jheir ^ ondnct before the Chartist body . the of
I -has always aw&re of difficulty my jjaaSon . To interfere capriciously with the Editor bald hsTe been an act of despotism ; and to allow jk conflict to-proceed , when , as the Proprietor of fla Tape * * I 'H'as no * ssfefied with the posiiion ^ jjjjb ^ by the Editor , wonld hare been weakness j ntj , posfinnion-• ffigR public notice was first directed to the jaljaee Sheet , I thought that it was done in a beggrn ss . manna 3 bat whea the intemperance of the cyjga ^ forced the Editor from his impregnable and him to
w ^ oncf senfinal induced assume the iart <) fMEserJ &en I was of opinion , and remain gDjthit he abandoned Ms strong hold . I paw the jjggegj ^ j of a close adherence to all the rales of our Qjgjjjjjgoaj I saw the fatal consequences of any jjgjjn ; Tjj&cco of those xale 3 j 3 xead the whole f j ge jgiaist the Executive , and also the circumjasia ! etidenee from many part 3 of the country , ij wHth a charge of neglect was sustained ; and fe&igh scrnpalonSj I trust , as any man , I never lure 505 B in ihar condaci that amonnt of guilt
jiifi Hiith it has been characterised . Is hare passed over ihe nsglect wonld have been aiEJa 5 iice ,. nDt only to the ChartiBt body bni to { & Exseadve themselves ; -while to hare magniSed gjsr errors would be 10 deal unjustly with them . Itos anxious for ths eorreciion of the wrong ; and iiercfore desirous t )" at the deviation from the presjribcd rale should have been laid before the country so jhu ihe opinion of the Chartist body might be Jurlj tasted upon thequesiaon : and it was because 1 foresxw , in the manner and language in which She -charge was made , the probable frustration of & 3 Xdesirable object , that I the more regretted it .
limy persons have supposed that I was not only eogniiant of , but favourable to , the course pursued by Us Editor of the Star ; and , had the contention eased , 1 should have preferred labouring under this inplied censure , to re-opening the breach . The time las now come , however , when I must justify Ejself ; and wiih that intention I beg leave to state . a ! tie outset , that so far from being a consenting psnjioths controversy I was most unequivocally opposed io it ; in proof whereof 1 feel myself konad to lay before you the following correspondenca whkh passed between Mr . Kill and me .
TheSrsi notice of the matter which appeared repugnant to my feelings , I read in the Star preceding Mr . DaEKsmbe's visit to Manchester ; and immediately upon perusing it I sat down and communicated my dissatisfaction of the conrse pursued "by Hi . HOI ; aad that is the first letter referred to by himia 1 breply . The second letter had reference to ihs-srriciein waith hard names were used towards ihs Execnirre , zui also to an article upon the
* £ xiraordxnarjl > ocument , " or the Address , supposed telave teen issued during the recentstrike , I never Isep copies of my letters , as I never anticipate the iseessrr of using them foz the purpose of justifying Bjself ^ however , in the subjoined letter you ¦ t Siee ample quotations from these letters to Isjjki ta the conclnsioii that , from the first , I waa loosed to the coarse pnrsn&d by Mr . Hill , or rather to&tmode ef making his Charges .
Ib following 13 Mr . Hill ' s reply to my two i&zs upon this subject ; and as the date is important , Ib ^ yonr attention to it : — Leeds , Saturday evening , Dec , lOEn , 1842 . Mi 2 > xxb Era , —I nt-rer do aayShing hastily if I as lety it , because 1 generally find things liastfly = to to be 21 done . I hasc therefore taken lame to * Tkr » Jhs feelings of Eurprise and astonishment with * £ 5 fii 1-read yonr last letter t » subside , before I sat « " » J » to anssrer it . I thill now trj to answer so much of it as I can ffiiaaitaEdfnily ; or at least as fully as may be necesszj for out duly -01061113120132 p-vh other .
ahU 2 nay omit nolhiBg in replying to it , I shall Bie « ehpa 3 agraph as J go on-XoubaJB thus : —'' I old think that five yeara inSB * 7 , ioi to spesk of Mend ^ iip , sbxrald bave insured * ° = $ better reception lor my observations . I never can in * a & 8 iiEguage o j dictation nor often of rex&c&a&K . I should not now -write if I were able » . 5 ° to J « ds . Bat I did all in my power to start tea mnrnaa , but iras obliged , -while dressing , to send w niy Doctor again instead of a carriage . For now * a day * Iiare hsea Tery SI—dangeronsly so , otherw » e I ibKild baTe socnfcr inteifered . "
-if Q »* &sipl £ = e , 1 do feel assured that jon -will be-^ s _ na * hsa I cay that the ne-sra of your illness fills = « - * itliregret-, end 1 have tbe sincerest hope that by tta Bos it ma , ^ = 1 ^ 7 ^^ The first part of the jragrg , a 1 am atterlj unable to understand , as I « aw > t 2 nd oat to vhzt " observations" you refer . If JMffisaa tbe observations contained in jonr pre-& * ¥ ' £ *** ' J mmt " ^ md yon that I did not receive aT ^ vr ' - " fact ^ 5 " "write ifc » Mtil "fter Si ^ ?^ ae SIticleB Kf e * red to , and comv f- ^ ln ? r&of of tbis ' I Be « i ^ t refer jw » tteioBofrisg i-rtiacts from it : — » As to the £ *} - apra as eipiiifiinirfc of tie Executive . I think
^ fmnsfsh . &x . " ' The article upon the Exe-« *« « onmeat I do not tsacHj comprehend . " It tet ei v- ^ tsen ^ y ohservaSons in this - r<n ! Jon ^ P ** ** that I should defer , in ^^ Uis Mtcies upo n irlikb your present letter ^^ » s-. Ttrfelj . 1 ba-re n r had from yon any ^ * a = mtHn ; j bssring at all upon Hie matters at k «* J- ™ * tb ^ - , cosj > dled to tfiink that yon i 8 j BT ? 'f ? t- BnScr ^ o ^ e misconcfeption arisiEg aatfes ^^ rec&neeti « a of facts ; as I do trust ^ naew ? TeSIH ¦ aa ^ tE 05 r ° = ie has given yon ** a » ZL ? c ° " tb 3 t my oiservafions Iroa yoa ^ t ,, « ofsul be disrssnerefcil-j ? k »; tu 1 V-o-mo i be
H ^ - ^ assurance nusM not necessary ; fijag j /;" 8 cec f ^ 37 , I xscat beg -to assure you that fcrn&" ° = 32 Imcg from -srhoia I Ts-ould receive ot-^ C ^ Sm *" ? iy £ cl ^ - connected Trith t na interests « sfcl t ^ T more ^ spsstfal deferenca and more ^^ SZ ^^ ^ ^ d I regret much ^ Ar S ? ^ "k-as juu eeai to do-that I ^ Soa : ' if '" " to Jcnr observations when " ^ Isle l > V - T than ^ LfcE - delivered personally . * te , rtia ^ iliKi 3 ' - be € Ej JsI-donbt E ° t I always ^ ^ iai adT ; ^*"** JOILr observations , suggesd « » 1 S * ^^ mcst Tes P ectful ^ d attentive en * 3 tha S ^ ^^ J 3 endeavunredin whatever conftsda « raT ^^ tb -e movemsnt , so to act as to BaB »* itiSn'S ^ ' * " ^ acalitd fot As to dicta-*** £ && eT ^ 2011 esongh to talk ct that when it is 1 vmtiF ?*** Ton ^ 7 that yon Mve Jsa ^ ia fflV ^ JCB EeTer "ffm- J inow of ^ ttsatotw , ^ - ^ or chaiactertaatBhouldinduce -14 iaw , " ^ 'to ay : — ^ « a «^? ycm " Jniie last ^^ tJ dM h ° Pe ^ e fttosij ^^ MEce never TFonld be nsed , as I was not !?* ¦* * a-. * , ^^^^ in -B-tich it was going on . ^• te JaT ,, ol 3 ett to in it ; but I am not to 3 ^^« afalse frie nd . " ! S £ ?* 'M £ ? 5 * ^^ ^ 7 laEt - ** & ' mjr ^ lo - ^? tad recommended to the Hull eoun-S ^ y a ) e : S ^ riTateJ y to Campbell , instead » f h ? 7 * t' hn ) hS t P ^^ c , yen expressed yourself in ^^ cijZ ^ ? Probation . I perfectly reman-2 L ^ -to I * 1 " * " ^ »» month of " 2 S ?* o « dS ^ * ' that ***> I *«» st «« birfi ja ^ * * sad t like com 3 e J 7 ou again expreBsea la ?* ** & 1 hi > ^ that th ^ ' d act on ray WL ^^ Katlt Tfcco ^ Son of your ever , till ^ fc"tl ^ lia ^? lfeToura : ble opinion of tbex"uan-^ ^ S ^^ > U&Snea *" soiB 8 on - todesd ' ^* the &Z ! T ? ? «> ta me ; becanse the t vo te ? * ^*?^* ^ keen -botb « nt by the 1 J ^ cel ^ f " ^^ P ^ enca was not" going Ra 8 « fe Bat &ne ; mi Vt <„ & £% &
Untitled Article
appearance of another balance sheet to note its effect However , I am to conclude that you are right ; and that my recollections are as "wrong as they are strong and clear . It may bs matter of regret to tbe Hull councillors that they shonld not have yonr approbation of their proceedings ; but I have yet to learn that that fact should render their proceedings nugatory , and deprive-them of toeir rigbt to act on their own jadgment If Una paragraph mean that the HuD councillors ought not to use their correspondence , beeause you-are not favourable to it , I fear your enemies -wonld deem this & -very dose approximation to that «• language of dictation" -which you affirm that you never used ; if it do not mean this , I confess that I am unable to discover any meaning in it .
You say that you are -not to me or any one " a false friend . * ' God forbid that yon should ; 1 , at least , have safFsrfcd enough from falsa friends without finding one in you . You go on in your letter to « ay : — " The moment seized for denouncing M * 3 > ou » ll , -was he even a robber , was most unfortunate ; - while the terms nsed in branding the acts of the Executive blamable , though not - ? enal , -wera highly offensive , and pre-eminently calculated to lessen the feeling of proper regret ¦ which a cala exposure -would have ensured . "
Zvever were words sjore adroitly and rightly nsed than yours in speaking of those acts . They were , indeed , * ' blamsdble though yoi vexal . " They were " mortal " sins against the -very life and principle of demscracy . Not the result of a hasty and thoughtless indiscretion , but committed- HsliberaUig after repeated caution ; cloaked over at first wiib . as much low cunning as oould have been exhibited by an Old Bailey pick-pocket , a-d afterwards , -when stripped of the disguise , brazened out -with an , impudence but seldom met with , even in that fraternity . It is not very easy in " branding acts" like these to find terms in -which to do it -winch shall fee other than offensive to the perpetrators ; and I trust that no person , save , perhaps , yourself ,-honestly cisposed to - view the subject on its merits -will think the terms I have used in this matter to be at all stronger than the case required .
Yi-u proceed : — " Tbe mention of the document and the mode of mixing M'Douali ' s name as part in it was unfriendly . ' This , as applied to my remarks on the balance sheet , I cannot understand ; for the plain reason , that in none of thosa have I said a single -word about " the document . " I am not in tbe habit of thus jnmbling things : nobody ever does -who has not some sinister end to
serve . You go on : — " And good God ! jnst now , while all are under prosecution , to have lighted such a torch ameag us . ' " You forget , Sir , that it was soi I , but Tors own pets , the Executive , who lighted the tohch . I did all I could to prevent its being lighted . Bat to sit calmly and see the people robbed and laughed at "without speaking did not comport with my disposition I envy no man ' who could . You say " plunderers , robbers , transportation , and so forth , are scarcely " the fit terms to apply to men upon the first announcement of their fault "
If the fault be " plnnder and robbery , " as in this case it is , I know not -why these should not be tbe fittest terms of all But -without arguing that po : nt -with you , I beg to remind yon that S was not in " the first announcement of their fault that those terms were used . Their " fault" had been announced to them by at least three different and separate parties , before the &ar said a sir-gle word . The Hull Councillors , the Leicestershire delegates , and the Metropolitan , delegates had severaliy announced the fault ; and it was not in " announcing the fault" at all . but in exposing the impudent ** brszsning out" of Campbell , that they
" expected the country to be delighted" vnth the robbery , that I adduced the parallel case to show how very " delightful" it might have been under other circumstances . I should not have been surprised to find Campbell or -M'Donall placing this in the light in ¦ which you have placed it . It is "very natuial for them to seek to wriggle out of the " mess" by all sorts of misrepresentations and quirking falsehoods ; but I have no right to expect $ ou to misrepresent -what I say for the purpose of censuring it . From you , at all events , I have right to expect justice ; I ask no more from any man .
And th ^ n again you say : —" And then the a-lusion to Leach ' d and Campbtll ' s shops -was in bad taste , " Now , this is a gross perversion ; and one that from yoa I had no right to look for . It assumes that I sp-ke of their shops perse . I did n » such thing . If you had taken the trouble to read the article , instead of taking Mr . Campbell's version of it , you -would have known that Campbell -was complaining that he had no funds to pay the wages of bimsfclf , and Leach , and Baimtow . I showed that the Organ ' zation giTes them no title to wages -when not sitting . They are not sitting now ; and 1 did ask why we should pay them wages now when Leach and Campbell are minding their shops , and Bairstow is getting -vrages as a lecturer ? I ask it yet . I sever Mnt&d that Leach had no right to keep a shop ; theugb I do maintain that the Secretary has no right to do anything , but give his whole time to the duues of his office .
You " fear that much private pique will be set down to the account where remonstrance alone should have stood . " There can be no doubt that the fellows -will labour hard enough to make it seem as if my honest -B-atcbfnlness for the people ' s canse and purse was the resn t of some petty personal feeling . That is their gama Bnt though they seem to have played it successfully upon yon ,. I don't think they will succeed with tbe people . And whether they do or not is all the same thing to me . I seek to serve the people , not to please them . .
Your next paragraph is a strange ona It runs thus : — " I have no donbt that the country would have taken a c % lm remonstrance kindly , while they Trill , and I think just ] y , look with disgust and suspicion npon many of the charges and terms ; especially any reference to the ' Executive Docnment , " which was lugged in , head- and heels , without any ostensible cause . " Kow , from you , tl-is is most incomprehensibleindeed ie is " too bad . " I once more repeat what , if yon have read them , yon mnst iiiow—that in no article which I have written upon the Balance Sheet
business or upon the Executive at all , have I said one ¦ w ord about that document . There was a distinct article upon the "document" separate from any consideration of " Executive" matters at all , headed " The last Shift / ' and yon seem . somehow to have jumbled them To that article yon refer in your previous letter , and yon say : — " The article npon the Executive Docnment I do not exactly comprehend either the meaning or tbe utility of , " Now let me try if I can help you to comprehend both its meaning and its utility . In the Statesson of November 5 th , Mr . J . B . O'Brien published the statement , which I send you here inclosed .
" Talk of spies indeed « of informers too . Why , spies and informers are gentlemen , in comparison with those black-hearted , peiidions demagogues , - who can lock on cold-bloodedly whBe conspiracies are being formed to involve innocent people in ruin , and who , far the sake of the after-consequences to themselves , can coolly see those conspiracies explode , and scatter ruin and disgrace all around , while , with & single breati , they might have blown tie conspiracies to atoms , and thus saved all , without as much as naming or touching a hair , of the head of any of the conspirators themselves . Look at the case of Gnffin , too !
What occupation wonld there bare been for that fellsw , had there not been a perfidious demagogue base enough to draw cp a boastful , lying , document with his own hand , in which he deliberately tells the countiy that ever / thing was ready , and that , in eight days , the turnouts might calculate on the movement being universal ? Ifow , this Tricked demagogue knew well be was uttering falithotids ; for he not only took good care not to father bis own c-f&pring , for be actually disowned and Epit upon it ; and -while in the document of bis own dra-aicg ( bat the responsibility of which he took care to throw npon otbers ) he undisguiaedly invited a general r ising of hiB " Imperial '' dupes , he had afterwards the unparalleled baseness to damn bis own work in bis own newspaper , and to treat as madmen and fools those who might act upon his advice : thus not only making a laughing-stock of the people , bnt , after bringing them into danger , basely deaerling them , and denouncing his own acts and adviee , in order tosecurehis own cowardly carcase from the consequences . Talk of Griffin , indeed ! God forbid we should be Griffin ' s apologist The fellow ' s conduct has been bad as bad could be of the kind : but , nevertheless , it is innocence itself , ia comparison with that of the cold-Wooded monster -who , -while be was teTl ^ E us in his newspaper , that tbe strike could not succeed , and that it would only do damage to the cause , nevertheless , did secretly draw up a public anonymous address , in which he gave the Chartist public every assurance of success , telling them that the whole machinery -was perfect , and that in eight days the turnouts -would have it all their own way . His dirty tools and fanatic followers may try to gloss over this conduct as they best can , but to men of plain sense and-virtuom feeling it admite of but one construction . They will see in it only the conduct of a heartless villain , who cared nothing for the dangers in vrhich he involved others thronghhiB lying address , while he took precions good care ofjiimself , by disavowing his own acts and Ms own policy , in Mb own newspaper . To that which brought danger on others he took care not to append his name . ¦ To what was intended to provide for hie own safety * betook good care to append ' Fcargag O'Connor in fulL "
Untitled Article
There is , at all events , no mistaking that ! Its object and purpose are quite sufficiently plain . It was copied the week after into the W . eeh ' y Chronide , and would , if not stopped , have " gone tbe round . " I wrote that article , The last Sirift , " Tor no other purpose than to stop it . It did stop it It has not been copied into any paper since . And even your -way of thanking me for the service does not make me regret having written it . Yon remind me that *• just now , every Bpare line should be devoted to the Birmingham Conference . '' I think you must see ( if you read the Star , which upon my word I bejrin to doubt if you ever do ) that the Birmingham Conference has not lacked its shaft of attention .
Yon speak of this as " an unpropitious moment for the revival of old or planting the seeds of new controversy . " Once more I must remind you that these charges do not apply to me ; and I protest against your thus applying them to me , for the purpose of shielding those to whom alone they do appiy . What may be your reason or motive for thus pertinaciously misrepresenting my acts , and then censuring your own misrepresentation , you best know ; I cannet divine it In my avowed enemies , I can perceive a reason , and a motive for it ; in you t cannot : so that I have the mortification of smarting under effects which I cannot trace to any cause ,
Yon next say : —** I really am more than at a loas to furnish a sufficient reason for tbe mode of attack , and mean to propose the appointment' of a committee while at Birmingham , to investigate the whole affair . " I really am more than tired of reiterating protestations against this cruel and systematic perversion . I have made no attack upon any one * When the Balancesheet was published , aU I din was to ask the people to read it . 1 did not give an opinion of my own ; I did not even bin ; an opinion ef my own . The Metropolitan Delegates examined and c&n&ured it Campbell published a letter of explanation . That letter of explanation was a public document , and it was my duty to comment upon it- I did comment upon it in such terms
as my judgment dictated to be thb most appropriate . It may suit the Executive to call this an " attack . " It is their game to divert the people ' s minds from the question by making them suppose it to be a quarre ; between them and me ; I txpect them to take that position ; bnt 1 have no right to expect it from you . I ha- ? e a right to txptct that you . at all events , will withheld your censure until you have made yourself distinctly acquainted with the facts . I don ' t ask from yon any more favourable construction of what I say and do than 1 ha-ve a right to ask from any impartial person ; bnt I demand that you shall not do mean inj ustice ; that you shall not misrepresent facts aud pervert reasoniDgs , and then censure jour own misrepresentations and perversions .
You will , of course , do as you please about moving for the Committee at Birmingham . I can toll you , that I will never recognizs nor anBwer to any such committee . That is the very thing they want ! To div « rt attention entirely from their own malpractices , and fix it on " the brutal attack of Mr . Hill on the Executive . " I shall not permit yon thus to play their game for them ; at all events , 1 won't help yon to do it-. And , independent of that consideration , the press shall never , in my person , be degraded to such a position as you wonld thus place it in . The public at large is the true censor of the press . What I _ nave written is before the people . They will judge of it ; and I have no fear that the major part of them will jud ? e correctly . I have
never given forth an opinion fer which I have not given the reison on which it was founded . They have it all before them . I have given ample room for explanation and defence . They have both sides before them . I take the verdict of the whole people ; not of any individual clique of persons . [ Upon reconsideration , since my letter was written , I retract this paragraphreserving to myself the right of using my own judgment whether 1 answer tbe Committee ( if one be appointed ) personally , or refer them to what I nave written . In any case , 1 shall den ; the right of any such Committee to treat the matter aa a personal matter of crimination and recrimination between me and tbe members of the Ex ^ utive . —Monday morning—W . H . J
And now , my dear Sir . permit me to retort upon you yoar own words , " I did think : that five years' intimacy —not to speak of friendsnip—should have secured some better reception for my observations . " You ought by this time to know something of my temper , something of my jodgment , and something of my honesty ; how is it that , whenever a time of difficulty like tbe present comes—when & storm iB to be encountered for the interest and safety of the cause—when duties of the -most unpleasant and painful character are to be performed—not only iB the guidance and battling of the storm entirely left to me , but the work is made
harder by throwing into the mess yonr own misconceptions , and your heavy private censnres , levelled always at those misconceptions 1 It was thus in th 6 case of O'Brien ; it is tnos now again . How is it that your confiiieDce , and jour affection , and your kindly regards seem to be entirely reserved for your enemJta ; while you * suspicions and your groundless censures are equally reserved for these whom yon know to be entirely devoted to principle , and to be as thoroughly devoted to you as such men ean be . I have thought much about it I am puzzled with it It is a very curious and painful phenomenon .
I must now bring this long letter to a close . To no other man that lives -wonld 1 have condescended Ihe explanations and remonstrances contained in it ; seeing that they would be all precluded by a mere reading of the facts and arguments to which they refer . I do not think that in like circumstances , I shall ever again permit my personal regard for you so far to overcome my natural pride of character . I am , dear Sir , Your's , most sincerely and faithfully , WiuiiM Hill .
Now , although I am not very ceremoniously dealt by in that letter , I shall not make more comment upon it than ia necessary for my immediate purpose . When Mr . Hill says that he did not receive my fir ^ t letter until after the article complained of had appeared in the Star , he is quite right ; nor could I have writteu it upon anticipation that such an article would appear . 1 wrote it on the day on which Mr . Dnncombe was at Manchester ; and by reference to the date it will be found that that was on the Monday after it bad appeared ; and , therefore , that I did not lose much time , nor did I wait for any expression of public opinion to form my own notion .
The next point on which I would briefly dwell is the correspondenca between the Hull Councillors and the Executive . My impression respecting that correspondence was , that it was wise and judicious ; and as a controversy upon the same subject was going on in Leicestershire , I recommended that instead of publishing resolutions upon exparte evidence , a similar course should be resorted to by the Chartists of Leicestershire ; convinced that such a remonstrance would hare the effect of correcting any error that had been committed . I do not say that it was intended for publication ; but had it been so , the Executive should have been warned of it .
It is foliy to talk of the virtue of man . We mnst treat him as a fallible being ; and , at the time , it s truck me as if some of the correspondence and ra wlutions passed had not the genuine stamp of virt ue upon them . 1 by no means refer to the letters of the t nll Councillors , which were most judicious ; but I do r efer to the long withholding of them from the public , if i& tended for publication . I learned from all t bat was passing at the time , that there was a disposit / 'on to fall foul of the Executive ; I did not gather < his from any particular source , bnt from general obsi ^ nation , and I warned the Executive of it .
As to Mr . HiTFs " honest watchfulness" I never , for one moment , doubted it ; but I did doubt , not only the prudence b at the justice of the conrse pursued by him in presenting the conduct of the Executive to the public , a . id , the more especially , for this reaion ; because , J was anx . ou 3 that public opinion , fairly expressed , should operate as a warning , if error bad been coi . ' ^ uDitted , and at the same time , present a recurrence o * f the evil ; and I was conscious that calm judgment vfoaldbe led from a consideration of the offence ch . irged , to reflection upon the language used in preferring the charge .
As to the charge in the Statesman relative to the *• ExtraordinaryDocument , ' I thought t had aaBwered that fully myself in my letter to Mr . \ Vm . Brooke . With respect to Mr . O'Brien , I was af all timeB averse to any controversy being keptupw"itb him ; bnt , of conrse , I did not attempt to sway Mr .- Hill's conduct beyond mere suggestion ; and I do not think that I shrank from my portion of it , when I 5 ? as forced to it . I have now commented upon some of the passages in Mr . Hill ' s reply , and from which I imagine the
Untitled Article
readers of the Star will ' conclude , that , at least , Mr . Hill is no tool of mine . There is also a letter from , Mr . Watkins in last week ' s Star , against the whole import of which I most unequivocally enter my protest ^ 83 well as to its publication . The whole is written upon an assumption ; and from that assumption a conclusion is come to . The assumption is that the Executive are guilty ; whereas , I deny that any verdict of guilt has been pronounced against them . It is true , that the Secretary , by withholding the means of judging , has furnished " prima faeie" evidence of guilt against himself ; bnt I must protest against the " seqnitur , " rkafc , therefore , the whole boc ? y is guilty .
Mr . Watkins writes in a very fasoinating and impressivestylejbuthehas not succeeded in convincing me . He draws a parallel between the acts of our oppressors and those of the Executive : and cites the payment of ten shillings a week to M'Douall as proof of his guilt ; nay , calls him a " swindler . " Here again I protest against any such term baing used to M'Douall . Nay , I will not allow that man to be called by any debasing name . Here my blood gets warm , and the more so , because it has been long pent up . What , however , is the difference %
JosS « -thss . The acts committed by our oppressors we would not assent to , had our assent being asked ; while some of M'Douall's accusers say , " had he made known his wants , the ooutitry would have cheerfully acqme 3 cod in the augmentation of his salary . " Would we acquiesce if consulted in the acts of our oppressors \ No ; certainly not . What then is the difference 1 Just this , that M'Douall , without asking , has committed aa error , which , had he asked liberty to commit ^ would have been cheerfully granted ; while our oppressors commit sins to ! which we oould not be reconciled .
Why appoint a committee of five to examine the books of the Executive , if they have been already condemned ? and is it not a maxim of English law , that " all men shall be held innocent until they are convicted ? " Good God , how cm I marvel at the slight evidence upon which a middle class jury would find me * guilty if I am to be no more charitable to men , some of whose characters , are , in my opinion , beyond reproach , however some of their acts may be highly censurable .
Mr . Watkins says that the Executive have injured our cause , instead of advancing it . I deny it . I assert that James Leach , Dr . M'Douall , and Bairstow , have materially served the cause . I assert that we had no Organization before the appointment of an Executive ; I contend for it that we have now an Organization . However , I will rather rely upon innocence than presume guilt , when the whole of life speaks in favour of tho accused , What , then , has been tha character of James Leach \ Hnrti
working , sober , industrious , and poou . He has , to my knowledge , returned money gratuitously given to him , in more than forty instanoes . What ! then , arc we to suppose that this man prefers gain acquired by plunder to that volunanLy given ? Is he such an adept in trick aud chicane that ho would wish to grow rich by fraud , while he rejects the proferred bounty \ It is nonsense , rank nonsense . Then Dr . M'Douall ; is he to be branded with cowardice by Mr . Watkins , because be had the manliness to brave
torture and separation from his family , rather than entail misery upon working men , who went bail for him 1 On my soul , I do not understand this refined loj < ic ; nor do I 6 eo how those behind were to be bettered by M'Douall ' s swelling the number of victims . I have always said that the difference between Whigs , Tories , and CJhartists is this ; that the two former magnify the virtues and throw a veil over the vices of their party ; while the latter , in general , magnify the vices and throir a veil over the virtues of their friends .
I was of opinion , from the first to the last , that a calm judgment eould not be expected upon the question , until the sober mind was again brought back to the question at issue . The question then is this . —The Executive were elected to see the Orgamza . tion of the Chartist body carried out under certain rules . They are charged-with having violated those rules ; and are charged in such a way as furnishes them witn an excuse for not replying to the charge in that form . Tho evidence is in the hands of the
Secretary ; he refuses to give ap that evidence until he is paid certain monies , which , he says , are due to him . A verdict we must have ; and therefore it is the duty of the Executive to force the Secretary to give up tho books : and in order to facilitate this desirable object , I propose that the Secretary should hand the books over to Mr . ' Cleave , with an undertaking from him ( Mr . Cleave ) that in the event of a verdict being given ia favour of the Executive , the Secretary shall receive the monies claimed Should the Secretary refuse such a proposal then
there will be fair grounds for presuming guilt ; and then the county will not be slow in giving a fair and impartial verdict . Mr . Wheeler , in his very judicious letter , declining to act as a juror , merely states himself to ba an accuser , not an executioner . I also am an accuser . I accuse the Secretary of mal-practices . I wish to see how far the other members are concerned in those malpractices ; but I am not going to give my verdict without a fair and impartial trial : neither have I , from the evidence already adduced , seen any , the slightest , reason to decline the acquaintance of M'Douall , Leach , or Bairstow , or to make me ashamed to meet them as friends and associates , or to deter me from acting with them in an official
capacity . I have had a friendly explanation with Mr . Hill upon this subject . 1 told him that his comment of last week would compel me to take this course , and , at the same time , we came , to a mutual understanding that not 0110 word , more pro or pon , should appear in the columns of the Star apou the subject , until the decision of some accredited body shall be reported upon the case .
While I was supposed to be an idle speotator of passing events , no one was more alive to the question than I was ; and , in justice to Mr . Hill , I must say , that while much dissatisfaction was expressed at the nonappearance of resolutions , said to have been sent for insertion to the Star , in this case he is not blamfcable . One instanoe , particularly , I deem it right to mention . Ihe toast of the Executive , proposed and " supported by me at the Duncombe Demonstration at Manchester , never appeared in
the Star ; and for the best of all possible reasons , because rr NEVER was SENT . The whole report , without deduction or alteration , was printed as it was sent . Now , this I assert , after having made the fullest inquiry ; and , in fact , Mr . Hill never saw the report , until it was in print ; as that is no part of his duty . There are two other persons under Mr . Hill to arrange all mattera for publication ; and correspondence from our own reporters goes , generally , at once to the compositor , without his inspection .
I have now said all that I have to say upon this painful subject ; and shall conclude my letter , by expressing an anxious desire that the public will suspend its judgment till after a fair and impartial inquiry ; and then , if the Executive , or any of them , have been in error , let them be told " it ia such language as will convey a proper caution for the future . But , for Heaven's sake , let as not condemn them first and try
Untitled Article
them afterwards . For myself , I say I would trust M'Doaall , Leaoh , and Bairstow , with untold gold ; and would rink my life upon their devotion to the peoples' cause ; and thank God , 1 jsoe Leaoh overcoming accusation by increased ! exertion , instead of making it a pretext , as many have done , to abandon the cause altogether . I have now " made a clean breast ; " and I trust I have convinced the world that I am not hypocrHe enough to meet James Leach on the public platform on Monday , and wink at , or countenance , censure upon him on Saturday . God knows pooi ^ M'Douall has suffered enough , without those who should be his defenders increasing his sorrows ; and I am sorry to learn that throughout the country , too many such are to be met with , but I never will be one OF THEM . I ana , my friends , Your faithful friend ,, Fearous O'Connor .
Untitled Article
of a paid Executive would not amount , in the year , to one-hundrtdth part of what has been snatched up by Political Pedlars , most of which , could have been spared . Besides , nothing can possibly damage our cause more than frequent announcements that Mr . So-and-so will be here and
there upon such and such a day , without further notice , and whose expences must be paid , while his services are rendered unprofitable from a want of any knowledge of his honesty or capacity . The lukewarnmess is put down to defection , and thus wo suffer materially by this itinerating system of Chartist mendicancy . Let us have our paid Executive , our paid lecturers , aud our unpaid volunteers confined to their several localities ; but let us have no more of this system of unconnected and disorganized agitation . .
I shall be more at liberty now than I have been for the last six months , and shall , aa usual , devote ray whole time to the reconstruction of our machinery . Ab far as J am concerned , my policy , as it ever has Ron , shall be to keep our party together , to heal all differences , to nnitetb . e con ? of labour into one firm bond of union , and to ~ care little who I shall offend in tha undertaking , never needlessly giving eaute of offence , but not allowing delicacy to stand in the way when necessary . I Bhall never exercise uiore contvoul than I have done over the Editor of the Northern Star ; while I have solemnly sworn to oiyHotf that it shail never be made a means of achieving a triumph of one section of Chartists over another .
Before I conclude , I must Jstate that I received a letter from Dr . M'Douall , sent by Mr . Cleave to me as Editor of the Evening Star , on this morning , afi twelve o'clock , a&d when J had ceased to have auy con ^ roul over that paper , otherwise the letter should have appeared ; however , in justice to Dr . M'DouaJ > I must make a few" extracts from it : — He says , in speaking of the 10 * . a week , " what was my duty if the 10 s . was objected to ! To resign it . Well , an objection came from Hull . A corespondenco beiween Campbell and the Hull councillors ; tbe end of which w as , as far as I was concermd , the transmission , by Grahby , the secretary , of a written resolution , purporting to be tha deliberate vote of the HiiFl councillors in which they declare
their perfect satisfaction with the payment of 10 a . additi nal any week to me . That document I have in my possession ; and I hereby inform Mr . Hill that I a « cept of his challenge to produce that an ' d the letters I Bhcwed Mr . O'Connor at Nottingham . ' * Htre I must observe that she letters shown to me at Nottingham did not , as far as my memory seves me . ri-flo . t in any way ou Mr . Hill , but there they are- I referred , to them in a letter written at the tune from Nottiughaai . and from them 1 was ion * firmed in my opinion that a cabal was being got up atfaiust the Execurive , bus not by Mr . Hill .. The Doctor goes on— " Now Sir , when I receded
tho Hail note of approval , I informed the General Secretary , that 1 would notacepfc ot the 10 s . because an objection had been raised , an
In ju-tice to Dr . ii'Douall , I ^ ive those extracts , and tho move readily , as it unfonuaateiy happened that some of the Hull correppocence was not forthcoming , in consequence of the pros .-cutiou of tbe former Secretary . Mr . Grasby . Trio Doctor tells me , and the public , that of which I never had a doubt , namely , that his heart is , as it ever was , centred in the people's cause ; and _ I do hope it' he , for a moment , supposed that I had joined in hi- ; denunciation—that the developemeHt I have made this week will show that my conduct with re-Bpect . to the Executive has been consistent , and that I have uniformly , supported them .
I must bow say a word about the approac ' iing trials . Upon a rough calculation , I , as treasurer , have r-pcjived , as acknowledged in the Evening Star , abou' , £ -250— £ 132 from Mr . Cleave , and I know not how mu >» h , just now , has bean acknowledged through tho Northern Star , about £ 125 . These sums make £ 507 ; cut of which I have paid £ 20 Chester ConaroisHion , £ o 0 ditto Lancaster , £ 60 ditto Stafford , £ 71 ditto Q-ieeu ' s Bench ofBce-fees , small sums about £ 30 , outstanding about £ 100 , —making £ 331 ; and leaving a balance in my hands of about ; £ 176 . to meet about £ 2 000 , to be paid between this and April . I paid £ 7 yesterday for a SPECIAL JURY I was able to meet all these expences myself before I made so much profit of tho Northern Star ; but now
I am not . I have paid in law expences , on my own account , in four years , more than £ 2 , 000 ; on your account , more than £ 500 . You must begin to pay a little on your own account now . You will , henceforth , send to me , directed to Hammersmith , all monies for the Defence Fund , by post office order , made payable 10 John Cleave , so that I may know hotv we srand . lam Treasurer for the Defence Fund , Cleave of the Victim Fund . D m ' t mix them up . I shall hand all orders over to Cleave , but let me know how we stand , by transmitting all monks to me in the first instance . Ycur's , ever faithfully , Feaiigus O'Connor . Wednesday , 1 st Feb .
P . S . —I must state that my first letter to the Star wa ^ wr ufon and nosted on Tuesday ( yesterday ) , ami Dr . M'Donall ' s wa 3 not received till twelve o'clock this day ; therefore , he will at once see that I , at all events , did noc require hig letter to convince me of his purity in the Chartist cause . 1 cannot sufficiently express my disgust at the letter of Mr . Watkin 3 , which appeared in the Star of last week , and which I trust will not be received as proof agamst the Executive pending any investigation that is to , take place . I only hope and trust that [ shall not be further forced into any controversy upon this unpleasant subject . F . O'C .
Untitled Article
CANTERBURY , —On Monday , a lecture was delivered in the Guildhall of this City , by Mr . J . Campbell . REDD 1 TCH . —Mr . Mead ' s Iectnres on Sunday and Monday evenings are uprooting the idle fears of the mitldlfc-clasa men , and removing the prejudices of the a > i : n * 'j . H : s congregations increase in number . Oa Tuti&iiny-nKUt , a crowded tea party and ball were held , in the Cbani .-t Hall , for his benefit . Mr . Mead , and Mr . Weeks , from Leicester , both briefly addressed tha niteiing . Dancing was carried on with , great spirit till ten , when a second tea was served in the parlour of the O'C-mnnr Aims , tbe worthy host goo . i-naturedly pre .-eutuis ; a fiae American ham for the oc 3 ?' , ion , and eaiivf aihg the company with bis racy jokea and truly original ehqje . ice . Mr . Mead will lecture every Sunday and Monday evenings during his stay at Reddir . ch
LONDON —National Association . —On Sundny evening Mr . Parry will lecture in the Hall ; and on WedDL-eday he will deliver the second of a course of lectures , on Brit'sh Oratory , the Pulpit , the Bar , and the Senate . National Association . —On Tuesday evening the muiubtis heid tbtir weakly meetirjg , when the S-emary reported that the committee had agreed that the coffee an ^ rtading room should be opened permanently 011 Mcn < iny wetk , vrith a convivial meeting amongst the members : and that they intended to cdl a public mooting on that day three weeks , to take the opinion of the inhabitants of London , on tho national remons'rance . l , China Walk . Lambetu . —At a meeting of members in thin loeality , a very smart discussion took pliiort on the C > rn Laws . It was agreed to adjourn the discussion till next Sunday evening , at half-pcst seven o ' clock .
Hammersmith - ^ Progress movement . —Vn v ( O :, uay evening , January 30 tu . a public meeting w . ts held at the Black Ball Inn , Haminer&inith-road . Mr Cooper ' s Plan of Organization was again brought forward , tmd tbe following resolution x- as unanimously adopted— " That this meeting are of opinion that the preuunt Plan nf OrprsnvzitKin is tax preferable , but it will neverttit-Jttss . v . 'ruit of amendments by a future Chartist Conference <> r Convention . " HlUMIKGfJAM . —The usuil mrsting wna held at the Association rooui , As : on-street , on Sunday evening last , wiwn Mr . Andrew Weeks , of Leicester , delivered S ; n txc- h . * nt lrcturo on the principles of Chartism . Nuneatox . —Tbe Chartists of this pl&es have sent ten shilungs for defraying the exponees of the Birmingham Oonterbnco .
The CofXciL elected by the Chartists of Birmingham , held their second meeting at tha Chartist room , Astonstreet , at thme o ' clock ,, on Sunday last A motion that the directing committee should consist . fit nine instead of six was agreed to . Messrs . R . " ; ight / E . "Murless , and Blake wera elected to the rffi . ee . Mr . George White read over a code of bye-laws which had been prepared in accordance with the vote of the previous council meeting , an ( i they were ordered to be posted in the room and discussed at fieir next meeting , —The meeting adjourned to the following Sunday , at three o ' clock .
- . —At the usual weeKiy meeting it was resolved to take the offer of the Chartist Circular , and that the profits ba given to the General Defenca Fund . Also , that the Chartists , meeting in this locality , take immediate steps f-or getting up a dinner in honour of Feargus O'Con-. ior , &nd that a public meeting be held to carry out his challenge to the anti-Corn Law League . Broomsq&ove—A dinner has been given hereto Mr . John Mason . It took place at the Queen Inn . Mr . Matthew Hall presided , aud the usual patriotic toasts were given and responded to . We received a lengthy report of the proceedings on Thursday morning , for which we are sorry we . have no room . SKOTiiEY BRIDGE . —Mr . Con Murray lectured in this village oc the evening of S&torciay last . Several names were enrolled .
Untitled Article
TO THE WORKING CLASSES . TO THE WORKING CLASSES . My Friends , —By the subjoined announcement which appeared in t&e Evening Star of Monday , you will learn that I have ceased to have ariy connection with that paper . Much and deeply as I regret the loss of the only daily paper that has ever , within my memory , advocated the cause of the people , tho fact of that paper abandoning the principles upou which its fame was founded , oannot fail o ' f pointing your attention to the useful moral—that faction works its way through the press , while you appear to attack but slight importance to it . Further , it may furnish my friends wnh a rea-jy reply to my tienouncera , as they can now say . htre then ar « we once more thrown back upon our old and only friend ,
the mnch calumniated Northern Star , sfill , notwithstanding tho heavy fines and persecutions to which its proprietor has be * m subjected , stan-iiqg alone in its f » lory to uphold the cause of right against might . Your favour has been courted , and youjhave been deceived , not by one or two , but by ; scores of journals . The Statesman , " a real Chaktist" paper , passed into Tory hands , and sections ; of roauworshipoers would huvo still upheld it . The Evening Siar ha . » been cut r ff ; but , likeother newspaper btock , I have not gone with the type . I trust that if wo failed in our poor endeavour to push that paper , that wo shall not iail in our allegiance to our principles ; and that instead of seeing ihe long lit > t of Ct / fi ' -o Houses where it mii < ht , while Chartist , have been
mad , that now no Chartist will read it . While I writo thus , my friends , I teel no pique personally . I never have had one word of dispute with any of the parties connected with the paper ; and ! after bix months due attention to it , the proprietor must confess that my gratuitous obligations were most cheerfully discharged ; and that , in the outset , 1 pledged myself to him that so Ion % as the Evening Star advocated Chartism , I would continue my unpaid services , and that in the event 01 the concern becoming profitable , I would not even then accept of a farthing for my services , as I never would receive money for tho d . scharge of a pleasing duty .
The proprietor informs me that a loss of £ 3 , 500 has been sustained by the Evening Star in its ; advocacy of Chartist principles . J can only say that the Northern Star sustained a loss of £ 3 . 640 oefore I knew where I was ; and that then , and suos-. equentLy , enticing off-ro wor 8 made to me to sell it , but niy answer was then , as it is now , whenever the Northern Star ceases to advocate the cause of pure cdcacwiacy , it shall cease to exist . If to-morrow it was ' out of my power longer to carry on the Northern S'ar , which , thank God , it is not , it should perish ; but all the money in the kingdom would not purchase it from me for any purpose .
I mention r . his jut now as lam a ware that our disappointment must considerably shsike public confidence in the press . ! I had arranged with the proprietor , before I left town , that in addition to my daily services , I would attend the House of Commons nightly , aud write tho Parliamentary analysis , to save money . Thus I was to have been the principal reporter by rtight , and tho Editor by day , without pay , aud paying my own expences . Mi . Cleave has told me , Mr . Hobson has told me , and nearly all my agents have told me , that 1 was injuring the Bale of the Northern Star btyond concoption by writing , and recommending the Evening Siar . My answer to one and all hasinvariably been" Will , L know it ; but what do I care it I am serving tho cause . " I have sent mauy article ' s ot ^ rea ^ importance and matters of news to -lie Evening Star which I have withheld from the Northern S ' , \\> the hope of giving it a good standing .
Such , my frieudo , has been my connexion , which has now ceased , with the Evening Star . Henceforth , I unaorstand , that it is to be conducted upon high Tory principles , and you will mark the increase of advertisements . These facts will awaken you to a knowledge of what I have had to struggle against , and convince you ot the fact that my crime , from first to lastj my only crime , has been that I would neither -prostitute nor sell the Northern Star . At this particular crisis the loss to us ha * been great ; and I flattered myself that I couid have made the Evening S ; ar a really powerful organ , and hexce its purchase , from my management . Therefore , whil'j I regret iv , it proves that faction trembles at the very thought of an honost press .
Now , my friends , tho usual Sessional struggle is about to begif , and never was there fiic ' ii a struggle beforer ' all parries will bid lor the people to use ihem for their own purpose . And now , as there are many , very many , waiters ¦ upon Providence connected with our pirty , ami who look to a mixed agitation as the only means of sub sistence ; and , as we are too poor to pay them , I shall be extensively and systematically denounced for standing between thrm and the gold d ^ ist . Hut I will do it , and bear all tbe consequences . My policy is to keep our party together , a ? air army ot ' observation ; tt » let all other parties fitht it out without any assistance from us ; and then , [ when the Whigs ano R-jpealers nee their own w ^ akripss , they
will assuredly fan back upon ns > . But ii we were mad enough to give them the least couiitenance , they would use us for another Reform d-. lusion , ana then , when we wero broken up , ' -n ey would assemble to carry out the d' -taiUs of the new Reform , or Free Trate , which would be in character and value prociselv as valueless as all forr er changes made by the class legislators . I shall take a bold stand as I ever havu c ' nnej trusting to the triumph of Toryism over Wbipg' -ry and Freetrade . As a Chartist ( recruiting-sergeant , I will not oppose Toryism with the view of restoring Whiggery . No policy could bo worse . You iiavo now no more to do with policy than you have to 'lownb the moon . Machinery , will beat both Whigs and Tories . I de'y them to conquer that all-d > vouring foe , by any act short of the Cnarter , whidh would
develoreall our resources , cultivate our resources , and equitably distribute the produce , thereby regulating domaud and s-upply , by opening a . natural market for man ' s labour stud establishing therein a standard rate 01 wages , b <; low which the labourers will uot work in the artificial market . In the end , you will believe me , that , ui > t ; l that is dona exchequers , tilis , puckeis , treasuries , aud bellies will be empty ; aud stnte aud civil war , and confusion and dibirust , will only be suppressed by force or fraud—by the force of Government , or by the fraud of those who have au interest ia upholdiug injustice . But such means of preservi . ag order in a country are unrighteous as they are uirjusr , and wiil fail when the sufferers con > tituto a majority , which is now beiug brought about * by the operation of machinery . ?
Toryism is no longer your main en&my , Whiggery is no longer your main enemy . Machinery has rendered ali their acts comparatively powerless ; and all that Machinery now requires to complete hs temporary triumph , and to insure a revolution , is an " extension" of ics already unbounded power by the establishment of what is called Free-trade , which means neither more nor less than free plunder . While I am upon subjects connected with jtmr own movement , I may here make a pas-ing comment upon the state of our Organization aud tho proposed remedies for its reconstruction . I shall only apeak in general terms . 1 am , then , decidedly in favour of an Executive ; I think we cannot do without it . I am obstinately opposed to an unpaid Executive , and for this reason . If
you hav « an unpaid Executive , you must have a purely middle class Exoutive ; because you cannot get working men to live without wages , -and the very moment you elect working men as your , officers , that moment every door is closed against them , and at once they are marked , and if in work are dismissed . Moreover , { the very notion implies the office is to be a sinecure , or that we are to be unpaid If a sinecure , we do not require them ; if not , the labourer is worthy of his hire , and should have it . My opinion is , that the lice upon the back of Chartism have become 100 numerous and devouring ; and hence much jealousy among them towards a permanently paid body , while ¦! twenty times the sum requisite to pay all the expenses
Untitled Article
^/ ,. 4- 43 . > : 'YUrv
Untitled Article
AND LEEDS GENEEAL ADYERTISEE .
Untitled Article
YOL- YI- NO . 373 . SATURDAY , FEBRUARY 4 , 1843 . PRI 0 > lv ' ^^ ^;^ r "
10 Tbs : Rrubebs Op The National Chaster V* 3 ^ As Sociation.
10 TBS : rrUBEBS OP THE NATIONAL CHASTER V * ^ AS SOCIATION .
-
-
Citation
-
Northern Star (1837-1852), Feb. 4, 1843, page unpag, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/ns/issues/vm2-ncseproduct977/page/1/
-