Current:

Northern Star (1837-1852), 7th February 1852, Edition 1 of 2, Page 8, Untitled Article

Page 8
Page 8
8 of 8

On this page

  • Departments (4)
    • fJtt&It'c amusements.
    • ©fiartiat ftrteiltgeiwfc
    • JUlftvfcte, &t,
    • "» ¦ ¦ - —-^^ Printed bv WILLIAM kider. nf\n. s. ¦ViiMlrffitld-suw. •" '„.
  • Text (11)
  • Transcript

    • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

      Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

      Untitled Article

      thought it would facilitate the inquiry , he would « UwgJ do so . They all knew what deeds were . -they would tnrov no light on the matter . They could be peeled . Mr . Boberts then showed , from some instances , the nwnneiin ivhich his lien might i ) e prejudiced hy giving up the deeds . Be therefore declined . enivitor to lla Mr . W . P . Roberts examined : I ^ VSouehlUS SS 53 SSISS . ? not know the amount paid into the ban * ^ to ray credit . The books will show . That paper shows that £ 21 , 000 was paid into my acconnt I know nothing of it . Tne money was cbicflr paid in Tost Office orders in my name . I signed thein , " and they were paid to Mr . 0 Connor . I received shore £ 3 , 000 for costs due to mo by the Company . I do not know * what Mr . O ' Connor did with the money .

      Mr . Chinnery examined : Tho account he produced was * fce siims he had received and paid onto Mr . O'Connor ' s account . He had received £ 11 , 98712 s . Id ., and had paid to Mr O ' Connor £ 12 , S 9512 s . Id . The balance was due to Mr . Robert ? . Mr . Roberts re-examined : I liaTe not the account of Mr . O'Connor made out . I lent air . O ' Connor the sum of £ 1 , 000 upon the O'Connorville Estate , also £ 370 upon the satce . I bare also my bill of costs . I lent a further sum to Mr . O ' Connor on his fit > t starting the Company , which I shall also , if the Master allow me , charge against the Company . The sum lent on O'Connorville stands on a different footing . There was a mortgage deed . I shall only charge against the Company what the Master thinks proper to allow .

      A dUcas'ion took place relative to the prospect of any documents he produced being impounded . Mr , Roberts stited that he had taken the highest legal opinion , and knew that he sicriSced a portion of his legal right if he produced any document which might be imvounded . He was willing to make even this sacrifice , if he thought itwould benefit the interests of the Company . He wo i ! d look through the papers , and if he saw any that could be justiy said to belong to tho Company he would produce tiiem . The Master stated that he thought Mr Roberts' interest would be ben-fitod by following the course he recommended . His debt would he the first paid oat of the assets . Sir . Roberts was -willing to give up the deeds on the payment of the lien . He had understood that the £ 1 , 000 loan on O ' Connorville was to be disputed ; this would prejudice other persons besides himself , lie would give the subject farther consideration .

      Mr . 'Roxburgh : In reference to the accounts of Mr . O'Connor , thought that the best way to be adopted was to charge against Mr . O'Connor all the sums he received , and then for hia legal advisers to employ an accountant to examine all the hooks and papers , and thus endeavour to arrive at a conclusion . If Mr . O'Connor could not account for the money , he must be charged with it . TLe Master stated that he thought the suggestion a good one . It was , however , for the counsel to decide upon the course they would pursue . Mr . O'Connor must discharge himself , and he would not have the inquiry delayed by the non-production of documents . He distinctly requested Mr . Roberts to produce on the following day all the documents in his possession , Mr . Robeits stated that he understood the decision , but should take legal advice on the matter . Mr . Chinntry was re-examined as to the alteration from seven to one year in the deed , allowing the sale by the mortgagees of the Minister estate .

      Au immense number of drafts and papers were examined , wLicli showed that a discrepancy bad occurred in the dates , as ro which evidence had been given by Mr . Lee in reference to the execution of the deed of sale , and the ejectment of the tenants , the latter taking place prior to tne former . An arrangement was effected , that the papers relative to the estates should be examined by the solicitors of the OSicul Manager , at Mr . Roberta ' s ofBce . The court then adjourned until twelve o ' clock on the following day . THURSDAY , Feescaeto . Mr . 'Wheelar , a barrister , appeared as counsel for Mr . O'Connor . Mr . O'Connor ( examined by ilr . Roxburgh ) : He borrowed £ 1 , 007 of Mr . Rofcerts , and gave him a mortgage on the O'ConuorviJle Estate . It was to carry on the affairs of the Company . He did not think the Directors were aware ofit It was not in the " Daily Xews . " It was in 1819 . It went to pay labourers .

      Mr . Roxburgh suggested that the counsel of Mr . O'Connor should agree to take the amount of receipts traced to Mr . O'Connor , and then Mr . O'Connor and the Officia ! . Manager , each to appjint a surveyor to value all the buildir . es and improvements on the estates , and Mr . O'Connor to be discharged from whatever sum their decision , at usual hnililing prices , amounted to . The result of Mr . O'Connor ' s examiaatiou showed that this would be the best and least expetsire wa . i « f arriving at a conclusion . Mr . Wheeler , as counsel for ilr . O'Connor , could not agree to any such arrangement without furtfnr consideration . Oa the face of the proposition he saw several objections . By such an arrangeajentMr . O'Connor would « mlv have the beatfitof a judicious expenditure , instcai of a haan-jide one . Mr . Roxburgh : Mr . O'Connor was acting as trustee for the shareholders , and was tnly entitled to what the surveyors would state to be a judicious expeudi me . Mr . O'Connor then went into a long statement of the manner in which he had expended the money .

      After further ditcassion Mr . O'Connor was examined as to the principles on width the Land Han was founded , but gave very incoherent answers , ttatiKg that Ms recollection was wry imperfect . Mr . Roxburgh claimed that Messrs . Roberts and Chinnery should delivered up all dteds in their possession . Mr . Wheeler defined producing them , and appealed to several prior legal decisions . M-ltoberts was thea examined by Mr . Wheeler , as to his acting as so'iatorro the Company , his bill of charges , and his liea on the title deads of the Comjumy . The deed of the provisional registra lion of the Company havinjbeen produced , a long debate ensued between connseL The result was that the debate was adj -urned until the next day t-j endeavour to effect an arrangement relative xoMr . Uoberts ' slien .

      Mr . M'Gowan examined . Heprinte-1 the "Northern Star . " Mr . O'Connor had Ik en the proprietor , ire had ceased to be so . Witness had received lar-e sums of money for Mr . O'Connor . The amount was contained in the books and papers he produced . Intermingled with the documents he held we . e some private papers of Mr . O Connor . He had uot been able to separate them . I !' «^ bedded a'at any private pajers might be staled up . ilr . M'Gowan re-examined . The bosk produced contained an account of the money received by him , and what he did with it . There was aa earlier account , wh < ch he gave to Mr . O'Conner . That was llie original book . The account was not made up until lately . He madeitupfrom a private b-ok of bis own . He never was paid for anysenrces . He did it out of friendship for Mr . O'Connor . The ether bo . * contained his private account . There was a book , which TvaskeptbyMr . Wheeler and by Mr . M'Grath , which accounted lortne prior payments . He received th < . m . mpv from thorn . TTp

      kept cash bo ks , ledgers , &c in his taiSe account . He did not Know the money received by him prior to August , 1 S 47 . It was a large sum . He thought above £ 12 , 000 . He did not receive any » u < £ earl-. tr th . n May , 1 S 17 . The Official Manager could ascertain how much lie received from Messrs . Wheeler and M'Grath . Be could state what he did with it He fcund the book produced amonghis papers . Bethought it was in the writing of Mr . O'Connors nephew . Mr . O'Connor received monev . He disposed of ihe 2 "T £ ! f ^ ° p ° '" directed . Same went to Mr . Alison , the stocKdroker for the Company ; some was paid into the London Joint Stock Bant Mr . AUsup invested it in Exchequer bills . Ho also into the

      paid money Witncy and Gloucestershire Banks . On Use loth of August , IS ! ,, the sum of £ 15 , 000 was carried from a drawing to a deposit account . It was-after the sitting of the Lowband ' s Conference . He had nuihingto do with the Company beyond doin " some printing f ,, r it . He had no balance in hand . He had no Tiff rt S l } } l Hellad receiv « ri money from Mr . O ' Connor ' s ^ erk forthe 'Worthem Star" since that period , but none for the lairi Company since January , 1 S-50 . He di . l not keep the "Northern fctsr accounts , Mr . Rider did . That bt * . k contained Mr . O'Connor s private funds as well as the Land Fund . He gave a memorandum re eipt to Mr . M'Graih for the money he revived . Wheeler examined

      Mn by Mr . Uoibimrfc : Was a Director and tne t manual Secretary from the commencement of the Company until July , 1347 . Darin" that period there was r . ceived for the laud abuTe £ M , O 00 . Mr . O'Couuor received IOTt of that money . Tno ° e were the original books . The few first leaves were a cony , owing to a change in tne mauuw of booking the instalments . The total sums were contimed in the leaser . The cash books were weekly coroyilea iroin the day hooks . The nwnsy was paid weekly to Mr . O Connor . It was also a-knowledged in the Northern Swr . ' He could s ate the sums by refereuce to the books . The sums received W re f rIfln ? . aecOants ' abOBt £ 44 . t'M- ilr . O'Conaor received abL . ut £ U , O 0 aQfUiatsa ' n . Two books comamin- ; Ms receipts were missing . They ware a copy ofhis receipts as acknowledged in tn « Star / ilr

      ^ orwern . O'Connor did not then keep a book . Witness copied them , ihese b . « ks were in existence when he resigned . He i £ LZ ^< JS V S ? P > sssss ™ ° i & Grey , who examined themin ISis . lie had not seen tham siuce . Any error in the iortnern Star * was immed-ately ascertained by the district secre-Jams and shareholders . Mr . Wheeler , at therequest of the counsel , SSTm ^ V ™ " *? 1 ** " * ^ e Company was conducted , the f trlce h ^ th « Van 3 ferS - - Mr - « . by order of Con ! S ^ T ^ W ^^^^^^ Ibe Court ihenaajoaraea nntil Friday three o ' clock '

      Untitled Article

      HATMARKET THEATRE "tZe / Khe ^ rlc » klUlg Gosne ' radw ** " > « tle oi mmwmi ms&sgm itv

      *« Y ^ pv , p a «« naviug arrived at that place the ladv xorments him by a variety of threats and promises in thl Prench language and by keeping him in ignSance as to her name and habitation . He is driven alnfos ? S fc £ u 2 S * ?* tha ° affeciton 3 ' of I fai USuS

      bat , as the SAf ^ t nT t an ? " » en xne duel takes place-« n 5 anS SlrfI ? if r ree ™ P lies > in tho dark , and poor Ws auuSfi } P Mierathathe has mortall y wounded lenS ionrGrcennniT - amUS , ement arise 3 from th « appreconse ^ encea f hi , « . - * alarmed and » o « or-struek at the ie discovers thattL ^ mta « at » flirtation , " but in the end the same person t ; S- tess and the dnelistare one and cleared up to the ' SrfS- , wife - 3 [ atters are then nothingTery newio ^ f « of both parties . There is Tebidefor the display ^ ^^ >»«* they serve as a this respect the reiaitww ? uckstone ' a drollery , and in ff . « w langhed hearS SI Sat J Efactory to «» ™ & ' ™* «* . fl « faffof the Si ^ ^ the performance , WeHw amidst MnsiSe anpf 1600 was announced for

      Untitled Article

      NATIONAL CHARTER ASSOCIATION . The Executive Committee met as usual on "Wednesday evening , the 4 th instant . Present : Messrs . Arnott , Bezer , Grassby , and Holyoake . Mr . Arnott presided . John Shaw was absent through continued indisposition . Thornton Hunt has signified his intention of attending the next meeting . Mr . Lo Blond has not yet sent in his determination . Mr . Linvood writes to say he shall remain on the Executive . The Executive have engaged the John-street Institution for next Tuesday evening , the 10 th iust ., ' to review the promised Reform * Bill .

      I have just received an intimation ( which the Commiue may perhaps next week reply to , ) viz ., the West Riding Delegate meeting have passed a vole of non-confidence in the present Executive Committee , and called upon the country to elect a Convention . In the absence of my colleagues , and on their behalf , I can only say , that confidence or no confidence , all honourable Chartists are in duty hound to pay the liabilities left as a legacy by the former Executive to the present one , after which they may fairly thin of Conventions and paid Executives . The Committee is happy to say that they receive such assurances from various correspondents of the propriety of the course they are pursuing , ihat they believe it is unnecessary to support it by further arguments .

      Since we last addressed you we have received the sum of £ 3 8 s . 6 | d ., which reduces the liabilities to £ 29 12 s . & } d , and , by the aid of all honest Chartists , we are in hopes of seeing the entire debt spesdily liquidated . —Signed , James GttAssBY , Sec . pro tern . Receipts : Rotherham per W . H . Rayall Is . ; David Aiflech 6 d . ; Mr . Down and friend 23 . ; Howarth per W . Greenwood 12 s . ; Greenwich and ' Deptford per J . Morgan 15 $ . ; Proceeds of Public Meeting at John-street 14 a . id . ; W . J . Linton Is . ; Mr . Raymond Is . ; James Spurr 2 s . ; A Chartist per Roger O'Connor 2 s . ; A . Yates per Bezer Is . 6 d . ; A Friend per Bszer 5 s . ; William Pulling 6 d . ; Crook per W . Eylg 6 * . ; Cleckheatonper Mr . Lacey 4 * . ; C . TJ . Is . —Total £ 3 8 s . 6 * J . James Gkassbt , Secretary , pro tern . 96 , Regent Street , Lambeth

      Coventry . —The members of the Charter Association met on Mouday evening when it was resolved : — " That a Conference should assemble as soon as poss \ We ; and we pledge ourselves to render every assistance in our power . A subscription , lo the amount of £ 1 10 s . was raised for the above purpose .

      Untitled Article

      THE 'NEW PAPER' MOVEMENT . Metropolitan Delegate Council . —Sunday afternoon . Mr . Clarke in the chair . The minutes having been read , two shillings was received from the John-street locality . In reference to the case of the policeman charged with pulling down the hills calling the John-street meeting , the following letter was read from Commissioner Mayne : — Metropolitan Police Office , Whitehall-place , January 27 , 1852 . Sib , —I have to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the ISth inst ., and to acquaint you , iu reply , that inquiry has been made , and the constable mentioned ( S 1 ( 15 } states he did not pull down any of the bills referred to , and tliat he did not say he had or / era to do so . No orders have been given to the police on the subject I am , jour obedient servant , Mr . WasMnglftn . W . R , Matsx ,

      After some discussion , the Council appointed a deputation , consisting of Messrs . Nichclls and Murray , to wait upon the magistrates and have their advice about proceeding against the constable , thus giving further publicity to the illegality of the proceeding . The sub-committee for re-establishing defunct localities and creating new ones , gave in a favourable report ; in several instances they had been able to re-establish localities . —Mr . E . Jones proposed that a public meeting should be called at the eastend of London , to consider the present position of the iron trades , more especially the labourers connected with that body . " He perceived that dissatisfaction existed in that body ; that the labourers were likely to be led away by the artifices of the masters , and , though the engineers might be deficient in measures con « ceived in the true spirit of co-operation , yet it was far

      better that the labourers should continue in union with the Amalgamated Society than serve the selfish purposes of the masters . —Mr . Murray seconded the motion . —Mr . Farrer said the meeting of labourers at the National Hall did not consist of one hundred persons , and some of the speakers were evidently not labourers . He thought the masters were endeavouring to destroy the union of the men , by detaching the labourers and non-Society men from them . —Messrs . Nicholls , Knowles , and others supported the motion , which was carried with slight opposition . Messrs . Murray , Knowles , and Docksey were appointed a sub-committee to get a suitable place and to carry out the details of the meeting , which was agreed to be held on the following Thursday . —Mr . F . Farrah moved , and Mr . G . Farrah seconded , the following motion : — " That the Council do . all in their

      power to support the public meeting called by the Executive on Tuesday next , to review the Queen ' s speech . "—Mr . E . Jones objected to the motion . It was a matter of conscience with him not to go to that meeting or support the Executive . He thought that body utterly inefficient , and doing great harm to the movement , more especially since the addition of the two recently elected members to that body . —Mr . Washington said the Council was elected for the express purpose of assisting the Executive in organising the movement , and he thought Mr . Jones ought to bow to the will of the majority . —Mr . Knowles said he thought they had nothing to do with the quarrel between Mr . Jones and the Executive , but he did not think there was any necessitv for

      the motion . —Mr . Washington supported the motion . He believed it was their duty to attend end support the meeting ;—After further opposition from Mr . Jo ' nes the motion was earned . —Mr . Jones moved , and ' Mr . Farrer seconded , the following motion : — ' That tbia Council take immediate and all practical and advisable steps to promote the Chartist organisation among the trades of London . " The motion was unanimously adopted Mr . Jones moved the following resolution : — "That this Council forthwith take the best steps to ensure due representation of the Chartist movement , and of the social rights of the industrious classes in a Peoples' Paper . "—Mr . Farrer wished to know whether the letter in the "Northern Star" was true relative to his

      position as an insolvent ?—Mr . Jones , in reply , stated that he had no doubt that the letter was incorrect , but , to satisfy his friends , he had taken the opinion of Mr . Fesenmeyer , an attorney , which letter he read to them . The letter , which stated , at considerable length , that any property which Mr . Jones might in future acquire could only be applied to the payment of future debts nntil a surplus accrued , which would be applied to the payment of his prior debts . Mr . Jones further stated that all money sent to him would be loans , and as such wouM constitute new debts . —Mr . Murray seconded Mr . Jones s motion , and , at some length , contended that the people ' s cause was not duly represented in either"

      -Rey uolds ' sNewspaper" or the "Northern Star . " He complained particularly of the articles signed " Censor . " He was not positive as to the success of a new paper , but he thought they ought to attempt it .-Messrs . Mills , Farrer , and Weedon supported the motion .-Mr . Knowles stated that his locality were decidedly opposed to any attempt to undermine the "Northern Star . " They also complained irJS '' ° " eSj in his "Nat * 3 ' " had attempted to show up Air . O Connor under the character of" De Brasidas . "—Mr . Jones distinctl y denied that be meant Mr . O'Connor though some lineaments of Mr . O'Connor might be traced in that character .-The motion was then carried . Mr . Joueb

      then brought forward his programme for establishing a People ' s Paper , " and requested them to approve of it . —Mr . F . Farrah wished the motion to be postponed ; he could only give his own opinion , and not that of his lo-« T ? r " * Weedon raoved « an ( i Mr . Murray seconded , A hat the Council adopt the intended paper as their ? K t tl C" ^ - Fatrah moved ' as an amendment , 1 nat the subject be adjourned until it had been laid before their localiiies /' -Mr . Washington seconded the motion . _ M . Jones explained , that if they passed the amendment it would appear in the eye of the country as a defeat as ind . v . dual members , they could give it their support independent of their locality . After much discussion the motion was carried , and the Council adjourned .

      - n «*? £ \ . S l ° delegale meetin S was held on Sunday last at N « hoir « Temperance Hotel Delegates present from ana H ° u aderSd . rdefl Bi ° ^ ^ eighley Ha . Uax Mid gley After a long and tedious debate the following resolutions were agreed to Resolved 1 st That we have no confidence iq the pie 8 ent executive and consequently cannot render them any support tJt f l * - 5 * artists of great Brittiaa be called apon o give their opinion wether it be advisable to call a Convention to be brld in Manchester on an early day and that each totality send such opinions to the Manchester councill and and the ~ P ^ " ^ " ^ *« 3 rd . That we have no confidence in the Star as an oriran tSSpSS —— *• W .-3 E

      4 th That we pledge ourselves to use our utmost Pn deavour * to raise the means for Mr . Jones to s ? arU papS JL | i * ** . contem Pla « ed conventionusetheir best endea-Sismnp S ° me f * 3 SibIe > n t 0 « i 8 e a fund A J ^ f ^ s&r" * intaet and that we ^ M ^ V ^ l WMm b e sen" ° «> e Star Reynolds We 8 t Riding ¦ Christopher Shaekleton € ec

      Untitled Article

      [ In order to prevent any complaint of mutilation or quibbling , we give the resolutions on . this . aubjeot .. wriafnn etfiferatfm . ' -En . N . S . ] . Delegate Meeting—A meeting of Delegates representing the Chartists of MancheBter-Rochdale-Stockport—Ashton and Stalybridge was held in the Chartist Room Rochdale on Sunday last Mr Sutcliffe Crabtree m the Cbair when the following resolutions were unanimously agreed to and ordered to be sent to the Northern Star 1 st That while we deeply deplore the present position of the Chartist movement we are of , opinion that it is mainly attributable to the dissensions engendered by the yaccillating policy recently advocated on Borne of our Platforms and sanctioned by the approbation of the present Editor of the Northern Star whose leading articles it written for the purpose could not have been more directly at variance with the Fundamental principles of Chartism or more subversive of the best interests of the National Charter Association

      2 nd That while we recognis e the right of the Editor of the Northern Star to repudiate former avowed opinions and to call in question the policy formerly advocated in that Journal we claim for ourselves the right of calmly and dispassionately avowing our firm adherence to pure and unalloyed Ctartum and foroutsetoea and those we represent to unhesitatingly declare that we no longer consider the Northern Star as the exponent of Chartism or recognise it as the organ of the movement 3 That we are of opinion a thoroughly democratic Newspaper ought to be established which will be a faithful reflex of Chartist principles and we pledge ourselves to use all our influence in the Localities to which we respectively belong for the purpose of raising the requisite funds for the establishment of the same

      4 th That in order more effectually to carry out the preceding resolution we reBoWe to reprint the Circular recently issued by Mr Ernest Jones containing a plan with details for bringing to a successful issue so important an undertaking and we hereby authorise . our Secretary to order 4000 Copies to be immediately struck of for gratuitous distribution in the different localities 5 lh That the present Executive composed as it is of men so diversified in opinion on matters so essential to the prosperity of the cause we are compelled to declare it as our conviction that their retirement is necessary to give stability to the movement and we call on the localities we represent and the Chartists generally to immediately furnish means to liquidate the debts due by the Associatiou so that their retirement may be honourable to themselves as wall as heneficlal to the cause ,

      6 That Wm Grocott and E Lewis be appointed to draw up the Local Lecturers plan for South Lancashire Any Locality desirous of being put the plan or requiring the services of the Lecturers to write to Wm Grocott 1 Fairfield Street Manchester . 7 That the next delegate meeting on Sunday 7 th of March 1852 at the Peoples Institute Manchester Chair to be * taken at £ past Ten o ' clock in the forenoon That the Secretary for the West Riding of Yorkshire be requested to correspond with the South Lancashire Secretary as soon as convenient

      8 th That in case of a guarantee being given by the Yorkshire friends that 5 or 6 Localities in the West Riding oi Yorkshire consider it necessary to hold a Delegate Meeting prior to the 7 th of March the South Lancashire Secretary is authorised to . call the Delegates together prior to that time so that delegates from both Counties may meet together H possible in Huddersfield 9 th That the best thanks of the delegates be given to Mr Crabtree for his efficient management of the business of the meeting Wm Grocott Sec to the delegates 1 Fairfield Manchester

      Finsbtjrt Locality . —This locality met on Sunday last Mr Livesay in the chair . Messrs . Butler and Weedon reported for the Metropolitan Delegate council . The following resolutions were adopted . That this locality views with pleasure and delight the idea of a peoples newspaper being formed that should be the fearless and Faithful advocate of Chartism and Democracy in the entire sense , of the word and pledges itself to support it when it should appear That the question of calling a convention be brought before the delegate council That as the usual monthly aggregate meeting has not been held at the usual time we therefore request the Executive to convene a meeting of the membsrs of the National Charter association to be held on Sunday Feb the 15 th at three in the afternoon at the Finsbury Literary and Scientific Institution

      That a meeting be held in the hall on Tuesday March tbe 16 for the purpose of petitioning both houses of Parliament and memoralizing tbe Queen for tbe release of the political Exiles . E J Looms Sub Secretarv

      Untitled Article

      IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT . ( Concluded from our 5 th pace . ) Waller stud that if tbis portion of the earth were rent by a rude shock of the ocean from the continent of Europe it was to be the sacred refuge for mankind . I trust that from that obligation we shall never shrink ; that whilst we disapprove of any attempts made in this country to slinke the established governments of those countries , as long as these exiles and refugees conduct themselves peaceably we shall continue the honorable distinction of this country by receiving indiscriminately into its bosom the victims of revolutions and political convulsions . With those opinions as to our foreign relations , with respect to the advantage we may derive from them , and the obligations they impose upon us , I will conclude what I have got to say to the

      house , not wishing to enter upon the other topics of the Speeoh from the Throne . In complying with tho request of my hon . friend , to give any explanation of the conduct I pursued with respect to the noble lord , it was impossible to give that explanation without in some degree referring to what has taken place in a neighbouring country . But I must again repeat , that in any measure which we may have to submit to the house , it will be our object not to increase the unreasonable panic which has arisen . It is my persuasion that although it is wise to take precautions against contingent exposure and daugev , theve is no reason whatever for supposing that the country was in any immediate danger of hostilities with any other power . There is , in

      fact , at the present time , no dispute between us and any other power on tho Continent or in America . I have the happiness to say that our relations of peace and amity with other nations are most perfect , and I trust they may so continue ; and whilst I deplore the events which have passed en tho contiaent of Europe—events which , I fear , are the certain consequences of the revolution of 1848—I do trust , that with tho high civilisation and the knowledge which is daily thrown in upon us , and with the improved condition of th& times , that rational liberty will at length be fivmly established , and , with religion governing the hearts of men , may produce tho happiness and good of mankind . ( Hear hear . )

      Lord Palmkrston immediately , amidst loud cheers , rose from his place on the front bench below the gangway , and said that he felt it incumbent upon him to make some remarks , lest the house and the country should run away with the idea , that he had abandoned principles which he had ever entertained , and changed opinions which he trusted he should never alter—that he had become , in short , the advocate of military despotism and of the abolition of constitutional government . He concurred in Lord John ' s definition of the relations between the Foreign Minister and the Crown , and in his representation of the usage of office . He had done nothing inconsistent with those relations , nor deviated from that usage . With reference to the Islington deputation , he said : —The noble lord has commented upon an incident which I am ready to admit excited some decree of regret on my part-namely , the interview which took place between me and a certaiu deputation from Firisburv and

      Islington on the subject of the efforts | made by her Majesty ' s government to obtain the release of the Hungarian refugees detained in the Turkish dominions . I was asked by letter to receive a deputation , instructed to express the acknowledgments of a certaiu meeting to me , as a member of the government and the organ of its foreign policy , for the efforts made to obtain the liberation of those refugees . I thought it was my duty , being thus applied to by respectable persons . to receive this deputation from a meeting of her Majesty s subjects . I certainly did not expect , not being so much in the habit of receiving deputations as my noble friend probably is—I did not expect that what passed in conversation with those persons was to appear in a newspaper paragraph next day as an important declaration on the part of her Majesty ' s government , (" Hear , hear , " and a laueh . 1 But

      there was nothms which I said to that deputation which I have not stated in this house and elsewhere , and which has not been publicly known . ( Hear , hear . ) I certainly regret jnat the meeting should have mixed up with their acknowledgments to her Majesty ' s government expressions with respect to foreign sovereigns which it was entirely unfitting ml P i L ? " ir'Vfr ! 011 should have Presentcd t 0 hi «^ fc' ft / f J ba i take ^ - Potion , which I cer tamly might , to see the address previously I might have «» . ra t ? ffi 'SSH r *« . ^ xa ^ j ^ sSffljriwi I will now come to the mu . Hm . 1 .. ?« . „ .:..: " V .- 'S . , ear

      X ± 7 f f iS « Mhe »« biTiJ 5 EJXSS whS ?* T y ° {? J rem 0 Val from ° «~ . The event on tt SSTV *^ " CWP * ha PPened in Paris Amw , a d ° . L Deeembor . On the 3 rd tho French ComrnS ° J' n , l ™ S in tho habit of almost *^ comrnunicatiDg , called on me at my house to inform me of wnat hehad received , and to talk over the events of the preceding day , and I stated conversationally the opinion I entertained of the events which had taken place . That opimen was es-ictly the opinion expressed in the latter part ot the dispatch which the noble lord has read , and the * rench Ambassador , as I am informed , in a private letter communicated tho result of that conversation to his Minisi \ . thafc daT » the 3 rd of December , her Majesty ' s Ambassador at Paris wrote a dispatch to ask what instruc tions he should receive for his guidance in Franco during the interval before the vote of the French on the question SwJi " . K i ^ p 08 ed t 0 ' them ' and Aether in that intorjal lie should infuse in the relations with the French government any greater degree of reserve than uBual I

      Untitled Article

      iookthe opinion of the Cabinet on the question ,, and a draug ht of that opinion was prepared fand sent for her Majesty ' s approbation . Tho answer could onl y be one , in oonsistence with the course we had pursued since the beginning of the events alluded to , and was such as the noblo ' ord had read . Her Majesty s Ambassador was instructed to make no change in his relations with the French government , and to do . nothing that should wea r the appearance of any interference in the internal affairs of France . ( Hear , hear ;) -There was no instruction to communicate ; that dooumentto tho French government ; it simply contained instructions , not , in fact , what the English Ambassador was to do , but what he was to abstain from doing . The noble lord howev er ( the Marquis of florrhanby ) , thought it right to communicate to the French Minister for Foreign Affairs „________

      the substance of that document , accompanying his communication with certain excuses for the delay , which ho a ever did not rest with that noble marquiB , as his dispatch to the English government was dated the 3 rd of December . The French Minister , stated that he had nothing to do with respect to the delay , and the less , indeed , because two days before he had received from the French Ambassador in London a statement which the noble lord ( Lord J . Russell ) has read , viz ., thiit I had entirely approved of what had been done , and : thought the President of the French fully justified . That was a somewhat highly-coloured explanation of tho result ofthe long conversation we held together . Those particular words I never used , and probably the French Ambassador never would have conceived it consistent with the dignity due to his country to ask

      the approval of a Foreign Secretary of State . Consequently , the approval was not given , and was not asked , lie then explained the circumstances attending his conversation with tho French Ambassador on the 3 rd of December on the occasion of the Ambassador ' s calling at his house . He excused' the delay in replying to the letters of tho Prime Minister , which Had arisen from the heavy pressure of business . When he could reply , hehad stated to tho noblo lord that he had merely expressed an opinion to the French Ambassador that there had been for some time such an antagonism between the President and the Assembly that their co-existence had become an impossibility , And that if one or the other were to prevail , it would be hotter that it should bo the President . I said , if the doctrine of the noblo lord were to be established , that the Foreign

      Secretary was to be excluded from expressing on passing events any opinion to a foreign minister , except in the capacity of the organ of a previously concerted cabinet , there would bo an end of all that easy and familiar intercourse which led so greatly to the maintenance of good understandings and the fascilitating of public business . ( Hear , hear . ) To this . my noble friend replied that my letter gave him no other course than to advise her Majesty to name a successor to Hie . Now , sir , I humbly think that my conduct 18 rigUt , &ud tlut f , tae doctvine of my noble friend ii wrong ; because it is obvious that if a Secretary of State was not to be allowed , in easy and frank conversation with a foreign minister , to express an opinion upon foreign events—expressing them not as the organ of the government , but as the opinion which ho may have formed atthn

      moment—there would bo such a restriction aa would be exceedingly inconvenient and prejudicial to the public service . ( Hear , hear . ) I expressed this opinion to the French Ambassador on the morning of the 3 rd of December—and wob I the only member of the Cabinet who had an opinion on the event ? Why , sir , I am informed , and believe , that on the evening of that very same day , and under the very same roof , the noble lord at the head of her Majesty ' s government did , in conversation with that same Ambassador , express his opinion also . ( Laughter and cheers . ) I cannot tell what that opinion was , but I think from what has fallen from thatnoblelord in the course of the evening ' s discussion , it may be assumed that that opinion was not yery far different from even the reported opinion of mine . Well , w&a that all ? In the noble lord ' s own house , I have been informed

      that the French Ambassador met the noble lord , the President of the Council , and the Chancellor of the Exchequer , and that the noble lord again expressed an opinion , that the President of the Council expressed an opinion , and that the Chancellor of the Exchequer expressed an opinion . ( Hear , hear . ) Be it remembered that the charge against me was not the naturo of the opinion . The noble lord distinctly said , you mistake the question between us—it is not whether the President was justified , but whether you were justified in expressing an opinion on the matter at all . ( Cheers . ) I believe that the noble . lord the Secretary for the Colonies did also in the course of theBe few days express an opinion on these events . I am informed , also , that the noble lord , then Viue-President of the Board

      of Trade , and now Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs , did also express an opinion upon these events . Well , then , sir , it follows that every member of the cabinet , whatever his peouliar vocation may be , ii at liberty to express his opinion upon passing events but tho Secretary of State , whose peculiar duty it is to watch thes e matters , who is unfit for his office if he has notan opinion —( Cheers . )—is the only man who is not to . express his opinion ; and when the French Minister : comes to tell him a piece of news , he is to remain speechless , like a gaping dolt of an eastern paoha . ( Laughter and cheers . ) I am told it was not your conversation with Count Waleweki , it was your dispatch to Lord Normanby . No one would lay it down stronger than I do that a Secretory of State who sends out instructions without having ascertained that thevare anm-oved ofbv thn

      Prime Minister , isguilty of a breach of duty . But there may be cases in which , he may know perfectly well that he is only expressing the opinion of government , and that inoonvenience might arise from delay . Many cases have arisen in which a careful observance of that rule on my part has been attended with some inconvenience of that sovt , and has exposed me to the imputation of neglect and delay in answering dispatches . But what was the dispatch from Lord Hormanby , and what > as my answer ? There is nothing in that dispatch inconsistent with the instructions not to interfere in the internal affairs of France . But what does he report in that very dispatch as having done what the noble lord read just now ? Why , that ha- ing made that communication to M . Turgot , having just received instruc . tiona to avoid anything that could wear tbe appearance ui

      juwnerence wnn the internal affairs of France , he proceeded forthwith to tell M . Turgot he was quite sure that if her Majesty ' s government had known the events in France on Thursday and Friday , they would have joined with him in congratulating the governmentof France on those events . Why , it appears tome a greater inteference with the internal attairs of the French nation tban any opinion that I could * u- v < . , P res 8 ed in conversation with Count VValewski . I thmK it was a very unfair misrepresentation of the faots of thecase to assert that in answering the question of Lord Normanbyl was giving him an instruction on any important matter . It was no instruction . I said it was my opinion , lhat opinion might be wrong ; but whether right or wrong it was shared in by many . Therefore , 1 must say , that the charge the noble lord has hroupht mrsinak me aa tn

      thedispatch . isacharge that has no foundation in justice . X do not pretend to dispute the right ofthe noble lord to remove any member of the government whom he may think it better to remove than tocontinue . With regard to myself , the noble lord has done me justice by saying that the course of foreign policy of which I wasjthe organ received the con-Btant approbation and support of the rest of the government , I think that course of foreign policy was the proper one for this country to pursue . I always thought that it was the duty of the government of this country to make the interest of England tbe pole star to guide their course . I always felt that it was my duty to be , as the noble lord described me in the year 1850 , neither the Minister of Austria , nor of

      Russia , nor of Prussia , but the Minister of England . ( Cheers . ) " Firebrand of revolution , " as hehad been called , he had succeeded in removing many embarrassments—he had succeeded in wiping off the bitter recollections of two centuries between Germany and Denmark-he left this country in per . feet amity with France , Spain , and Russia—with a more cordial understanding than ever with the "United States-our claim upon the South American States in train of adjustment -Brazil co-operating in the suppression of slavery , an object we had sought , "Notfor fame but virtue ' s hotter end . " Austria is , perhaps , the only power with which our relations have not been as cordial as in former years ; but as far as outward appearance and diplomatic intercourse go , we are on friendly terms . For many years there has been a great difference of opinion ' . between the English and Austrian mvp . ™

      ments . England has supported the diffusion of constitutional governments—Austria , on the contrary , has p referred the despotic system , and therefore in Portugal and in Spain , and in Sicily , ana in the north of Italy , the two governments were at variance—at variance , I mean , in their objects and views . Uiey were at variance with reference to the Hungarian question , and also with regard to the refugees that had taken refuge in the Turkish dominions . But that was no reason Why we should not co-operate in any matter in which our interests agreed . Two countries could not be on more oppositei tacks than England and Austria were in 1835 , 1836 and 1837 , but thab did not prevent the countries from co-operating most earnestly together in 1840 and 1841 , when they found that their objects were the same : and therefore whatever relation of an unfriendly kind with that country mav existnow that relation will be sure to subside , and 1 am juatibed , therefore , in including Austria as one ofthe countries with whom our relations are satisfactory , and those « f fr \™ A .

      SSLti , T- T-, . thcn - 8 ir < 1 *»* that ^ vi « Vc ¦ ; . ? ^' , th « country through periods of very Sl n ? ° 'S CUlty > - tt wa 8 ^ 8 ° fort ™ * be ^ instrument for the maintenance of peace , and that in the fi , ? i inte " a"ce ? P e ( ic f . anil-in the assertion , notunsuccess-A ' i 'nte r re ? ts of E"g | and . I Hunk I may say that in quitting office I have handed the foreign relations of the country to mysuccessor , leaving the honour and dignity of England sustained , and leaving her character and reputation sanding high among the nations of the earth . ( Loud cheers . ) ' v The subsequent speeches were of vory minor interest Mr . Muntz defended tho manufacturers who had entertainea Kossutli from some remarks made by the mover of the Address . . . . m . ^ B S ™ ° SW C 0 m 6 10 no o ^ er conclusion than that fer ° S ? . i W J % Secretary had been offered upas a sacrifice for the sins of the whole Administration us 5 rpatfon defended Louis Na P <> leon from the charge of

      JS&dMffi f ^ f ^ ^ BometMng behind the . X t ^ t ^^^^ resto ! concl « sion , not conducive to British inte-Mr . B . Osbobne deemed the removal of the late Foreign i lary m great natio . nal lo . S "nt he could not Sj EhSJT * hlch h 0 had Bpoken of the tran "

      Untitled Article

      vr * $£ * Mr . Roebuck contended that the governmo ^ T ? jSi priTed of its right arm in tho loss of Lord p 3 m £ 2 > $ nothing left in it to entitle it to ask forthe confiS * < Sf the house . Tho hon . gentleman referred to themSS " ! M ment m the Admiralty , in the colonies , and otS > M ments of the administration , in order to establish hl Part ' $$ doubt the want of capacity in those who presided * " III uUGnii ' ¦ ; .. ¦ . ' " rfij ^{ J ^ Si Mr . Disraeii treated the reasons assigned for ii , $$ P moval of Lord Palmerston as unsatisfactory . He ha < U re' W severed the policy of that noble lord , which he tWk a l % nicious one , from that of the Cabinet . Was it ihol Pet % % ' sent policy ? If so , he would rather it should be adm- - e" $ < tered by the late Secretary , whom all recognised a 8 T ^ ' fi man , than by any oilier person . He complained of { Zr % quent , unnecessary , and unusual introduction of her < » » - ' jesty ' s name into the explanation of Lord J . Russell , BLij l # t he relieved himself of a responsibility which he should k y ; Vj been the first to adopt . Having expressed his dhaatiiSS * W < of the programme of the session , he drew attention to a ' $ promised Reform Bill , and said :-Without expresMnp IT W opinion on the necessity or non-necessity of what is Lli I '& Parliamentary Reform , or of any « degree or kind of S !* & mentary Reform , I am bound to say that I cannot anS' " % the statement that this appears a " fitting time" for tliefn l < ^ l ?" / i ? t , ^ 8 tion- . (^ ar . heaf . ) Itttay bP ' : & \ wiiiuu minister

      ™ , a may thinlt necessary at a fittinc tirauV W bring forward ; but when he asks the house to moS k statement that this is not only a « fitting time " for ¦ JJ ¦ * % dering such a subject as the reconstruction of this house w % a fitting time for '' calmly" considering the subject , it ii ;„ ft possible not to stop at expressions which I think 80 iZ' & posite , and not to ask the house at least to pause before th " $ allow such expressions to pass unchallenged . From au t - >> hate heard to-night-when the continent is in amoitiii . # 1 turbed state , when the noble lord himself told us the wu m aspect of circumstances relating to the nature and exen-: H of the franchise in foreign countries had clearly cha 2 P within the . last few years , disappointing and confound ! , m the expectations of all men at a momnet when expetienn m had failed us and experiment distracted us-though it n , ! P be necessary to consider the question of Parliament ^ H Reform , I cannot admit that this is a fitting moment f 2 . W the calm consideration of the question . ( Hear , hear ) Z H might be so if there were an irresistible demand in the com P munity for measures on the subject , but no one contendpi 11 that there existed that circumstance . I will BiYennn . fi I ?

      nion on that subject to-night . I will listen with atten I tion , and of course with interest , to the noblo lord if C % ¦ favours the house and the country with the reasons whic w [ f I have convinced him that the immortal measure he not onlv i i introduced but devised in 1830 has failed of the objects he * i then thought it would accomplish . I will listen with at- A tention to the noble lord when he lays down the princi ples i on which he thinks , after twenty years' experience , a neff ? - ; Reform Bill ought to be establiseed , and explains how all M those anomalies of representation of which we are all sen . A siblo may be removed , many of which , it may be remarked . 4 i

      render our system of representation as practical as we find % it to be . I believo I may say there is no gentleman on this I side ofthe house who is not ready to consider any change ¦¦ % that may be proposed , to supply any well-proved deficiency $ in our representation ; and I would . say even more , for my pi friends as well as myself—that there is no one who insists 1 that the . increase of the franchise is tbe same as the in . ® crease of democratic power . I will consider the proposition § of the minister entirely without prejudice . I wil ) , with f $ interest , watch the Whig critic of the Whig law . The nobfe ^ lord could hardly expect , on the other side , any supers ^ . f 5 tious feeling in favour ofthe Reform Law . . People said-, ft "It is anew Magna Charter . You cannot trust the men | g who opposed it . " My answer will he the speech of the -H

      noble author . While I express tHe most sincere desire to ¦ : % receive without prejudice any proposition tlie noble lord - may bring forward , I must at the same time express those f sentiments to which I gave utterance last year , that if I find & under ' the name and guise of a Reform Bill , only a recon- & struotion of tbis house which is in favour of the predomi . V ;; , nance of some political party , which , without that change , f ' cannot govern thiscountry , I . will oppose , and I believe the \? whole country will oppose , a device of that kind . If , also , f I were . tomeet a measure tho object of which was to d * . : stroy or even disturb that just and salutary balance whichf I now subsists between tho various classes of tbe country—i % I saw a measure to destroy tbe legitimate and salutary in . § fluenoe of landed property in this country , the surest te- i

      curity both of the prerogatives of the Crown and of the I liberties of the people —( hear , hear)—the fear of no imputa- 1 tion of being an anti-Reformer would .. prevent me from I giving such a bill my determined opposition . He noticed a I : strange omission in the Spcech . Last year tho country had p been agitated by the aggression of the Pope , and Lord John W Russell had denounced it as part of an organised conspiracy ! J against the liberties of Europe . What had been the fateof $ the bill introduced in order to repel that aggression ? De- ? S fiance in Ireland and disobedience in England . Our home Ij and foreign relations were alike gloomy . 1 see our best in- v tGrests depressed , our merchant ^ bankrupt , and secret so « t cieties of amalgamated mechanics springing up ; and vrhat ,. V 1 ask , should we do if our position became one of warlike S and perilous isolation from the political or religious senti . ments of all the nationalities of Europe ? Nothing could 3

      persuade me that a political system can be sound which has j ? resulted in circumstances so menacing and ruinous . The ¦ $ noble lord is about to reconstruct our Constitution . May $ he be more fortunate than he was in his first enterprise , Twenty years of Reform have left the country in this cir- $ cumstance , which no statesman can pass unnoticed—an in « " % !? war of mterests—a total want of sympathy between I the different classes of the country . Tho noble lord will be a greater statesman than even I give him credit for , if , on £ tneath of this month , he proposes a measure which will I put an end to a position which I believe to be most perilous I ( Cheers . ) v % After a short speech from Mr . Granthan , * Lord J . Russell offered some explanatory remarks on 1 ; various points ; the Address was agreed to , and the house adjourned at half-past twelve .

      tt ™™ « WEDNESDAY , Feb . 4 . HOCJSE OF COMMONS .-The house safc for about two hours and a half , chiefly eccupied with the consideration of the sessional orderB . Mr . Hume moved that no moneyvotes should be taken after twelve o ' clock at night , which was negatived by a majority of eighty-two . The same hon . member complained of the beat and the bad ventilation of the new house , and sundry other small complaiuts filled up the short sitting . tTATTcr . „„ " THURSDAY , Feb 5 . HOUSE OF LOItDS . -On the motion for inserting her Majesty ' s ' most gracious repl y to their lordships' address upon the journals , the Duke of Wellington defended the conduct of Sir Harry Smith m lus government of the Cape . Tho answer to her Majesty was men ordered to be inserted on the journals . The Lord Chancellor laid , upon the table a bill for the improvement of the general administration of the law . Tbehouse soon after adjourned . HOUSE OF COMMONS . —The house sat for a short time , but the business before it was entirely of a routine character .

      Untitled Article

      CORN . Mark-iane , Monday , Feb . 2 . —The show of wheat from tbe farmers was moderate this raorninp , but its condition generally beinj much affected by the weather , the sale was slow at last Monday ' s prices , excepting the finest dry samples , which were fully as dear , lne . demand for foreign wheat was less active , butholders would not submit to any reduction in price . Flour firm , at full prices . Barley wanted , and fine malting samples Is per qr . clearer . Beans ready sale . Peas , t oth grey and white , Is higher : The supply of oats was short by vessels but there being some quantity by railway sellers could not get move money .

      CATTLE . Sjuthfield , Monday , Feb . 2 .-The show of foreign stock in totiays market was very moderate , both as to number and quality ; but the supply of beasts derived from our own grazing districts , as well as from Scotland , was seasonably large , whilst its ceneral concition was good . The weather being extremely wet , and Negate ana Leadenhall extensively supplied with meat killed in t'e pro . yii ces , the beef tvado was in a very sluggish state , at a decline in the pviees ob'amed on Monday last of M per Slbs . The top 6 ^ te tor the best Scots was 3 s 8 d per Slbs . Notwithstanding tliat ive iiave to report a further decline in the number of sheep , the demand tor that description of stock was far from active ; nevertheless , a lair clearance was effected at last week ' s currency . The highest quotation for the best old I owns was 4 s id per Slbs . About i , W ' sheep were out of the wool . The supnly of calves was unusual * small ; neveriIn-less , the veal trade ruled heavy , at barely stationary prices . In pigs , the show of which was but moderate , very little Business was trans-acted , at late rates . Beef 2 s U to 3 s Sd ; Mutton 2 s 10 s to 4 s 4 d ; Veal 2 s lOdfcofful ' k 2 S Ga t 0 3 S 1 Oil " Price por stoae of 81 bs % ( siukl "

      tewaATE and Leadexiuh , Mabkets , Monday , February 2 . -Smce our last these markets have been very moderately suppli **' ?" meat killed 111 London , buttLe arrivals from various parts of IW country have been large-upwards of 1 G , Q (! O carcases . Prime b «| ana mutton aro m moderate request , at lull prices . In other lamb ot meat only a limited business Jsdoinc at barely late rates . A Jew baskets of beef have arrived from the Continent .

      PROVISIONS . London , Monday—The transactions in Irish butter since on' 1 » 5 | nave been full and limited in quantity ; prices for the mostp nominal . The best Dutch met buyers at a further advance ot - ' s W is per cwt . Bacon was held with firmness , and for extreme rates , i but the demand was not quite so keen , llams slightly more m «• quest . lard in steady sale . kttfsusH Uuitib MAKKiT . Fe'brunry 2 . —Our trade continues »* very bad state ; In the absence of new milk butter in Dorset , *«• nave really nothing doing in the article . The old stock of » ' must turn to a very bad account .

      BREAD . The prices of wheaten bread in the metropolis are from 6-W . 7 a . ; ot household ditto , 5 d . to Gd , per 41 bs . louf . COTTON . ?^ nml , ' Fe > 4-The sales of cotton to-day were estiui ^ at 8 , 000 bales , of which exporters have taken 1 , 500 , and , fPeSs tors , 500 bales . They consist chiefly of 6 , 000 American , aud mcW" ; o 00 hgypt . au at ojd . tofijd . ; 1 , 000 Surnt , atSQ . to 44 ; f " ^ -nnn l V ' & 14 d- t 0 la * d - The "" Ports since Thursda ] , « £ 3 p , 000 bales . The market closed tamely , with prices of Americnominally the same , but a shade easier , to ' buy . AH other so " little effected . IlIDES . ,. . ^» pm — MarkctIlide 8 > SGlb . toGUb ., Hd . toli * PffJ ? : ditto , Wlb . to 721 b ., ljd . to 2 d ; ditto , 721 b . VsOlb ., 2 d . to ¦; d !« o-801 u . to SSlb ., 2 $ I to 3 d . ditto 331 b . to « ttlb ., ** W * Wdit . to 9 Clb .-to 1041 b ., 3 Jd .-to 0 , 1 . ; ditto , 1041 b . to 1121 b ., Id to ^ ' UUl-skins , each , Is . 0 a . to 3 s Od .: horse-hides 5 s . to 0 s .

      COALS . Monday , Jan . 26 . —A very heavy market , with a general «« "J tum .-Stewavt ' s 17 s Ofl-Braddyll ' s , 17 s 0 d- KcUoes i « Wylam's 15 s Od—Hartley ' s 13 s Gil-Durham 15 s Cd—Fre = " rivals , 181—left from last day 21—total 19- ' .

      Untitled Article

      parish of St . Anne , Westminster , ntthe 1 ' rinnn- . office , Wi . Wiudmfll . Btre ? t , Haymarlset , in the City of Westminster « Proprietor , FE ARGUS O'CON SOU , Esq ., JU \ , « nd P " l ai-J by the said William Rider , nt the office in the same s ;« w arish ,- Saturday , February 7 th , 1 S& 2 .

      Fjtt&It'c Amusements.

      fJtt&It ' c amusements .

      ©Fiartiat Ftrteiltgeiwfc

      © fiartiat ftrteiltgeiwfc

      Julftvfcte, &T,

      JUlftvfcte , &t ,

      Untitled Article

      —^ - ' 5 * --U ^ ^^^" T*—*^———i * Mw— ^^ . ^ 4 8 THE NORTHERN STAR . February 7 , lSfto ,

      "» ¦ ¦ - —-^^ Printed Bv William Kider. Nf\N. S. ¦Viimlrffitld-Suw. •" '„.

      " » ¦ ¦ - — - ^^ Printed bv WILLIAM kider . nf \ n . s . ¦ ViiMlrffitld-suw . •" '„ .

  • Citation
    • Northern Star (1837-1852), Feb. 7, 1852, page 8, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/ns/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1664/page/8/