Current:

Northern Star (1837-1852), 22nd May 1852, Edition 1 of 2, Page 7, Untitled Article

Page 7
Page 7
7 of 8

On this page

  • Departments (1)
    • ffiraiftftu vavuament
  • Text (9)
  • Transcript

    • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

      Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

      Untitled Article

      ( From our own Correspondent . ) , tVFTIPOOL-THE POLISH REFUGEES ASD THE ^ sIS-lSals-democratic action , &c , nf tetter of Mr . W . J . Linton . in last week ' s " Star of VuaZ " in reference to Lord Dudley Stuart ' s Association ri ft ° th ^ S " Friends" of Poland , has given pat ^ faction to all who recollect the inhuman conduct of the SKi here , when they found the Polish Hungarian RefS had resoled to adhere to the advice given them by IHT dPceivd fellow countrymen in America , Jot to rc-„« from England , but to suffer for a little time , until the of ' prosperity should arise . " As the Aristocratic Asso'Ition has made sreat boasts out of the little benefit it ever foaWd on any Polish Refugees ., it is considered advisable TLtlse the British public that , in defiance of Lord Pudley

      LOCAL INTELLIGENCE

      ctnoft ' s opposition , aad that of his Secretary , DacKecl oy all ? £ . ' lowland government influence of the time , the appeal m ^ . e to the generosity of the people on behalf of those untotnna : e ess ! & 3 « a * mo-t nobly responded to . A complete liilsnceslieet , showing the amount of suhscnptions received ( „ jjj ' e " rariou 3 towi : 3 in the kingdom , was some time since prepared by 31 r . James Spurr . the indefatigable Secretan- ot the Central Operative ' s Committee hei ebut an accijhjt befel the MSS . while in the printer ' s hands , and severe SLestic affliction ensuing in Mr . Spurr s family , the document has not yet appeared . Altogether , in money aid other mkantialaid , itis estimated tint fully £ 3 , 000 were raised by the people , although after the spsecd of the late stipendiary , llr ' Rush-on , at the Emigrant ' s Home , the poor fellows were turned adrift , and must have siarved , but for the noble p ffiirts of a few patriotic men of this town , among whom the

      Bswes of llobbs , walsall , and Tarfier , form a pleasing contrast to the pseudo-liberals—Brown , Ruthbone , ar . d Bent . J [ r . Brown , the member for the northern division of the county , would have paid the cost of transporting the refugees to America , but would not give a pennyworth of bread to keep one of them from starving . Mr . Rathbone , the great ; 5 i (/; Va . 'i ( liberal , behaved most insultingly to a gentleman ^ ho waited on him to solicit aid for the starving exiles ; and Mr . ( now Sir John ) Bent , who was then Mayor of Liverpool , lefased with indignation the cost of a few blankets , from an ample fund placed at bis disposal for such purposes by his fellow townsmen , although the poor fellows were then

      expose d to the inclemency of the weather in an old soap-house , the only building that the charity of their friends could at the time provide . It is quite as well the public at large should fcnow these things ; and , as Mr . Linton ' s letter has created some sensation here , the present is deemed a fitting opportunity to lay these facts before your readers . A political committee has been formed for the purpose of issuing a declaration of democratic principles at the approaching election here . It has been determined to placard the town , and use every legal means to make these principles more known , and therefore better understood and appreciated by the masses of the population . There is a great somber in Liverpool who are far in advance of the opinions promulgated by either of the present candidates for the

      representation of the borough , and it is intended to test these gentlemen on the question of the franchise , at the earliest public opportunity . The committee held a preparatory meeting on Sunday afternoon last , and adjourned until tKat iij week ; the principle of universal Buffi-age , the social condition of the people , and all questions affecting the rights of labour , will be bronght prominently forward by means which are now in course of organisation for that purpose . Many persons are taking the " Star of Freedom" who latterly did not take the " Star ; " and great dissatisfaction is expressed at tbe squabbles festered by Mr . Ernest Jones aad his adherents . It U hoped , by all here who are real well mshes of ike came of progress , that the Editor of the "Star ' will wholly eschew all personal controversy , even in E ! lf-defence , and , like Epieurns of old , " lite down" his

      s-aiderers . At the meeting of the Committee above referred to , held on Sunday last , the following resolution wa 9 unanimously adopted : — That we consider the first and primary question whica ought to fcehronsht before the people of Liverpool at the approaching election , 13 the right of every man of twenty-one years of age , who is of iDsnd mind and untainted by crime , to be in possession of the des - ire franchise ; and that a fund be rased to bring this principle fcirlj before the public , both electors and non-electors . There is a very general expression of indignation amon *

      ail classes here at the impunity afforded by the Cheshire mag strata last week , to the crew of the emigrant ship Bappenhannock , who 1 roke open the boxe 3 of the emigrants , etole their money , got firunk with their whisky , and afterward committed personal violence on the em ' igranis themselves . It was a rascally case , and the negligence , at least , if BtiUang worse , of the Birkenhead "justices " tondly calis for the Home Secretary ' s investigation . " Why does not Mr . Thornley , or some other member , inquire about it in the house ? " is asked , and the ir pans of preventing areccumnce of similar disgraceful eonductis urgentlv

      Untitled Article

      T . S . DUXCOMBE . M . P .- "RESIDENTAL SUFFRAGE . " ^ Beab Hahset . —Having been a constant subscriber to the Star nearly from its commencement to the present time nnder all circumstances , I hope will be a sufficient apology for asking you the favour of inserting these few lines m yonr next nnmber , although you may not agree with my sentiments . In looking over the letter of friend " SparlacuB , m thi 3 week ' snnmber , I find that inr . viewin / tlie fflents of the various franchise qualifications now submitted » r public approval , he makes reference to ( using his own words ) fle Residental Sujfrage of our good friend , Mr . Dunmm * which is contained in that gentleman ' s reply to our Maim . In further commenting on the Suffrage of Sir J . Sty ' P ^ amlCo ., he says , "in referee to the crejuaed million , Mr . Buncombe's residental impediment is soseariy of the same character , would have Sfnearly the same effects , that those who refuse to beM <*« „ v .

      „ , 1 SSLT f £ , rdly 4 ollow ewn the honester misleader . iZtlll " « l « adence , as a necessary qualification , and t ™ S-. ? , dlstnctm whlcl 1 y « n w * k is the property of Sg * Spartacua" that I trouble you with thiB , and likeffIS * * Jt ? , , MWof our ^ Wpnblio correspondency mSi ^^ d that in his lastreply to us , Mr . Dun-Sd ^ h , ^ rni ! & ^ d filtfl ! 8 ays . ' Hh reference to his S jSSS ? S T ^ IVe 3 fOT l o 5 ng int 0 detailB that 2 *^ ' - $$ * & ** W ¦»*>* ifc will bere-2 £ !»» ° \ 8 ir » wltaaU dne Reference , there is scarcely » 7 analogy between the two ; that of Sir Jo-Wa t ml

      « ° cam eaon , never hardly defined twice alike , and at anr ^ ° U m ^ Kclaim l 0 be rated - And is . there SLiS ?' * * ^ ha ^ . » t believes that PWOchial officers wiU be troubled with a host of names on HStfrafe books without I . S . D . attached to them ? Then "Hat is to become of the hundreds of thousands of single » en who are just arriving to manhood ' s bloom , and others w more mature years , with all theadvantages of a superior tlueation to . that which we and our contemporaries ever fi mentally , morally , and politically full of vigour and independent spirit , all of whom would be excluded by the » Bn » clause , but few by Mr . Dnncombe ' s " six months ' xteadental Suffrage , " founded on the inherent rights of fflM jWith only three months' probation more than the Charter provide ? . As to i lacing Sir . Dnnccmbe in thesame catepry as the cold and frigid school of nolitical economuts

      aoove alluded to , there is still a deep gulf between ™ fim aud the generous and warm-hearted Duncombe , ¦ no has on all occasions stepped boldly forward to defend "fc nghts and expose tie -wrongs of suffering humanity , Poli ticall y and socially . And I must here beg to supply an JTfsion of friend "Spartacns" in reference to the number g ^ has been registered at different periods for Uuniversal tibju ?" " ^ Dancombe presented , and ablv supported , a Jtttoon inisfi , signed by 3 , 317 , 702 . Inl * S « , Mr . Duntbe tnron 5 I " vigilance , strangled in its birth one of » tf 0 f f tesfc inonster manacles that was ever insidiously of TkF a to le fasfened 0 D the limbs of the working classes be uL c nntry » fo wbich he is still , and ever will ^ mi ati- ' 7 them in dear WMembrance . 2 for was his onrL »^! 1 , confi ned t 0 our own countrymen : for when "Brinish jv - lo our own countrymen ; ior wnea

      lnisJT ° , hospitality to Refugees was secretly compro-^ ly f -L in&mous Post-office Espionage , he stood tf thi ill ar « , * nd in s P 5 te of t !» e most fierce opposition £ <* lafi ? W ^ T ^ f d r ragged a 1110 light « and Ioudly ^ jmSi ™ ' ^ Wood of the murdered brothers Ban-* W Tilln the head of one of tb-e first Ministers of the 16 HbJk ? " orrors r of * 1 » convict treatment in the hulks , exe rciGnsrr sacc t es f fnlly exposed , and , coupled with his t f tta soc ^ eeted with the United Trades , thus mindfnl ^¦ f Polis ^ li ¦ ? tlon of tne working classes , aa well as ? " « a bSt - ^ health broke down » and for a time 5 mewhat » 5 in ? ls Hs efnl career ; but tBe moment he is S §^ nUeU « nf J h - ealth ' he haa a « thrown down t- «« S ££ ? " ^ . 'sUition ; and I respectfully aubmit ?* ente eo ; " ° ^ L - . in 1 >» present position , whose ante-S Bl ) £ « i * r £ S , ? Uy eDtltlea "to to the confidence of > formaL ^ c -R ua ' and to counsel and assist v Wg K » f » . People ' s Party-aye , and sncK a f as har of da

      f Proud toii- i no P « that the People of Europe will Jfr ^ " £ ? ^ 5 iager better ^ ^^ Jn asm -, W ( as thereis not a word of this i ??»» "na •^^™ S »» alone is worth a noble and vigorous J ? - of f ZT ? m « c «» detaUs as we can . Doping that the S alfi 2 SS . , S ^ - 6 bri S - thanlverin Se tert ? ^ n iS . that ms P iteof thes P ee » of am-S ^ lJ « T l 0 Dg continue l 0 be th 0 mi w » of trulh ^ are givbt « iASSure ycu ttat » l » Pre ^ t arrange , ^ tiotjf ^ satisfaction here with au increase of 1 remain , dear sir , yours truly , tle V Bristol , Ly 18 , 1852 . t > . ^^^«« Mm _

      Untitled Article

      ADULTERY AXD D 1 VORCE-EXTRA 0 RD 1 UARI AFFAIR . The House of Lords sat on Monday , at three o ' clock , for the purpose of hearing further evidence in support of the Becondreading of " Hawkins' Divorce Bill . " The Peera present were—the Lord Chancellor , Lord Ite « desdale , Lord Colville , and the Bishop of Norwich . This ca ? e came before the House some six weeks or two months since , when , it will be remembered , after hearing considerable evidence , the further consideration of the bill was postponed for the purpose of enabling the petitioner to produce two additional witnesses .

      LAW INTELLIGENCE

      From the evidence given on the former occasion , it was proved that the petitioner , LieHtenani ; Septimus Moore Uawkins , of the 97 th Foot , TTas married on the 4 th of September , 1843 , to his present wife , from whom he now seek 3 to be divorced , Htirriette Lavinia Dennie , the daughter or Colonel Dennie , ofthe 13 th Regiment of Foot , at the parish church of Carisbrooke , in the Isle of Wight ; . From the period of the marriage till the early p art of 1816 the parties remained in this country , but in the latter year Lieutenant Hawkins quitted England , accompanied by his wife , to joiu his regiment , which was at that time at Corfu , from which place they afterwards proceeded to Malta , where they remained until the month of April , 184 S , and , in the following June , Lieutenant and Mrs .

      Hawkins returned to England . They then took up their residence at Glatterford , near Carisbrooke , and here they continued to reside until about the month of October in the same year , when they removed to a place called Bonchurch in the Isle of Wight . Having been at Bonchurch until March , ISiO , they went on a visit to the lieutenant's brother , who Iive 3 at Alresford-hall , near Colchester , and having extended that visit to three months they in June returned to the Isle of Wight , and resided at Shide , with the view of Lieutenant Hawkins being near to the depot of his regiment at Newport . They continued at Saide till the 16 th of May , 1850 , on which day the lieutenant embarked , under orders from the Horse Guards , to ioin his regiment at head quarters—viz .. at Frederiokton

      in &ew Brunswick . Upon this occasion Lieutenant Hawkins was , under medical advice , compelled to leave Mrs . Hawkins in England in consequence of the delicate state of her health . In the meantime , in the month of June , 184 G , Mrs . Hawkins had givqn birth to a male child , who died at Malta in the month of July in the succeeding year , while in tke July of 1848 , during their residence at ulatterford , she was delivered of a female child , named A . iee Ainsfce , now living . During their sojourn at Clatterlord Lieutenant and Mrs . Hawkins made the acquaintance of Viscount Maiden , who was at Parkhurst-barracks , the depot of his own regiment—the Rifle Brigade . Lieutenant llawkins arrived in North . America in the month of July , ISaO , and remained with his regiment till March , 1851 , in which , month lie again set Bail for England , where he arrived

      on the 23 rd of March . He had thus been absent from home and from England from the 16 th of May , 1 S 50 , to the -3 rd of March , 1851 . Mrs . Hawkins remained the whole of that period in England . Upoa the arrival of Lieutenant Hawkins cohabitation with his wife was resumed , and continned till the 3 rd of Jane following , when , to the utter astonishment of the husband , his wife gave birth , to a full grown child . Upon this event coming to pass Lieutenant Hawkins instantly quitted the house , and from that moment ceased to hold any communication with his wife . He thereupon took advice of some of his friends , and instituted an inquiry , which resulted in the discovery of the following civcanistaaces : —It appeared that Mrs . Hawkins left her residence in the Isle of Wight in the month of September , 1 & 50 , and that in that month she arrived at Cox ' s Hotel , Jerroyn-Btreet , London , an hotel at which she sojourned on previous occasions with Lieutenant Hawkins when they were in London . The first floor of the hotel had hsen

      engaged for her prior to her arrival in town . She was accompanied on this occasion by her child and jnaid servant , and they arrived about six o ' clock in the evening . Shortly after her arrival Mrs : Hawkins despatched a note by one of the porters ofthe establishment , directed to Lord Maiden , and not long subsequently his lordship came to the hotel and was ushered into Mrs . Hawkins' sitting room . Lord Maiden remained with Mrs . Hawkins from about half-past six till nine o ' clock . After his lordship ' s departure the waiter went upstairs , but did not find Mrs . Hawkins in the sitting room , nor had the tea , whioh he had taken up prior to the arrival of Lord Maiden , been touched . Neither had the candles been lighted . These matters having been ascertained , Lieutenant Hawkins bronght an action against Lord Maiden for criminal conversation with his wife , which resulted in the jury awarding him £ 500 by way of damages . He had since that , pamely , ' on the 10 th of February , in the present year , obtained a divorce a mensti et tkoro in the Eeclesiastical Court , Doctor ' 3-commons .

      George Ludlow Ward , the captain of tlie Earl of Durham , bark , in which Lieutenant Hawkins went out to North America , in May , 1850 , proved that that officer had landed in that country in the month of July in that year . Ann Young , Mrs . Hawkins' lady ' s-maid , stated that she had lived with her mistress the whole of the time during Lieutenant Hawkins' absence from England . She had accompanied her mistress to Cows , and had seen the Earl of Durham sail with her master on board . That was in May , 1850 . Her master returned in March , 1 S 51 , and she remained in the service some six months afterwards . After

      her master had quitted her mistress , that lady , the child , aud herself , went to Mr . C . Pennington ' s , in Essex , where they remained about six weeks . They then went to Mr . Peauiugton ' s senior . That was in July ; and afterwards they returned to the Isle of Wight , to Castle Cottage . Here they remained about a month , and in the early part of Sep . tember . she remembered accompanying her mistress to Cox ' s hotel , in Jermyn-street . She had never had the least suspicion that her mistress was in the familyway , although she had been in the daily habit of dressing and undressing her , even to the night of her confinement .

      By the Lord Chancellor . —She had never , even on the night before the delivery , observed anything in the personal appearance of Mrs . Hawkins to cause her to suspect that she was in the famil yway . Her mistress certainly was somewhat stouter in her person , but she had always attributed that enlargement as being the result of a chest disease under which her mistress had for eome time been labouring . She was not herself a married woman . She had not noticed any indications or movement which had led her to suspect that Mrs . Hawkins was in the familywey . By Mr . Talbot . —Her mistress had altered the style of her dress ; it was a looser style of dress . The birth of the child was the first intimation she had had of the fact of her mistress being in the family way . The evidence being brought to a conclusion

      , t The Lord Chancellor Baid , that this case , in some of its circumstances , was of a mo 3 t extraordinary character , for , up to the moment of the birth of the child , it appeared that there was no person who had been about this ladyeven the lady ' a-maid , who had dressed and undressed her mistress daily—who had at any moment entertained a suspicion of her being in the familyway . It was still more singular , too , that Lieutenant Hawkins himself , who had been the father of two children , should have slept with hi 3 wife up to within fire minutes of the birth , even without having had cause to suspect that she was in the familyway . It appeared that Lieutenant Hawkins had left England for North America on tbe 16 th of May , 1850 , and that he hnd not returned until tbe 23 rd of March , 1851 . It was utterly impossible , therefore , that he could have been , # J i * *" vl l # «*» v **** VVU 1 U UAfV Ubbll

      tne father of this child , which vras born on the 2 nd of June m the same year It was clear , therefore , that that child was the fruit of an act of adultery which had taken place during hisabsence . That was beyond all question , and the time of delivery exactly corresponded iu the ordinary course of gestation with tho period when it was stated the act of adultery must have been committed . That neing so , then there could be no reasonable doubt that the act of adultery had given rise to the delivery of the lady in the June following . It was said that the adultery had taken place at Cox ' s Hotel , in Jermyn-streefc , in the early part of September , and the birth of the child had taken place on the 2 nd of June followirg . As he had already said , tbe most extraordinary circumstance in the case was , that the husband who had cohabited with his wife during two previous pregnancies , had not found anvthine to raise

      nis suspicions as to the state in which his wife was after the renewal of his cohabitation with her subsequently to his ntaral to this country . It appeared from the testimony of the different witnesses , that the lady had been lino * at a respectobe hotel at Bonchurch , vi / iting , and being visited by , a 1 the respectable families of the place , and conducted herself with theutmost propriety . Then , when her husband returned she received and welcomed him with all the ap . TTFvll f W stWB S . ? d warm affection lAtfc * w * she had parted with him on his leaving for America IndPPa it had been proved that the only SSe rfS ? 5 Kt having accompanied her husband on that occasion was the extremely delicate state of her health mS \ t tbl time sue had received her husband in this affectionate man-Sfti tswiK ^ h T V :- months gone with child . \ Vell , the husband in the ord narv wav tpiipwh tho relation of hnsbandand wife , and he even continued !!» with her in the same bed , forithad been Sffttft

      was but one oea in the room , until within five minute * nf the birth of this child . It struck him as a most eSaordf pary circumstance , that one who might be described as tha father of a family should not even up to that moment have made any discovery that she was in the familyway If the husband , therefore , had not made that discovery , it might be considered as a circumstance less to be surprised at that other parties who were m daily communication with her should have been equally blind to her real condition . l t was quite clear that had he made any such discovery as to the fact of his wife having been in the family way he would at once have been aware that he could not have been tho father But sin » gular as this circumstance was , it was not the less true that every person who had been intimate with hprhmihppn

      equally deceived as to the cause of her general appearance , all of them attributing any change which might have deve loped Itself in respect of an increase ofsizo , to the ill state of health under which it was known ehe had Oten for some time labouring , l-ven the medical men themselves , recollecting the length of time of the husband ' s absencg , had been deceived as to the true state of affairs , notwithstanding they had noticed an alteration m the personal appearance of the lady . They , like everyone else , appeared to have attributed the enlargement of size to the illness under which Mrs . Hawkins was labouring . The lady ' smaid , too , who had dressed and undressed her mistress up to the night of her confinement , had been equally deceived ; and , like the physician , the surgeon , the mistress of the hotel , and others , had attributed the increase in her size to the chest disease with which she was afflicted . This

      witness , Ann Young , was a most material witness , and as their Lordships had beard she had entertained no suspicion . It was a most extraordinary case , and in respect to

      Untitled Article

      the husband ' s not having made the discovery , that was a point upon which their Lordships were left in a great measure to conjecture . It appeared , however , extremely dim . cult to believe that , placed as he had been as the husband of the lady during some three months of cohabitation down to the moment almost of her delivery , and with his previous experience , that he could have entei 4 lined no suspicion of the true state of his wife's condition . Nevertheless , strange as it was , it was perfectly manifest , difficult though it might be to credit the fact , that he bad been , like all others , misled as to the situation of his wife . What had occurred upon the day of the delivery was perfectly conclusive , however . As soon as Mrs . Hawkins had got her husband out of the bedroom , she had oxpn ssed herself as most anxious that the nffair should not bo at onco made known to him , nor that it should come to his knowledge

      in an abrupt manner , and had requested tbe landlady to break the matter to him as quietly as she could , for that he had a heart complaint , and it might kill him . Now , their Lordships had had ample evidence placed before them of the heavy blow this painful discovery had been to Lieutenaut Hawkins . Looking , then , at all tho circumstunces of this axtraordinary case , he had arrived at opinion that Lieutenant Hawkins had been wholly unconscious that his wife waB in the family way up to themome ; it when she had actually given birth to'the child . This , then , waa the case , and , under all the circumstances , it was one in ¦ which he felt he could , notwithstanding its peculiarities , advise their Lordships to read this bill a second time , and thereby give Lieutenant Hawkins that remedy and relief he sought . Tne bill was then read a second time , and ordered to be committed on Monday next . The house thep adjourned during pleasure .

      Untitled Article

      CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT . SHOOTING WITH INTENT 10 KILL , Felix M'Gee , 40 , gasfitter , was charged with the capital offence of shooting at Michael Collins , with intent to murder him . —It appeared from the evidence ofthe prosecutor , that he and the prisoner , and a number of other peraons , were members of a teetotal benefit society , which held its meetings in one of tbe rooms of a coffeeshop in York-atreet , WestminBter . In March last , it seemed , there had been some disagreement between the prisoner and the rest of the members upon the subject of the society , and a good deal of angry feeling prevailed , and , a meeting of tl ; e society being announced to take place on the evening of the I 2 tb , the prisoner declared that the meeting should not take place , and he conveyed a bed nnd some articles ot clothing into the room , and secured the door , and

      declared that no one should enter . When the time appointed for holding the meeting arrived , the prosecutor and some of the members went to the room where the prisoner was , and insisted upon being admitted , but he declared that no meeting should take place , and said , with violent imprecations , that he would have the life ofthe first man who entered the room . After a short intervalthe parties forced m a panel of the door , and they then observed tho prisoner standing m the middle of the room with a pistol in one hand and a cutlass in the other , and as the prosecutor was about to advance into the room the lock of the pistol was heard to snap , but it did not explode . The prisoner continued using desperate threats towards the prosecutor and h 18 companions , exclaiming among other things "that by the God that made him he would shoot any man that entered tne room . " At length the door was forced open , and the prosecutor advanced into the room , and the moment

      1 i S ? A ? nsoner fired a second piatol at him , and the whole of the charge entered his belly . The iuWy he received was of tho most serious character , no less than between fifty and sixty shots having entered the stomach , which , according to the evidence of the surgeon , was completely riddled . For more than a month his life was considered in danger , and , although he was now nearly recovered , it appeared that a good many ghotB still remained in his bod y . After the injury had been inflicted the prisoner continued for some time in a very excited state , but upon the arrival of Mr . Moran . an inspector of police , he surrendered himself , and on his being taken to the police station he said that the pistol had gone off by accident . When the pistols that were taken from the prisoner were afterwardsexamineditwasfoundthathohad reloaded theono with which the injury had been inflicted , and the other pistol was also found to be loaded . The prisoner was found Guilty , and sentenced to transportation for ten years .

      BIOT AND BRUTAL ASSAULT . George Terry , Joshua Tudgey , and George Cooper , surrendered to take their trial for forcible entry and riot , and assaulting Ehza Coffield . It appeared from the statement of the prosecutrjx , an interesting-looking young woman , that her father had been landlord of the Homshoe and Magpie , Bath-street , Clerkenwell , and having fallen into some difficulties he had all his goods sold ofi at the close of tho last year , after whioh she was left in the house to keep possession . Some attempts were made to obtain possession and get her out , but , they not succeeding , Terry , who is a jobbing builder m Clerkenwell , came , accompanied by a dozen men , among whom was the two other prisoners , and stating that they had been sent by the freeholder to make repairs , they , with a view of driving her out of the house .

      for the period of some days were guilty of the most brutal , low , and unwarrantable conduct . Under Terry ' s direotion they took out the windows , took up the floors , out down the stairs , and under the pretence of cleaning the room 3 drenched the place with water , so that , to use her own expression , • the water for two days was up to her ancles ;" day and night some of them were in the house . They abused her ; threw water over her , and bricks and pails of water down the chimney the moment Bhe attempted to light a fare , opened the drains , and , finally , Terry so carried on the work of demolition that the next-door house fell down This not succeeding , they had recourse to personal violence , and after pushing and driving her about , she was by three at the bar , knocked down . Terry said , " Throw her anywhere . " Tudgey said , "Knock her down . " Tudsevthvaw

      ner into the fareplace , and Terry threw a pail of water over her , and , finally , upon the last day of the riot , Terry oame again , and they illused a young man named Hardy who was in the house with her . Terry knocked her down ; she was kicked severely in the groin , dragged from the room , and he , forcing her partially through the window , put a shutter up , and began to nail it , jamming her thighs and injuring them . Her screams had attracted a great crowd , and some of the nei ghbours extricated her and took her fainting to the nearest surgeon ' s , and under whose care she was for some time .-The mob outside were so exasperated that they attacked Terry and his party , who van away , and finally legal proceedings settled the question of tenancy .-The jury found them GuiHy . _ Terry was sentenced to six , and the others to four months' imprisonment , and hard labour . ' This conoluded the business of the session .

      Untitled Article

      Attack on the Sooloo Pirates . —Singapore , April G — The expedition , consisting of her Majesty's ehip , Cleopatra the steam frigate Semiramis , and the war steamer Plutothe latter two vessels belonging to the East India Company —returned to Singapore after an unsuccessful endeavour to meet with and punish tho Sooloo pirates , on the east coast of Borneo , who were concerned in cutting off the schooner Dolphin and the miirderWof Mr . Burns and his companions . Much uiscuBsion has ' of late taken place on the subject of piracy in tho Arohipolago , and who are and who are not pirates ; but of tho character of tho men against whom the expedition under Captain Massie , of her Majesty a ship Cleopatra , was sent , there is not the least doubt entertained . Tr . e head-quarters of the Sooloo , liinun , andlllanun piratical prahuswhich scour the Indian

      , Archipelago , have frequently been pointed out from tho aays ot Dalrymple to the present time , but it was not until the recent outrage on Mr . Burns that the English authorities adopted a single step to punish tho pirates in their strongholds , and on the present occasion they have been completely unsuccessful . The following particulars will Bhow what manner of people these marauders are . Having coaled both steamers at Labuan , the expedition sailed for Maluda , the Cleopatra a short time in advance . Mr . St John , acting commissioner , and Captain Brooke , better known as the Rajah Muda of Sarawak , were on board the Ueopatra . Captain Massie ' s boats proceeded up the Menggatal river to the houBeof a chief who was known to be m league with a party of Lanun pirates , but nothing was done , the object being merel y a demonstration . After much

      difficulty tbe Cleopatra was taken through the Maltawalh pas ? age , and at length reached Tungku , the principal headquarters of the Sooloo pirates . The steamer ' s boats tried river after river before reaching tho one they were in search of . Having anchored below the river , an expedition was formed of sixteen boats in two divisions , the light boats being under the direction of Captain Buvbank , of the Fluto , and the heavy boats under Captain Stephens , of the bemiramig . Captain Massie , accompanied by the acting commissioner , proceeded in the Cleopatra ' s gig . -White flags were hoisted in most of the boats , and after two hours ' pulling they reached the chief ' s house , and on tho top of the room they placed a white flag in token of a peaceful visit and to induce the inhabitants to approach ; not ono , however , appeared , they having fled before tbe boats reached the

      place . While they were meditating on the step next to be taken they were suddenly saluted with a shower of balls , or rather shots , issuing from the iung ' e , killing one of our men and wounding two others . Having thus shown a hostile disposition , Captain Massie immediately directed preparation to be made for acting on tho offensive . A smart fire was returned from the marines , firing in the direction whence the smoke was obsevved , but without any effect . The boats then returned to-the shipping . On tho 17 th the flotilla proceeded to the place , with the view of inflicting a severe punishment for firing upon the flag of truce . The small arrasmen wore placed on one side of the river , and the marines on tho other . The Stockades were reached , but the guna had been removed . Scouring parties went in all directions , but not a man was visible . Some of the pirates , however , advanced , stealthily through the jungle to tho stockades , and firedand a party of them fii ed

      , on the boats , wounding three men , one mortally . Yet not a soul was observable . Whenever smoke was seen to issue from the jungle the place was immediatel y invested , but the daring adventurous Lanuns managed to escape . Finding this mode of warfare very discouraging , orders were given to destroy all the buildings made of bamboo and cadjan , and soon replaced , together with large granaries of rice , which , being accomplished , the flotilla returned with the loss of several men killed and wounded , without tho satisfaction of knowing that they had even wounded a single Lanun . From the absence of their prahus it is believed the pirates were absent on a piratical expedition , but it is equally probable that their prahus and themselves were concealed up some of the numerous and to us unknown rivers abounding in that quarter . —Singapore paper . . l

      ioREiGN PosTAGE . —The Post-office authorities have in contemplation a comprehensive scheme for the equalisation and reduction of foreign postal rates .

      Untitled Article

      MOSDAY , Max 17 th . CONDEMNATION OF MR . MURRAY AT ROME . QOUSE OF LORDS . —The Duke of Argyll wished to put a question to the noble lord opposite the Forei gn Secretary . It had been reported in the papers that a person of the name of Murray had been imprisoned in Ancona for two or three years , accused of a criminal offence , and without being brought to trial ; as also that he had lately been found guilty , and sentenced to death . This was certainly a somewhat extraordinary statement concerning a British subject ; and ho wished to ask whether any

      communication had been made to the noble earl on the subject , or any application , either on the part of the friends of tbe gentleman in question , or our consular agent resident at Rome , which was the only channel of communication there ? He thought it mipht be satisfactory to the public mind , if the noble earl could give some explanation of the long confinement of the person alluded to , and ot the way in which he 1 ad been brought to trial . It was stated that tbe trial was a secret one , that the accused was not allowed to confront the witnesses against him , and that the whole proceeding was of a character not likely to inspire the British public with any confidence that justice had been done .

      The Earl of Malmesbuiiy , as far as he was concerned , was glad to have an opportunity of explaining what had appeared in the public journals , and which he had seen with some pain . The facts of the case , as far as he was informed were these : About a week after he eame into offioe—about the first week iu March—he received a despatch from Mr . Freeborn , our consul at Rome , stating tliat a gentleman of tho name of Murray , the son of a meritorious officer , formerly in her Majesty ' s service , had been confined for thirty months in a prison in Ancona , on a charge of murder ; that he had been charged in common with a band of bravos , regular murderers , with having committed several murders in that part of Italy ; that in consequence of the disturbed state of the country , he had not been brought to trial , and upon the representation of consul Moore he had been transmitted from Ancona to

      Rome ; that Mr . Freeborn had written to Cardinal Antonelli , and begged that he might have a fair trial , and that justice might be done him , and that the Cardinal had promised that justice should be done to Mr . Murray . He had since received a dispatch , from Mr . Freeborn , stating tlio arrival Of Mr . Murray , as a prisoner in Rome . On receiving the first despatch he wrote to Mr . Freeborn , desiring him to watch tho proceedings and take care that the aocused had fair pliy . The next intimation which he had received on the subject , was through the medium of the public prints . He had not received any further despatch from Mr . Freeborn , | nor had he received any information from the charge d'affaires at Florence EXPULSION OF MISSIONARIES FROM HUNGARY . The Duke of Argyll was satisfied with the explanation

      which had just been given as far aa the noble earl himself was concerned , lt must , however be apparent that if this gentleman had been in prison two or three years without any remonstrance or inquiry on the part of the English government , those noble lords alone could be responsible who had preceded him in oflice ; He now begged to ask tho noble earl another question—namely , whether he had any objection to produce to the house , the . despatches and papers which had passed between him , his predecessor in the Foreign Office , and the government of Austria , with respeot to the case of Messrs . Wingate , Smith , and Edwards , missionaries in Hvmgavy 1 The communications had appeared in the public papers , but they had not been laid officially on the tubie of the house . He must confess that he looked for them with great curiosity ; for as far as

      he was able to judge , the reply given by his noble friend opposite , in reference to the application from those gentleman , was far from satisfactory , and tbe answer of tho Austrian government was still less satisfactory . ( Hear , hear . ) The Eavl of Minto put a question to the Foreign Secretary , which was totally inaudible in tbe gallery ; as was also the reply of Lord Malmesbury . The Earl of Malmesburt said that with respect to "the observations of the noble duke ho was sorry to say he did not think it would ba advantageous to the public service , or to the interests of the individuals referred to , that tho correspondence should bo laid on tho table in its present state , as it was not yet complete . He ( tho Earl of Malmes . bury ) could give his most solemn assurance that he had endeavoured to maintain , as it was his duty to do , the rights of international law : and he should have nothins ? so much

      at heart , so long as he filled the office which he had now tho honour of holding , as the endeavour to maintain international law between this nnd all foreign countries . m The Mavquis oi Bubadalbase said that on a former occasion the noble earl had stated that the case of these three missionaries was a very bad one , and chat they were entitled to compensation ; and that was also tho opinion of the noble earl who had preceded him in office . He trusted , therefore , that the negotiations would be conducted in that spirit ; and that the Austrian government would not be allowed to escape the consequences of their conduct to those gentlemen—( hear , hoar )—or be allowed to suppose that they could exorcise an arbitrary principle towards British subjects , as they should to their own people , without this country seriously entering a Btrong protest against lti ..

      THE CASE OF MR . MATHER . In reply to a question from Earl Fitzwilham , The Earl of aIawiesbuot Baid that tho affair of Mr . Mather was nearl y settled ; and until it was finally decided he begged to defer answering the question of the noble earl as to the correspondence which had passed on the subject .

      THE CASE OF MR . MURRAY . Lord Stanley ( of Alderly ) Baid , that during the lime ho was in office , no information had reached the foreign office as to the case of Mr . Murray , He had no doubt the noble earl would vindicate our national rights , and do what justice required . The treatment of English subjects abroad had been influenced in many states , more by their relations with the English government than their consideration of lustice to individuals . EMIGRATION TO AUSTRALIA . The Earl of Hariiowbi moved for returns connected with emigration to Australia , and dwelt with great force on the importance of providing those colonies with a sufficient supply of labour . The Earl of Desart admitted the importance of the subjeet , and after some discussion the returns , with one exception , wore ordered .

      Some other business was then despatched , and their lordships adjourned . , HOUSE OF COMM 0 NS . -L 0 YU 3 . Resell stated that it was not his intention to bring forward the motion of whioh he had given notice , and which stood for this day , for a committee ofthe whole house on oaths taken hv members of parliament .

      TUE METROPOLITAN POLICE . Mr . T . Duncombe put a question to the Secretary of State—by what authority a portion of the K division ofthe Metropolitan Police were ordered , en the 5 th and 12 th instant , to attend divine service in St . Thomas ' s Church , Stepney , and in default of so doing were subjected to military drill ? On Wednesday , the 5 th-tbat not being a drill day with the force , but their pny day—a number of men ( 130 ) were assembled in Harbour-square , when the inspector informed them that an order had just come down requiring them to go to church , and directing- that those who refused to do so should be sent to drill . About 100

      went to the cliutch , but thirty , including a sergeant—the greater part of them being either Roman Catholics or Dissenters-preferred going to the drill . On the 12 th , the same thing occurred again , when tbirty-eight men refused to attend the church , and were compelled to undergo the drill . Now when a man entered the police , no question was asked of him as to what his reli gious opinions were and , as a matter of course , there were many Roman Catholics and Dissenters in the force ; yet , under tbe order no referred to , nil were required to attend the service of tho Established Church . He wished to know under what authority this order had been issued for the first time since the establishment of the Metropolitan Police ?

      Mr . Secretary Walpolb observed , that he had made inquiry aud found that no compulsory order had been given for the n . en to attend divine service , nor was any additional drill imposed if they did not . The facts were these : —Many of Hie police had not been able , in oonscqwmce of their duties , to attend divine servico on the Sunday , and it being found that an opportunity offered of their doing so on the Wodneaday , it was ordered that those who otiose might do so according to the regulation ; and as ; those who did not would have nothing 10 do between the hour of the inspection to tho time for paying them , it was thought advisable that they should have the drill in the station during tho Swte- i / Uttll , ' ,, S . L additi 0 I » al drill , but ono substituted for a drill which they must have gone through at another time . c ^ IlSs ^ Ito ' Z ^ " * " •»*«» tf *«

      THE PARISH OF FROME . hou ^ h ~ H ° Vl ^ house the result of the investigation which her Maiastv ' s = SnW-- » SS I ^ W 3 SJKSS 5 lS * ffift communion issued it would not be possible tOcomDei h ° production of evidence ; and that there mKht ? fi ?? tak of contravening the Bill of Rights if the commission assume the character of a court of ecclesiasticaSS By the Clergy Discipline Act , it was open to anv Shioner if Frome to appeal to the bishop of the diX Sf a SSK SSKSSas grievance , nothing could be more uniisTtha Thw ! re course to any unusual course . The gove nment were of

      Mr . Horsmak gave notice that he should move for a Commission of inquiry into the facts he had taii before the house 1 . 1 this case upon a former occasion THE MILITIA BILL . ' JSgStftSl ^ ° —» ^ bill , » unto tftiVrLVm ^ ,. fallen by the militia , thev would [ 2 L « ' ] l > obli S ed th 0 me "t ° swear that Under thif o 2 h M , * " ? P Wt of the United KhiSdom . and WilGS 2 S ^ , vaise S 0 000 militia in England resuiai soldiers there , and send tho ,. ,, ia ,. , \ M * * * n t ) m oaI was

      EXE £ ^ - ^ ' H ^ olievrdVh ; rthath conproposed . ° the MilitiaBm mB ortg 10311 ? Jrl' W ^ P 0 L ? flaidwhen the Interchange Act passed the u } a ? v ^ gtori couM be sent to Ireland , and that of Ireland to England . It would be impossible to alter that , fox

      Untitled Article

      the njijitia lm of Ireland was in force , and might ba brought into operation . It did not necessarily follow thafc the men would be sent to Ireland . viscount Pamerston hoped that the government would miiif- , to the Proposition of the hon . gentleman . The within -1 t isIan . was ° « 2 'nally limited to servico inwrrnnli' L thS ° J ° tlj 0 ' forOe WaS DOt t 0 P ut d 0 Wn Sw& ' but . to ^ fond the country , and it was found fined to T . M j menUhattl 10 Ms * militia should be con-ParlKmnnf ^ ai i dthoBr > tisn -militia to Great Britain , militia should'l ^ , ? . deliberately determined that each Mr . Mowatt wishe ? T 0 shouId be squired , thoy refused to enSui § ° Tnment would expbin why defend their ownSiy MandSC 0 teh wUh armS t 0 gentlemen oppoaTt * . ( iXhSr { y altW 8 frOm th ° h 0 B : Mr . Home said this was 1 l 0 t a ' miliiiim «„ i- 1 l question of raising men by a forced ^ Svi t q . UCBtl ° " . bul a a bill of pains and pcniltiS , and ITS * I ? V 3 WaS equally throughout the country . Tf & , *** fc o o s be en d 0 ^ money on the force at all , it cu ^ ht to L « £ 3 by X

      In answer to Mr . Bernal , Mr , Bright would move that the oath which wis mm scribed in the 42 nd Geo . III . ( the act of 1802 ) » Hd& substituted for that in the 54 th of Geo . III . ( tho act ot loll , ) though he would have preferred au oath referring « . nly to England and Wales . s Tho Attorney-General was quite astonished at the lino taken with reference to this clause , the two first words of which expressly restricted the oath to volunteers . ( Hear hpai * . ) ' Mr . M . Gibsos thought the hon . and learned gentleman ' s reply was not very candid . Surely it was not proposed to nave two oaths , one for the volunteers and the other for tho balloted men ; and therefore it was necessary now to settle its terms .

      Mr . Bright would not trouble the house to divide ; bufc ha thought that upon the constitutional question he had the best of the argument . ( Laughter . ) The clause was then agreed to . On clause 15 , Mr . M . Gibson asked if the government could supply any estimate of the expense that would be thrown on tha county rates or poor rates , by this measure ? Mr . Walpole said he had made inquiries , but was not able to give any estimate . The clause was then agreed to . In clause 1 G , which authorises a ballot , whero men cannot bo raised by voluntary enlistment , the blank was filled , up with "the 3 lst of Deoember , " and somo verbal alterations were made . On the words " shall be raised by ballot , " Ciurtems

      Mr . moved to omit the words ' " shall be raised cfauses preparatory t 0 striking out all the compulsory Mr . Walpoie was of opinion that the compulsory clause 3 should be retained in the bill , lest the requisite number of men might not be raised by voluntary enlistment . wr . uto earnestly entreated tho government to omit , nt ? "Jluhu ? , had had more extensive acquaint-? h « noM ?* £° indttrtri «>™ classes than himself ; and he 3 * be ? , l our 80 mm be firs ' ^ ^ y 'he voluntary t o Jorn ^ ft ff V of ^ year ' and then ' necessary , mew ) an se of the 8 tanding arn > y « wot ' h ^ SL ^ ffpSpl " 16 compulsory clause 3 Mr . W . J . Fox said he must bear his testimony to tho unpalatable nature of these clauses to tho neoplo generally . Let government rely on the volunteer system till the end of the year ; if it were then found to have failed , the compulsory power might be resorted to .

      _ The Attorney- General said the argument was so clear in favour of these clauses , that the committee could not do ofctierwiso than support them . Tho committee acknowledged that a force of SO . OOO was necessary ; and , as tho force was one of precaution and defence , how could that be complete , unless , in the event of the volunlary system , failing , there was a power to resort to the ballot ? ( Hear , heai- . ) It was admitted that the voluntary enlistment might not be sufficient ; why , then , should not tho government have the power to make up the deficiency ? Mr . CAiumuM , said the argument of tho Attorney . General went to this-that the ballot oucht not to hn

      asRed of tho new parliament , because it would come before thorn m all its nakud deformity . ( Cheers , ) lie know that it could onl . v be obtained whan sheltered , ns it were , behind a proposal for voluntary enlistment . The practical proposition was , whether , in timo o- ' profound paace , the Queen ' s subjects should be submitted to compulsory consenption through the ballot ? ( Hear , hear . ) For twenty years there had been a power to raise tho militia in thi 3 way , which had been suspended from time to time . To paE 3 the clause as it stood would bo tantamount to enactinjr that this compulsory conscription should be resorted to in time of profound peace , merely to make up a deficiency in voluntary enlistment .

      Mr . Wjklet said that he had attended several meetings lately , at which many persons declared that they would go to gaol , if they were drawn by ballot . ( Hear , hear . ) Mr . Geach said they might as well enact that they would force men into tha army , if they did nob accept the bounty offered , aa force men by ballot to serve in the militia who would not enlist voluntarily . ( Hear , hoar . ) Mr . II . Bbrkeley . said that in the City of Gloucester the people were determined not to submit to the ballot . ( "Hear , " and "Divide . " ) The committee then divided : For Mr . Chartem ' s amendment 110 Against , 127 Majority against the amendment ... 17

      Mr . Hume suggested that the government having succeeded in carrying this important , but most unpopular , part ofthe bill by so inconsiderable a majority , ought nob to insist on retaining it . Mr . Mitchell saia that on the bringing up of the report , he Bhouldmove that no substitutes be allowed , in order that hon . gentlemen who were drawn by ballot might themselves have an opportunity of defending the country . Mr . W . J . Fox moved a proviso to the same clause , to the effect that no person shall bo liable to compulsory military service who is not registered as a Parliamentary elector . He supported his motion upon two grounds—first , that every person subjected to the obligations should be entitled to all the rights of citizens ; second , that many per . sons entertained conscientious scruples against such a service

      unaer any circumstances , and were ready to pay tho penalty of disqualification for the sake of exemption . Mr . Walpole opposed the proviso , observing that the first ground assigned by Mr . Fox raised a much larger question than could be discussed in an argument upon a Militia Bill , while it would narrow the numbers out of which a militia could be drawn ; and that the second , if good for anything , would go to the extent of exempting persons , with conscientious scruples , not merely from serving in the militia , but from paying any tax towards it . Mr . Hume recommended the substitution of a proviso of a different character , that any person drawn for the militia should be entitled to be put upon the electoral Ii 3 i . Mr . Fox declined to adopt this suggestion , and his amend * ment was negatived .

      Mr . M . Gibson asked whether the government would lay upon the table of the house a list of the general exemptions ? or Mr . Secretary Waijole said that the government had carefully considered the subject , nnd he would willingly afford the information required . The exemptions were to be as follows : —1 . Peers who were doing their duty in the other house of parliament . 2 . Persons serving in tne other forces of the country . 3 . Officers on half pay . i . Commissioned officers serving or having served four years in tno Militia . 5 . Resident masters in the uviversitieB . 6 . Clergymen . 7 . Persons licensed to preach or teach { iisa right hon . gentleman was not quite olearly heard in the gallery . ) 8 . Constables or police officers . 9 . Articled clerks or apprentices . io . Paid seamen and seafaring men . 11 . Parsons employed in the dockyards and ordnance gunwharves . 12 . Persons free of the company of watermen ; and 13 , any poor man who has more than one child borne

      m wedlock . Mr . M . Gib 30 s could not see why peers should be cx » empted or allowed to esoape the payment for a substitute . The duties of the other house were not so severe as those required from members of that house . He thought thafc the peer 3 ought not to bo exempt , and he should take tlra sense of tho house upon the subject . The right hon sentleman proposed to exempt paupers as well as peers . What did he mean by a poor man ? What was the degree of poverty required ? 6 m A Dos . Member . —A day labourer , Mr . GmsoN .-Then a day labourer was the pooi ' msn , and all day la \ ourers who had one ohild born in wedlwfc were to be exempted . Then , as to the Watermen ' s Com . ! ffi " ^' & **!» * ere l ««* extinguished by the

      . 8 toa . mers , andtheexemption 8 houldbeapplicable toenBiueerB and stokers . The goYernment was legislating in thl spirit ot the days of George III . There ought to be an opportunity given by which the question of exemptions should b « submitted to the house , and the aenge of the house taken on it . lhen , again , with regard to resident members of the universities . Why should they be exempted ? Could not they purchase substitutes ? Did the exemption apply to all universities ? In order to givo the house an opportunity of expressing an opinion on this subject , ho wonld suggest that the right hon . gentloman tho Secretary for the llome Department should move toropeal the exemptiog clauses of 42 George III , , and bring up a clause containing such exemptions as tho government thought ought at present to exist .

      Sir II . Wihouguby then moved a proviso , that no married man bo drawn by ballot . Mr . Henley objected , that , without some statement of the extent to which this proviso would limit the area of choice , it might narrow tne ballot so as to make it vwy hard upon the class upon which it operated . This amendment was negatived upon a division , as wdl as another proviso , that no private man chosen by ballot shall be compelled to take any oath that he shall faith , , fully serve in the militia for five years , or until he be SOOUfi * discharged .

      A similar fate attended provisoes moved by Mr Gibson for exempting schoolmasters , and for E exempting neers S / S'XST ^ 01 "' " ¦*"' ^*« Upon the question being put that the clause sta * a » t © f the bill , Mr . "Wakley moved that the Chairmau repo t progress Tbe Chancellor of the Exchequer observed that , aftec the reiterated appeals made to the government to expedite business , a motion of this kind appeared to him to MM almost the character of being vexatious .

      Ffiraiftftu Vavuament

      ffiraiftftu vavuament

      Untitled Article

      May 32 , 1852 . THE STAR OF FREEDOM , 7

      Untitled Article

      THEOLOGICAL COXTROTEItSY VT XOItTHAJIPTOX . iablic debates have tafcen place in this town between John Hamilton , editor of the " Aylesbury >~ ews , aad G . J . Holvoabe , editor of the . " Beasoner , " on Mondav and Toesday evenings , May 17 th andlStb , on the following snbjecta . Monday— " That Jesus Christ is the Revelation of Divinity" and on Tuesday , "That Jesus Christ is a rerfect Model of Humanity . " Much opposition was manilested by the " religions" persons in the town , but without stzU . The good folfc » of the town were well pleased ap-Darently with the tone of tbe debates .

      Untitled Article

      V 03 ^ i W thS ° \ Poiffi ^ -Ifc " Sieved , from

  • Citation
    • Northern Star (1837-1852), May 22, 1852, page 7, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/ns/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1679/page/7/