On this page
- Departments (4)
-
Text (13)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
*m Bxav&mj # t*
-
Untitled Article
-
©fj? m\ntt.
-
Untitled Article
-
in the ~- ^^ ¦ "¦'-- - —- - -¦ ¦. -¦ . ¦ "•", ¦ '--— ~^ P ointed by WILilAM KVJEVL, ofNo. 5. Hncclesfield-sti ee:
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
of civil and religious liberty now acknowledged by the constitution , arguing that if those principles ¦ were infringed , they \» ere far more so by the attempted usurpation of the Pope than by the protective measure indicated by the Government . doinmcBting wpou various arguments adduced by preceding speaker , the hon , member observed upon the practical anomalies that must alwayi arise when ifco policy of a government was anti-Protestant aad their legislation anti-Catholic . Such was the Inconsistency shown by the existing ministry , as testified by their use of patronage , especially in . the legal promotions in Ireland , by their recognition of episcopal titles and influence , and their submission of legislative acts to the authority of the Pope . He wished to have our policy rendered consistent and constitutional , and the papacy instructed that \ re were competent to mauasre our own affairs . YChecrs . y
Mr . Keogh animadverted with much seventy upon the speech of . Mr . Xapier , whose new-born ardour for civil and religions liberty and the act of 1829 he contracted with his connexion with tie Brunswick Club in Ireland , the avowed object of -which was to set the leg islature sit defiance if it emancipated the Rowan Catholics , and with his opposition to the system of mixt-d education . lie disputed various alleipitions of that gentleman resetting the proportions of Protcstania md Catholics
appointed to office in that country , in support of his argument that Protestantism was , a positive disqualification . With respect to the measure in question , he opposed it because he disputed every one of the wounds "P »» which it was based , lie dented that the Queen ' s prerogative had been interfered with , that there was an assumption of territonil power , or that an insult had been offered to the Sovereign on her subjects . There was nothing in the common or statute law to prevent the creation of sees , or that made the act of the
Fope an invasion of the prerogative . That act was no assumption of territoral power , at least "beyond what was sanctioned by precedents , several of which he cited ; and he complained that the government , for a series of years , had been leading the See of Rome to believe that the act would be aticepUble . With regard to the details of the measure , he asked the noble lord whether he had considered maturely the effect of the bill in Ireland , the practical working of which would Ik ? , he briieved , to siop the ecclesiastical functions there . Was he prepared to rouse the fell spirit of religious hate ? Did he intend to execute the
law , and to prosecute the Roman Catholic prelates of that country before an Irish jury ? ( Cheers . ) Mr . C . Asstet argued against the propriety of extending tte provisions of the bill to Ireland , dilating upon the different condition of the respec * tive religions in England and Ireland , and contending that " repressive m « asures , which , were politic in ouo , would be wholly inappropriate in the other . ( Hear , hear . ) lie announced that at the fitting stage ho should aiove a clause , restricting the operation of the bill to this side of the channel , and endeavour so to improve its clauses , as to ensure protection to the liberties of Roman Catholics in general . The moment that Mr . Anstey sat down , much
amusement was excited at the eagerness displayed by hon . members to apeak , nearly twenty starting up in ail parts of the house . The Speaker ' s eye was , however , caught by Mr . Spooser , who wished that leave might be at once given for the introduction of the bill , that they might koow what they were debating . He meanwhile encouraged Lord J . ltusseil to persevere , and to throw himself , if necessary , upon the couutry to support him in protecting the Protestant constitution of these realms . Mr . A . J . B . Hope thought the bill had been dictated by mistaken bigotry , and was an unfair and ex post facto law .
Colonel Thompson said , if the Roman Catholics had conducted themselves with the same wisdom as the Wesleyans , they would not have been molested ; tut there liai beeu aa aggression on their part , and though he repelled the cbarge of bigotry and fanaticism , he should have been glad if the bill had proceeded further in the way of penalty than it did . ( Cheers . ) Mr . Home was surprised at such a declaration , breathing persecution , from one who had been a friend ofcivil and religions liberty . ( Hear , hear . } Be deplored the measure , though he wished the bill had been laid upon the table , for , from the explanation given by the Attorney-General , it ap « pearcd that it would be a different measure from that proposed by the First Minister , whom he accused of obeying a " "Xo Popery " cry , and making a retrograde movement that would replunge Ireland into anarchy . ( Cheers . )
Mr . A . Oswaw believed the Pope ' s act to have been purely a spiritual one , and declared that the free Church of Scotland had done what had bceu attempted by the Pontiff . He remarked to Lord John Russell that there were those on the Liberal side of the hou < e who were quite ready to go over to the ether , and if his 1- rdship persevered in giving i ^ rcong interpretation to the supremacy of the Crown . Le might find hinuelf ia presence of a formidable opposition . Lord J . Russell , in reply , said that the act against which this bill was directed was contrary to the public law of every country in Europe . In answer to the excuse that the conduct of government had misled the Court of Rome , he reminded
the House that after Lord Miiito had left Rome , be ( Lord J . Russell ) bad distinctly declared in that House that government would not give its consent to the establishment of Roman Catholic sees in this country . ( Cheers . ) It was evident , therefore , that this measure wai adopted by the court of Rome in opposition to the government of this country . And ia reply to the allegation that the measure was inconsistent with his former declarations , his lordship was not about to say that it was not so , or that his former declarations did not amount to this , that it was puerile to fear any thing from the pretensions of the Pope to create English bishops or archbishops . But whatever confidence he mi"ht have had in resnect to the Roman Catholic
eecleesiastics , or the Pope , he had found was misplaced , and he plainly avowed that he was mistaken upon this point . ( Cheers . ) He had trusted too much In the forbearance and respect for the Sovereign , evinced by tUe Roman Catholics . Defending , at some length , his own conduct ia reference to the Catholics of these kingdoms he declared that he would not be frightened by the word " persecution" from asserting the due authority of the Crown and the independence of the government , and he reiterated that the recent Papal step was an insult to the conntry . ( Loud cheers . ) lie thought that we ought to have a parliamentary declaration to free U 3 from the stigma and the shame of having submitted to have our country parcelled out a 8 if it were conquered and submissive . ( Cheers . )
At the close of the noble lord ' s speech the house was crowded , and a division momentarily expected , 6 o ' clock being but a few minutes' distance . Mr . Moore , Mr . Fagas , and Mr . Lawless , however , interposed some observations , and the last-named member continued to speak until the hour arrived , and the Speaker left the chair without putting the question . THURSDAY , Februaby 13 . HOUSE OF LORDS . —The house sat for half an hour , when Lord Staslct gave notice , on belialf of Lord Malmesbury , that on Tuesday next he would bring forward a motion upon the state of the country HOUSE OF COMMOXS .-On the motion of iord J . Russell , the Budget statement was postponed till Monday .
Agriccxtubal Distress —This adjourned debate on Mr . Disraeli ' s motion was resumed by the Marquis of Gkasbt , and , after speeches had ' been delivered by several leading members on both sides , the house divided , when there appeared—For the motion 267 Against 2 S 1-14
The house adjourned at a quarter-past two . [ Through press of matter , we are compelled to abridge the discussion on the subject . —Ed . N . S . ] ( From our Third Edition of latluieel . ) FRIDAY , Feb . 7 . HOUSE OF LORDS . —On the motion of Lord Brougham , leave was given to bring in a bill extending the jurisdiction of the County Courts , so as to include cases of bankruptcy . The bill was read a first time . After some further business , their lordsuips ad « journed at half-past six o ' clock .
HOUSE OF COMMOXS—PapaiAggressios .-Lord J . RossEii moved for leave to bring in a bill ** to prevent the assumption of certain Ecclesiastical Titles , in respect of places in the United Kingdom . Having glanced at the recent act of the i ^ . In this country , Lord John explained that hZ «« b con * lnSency first arose , the opinion of the kw officers of the Crown was taken , to the effect bTj ^ pfrT * ' ° aofthe P Ia t ! *»««* coald not MroductiS * r ^ cbed ; and that . th 0 ° Sh the ZS ?? ' * * ' apostolic fell under the
ssssssSl plans , modelled upon the nractiL « f ?? tries , had been proposed foKSSit ? &T ° T enact that no bull or writEfi i ft Was f t 0 nature prejudicial to the TnSom SA * allowed to enter it ; another to SfertSLS writings to the scrutiny of some rivU LfhoSI without whose sanction thev could not o 2 l n 7 | rency . After briefly detailingthe 1 n «™ ^ ¦ that might result from ^^ "JETS toe
-wese pians noble lord referred to the ¦ Mncipb . laId down when the Emancipation -Adtwas passed , and accepted then by the Roman Catho' -ic Clergy , that no titles should be ~ S iff the-hierarchy- of that church , tar ing anyS : pect of rivalry w th the Protest rot establishment fbi ^ urincjpleit waa now designed to carry out . "
Untitled Article
For this purpose to protect the Catholic laity . from , aggression , and to guard against the absorption of endowments , the measures he desigaed to introduce would forbid the assumption by-Roman Catholics . ot any titles taken from , any territory or place ' within anypart of the United Kingdom , and would contain clauses rendering void any acts done by any parties under those titles , and annulling any , bequest made * to them , which should at once fall into . the power of the Crown , to administer according "to its discretion . This measure , he contended , would repel the offered iusult , and secure the independence of the kingdom . It was his hone that the Pppe would prudently accept the intimation and
withdraw his claim . But u angry councils should pre vail at the Vatican , an arduous struggle might ensue , throughout which , for his own part , the conduct he should pursue would be id accordance with the principles he had always advocated , embodying the desire for perfect liberty of conscience with the most jealous repugnance to any interference of ecclesiastics with the temporal supremacy of the crown . The noble lord concluded by a brief vindication of his consistency as a veteran champion of religious toleration . Mr . UoEBGCK contrasted the vast premises laid down by Lord John Russell , alleging invasion and insult , with the insignificance of the measure he had founded on them .
Mr . J . O'Coxxell acknowledged the temperate character of the ministerial proposition , and felt himself able to support the measure , though he believed it would prove inefficient and paltry . Mr . H . Drummoxd , though no Catholic , rejoiced that a church existed which still , in matters ' of faith , presented a bulwark against the advances of infidelity and latitudinarianism , Air . E . B . Roche looked upon the bill aud the speech of the prime minister as essentially mischievous , and inspired with the evil spirit of bigotry . Mr . Moore argued at much length against the ri « ut of the State to interfere in matters of
opinion . . Mr . BftiGnx commented upon the inconsistence between the tenor of Lord John Russell's letter where the progress of high church principles was set forth as the most threatening danger , and his conduct in omitting all . mention of that danger in the royal speech , and proposing a trivial measure iu which it was not touched . But he believed that this would be but the beginning of measures , if the precedent of interference were once established . He contrasted the minister's declaration
against the interference of ecclesiastics in temporal affairs with the vast secular powers , numerous dignities , and privileges enjoyed by tho prelates and clergy of the established church , and the political union they maintained with the civil governors . For ages the church had existed as a political machine , and tbe opponent of all legisla tive reforms . Unfortunately zeal had entered its ranks ; it was rent by bitter schisms , and kept to * gether only in name by the possessions to which it held a parliamentary title .
Mr . Disraeli announced his intention of voting for the measure , which , however , he declared would utterly disappoint the country , and proceeded to dilate upon the ministerial letter , the : official synods , the solemn deputatioiis , the innumerable gatherings , and universal excitement which had led up to the anti-climax of a paltry bill , providing a remedy purely technical , and doing nothing more than prohibiting a few ecclesiastics" from assuming a few titles . Sir R . H . Ixglis entered into a warm defence of the Established Church , against the bill of indict ment which he said had been preferred by Mr . Bright . On the motion of Mr . Reynolds , the debate was then adjourned .
Untitled Article
mi -. ; ABOLITION OF THE WINDOW TAX . A public meeting of the inhabitants of Westminster was held on "Wednesday in Drury-lane Theatre , to consider the proposal for the unconditional repeal of the window tax . Viscount Duncan , M . P ., presided . There was a very numerous attendance . Amongst the gentlemen present were Lord Dudley Stuart , M . P ., General Sir De Lacy Evans , M . P ., Sir B . Hall ., Mr . Charles Lushington , M . P ., Mr . Wakley , M . P ., Mr . J . Williams , M . P ., Mr . William Williams . M . P ., Mr . Mowatt , M . P ., &c .
Lord Duxcas said he would not waste the time of the meeting by a reiteration of those arguments which he had for six years been in the habit of annually bringing forward in the House of Commons , nc had again this yeav put his motion upon- the paper of the House of Commons , aud unless previously the Chancellor of the Exchequer should have risen in hi 3 place , and should have taken up his ( Lord Duncan ' s ) arguments , he should again urge upon the house , on Thursday next , the necessity of granting a total and unconditional repeal of this tax . ( Hear , Lear . ) It was nearly carried last year , aud this yew , perhaps , it would he entirely carried . 'When he first brought forward tha motion he was told that he was an
impracticable man , seeking an impossibility . ( Laughter . ) But now he was told that the repeal of the window tax was not only a possibility but a probability . ( Cheers . ) They had fought the battle in the time of adversity , aud they must not be run away with in the day of prosperity , or consider that the t ; ix was repealed until the Chancellor of the Exchequer had said so in Parliament . Last week he ( the chairman ) went with a deputation to the Chancellor of the Exchequer , and asked him whether he was willing to agree to the repeal of the window tax . The Chancellor said very little ; and he trusted that in this case his silence might bo interpretatcd as consent . ( Cheers . ) It had been whispered ( he did not know on what authority ) that when other
parties had asked the same question , it had been answered in Downingstreet , "Why , do you wish a house tax ?" They wanted nothing of the kind ; but they wanted the total and unconditional repeal of the most obnoxious tax that had ever been raised in this country . ( Cheers . ) In Westminster the people had always been alive to this subject . In 1797 , the constituents of Westminster sent down Mr . Fox to oppose the Tri ple Assessment Aet ; in latter days they must all have read with pleasure the speeches which Sir J . C . Hobhouse , as representative of this city , made against the window tax ; and in later times he had seen with pride General Evans always ready to second bis motion when he broughtit forward in Parliament . ^ Cheers . )
There was no need , therefore , to give them a historv of the window tax . In the time of George III . some Chancellor of the Exchequer discovered that a commutation of the unpopular hearth tax was necessary , and he changed it into a house tax and a window duty . It had often subsequently been tinkered , but every succeeding modification had made it worse than it was before . There was now in the Exchequer a surplus of two millions and a half . This tax amounted only to £ 1 , 700 , 000 , and he thought it was now the duty of the government , in a time of peace , to endeavour to do without this obnoxiouB impost . What had placed them in this happy situation with a surplus revenue ? Was is not those Free Trade measures , of which they had heard much
so . ( Cheers and hisses . ) We had a Free Trade government supporting Free Trade principles , and therefore the people had ari « ht to demand at their hands free-trade in light and air ( Loud cheers . ) This demand they would make arid he hoped the day was not far distant when every i-mrlishninn might , if he was so minded , be able to raise a crystal palace for himself . ( Cheers . ) Mr . W . Geesi . v , churchwarden of St . James ' s proposed the following resolution : — " That the window duty is a tax upon light and air ; that it is unequal , unjust , and detrimental to health and comfort ; that it is opposed to sanitary reform and architectural improvements ; and that ifc is a mode of levying taxation that never ought to have been adopted , and in the opinion of this meeting should
no longer continue . " The speaker at some leneth endeavoured to prove the inequality of the taxation , showing that some ot the larger houses onlv paid from 1 $ to 2 J per cent , upon the rental , while the houses of the working classes paid from thirty to forty per cent . 3 fot only in a monetary point of view was it unjust , but it did vast injury to the health and morals of the lower classes , by compelling them to live in houses which were defectively supplied with light and air . This caused an additional tax upon the country ; for when , in consequence of living in those filttty uafeAons , a . waking man fell isi , his wife was compelled to go to the parish and obtain out-door relief . Mr . George , churchwarden of St . Ann ' s , seconded the motion , and announced bis intention to resist the payment of the tax in future
Sir Be Lict Evass , M . P ., supported the resolution , stating that he had given his support to a similar measure for seventeen years ; but he trusted that within forty-eight hours they would hear that agitation upon the subject was no lonjer-necessary —that thetax was already extinct . ( Cheers . ) The imposition of a house-tax was talked of ; but he could only say that if that was attempted by government , thev would more than lose any good opinion they might have gained by the abrogation of the window duty . ( Hear , hear ) Mr . ' -LusmxGTOx , M . P ., said that : bis colleague
and himself had been called upon to stop the supplies if tbe window-tax were not abolished ; and both of them had agreed to obstruct every financial arrangement till it wa 3 repealed . That , however , would not be necessary , for he could almost pledge his existence that Friday night would see the Chancellor announce that the tax had been abolished . ( Cheers . ) Lord D . Siuaht , M . P ., agreed in the opinion that the Chancellor of the Eschequercould not tor a moment think of retaining this odious impost , lbey would have repeal , but would it be unconditional ? ife feared that some attempt would he Mt ^ l £ W ? ltbyanotuer tax / That must not be submitted to ; and even though tho finances
Untitled Article
were not in such a favourable state asihey were at the presentmomerit , ha ' would / . fitiUjdemand the total and unconditional repeal of ' this tin just tax . But with auph a large surplus , he-would not be satisfied with a repeal of tho window * dnty . He was in ' favour of the abolitionof " 'the taxes upon knowledge . '; but : what was , the use ; of a cheap newspaper , unless the man had a li ght to read it by ? ( Hear , hear . ) He also believed that the duties upon tea , soap , &c ., ' might be' taken off without injury to the Exchequer , ; and when . ' . the window duty had beeirentirely removed , he trusted to see attention turned to othetjmportaht reforms ;
Sjr . B . Ham ,, M . P . ; supported the resolution , which was then put and carried unanimously ; ' Mr .. A ELS 0 N , of St . James's , proposed :- — "That this meeting pledges itself to use every legitimate means to cause the removal ' of this obnoxious tax from the statute-book , and earnestly appeals to all members of parliament , in the event of the government refusing its total , immediate , and unconditional repeal , to offer such constitutional opposition to the passing of the supplies as will show that the present ministers no longer possess the confidence of the people . " They had assembled
that morning , not by command of her Majesty , but on the invitation of the Prime Minister . The Chancellor of the Exchequer bad told them that no proposition could be successful without popular agitation . He thought the right honourable gen- ' tfeman would have plenty of it there . Really the Prime Minister was acting thepart of a blushing maiden , who only wanted to be importuned , and it appeared that the humble citizens o { Wostminster must waste their time , spend their money , and neglect their business , iu order to make the Primo Minister do his duty . ( Cheers . \ . .
Mr . Coiwrlt ., ot St . Clement ' s , seconded the resolution without comment . - Mr . Waklet , M . P ., was received with tremendous applause . He appeared there as an elector of old glorious Westminster ,- the ancient cradle of their liberties , and a city always active and full" of zeal in every public cause . Ho was there , therefore , | to tell his representatives , that if they did not act up to the pledges they had made that day , they should never more have support from him . ( Cheers . ) But let the constituency depend upon them ; they would do there duty , and the Chancellor of the Exchequer , knowing their determination , would blanch and quail before he dared to resist the demand for the repeal of this odiou 3 and infamous tax . ( Cheers . ) Having paid a compliment to the ladies who were present , and one equally graceful to the noble lord in the chair , the hoa .
member proceeded , in terms ; similar to those which we have frequently reported of- late , to denounce the tax , and to censure the people for . having so long submitted to it . His mind upon this subject was made up . While he should oppose the granting of supplies in the House , he called upon those out of doors to resist the payment of the tax in future . After this year let them resolve , as he had done , to allow seizures , but upon no accouiit to pay the tax , for such a proceeding on the part of the public generally must inevitably prevent its collection by this or any other government . ( Cheers . ) He believed that in . a few days he should have to hold an inquest on this tax . ; and he was convinced , if he did so , he should behold the most monstrous , the ugliest , the vilest , and the most infamous corpse that it had ever fallen to the lot of a coroner to sit upon . ( Cheers and laughter . )
Mr . Brettisguam , of St . Pancras , observed with reference , to the recommendation to allow , seizures , that the government bad long ceased to levy for the assessed taxes . The process now adopted-was an Exchequer process , the peculiar feature of which was , that whether the Crown were successful or not , the individual had to pay his own costs ( Cheers . ) After a few words from Mr . W . Wiuuus , M . P ., the motion was carried unanimously . Mr . Wilson , of St . Margaret ' s , moved , and Mr . Brown , of St . James ' s , wcoivded , the third re solution : — " That this meeting cannot anticipate the possibility of any attempt to re-imposo the unpopular house tax , which was repealed in 1834 by Lord Althorp , demanded by the unanimous voice of the people , more particularly as since that period houses have been made subject to the property tax , which is ia fact
a house tax . Should any such attempt bo made , this meeting pledges itself to give it every opposition in its power , being , convinced that sufficient reduction can be made in the expenditure of the country to meet this as well as much larger reductions . " Mr . Mowatt , M . P ., said he had always voted for the . removal of this and all . similar taxes . But members of parliament were of themselves powerless ; and if the people desired the removal of any oppressive impost , they must arm their representatives with full power to get them removed by the government . This tax was especially unjust , because it not only did what taxes were intended to do , take money from the pockets of tho people , bat it took from them their comfort , their health , and even their lives . It must be immediately removed and then other grievances as heartfelt asthia would , he hoped , be quickly made to follow it .
Mr . John Williams , M . P ., having supported the motion , Mr . Ernest Jones rose , amid prolonged cheering from all parts of the house , mingled with hisses from the private boxes and the platform , and said he was glad there was one question on which all could agree without dereliction of principle—and he felt he could , as a Chartist , support the measure for the repeal of the duty , on light and health . ( Cheers . ) Government thought to hold a monopoly of light ; but it was itself a monopoly of darkness . Some gentlemen had done him the honour to hiss him . Now , they mi g ht see what a pitiful thing prejudice was—they hissed before he spoke ! Yet he was proud of getting the hisses of the rich , as lnno
as he got the cheering of the poor . He addressed ' them as a resident in Wc 3 tmiiister inadoublc capacity , for he had an official residence for two years in Tothill-fields Prison—and was ready to go there again for the same cause . ( Loud cheers . ) The noble lords and members who had addressed them had told them , if this bill were not carried , toresist the payment of thetax . It was lucky for him thatlio had not said anything as illegal , as a Chartist but he applauded the advice , and did not see , if tho middle class could do this for a pocket question why the working classes could not do so for the franchise . ( Hisses , and loud cheers . ) Most of the gentlemen on the platform were members of the Fiuuncial and Parliamentary Association . Let them he consistent , and carry out the plan they had adopted in this window tax agitation . The bill he held in hh
nana was headed , " Total , immediate , and unconditional Repeal of the Window Tax . " There was no " putting in the thin end of the wedge" there—no "taking the thing by instalments " -no saying first eight windows , then nine , then ton—oh no 1 Thev said they would have no half-measures for their wmdows-then the Chartists would have aone for their votes . ( Enthusiastic cheers . ) IHhey now asked us to help them in a half-measure-the people would remind them of their present act The people were no longer to be deluded ; and he told them , while trying to throw light into their houses , at the same time to draw up the blinds of their intellect , and open the windows of their understanding . ( Mr . Jones resumed his seat amidst housT prolon S cheers fr ° m all parts of the The motion was then carriod .
Thanks were then voted to those members of the House of Commons who had supported Lord Duncan m his agitation for the repeal of tbe window tax , and also the noble chairman , for his indefatigable exertions . Tbe proceedings then tenninated .
Untitled Article
The Blood of a McRDEitEn . -The following extraordinary statement is made in a letter from Ystad , in Sweden , dated the 28 th ult .: —" This morning having been fixed for the execution of a journeyman butcher , named Marcusson , and a womannamed Botilla Nilsdotter , for hav ngmui dered the husband of the latter , a vast number of persons of all ages and both sexes , and eSally of peasants in their national costumes ; arSed last ! uh nmg V ^ bivoua <* ed in the town all S Although for upwards of sixty years no exeSn had taken place in the province , and for upwards of eight years none in all Sweden , it was noKmuch curiosity wh ch attracted the multitude , ° £ des . re to swallow a drop of the blood of the crimU nalsatthe moment it should spurt from beneath the axe of the executioner : it UinB » ^'! . 1 '"
belief „ Sweden that ^ renders theTweak rtrOM cures aH sorts of maladies , and secures a loneT 5 f ' When the scaffold was erected , the people assembled round with cups , glasbes , bowls , sorne even wUh large saucepans , to catch the blood . The soldiers had the greatest difficulty in forming and maintain " WSSJt'E ^ ibS s ^ sa&'ySttaS nrst
xuu wumaa was oeneaded , then the man The anxiety of the spectators was Very greafand the KJ " , ^ ' , - was sevVed th ^ cke through the lme of soloiers . The soldiers to drive themhack lustily employed the butt ends of Si ? muskets ( themuskets were not loaded ) , " ade perate conflict ensued At last the crowd sieeded lnreachine the scaffold ; but in tbe meantime the police had placed the bodies in a cardan I had ' sent them oft- under a strong escort of cavalrv . Tl , ™
naa , nowever , to taKe the precaution of removing by spades and pickaxes the portion- ) of the road o » which drops , of blood happened to fall , to proven the people from k pping up the Dlood . When the bod . es had got fa . r < y off , the crowd gradually d ! persedI ; two hundred of them We ? e gXoudy injured , and a greater number had received severe contusions . " . c _ se » ci « . Tom TflOMB . ^ -General Tom Thumb has arrived in Brussels , arid ha 3 had the honour of spending the evening at tfae-Meidenoetf the Duke ' tfAwmfcrg
Untitled Article
: - ' - ""^ gE-SLt ) ANES " AS-D * -THE " BIRDBi ' - ;'; ' - i r- , ¦ . ¦ :, ¦ ¦ . ¦ •/* . LAW ^ JUSTICE . : ;• ,. - , r- .- ¦{ i Another page has been addedto the catalogue of crime—the Newgate Calendar—which , for cool blooded atroojty , and wanton , reckless , barbarity , is not surpassed , if equalled , in that guilty chronicle of ages . ¦ The publio mind has been most intensely excited by the investigation into the conduct of George and Theresa Sloane ,: towards the unfortunate parish orphan committed to their charge , the termination .: of which has caused disappointment and disgust . ¦ . > / , ¦ ¦ . - . . > . ¦ : . The statement of their victim , Jane "Wilbred , was bo . revoltin g , in all its details , so y ^
. .. " Cruel , strange , and unnatural , " that although her emaciated appearance authenticated the main portions of her story , still it was generally believed that some parts of her evidence were exagerated , and that in the full and searching inquiry , which the learned , gentleman for the defence repeatedly .: said his clients courted , facts would bo . produced which would . strip the case of its revolting details ;• that the evidence of Miss Duvaux , aided by the ingenuity ' . of counsel , would have accounted for tbe wretched condition of the girl , and that the case would dwindle down to the level of a common misdemeanour . Nothing of the sort , however , has been done , no palliation ha 9 been offered , and every particle of Jane Wilbred ' s statement has been proven by t e . tacit admission of the guilty parties . Hence arises the disappointment of the public , and . the loathing and abhorencc which
follows the culprits who could so hommy and wantonly ill-treat a friendless orphan without advancing anything in extenuation . Devoid alike of tho boldness , of the , villain , or the sophistry of the lawyer , this guilty pair pleaded guilty , without the slightest defence or apology for their unparalleled and unnatural conduct . True it is that they said " Not Guilty" to the two first counts , but those counts did not involve the facts , but mere questions of law . Jane Wilbred was set forth , in the indictment as an infant , of tender . years ; whereas , being between sixteen and seventeen , years of age she was . considered'old enough to have claimed the , protection of the law , and the neglect of supplying her . with a sufficient quantity of food , &c . .. was not an indictable offence . Tho facts of the case were not disputed , but ., acknowledgeil . ... . .
It is somewhat gratifying , however , that by this mode of procedure the public mind is not again shocked by . a-repetition of the . disgustingstory . This case , unlike the violent murders perpetrated by Rush or the Mannings , from the total ab .-ence of a Bupposed , benefit arising in perspective is a frightful libel on our countrymen ' s nature . It shows human beings , revelling in heretofore unhoard-of cruelties , for the mere enjoyment . arising from their infliction . , . The Sloanes were sentenced to two years' imprisonment , the judge not having the power of
inflicting a heavier punishment , \ 1 nles 9 he had coupled it with hard labour . They will thus be ranked among first class misdemeanants , and , unless placed in a prison whore the rules are stringent , they will only suffer the . punishment of confinement , . This naturally leads attention to the state of our criminal jurisprudence , and to the comparison of crimes with their punishment . The necessity of an entire change in our law , as . well as in our prison discipline is shown by comparing the sentence in the case of the Sloanes with . the sentence delivered on their trial . .
On Saturday last , at the same court , and before one of the judges who presided at the trial of the Sloanes on the previous Wednesday , Samuel Pizzey , 28 , William Randall , 21 , and Thomas Simms 21 , were indicted under tbe statute for having been , to the number of three and more , in certain enclosed land in . the night time , armed with guns , for the purpose of taking game . It appeared that the prosecutor of this indictment was Mr . Clark , one of the , magistrates . for Middlesex ,. and who . resides near Uxbridge . On the night of the 12 th . of January two of his keepers , named Stent and Wilding , were out watching in a wood called the-Park wood , in the parish of Ickenham , when they came up with four men , who immediately upon seeing the
keepers ran off . On their arriving at . a gate the keepers came up with them , and a struggle ensued , during which Wilding received some severe blows from Randall with the butt-end of a gun , aud Pizzey also struck him with a stick . The keepers succeeded in securing Pizzey , but the other men got . away . ; Sims and Randall ,. however , were apprehended , the next morning , but the fourth man succeeded ; in ; making his escape altogether . The keepers positively identified the prisoners as being three of the persons who were in the wood upon the occasion in question . —The jury , without any . hesitation , found all the prisoners Guilty , and Mr . 'Justice Cresswell sentenced them to be transported for seven years . ' ,
Here wo have three . young men , prosecuted for breaking the abominable Game Laws—for an offence which ( except by law ) is not a crimo—who had . not killed a hare belonging to their magisterial prosecutor , but who fled from their , pursuers , and , to avoid arrest ,: assaulted the keepers , sentenced to transportation for seven years ; while those who have outraged the laws of God and man—whovieye pevpotiwting a murder , and were daily and hourly gloating over the torture of their victim , adefenceless orphan , who , according to the evidence of the surgeon , on
the discovery , of the crime , weighod only sixty pounds , and could not have lived many days longer , were only sentenced to two years' imprisonment ! The poachers will be sent to work either in the hulk 8 at . home , or in our Australian colonies ; while the Sloanes are imprisoned , without labour . The poachers were uneducated men—the candidates for the gallows were a lawyer and his lady . Many similar cases could he cited to show the injusticenay , positive iniquity—of our criminal laws j but the one already given will no doubt answer the present purpose .
Again , it should be remembered , that , had the starving of Jane Wilbred been the only charge against them , they would have been acquitted . They were indicted for starving a child of tender years . Those counts . turned out to be bad , She was old enough in the eye of the law to have complained , of starvation ; but they had inflicted other acts of barbarity at various times—and for this they were punished . The system of slow murder appears to hare more chances of escaping the lynx-eyed law than minor offences . Had Jane Wilbred died of starvation the law would have said that she was art and part accessory to her own death , and her murderers would have been acquitted . The difficulty of comprehending the meaning . of
the criminal law , and its incompetency of meeting such a case as the one under consideration , cannot be better argued than by giving a brief sketch of the case of the Birds , who were tried at the last Spring Assizes , in the county of Devon , for the murder of Mary Ann Parsons . This poor girl , like Jane Wilbred , was the inmate of a workhouse . The evidence adduced on the trial went to show that the prisoners had been inthohabitofconstantl ymaltreating the poor girl ; and the surgeons who were examiffed on the occasion gave it as their opinion that the deceased , Mary Ann Parsons , had died from the effects of a blow on the head . The learned judge , upon this , directed that the jury should acquit the prisoners , on the erbund tlint
there was a lack of evidence to show that either of the prisoners separately , or both conjointly , had inflicted the blow which had been the cause of death . An intimation was then made to the learned judge that the prisoners ought to be found guilty of the assaults proved against them ; but his lordship withdrew the case altogether from the consideration of the jury , without permitting them to form an opinion on the credibility of the medical testimony brought forward , and directed that a verdict of acquittal should be entered . On the 10 th November , 1849 , another indictment was preferred against the prisoners , charging them with having assaulted Mary Ann Parsons . The trial aocordin » lv took place before Mr . Russell Gurnev . who
on tne last Western Circuit , presided as judee At this time the prisoners pleaded that they had V ready beentriedand acquitted of the offence charged Alenghty discussion then ensued , as to whether the general acquittal pronounced at the former trial could operate as a bar to a prosecution for eaohaud every of the assaults given in evidence : after which tbe jury returned a . verdict of Guilty . But itappeavea that a doubt existed in the mind of the learned judge as to whether his direotion was right , and he did not pass judgment against the prisoners . The case was then argued before five judges , constituting tho court sitting to decide upon cases of appeal from , the criminal courts , reserved for their consideration . But as they could not aeree unon
their decision , the case was again argued before all the learned judges , expept Mr , Baron Platt , and the question remained undecided . On Wednesday , the 12 th inst , the case was again argued by fourteen judges at the Exchequer Chambers , when six wero of opinion that the conviction was bad , and eight thoughtthe conviction good ; thusamajority of two decided the knotty point , after the question had been fifteen months under the consideration of the judges , and the Birds will receive sentence at the next Devon assizes . Thus the law , which sh ould 1 ) 0 so plain , " tbat ho who runs may resid " is so incomprehensible that the highest judicial functionaries cannot agree . If eight judges understand its
meaning , six at least do not .- Surely it is hWi time thitt a sweeping revision should be made when such monsters escape with so little punishment , and are again let loose to prey upon society , while thp most trivial offences , such as pookoc-piokiuir or poaching ' , are so severely dealt with . ¦ Even Chartism is n worse offence in the eyes of the judges , than what for want of a better word we must call «¦ 'Sloaneism . " Not only were the Chartist misdemeanantsimprisonedbutsontencedfo hard labour . Scores of pounds had to be paid to purchase immunity from their degrading anddis agreeable occupation of picking oakum . For re
Untitled Article
fusing " to ' submit to the stringent ' -regulations and harsh discipline awarded to the lower class of misdemeanant s ; ' some of the'Ch ' aftist prisoners in Toth . Ul-fields . Prison were doomed to death , and heavy bail was required for others '' previous to release . ' * Arelho'lawB just that sanction ¦ such doings ? Is the system endurable that permits judges to ' gratify personal class , and political prepositions at the expense . nf equity , common sense and common hnmiinit . v ? •••• ¦ . : ¦
Untitled Article
CORN . Mask-uhe , Wednesday , Feb . 12 . -We had a verv sho * supply of English wheat to-day , aud the quality & generally inferior , it mot a very dull sale , at ratlu ' v C prices , unless for prime qualities . The arrivals of fen wheat and flour have been only moderate durin » the & week , but the business done in both articles hVh * quite in-retail . We have had large arrivals of bw ' eV both foreign and English , aud the demand bein » « £ limited , the sales were extremely sl . w , althouRh « ftS fully Is per qv . cheaper than on Monday last . Fine " ™ were scarce and fully as dear . In peas no alterS Owing to the increased supplyofoatscoastwi . se nmlfe * ssa : seitr ^ hcavy for teS
CATTLE . SMrrHFiELD , Monday , Feb . lO .-Xotwithstandin ? that tin 6 £ ! V , r i ? OnoScv ia t 0-da J ' s mi * ket exhllriud i slight falling off compared with that shown on Mo I last , it was more than adequate to the demand . Tlf ' attendanca of buyers was tolerably good j but all breeds p beasts met a very macUve inquiry , at unaltered quot ! m ^ igueat figure for the best Scots was 3 . a per 81 bs . Tliegeneral duality of the stock was gooa . \ V were again toleraW . v well , but not to sav heavily Sim * ' mtll fheep foi- the time of year . For most breeds \ Th quiry was firm ; and , in some instances the cm ^ W ? LUP ? ' >( 1 ^ "W' We m « y observe , \ m ^ that the extreme figure for the best old Downs in S wool was 4 s Gdper 80 » . There were about 100 ) h sheep , tho market , together with ninety DoS a " which latter sold at 5 s Gd to Cs per 81 bs . Calves , t& in short supply were dull in sale at late rates ' S reXortidT * P ' > th 0 P " CCS Of wllich were *®
lieef , 2 s 6 d to 3 s 8 d ; mutton , 3 s 4 d to 4 s 4 d veal 5 s i 1 be&r ^ Sinti ^ . o-V ^ prune large ,, 2 s 8 d to 3 s Od ; prime small , 3 s Od to 3 s u ' argepork 2 sCdto 3 sea ; inferior mutton , Sg MttSwj £ hg . i ?* £££ il Bma 11 ** 3 s 8 d t 01 S ^
PROVISIONS . London , Vedncsday . -There was a decidedly better feeling towards Imh Butter in the past week , and s&it * a resyemble amount made at a further advance of : \ to 4 s . per cwt . nolders were not disposed to sell freely a : the rates current ; otherwise the transactions wouM have been of more importance . The market closed with firmness , and prices inclmcd upwards . Foreign in st . » b request . , Friesland , 2 s . per cwt . dearer . Bacon : Tlieri whs atair business done hiMsli and Hamfer 0 ' Sin 8 easides , landed ; at last quotations ; buyers more inclineii to i > ur ' chase for forward months . Hams , landed , scarcely valid in demand or value . Some sales were reported at ' iiht . ptr tit "blF ?> w » tln April and May . Lard more soughs after , and prices Is . to 2 s . higher . a ™? a U BDTT f , J ] ARKET ' - «—We experience a fair demand generally for English Uutter ; a little rn .-wi . iilk i . ™ a ? IT i lts i | PP earance , and tiie best quiditj is readily taken at Is . n pouud . Dorset , fine weekly . 1 « p ° , p ; 1 o Plr ff d ° - "idling and stale , 70 s . to Sis . ; Fresh , 9 s . to 13 s . per dozen lbs .
BREAD . The prices of wheaten bread in the metropolis are from loaf ' household aitt 0 « 5 < 1 . to Old . per libs . POTATOES . feOOTHwAKK , Watehside , February 10 . —The arrivals coastwise and by rail have been very considerable , which , wita seveval from France , has made the supply larec . lrade is heavy , and it is only with a few of the best samples our . top quotations are realised . The following afi the present quotations :-Yorkshire Regents , 73 s loiute per ton ; Scotch , lias to 80 s ; Scotch cups , 50 s to 70 s ; Kit . -s to-s ; Cambrid ge and Lincolnshire Whites , 5 Us to 80 s ; Ithemsh Whites , -s to -s ; French Whites ,
WOOL . City , Wednesday , February 12 .-The imports of woo ! ™ i ^ r w "An ek wcve 1 > 584 bales ; of wWch 51 T werefrom France , 321 from Odessa , 97 from Peru , and the m » n « ^ f ? dOr 1 and Germ » "y- The public sales commence next ibursday , and tho prospects are consider *! autwsS ^ i ^ i !" — There is on ] ya m 0 ( to ! c in ' StL ' p Um » ll'gbland wool at late rates ; anything very PrK , W 1 lOmc sales have >^» made at full imaS oflSX 3 * ' 0 W 1 'f aboUt 2 ' 500 biltps of coUm&l woo ! an / Pi ^ auCtiol > 0 n thc Gthaud Wi iMt . live uko * SMm n ¦ ** S ? < ; omPe «« on spirited , and all sold <> IZl ui CeS ' ^' v tIle low wools offered on Thursday a good many were withdrawn . Imports for the week , 301 bales ; previously tliis year , 8 , 310 bales
HIDES . ' ^ £ Aiii . —Market hides , 5 Glb . toCllb , 2 d to - 'I' ! B ^ S ^ S ^^ AXiii ^ MfSw ^ s
Untitled Article
From the Gazette of Friday , February 1 th . BANKRUPTS . John sifJl ^} ° 1 ^ Uey-n » a . Clapham-road , buildcibZt ? « a "Mawhall , of 91 , Goswell-road , ClevbemvcH HoundSli / T dealM- ^ numm Friedeberg , of SO Umuidsdittat , forrier- James Dixon , of Morley , Yorkshlrc Shiirf ? p JV > i nn " ' Somerset , groW-Jame : Shut , of Frodsham , Cheshire , provision dealer . SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS . Hoseason and Co ., of Glasgow , inerchants-Aitkcn of rh ^ J ? '' ° / &lac SOW , founders-Alexander Uro «» contractor ' manufuctuver-Alexander Graham , of Bart .
From the Qazettt of Tuesday , February 11 . BANKRUPTS . linm l P ^ Ugl \ i Iigl 5 1 Wborn ' = " » ! colourman-Wil folu m J " ^ ood > Chnrles-street , Drury-lanc , piano W tm ? « Wood Coltl « an . Regentstreet , Court mil IWhlm £ Muwel 8 » Colchester , barge owner-Ifcnr . chant ! Stevenson ' Bishopwearmouth Durham , met SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS , C Scobic , Perth , coppersmith .
Untitled Article
DP AT FT ' qm ^ at , V on the 4 th inst ! , Feargus O'Connor C ! is ; "f" nme years , the son of George and Etabctl unsold . He was accidentally burnt to death . ——
Untitled Article
LAMBETH . —Appauino- Profligacy . ~ Mi \ W . 6 . Smyth , a surgeon in . very good practice , and residing at 59 , Vauxhall-walfc , was brought up on a warrant , and placed at the bar before the Hon . G . 0 . Norton , on a charge of assaulting Mary Ann Hall , a girl thirteen years of ago .. The case occupied upwards of two hours in its investigation , and the evidence , the greater portion of which was unfit fpr publication , disclosed scenes of-the . moat disgusting profligacy that can well be conceived . It appeared that the prisoner , who is a married man and nearly sixty years of age , but separated from his wife , had iu . his confidence two little strumpets named Ockingden and Macklalin , with whom ho was on . terms of . profligate intimacy ; and those persons he induced to invite to his house a number of girls whose ages , ranged from sixteen to eighteen years .
Once within his roach , the prisoner commenced : by plying his victims with spirits or wine , principally gin , and by these means ,. and stating that he should require their services in assisting to clear up the house , he soon effected his purpose , and the names of . setrenor ei ght were mentioned whom he thus succeeded in ruining . Of the number , oneoft tie procuresses , Ockingden , and two of the girU , ILU 1 and Horno , were examined at considerable length , and their testimony as to the prisoner ' s profligacy was perfectly conclusive . —In the course of the proceedings : Mr . Norton , exelaimed , that in tho whole course of many years' magisterial duty it had not been his misfortune to hear disclosed such a scene of profligacy as that related , and which made one doubt whether wo lived in a civilised or barbarous state of society . —An application was made to admit the prisoner to bail , but it wag refused , Mr . Norton remarking , that he never knew . of a case in which the acoused was less entitled to any favour .
THAMES . —An Englishman ' s Right . to br Meiirt . —R . Trulove , a respectable-looking mechanic , was charged with being disorderly nnd assaulting the police . —Sheppard and Wakefiold said that prisoner end others were coming down Fieldgate-street , Whitechapel , singing loudly . Being remonstrated with , they refused to desist , nnd ~ . behaved violently to thopolioe . —Prieonei- said he had been to a musical party , and on his way home was repeating Borne of the airs . Ho justified his behaviour to the police by producing a young woman who had been with him , and upon whose shoulder the policeman ' s truncheon had left a bruise . —Mr . Yardley having , looked over the Police Act , said that he found nothing in it which prevented people singing at the hour of twelve , unless there was a
8 icH person m the vicinity , or some other reasonable cause assigned . He did not hesitate to say that this was a case in whioh tho police had no right to nterfere with persons singing merrily on their way home l and if a row ensued , and blows wero struck * , it was not to be wondered at . No one , however , was warranted in striking a constable ; but if disturbances arose out of their undue interference or abrupt interposition , they must be answerable . Though he did not like making general remarks , he could not help saying that , in cases where he had to observp on the conduct of the police , there wero three to one in the H division as compared with the K . —The prisoner , who complained that he and his party were knocked about shamefully , was then discharged . . ..
MANSION-HOUSE . —SBBiona Robbert . —James Scolfield wa 9 ohavged with hating robbed William Hawley , a coffee-shop keeper , at No . 64 J , Lower Thames-street , of ninety-seven or ninety-eight sovereigns . —The prosecutor said , on the 1 st of January I took the : place I live in of the prisoner , who was going to Port Natal as an emigrant . I had succeeded him in the business , and he continued to live m the next house , between which and my house there is a communication . On Thursday week I had in a carpet bag in my truuk underlay bed ninety-seven or ninety-eight sovereigns . On Thursday last I had occasion to pay some money for freight and other matters , and upon going to my trunk I found that the carpet bag was out , and all the
money was gone . I had not seen the prisoner since Friday week , but he was seen leaving his house or lodging on the following Saturday in a hackney-coach with two boxes . He wrote tome from Poplar a letter , whioh stated that he had gone to Liverpool , and I have since ascertained that he never left town at all . I gave him £ 10 for the articles and the fixtures . There was no stock ,. and he was unable to go on a day longer for the wnnfof money . He told me thAt he had not more towards his passage-money to Port Natal than £$ , and he could not take his wife with him on account of the expense . —The Lord Mayor : How did he know that you had all this money ? Witness : He had seen forty-nve . or forty-six sovereigns \? ith meand he
. knew that I had nearly a hundred pounds in sovereigns . I . had got sovereigns at the bank but a short time before for a £ 100 note . As soon as I missed the money I called out to my wife that it was all gone , and she immediately suspected Scolneld , and advised me to go after him . Ho knew ^ the name of the vessel in which he was goine was the John Bright , and I took down an officer to the hast India Dock , which the vessel was at the moment leaving . When he saw me he said "Oh is it you Mr . Hawley ? " "Yes , " said I , "I have come about the ninety-eight sovereigns you robbed of Ohcould
me . " , you suspect me , Mr . Hawley , of such a thing ? " « Yes , " said I , « you are the only person I do suspect , for you are the only person that knew of the money . " He made no reply , and the officer took him into custody . AVe fouud that he had on board eight or nine new suits of clothes , and new articles of various kinds although he had just before scarcely any money . Wa Uien brought him here , and your lordship detained him , and we went down to the vessel , which had gono to Grayesend , to make further search We there found some sovereigns in his trunk , and we also found a number of working tools of mW
some 01 wnicb my father had made himself-The Lord Mayor : You aro sure of tho identity of the tools?—I kium one of them a file these thirty years 1 know two adzes as well as I iLlSf' l know 8 everal other instruments . -The officer who 1 accompanied the prosecutor to the John Bright for the . purpose of more closelv examining the prisoner ' s trunks , said he found S them eight new coats , eleven pairs of new trowsers and quantities of linen and necessary artic esTS were of considerable value . He also found ^ key which opened the prisoner ' s bedroom door and the door . of . the bedroom of the prosecutor / in which k Df rP Tt i COntaining the *<> vereigus had b en kept . —The prisoner was remanded .
BOW . STREBT . -AuiEOBDPwroEB bt a Shopman-John Fox was charged with plundering hfa ST M ?? 8 rs \ and Wilson , wooCdJa-St Sf v P " - ° - ner had boen sh ° P ra ! m s ^ co August last , receiving a salary of £ 40 per annum , was about to leave his situation very suddenly , ott ? , f - , ? 8 U 8 Picion 8 of Mr - Wey , who whs connected with the firm , and who also received intomation that the prisoner had been carrying on a system of plunder to a considerable extent . A ceriam portion of the premises was set apart for tlie leception of goods purchased by customers and made up into parcels to be left until called for . it was ^ the duty of each shopman to place his signature ; to the bills ,, and attach them to the parcels when left in the repository , and they were then
entered id the oash-b ' ook , in the charge of the cashier . Mr . Wey found the prisoner ' s signature to a great number of the parcels . One of the bills referred to a parcel which was alleged to contain goods to the amount of £ 2 19 s . 9 d ., but -which really contained goods not mentioned in the bill worth £ 4 os . 5 d . The syatem of plunder was this : Ihe prisoner served a stranger with goods , and the parcel was to he called for . On packing up tho parcel the prisoner placed articles not mentioned m the invoice . "W hen the stranS oalled for tho parcel it was handed to him The prisoner would afterwards meet his con " federate and divide the spoils . Mr WnnfJta ttbtoP ? plund k *" « teft tent in that manner . The prisoner , who wore afasbionabl y-made coat of camel's hai , ZT * J ? , ?!?
wnere he had purchased the cloth . He . aid it hS been suppl . ed to him by another young man n K ss = # sP S « ap cortained that the y prisoner 22 5 ,. ? had bo , * " - SS 3 ££ 4 ? S ? manacer that fk » • snd ne informed the eood ? t £ ? **««?«* Paid him principally in Son t o * h ™ T deniod aU know W ° f £ SSeiSmJXSj . Parcel ffas address ed .-Jlr . JJ ! » e ^ anded the prisoner until Saturday wi ^ i « a * ° ?» ft roljU 8 t . daring-looking fellow J- EHri * i ^ , n Monday chai * ed with & P . ° emis f of S ^ if ' ' ? ' ? plundered ^ e n * Z \ } ^ Ir William Johnson , a grocer in S 1 a ir ? treet ' I tbnal - ^ en .-The prosecutor- stated that he retired to . bed at one o ' clock on Mon day morning , having previously seen that allffi . " foora and windows were properl y secured and about an hour and a half after wards he ' Jv aroused from sleep by the violent bBrkirir « pv " uouse dog , followed a loudS oi >* £ & £$
Untitled Article
Untitled Article
glass in-the lower part of ¦ the premisb ^ V ^ stantly hastened down stairs , and ,-on e . fu - h shop discovered 'that' a' pane of nl ''' " " 5 window had been dashed in , one of the «„ , '" " 10 ters having been previously removed Z , ! H quantity of cocoa andother articles of cZ hilt « been abstracted from the show-board im » , > ' Hi under the aperture . The prisoner wasT % his shop soon . after in the custody of t ° » slit t a stables , who had in thoir poss ession thn V Cc ipaokages of cocoa now , produced , and whi . i 1 ftl » once identified as a portion of the stolen ni " 5 -The prisoner , in defence , said that he bWdrinking to such an ' extent that he did m S what he was about at the time , and he w ^ l , no to be fully committed for trial . Oti * tq OLERKENWELL . —Dangerous State m , Clerkenwbli , District . —James Harding . tp > s man , was charged by Mrs . Francis Mills i ' m" ? la d y , residing in Geprgiana-strcet , Camden 7 '" * with a daring highway robbery . - The nrn „ tn . was wnllrinw in ' TIinV \_ ot »« nf o 1 l ¦ 1 l -CUtfi .
Tuesday night last , with her purse in hoM 0 ! > when the pvisonor seized it , and drawgimr . i"H violently , struck her a trcmonilous blow ° 5 nearly stunned her . He succeeded in nnkin ^ escape with the purse , containing 12 s . 6 d ™ , r J" ' property The prisoner was traced aVd ^ hended by Charles Bow , and was positively ? tiBed by the prosocutrix . The prisoner don eft ' charge , but he was fully committed for tri- ttl * racter charged Miss
, was by Bennett , inillii 1 . High-street , Islington , with the following ; , „„ , ; , of outrage—The proseoutrix was walking JlS servant in High-street , Islington , when t ^ e nri ' r seized her and demanded her money . She * ii ? ° ? had got none . She was then joined bv vl \* woman , who tore witness ' s bonnet and dress F servant ran for apolicoman , who took the prU ? into custody .-The inspector said that several ;' stances of this sort of outrage had recently currcd in the neighbourhood . The prisoner * sentenced to one month ' s imprisonment whhC labour . ¦ ¦ - ¦ "M
MARYLEBONE . —Assault on a Cibhotjiw , AFEHALE .-Elizabeth Waldron Penny was cliaJ : with having threatened tho ; Rev . Septimus c < Holmes Hansard with violence . —The rev . ^ plainant is curate of St . Mary Paddington v ] somo months ago in the course of his past ,- ! 1 visitations mot with the defendant , from whom 1 learned that she had lately been living with a L tleman as his mistress and been ill-treated . Oiit
compassion to her Mr . Hansard waited on tlic Z tleman and found that she had been well tve-it ? i ultimately he succeeded in obtaining from thi > p , tleman an allowance of 12 s . a week , of wiiklV was to bo tho medium . Subsequently she J " taken ill , and was supposed f , o be in a <| VI state . C 9 mplainant attended her , and endcavoui-M to obtain from the gentleman additional a « i ' ancelfor her , but it was given only on the iiiT , u
standing that 2 s . a week was to be stopped tZ her allowance on recovery . These directions W ing . been complied with , defendant no sooner « . ' covered than she became dissatisfied , and beam in ' annoy Mr . Hansard , and on the evenin" of the" ! - ? ult ., as that gentloman was engaged in the sqM room , she rushed in and created a distuiWp threatening to tear his eyes out . —Theiw «? Gurney , rector of St . Mary , said that the \ Z ' plainant had acted in the matter with his 5 C tion , and his' interference was exclusive ! v " of i benevolent character . —Mr . Broughton at fir ' ordered her to put in sureties , herself in £ 30 , » ,
two otners in £ 20 each , to bo of good behaviour for a month , but , on the intercession of the com plainant , accepted her own recognisances fov \\ m months . ™
*M Bxav&Mj # T*
* m Bxav&mj # t *
Untitled Article
parish of St . An-. ie , Westminster , at tin l'ri < inrv - " ' eS ?' > . Gri !! U V / indmllUtreet , Havmnrket . in the Cit , ot Westminister , f * r t \ e Proprietor , FE V .: G \ JS u ! CO . x it , Esq ., ii . l \ , aud publ : Oed ' by the raid \ ulu ' wider , at the oflico ia the tame street md parisSr fcaturdoy Februa y ISth 18 * 1 .
©Fj? M\Ntt.
© fj ? m \ ntt .
Untitled Article
. 8 " THE ^ NORT ^ R ^ j ^ AJl , „ , , ^ February 15 ^ ^
In The ~- ^^ ¦ "¦'-- - —- - -¦ ¦. -¦ . ¦ "•", ¦ '--— ~^ P Ointed By Wililam Kvjevl, Ofno. 5. Hncclesfield-Sti Ee:
in the ^^ ¦ " ¦' -- - — - - - ¦ ¦ . - ¦ . ¦ " •" , ¦ ' -- — ~^ P ointed by WILilAM KVJEVL , ofNo . 5 . Hncclesfield-sti ee :
-
-
Citation
-
Northern Star (1837-1852), Feb. 15, 1851, page 8, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/ns/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1613/page/8/
-