Current:

Northern Star (1837-1852), 2nd December 1848, Edition 1 of 3, Page 7, Untitled Article

Page 7
Page 7
7 of 8

On this page

  • Text (5)
  • Transcript

    • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

      Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

      Untitled Article

      - ^ T ^ ned the ' door they walked . The IS « V « k « Wbatwe the acts ai the Assembly ? i * " not ' its resolution ? Yes , distiuctlyyarid & Hi shall publish one proposed by Mr Adams I n ference * a large portion of his attack . ' . fi *! ^{ ie re solutions to which I refer shall be an * to the charge of blarney' agains "; myself . ^ j "As t ° E ^ " ! ltire not ^ S dismissed by Assanbl y , appointing five others appeared very ^ ^ ffhfl ' e my acceptance of office as one of the Entire pr ° Testwa t ^ S — first 1 J » that I was riot PCdrfcen fr ° m the ranka by a set of natribyp pismires : and secondly , that as I did 8 o , f ^ fc termined to recommend the old organisation , 1 ' a jendeied the Chartist movement perfectly f ^ T ' sly acceptance of office «« long after the % Mj h » d died a natural death . I was elected M * T j peop le and not by the Ajsembly ,. and by ^ ns » Ie I w « and ata determined to stand . - ^^ , - , f in 11 ¦ it , it--

      & is the' Northern Star stands as a book of PjLje when it is supposed that it may be nsed ^ Lj me , I defy any of ray accusers to point out ^ sing le line in that paper confirming the asser-** tot I admitted the legality of an association •^ tjng of m ore than forty-nine members ; but , on ^ con trary , I stated in the Star of the 6 th of May vtfs . no * ontaMr M'Grath told mj on the 15 th of jLj that the London men were to elect ei ght jjtffiesto the Assembly , that I was aware of the S ^ ded illegali ty ; what elicited the answer from L . M'Grath was this , as published in the Star : ^ don / said he , Ms to elect eight delegates . ' . ften , said I , ' is the rest of the country but to Mfortj-one ?

      _ __ jls this question of legality or Illegality is sought pi * based npon my pnsumed legal knowlege . al-^ diffusely scattered over thewholeindictment , iffjlT answer it continuously . tfhen the Convention was sitting , it will be res tored that my visits to it were only casual , and jjun hurried ; that I merely made SHch statements as I thought necessary , and was then compelled to atgad to my duties in Parliament—and the delegates -51 remember that I requested them to sign a petiti on behalf of Frost , Williams , and Jones ; that g : v did sign the petition , and that it was brought to at , ' I think , by Mr Murray , a clerk at the Land

      ( gee , at the last moment for presenting petitions , j presented it . Sir Robert Inglis and others looked jjit , and counted the names , and . having discovered gat there were fifty-one signatures , it was moved Ha t it be rejected , u the law did not recognise gore than forty-nine delegates meeting in convention . I went to the Convention the next morning , loot the petition with me , and told them what fools they must have been ¦ to have given me a petition gjned by two more than the law permitted to sit jn ' cnch an Assembly , and that I was not at all aware fin t it consisted of more than forty-nine members I hen , as to the Convention of 1839 , it did not tonsist of more than forty-nine members .

      Ag ain , the Convention in 1842 , in Manchester , jgd not consist of forty-nine members ; but these grjbes-so ignorant of Chartist matters—presume ggi because there were fifty-nine included in the lincaster indictment , that they must « # have been iielejates ; whereas , from fifteen to twenty consisted H'defendants from different parts of the country , that sever had anything to do with the Convention ; for instance , the Rev . Mr Scholefisld , in whose ] iOflse the Convention assembled , had nothing to do tiththe Convention : and it shall always be my p ride and my boast , that my rejection of the address , submitted to that Convention , saved the delegates from a lone imprisonment .

      Then , as to the Stnrge Conference , I would be only too happy , to morrow , to make a delegate in a Conference of four hundred or four thousand , to save the PEOPLE'S CHARTER from such men asBrewster , Etchie , the middle classes constituting the Jury dus , even backed by such men as Cochrane , and , I think , Adams , who voted in that Conference for fee abandonment of the name of the PEOPLE'S CHARTER . There is , however , one most important fact , and one which must not be lost sight of , touching the fiasrenee of the law ' s nicety before and after the JOik of ApriL Man nay brave imprisonment at tome , even at the expense of the folly of others , as I have done—but these critical lawyers , so full of

      feels , but deficient in dates , appear to have forgotten lilt , on the very night of the 10 th of April , after felt national triumph , which the Ten Thousand Founders and the National Assembly wholly , utterly , cd \ entirely destroyed—but I trust only for a fee—Sir George Grey explained the provisions of his Gagging Bill , making open and advised jpakmg felony , and the publication of it also felony . This was giving despotism a power and a might against which right could not successfully contend , and had it not been for the timely dispersion of that Assembly , wherein a few cowards would have influenced the minds of brave em , the long catalogue of expatriated victims mold have struck & deadly blow at Chartism .

      The Attorney-General declared Chartism , as attempted to be organised by Adams and Co ., as ille * gal , but never has declared that Chartism , sbpropounded by me , is illegal ; but these three wise am say : — 'Well , and are all things to be held as illegal which ' a TOa ? Attorney-General chooses to call so ! Splendid authority , certainly ! Upon the lame authority , Mr O'Connor is & sedition-monger , a libeller , and a conspirator ; kit will Mr O'Connor plead guilty to these charges , limply because the Whig and Tory Attorney-General who jreferred these chartes againit him said to !' This is an extremely enthusiastic appeal , but my answer is , that Mr O'Connor pleaded Not Gnilty' to those charges , bnt , unfortunately for Mm , Special Juries declared him' Guilty . '

      4 tbk The Chartist power is to be measured by numbers or funds , and we are told that our _ former safety was attributable more to our inherentjpoverty ad weakness than to the superior wisdom of its acknowledged leader . Well , the National Assembly ws certainly weak in numbers , but wished to make anends in wealth by substituting a £ 10 , 000 fond for onr poverty . othly . As to my acknowledging the National

      Assembly to be a fair representation ef the Chartist Qind . in the' Star' of the 6 th of ilay . it was based upon the natural presumption that they would do their duty to the Chartist body—a pTesnmption , howcrer which every day ' s experience iaught me was iH-founded . 1 was deceived in the same way at the list General Election , when I anticipated great Clings from the fact of 260 new members being chosen tvho were likely to be influenced by the propesmg mindof the age .

      Glhly . As to the conversation so critically re-Ported in the indictment , between Mr Adams and ^ O'Connor , on the question of legality ; net one ford of it ever occurred . 7 tbly . Mr O'Connor is not answerable for Mr park ' s proposition i it would be hard if he was , particularly as Mr O'Connor never directly or indirectly interfered with the election of delegates to any Con * Tention that ever sat , and had not time to hold a &gie conference with the Executive during the Etting of the Convention .

      8 thly . With regard to a larger number than fortyi tine , I should have had no objection to a larger and Store comprehensive Convention , representing ALL CUSSES FRIENDLY TO THE MOVEMENT , * ° present a memorial to the Qaeen , praying for the ^ solution of Parliament—the dismissal of ministers "tod the appointment of men who would make the CHARTER the ' law ef the land . In such an as-*? % of all classes , including the jury class , there tt itkt have been safety , and the scribes forget that fl * one and simple duty is defined—namely , that tf Presenting the memorial . 9 t % . The scribes deny that because there was

      ^ effensite resolution passed , that , therefore , there ^ no offensive language used towards Mr O'Con-* & Now , for the contradiction of their false as-** onf I refer to the delegates—to the daily papen J ™ eh ; jffere flashed in my face every eveninu when 1 entered the House of Commons—and to the secret ^ ngs of the Scotch delegates , which were held * £% by a band of conspirators ; and I think that * J fact admitted by the scribes , that , without r ^ dting me , they dismissed me from the j ^ cutive ; and then , curiously enough , they refer to zf ' 5 ft » ' of the 13 th of May in proof of my acjp Sttnce in what they did a fortnight before , tnd * An ther a whimsical charge against me , that I hive to than

      j ^ tt submitted this insult rather be >« of contention . However , I am well pleased ^ the taunt . J 0 % As to my use of the words ' WAIT , JJTCi WAIT , ' I really do not know how to 2 ™* r them . I caa only say , that if all , or as I hare jv ^ d before , that if one-half of those professwg wj * t f principles worked for a month as I have y ^ «» England for the last fifteen years , that you ¦ JJwt have to wait t day for the Charter . ^ : - Coma the charge of cowardiee on the 10 th 3 j $ jW . and this charge Mr Adams shall answer hia-^ ° J ipeech ind resolution . The speech delivered uJ ^ Hth , the day after the Kennington Common to ^ Si andthe resolution proposed on the 14 th , of j ^ 1 &&K to Mr O'Connor ' s blarney , ' but eer-^ 7 ifttt thU Ten Thousand Pound * wm aware of

      Untitled Article

      SStiSf ft " ^ ^ also after he - ~ aware that , the Convention . 1 hadnde $ ded ? iH > attMr h £ Sl ° ^ " for the ChartershouW nottbe brought forward . Here is Mr , Adamsi speech , de-^« e ? « " » Tuesday * the llth of April , at a ° ^ GR , 1 A J CHARTISr MEETING AT THE LITE . MRY AND SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTION - ¦ JOHN STREET , FITZROY SQUARE ' Now , curious to say . Mr Adams was the first from the Northern Star ' . ol the 15 th of April sS ^ swwwia .- ,

      cnaracter of con » istenc > to prewWeMwelTai ttTatTf SSXifir- " - ' ' 7 ? ? tad iKSTJSK S « % »? £ w ? peaceful and moral , and yestirda , SSJX * *™?? OH " o ~ 8 l ™ a demonstraUoaof tbek pe « efnl moral force , not to give battie . ( Loud cheers ) AMwughbe was one of tho ? e who held the doctrine « morally tf we may , forcibly if we mnsf ( Loud cheem . ) Bnt , t ™^ V e 3 ih *^ » 0 « l means first ( Hear , hear ! l ? f w "JfffJ * tbe ^ n ^ ntion with hU Ufe in hii n * nd , bnt still that was no reason he should commit sul . Ciae- ( hear , iearj-and he did not think they had showed any want of courage . He had a letter in hU 1

      p o * bet which contained this .: —1 ehould sooner hear of yonr death than jfonr cowardice . ' His sister : also , wrote as follows :- I wonM rather lay your lifeless body in the grave than hear that yon were guilty of being either a spy or a coward . ' How , this showed that his family were ' up to the mart' ( Tremendous cheering . ) His consU . tuency , also , left it with him whether he should remain i town or not . He bad never heard anything leu ( torn any de egate , bnt that he was prepared to sacrifice all in their causa , Ma wnen the real day of trial arrived , they would all be found to act worthy ot Englishmen , Irishmen , and Scotchmen , ( Great cheering , )

      Now that was the speech and I next come to the resolution . : ¦ lst- « Mr'West stated that he doubted whether they would ett the people to petition again ; but he begged to more , after what had taken place in the House of Commons on Thursday night , that Mr O'Connor would not oe justified w bringing forward a motion on the subject of the Charter . . - 'Mr Graham moved , as an amendment , — « That the Charter be brought forward that aight The motion and amendment having been respectively seconded , a vote was taken , when the amendment was negatived Vy a majority of thirty . fire to four , and the originalmotion carried . ' Now that resolution is in the Star of the 15 th of April , page 8 , coli 3 . and in the same page , col . 4 , will be found the following : —

      On , the motion of Ifr Adams . A VOTE O ? THANKS WAS GIVEN TO MB . 7 E&RGTJS O'COHHOR FOR HIS HOBLE ASD DIGH 1 PJED COSDTJCT IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS H 3 T N 16 HT , AND THAT CONVENTION DECLARED IT * WARMEST SYMPATHY WITH HIM IN THE TREATMENT HE HAS RECEIVED . 'The motioa waB carried unanimously , and briefly acknowledged by ' thehon . gentleman , who retired asaid ¦

      loodcheers ? Now , here was my justification—nay , MY COMMAND—not to bring my motion forward under the circumstances , and here was Mr Adams ' s condemnation of ray out-door COWARDICE , and my indoor BLAJtNEY , after four days' and nights' reflection , as the meeting was on Monday , the 10 th , and his motion was brought forward on Friday , the 14 tb . I would ask if there could possible exist a stronger conviction against my present accusers ?

      12 th . With regard to my laudation of Sir George Grey , I stated then , as I state now , that men will be guilty of acts as a body , that the basest among them would blush to acknowledge as an individual , and I was showing the vices of the system which thus induced individuals of kindly feelings-to lend themselves to acts of injustice ; but surely this was no great crime ? But , perhaps my Scotch censors hold it to be a crime to say good of any man . 13 th . Wth regard to my fling at the Irish Confederates in the person of C . G . Duffy of the Nation , after circumstances are not to constitute a test for judging previous acts . In the letter of Mr

      Duffyupon which I commented—the most rabid and ungenerous attack was made upon the English Chartists , and the > lrish people themselves were invited to rely upon the shopkeepers and the landlords rather than upon their own exertions ; and would I , who have suffered so much in the defence of Chartism , have been justified in allowing this apple of discord to have been thrown between the English Chartists and Irish Confederates , to secure whose amalgamation has cost me years of pain , trouble , and expense . But , do my accusers forget that the Irish Confederates of that day were as much opposed to the policy of the' Hation' as I was ? and would these Scotch

      censors make Mr Duffy ' s martyrdom the basis of their present onslaught upon me ? Mitchel was suspected and denounced until victimised , and then he was enlsgised , and so it is with every man ;• ' but ranch as I sympathised with Mr Duffy , the English Chartists must bear in mind that he vowed never to 'BRIDGE THE GULF' between them and the Irish people , and that as a lepresentative of Chartism it was my duty to resent the insult . I did so , and will again , if circumstances warrant . 14 th . I have so , objection to risk my ' corpse , ' as the Scotch philosophers term it , because it would be worth but little except for dissection ; bnt I have a great objection to place my life in the keeping of such ' men as Adams , Cochrane , and Co *

      15 th . The scribes state that no insult was offered to Mr O'Connor , and yet we find the following pithy morsel in the voluminous indictment preferred agaiRsthitn . Here it is . ' The enthusiasm of the people abated—their brightest hopes of success were all blasted by Mr O'Connor's letters . They hesitated about sending their delegates to the Assembly . The first of May came—toe Asstmbly met ; and behold the result . Out of 180 delegates elected , only twenty-seven appealed , at the commencement . Gtainally they came dropping in , till the beginning of

      the second week ; but never did tbe number reach anything like that originally ntended . The Assembly sa . tr , fram . the beginning , it had . not the unaaSsuros support of the country . The sincere portion of the members , find . iug themselves so awkwardly situated , and knowing the eatue . BOLDLY and opbhlt xxpusseu their minds upon the ubject Thi > called forth the condemnation of the O'Connor party , who . in consistency , ought not to have been there at all , and hence the speedy dissolution of the Assembly , and the complete prostration of the people ' s cau'e-wtt O'Connor is tie popular leader . '

      Now 1 should be glad to know what the terms ' boldly and openly expressed their minds npon . the subject , which called forth the condemnation of the O'Connor party , and blowing the cause' refers to , it not to abuse of Feargus O'Connor ? But then see the self-condemnation of the Assembly , and see the exemplification of the democratic principle , as illustrated nth those gentlemen with their LIVES IN THEIR HANDS , ready to be sacrificed in the glorious cause of liberty , but panting more warmly for the ten thousand pounds , but now increased to the fever pulsation , in the vain , hope of destroying him who prevented the plunder of the people , and the sacrifice of their cause . The democrats admit that the Assembly . from the beginning , hadnot the unanimous support of the country ; and although the veritable Chartists belonging to the O'Connor party constituted a large majority of the Assembly , we are

      told that' IN CONSISTENCY THEY OUGHT NOT TO BE THERE AT ALL . ' Now , is not this extremely democratic , or does it not smack of the democratic policy laid down in the Birmingham Sturge Conference , in which Messrs Adams and Cochraae were delegates , when the Chairman declared that the majority was in favour of preserving the name of the Charter , hut the good sense was with the small minority , the chairman , walking out , and abandoning his own Conference ? Now is not this a bright illustration of the Scotch philosopher ' s notion of Democracy and Universal Suffrage ? Sat still further to prove that these creatures of Faddy Brewster are strongly impregnated with the Birmingham policy and definition of majority , they have the unblushing insolence to propose that the name of our movement should be changed from the

      CHARTIST ASSOCIATION to the DEMOCRATIC CONFEDERATION OF GREAT BRITAIN . . 16 th . Mr O'Connor did promise in the Star' of the 15 th of April to propound a plan , and every week from that period to the close of the sittings of the National Assembly , Mr O'Connor waj propounding his plan ; not a new plan , but the plan which he recommended in the ' Star' of 1848 , namely—a nnion with the small shopkeepers , . trades , and Irishmen . The Irish had but recently'joined us ; and had it not been for the villainy of the Ten Thousand Pounders , ' with their hearts in their hands , ' before one month after the 10 th of April , all those parties would have joined us ; and from the Scotch delegates in that Assembly I trace the ternporwy suppression of Chartism .

      17 . h . Mr O'Connor did pledge himself that if that Gagging Bill passed , he would declare himself a Republican ; and he thinks that was a pretty broad announcement in such a House . And when taunted by Sir Robert Peel with stating 'that he did not not care whether the Pope , the Devil , or the Pretender was on the throne—or what they called the monarch—if the people bad the power of electing him '—npon that occasion Mr . O'Connor did not qualify , bnt repeated the assertions . And now , without any reference to the enraged state of the House during the last session , Mr O'Connor submits his speeches as published in Hansard , as specimens of the boldest speeches erer delivered in tbe House of Commons . 18 th . I did aay , that I would impeach the ministers , bnt I trust that I Lave more mom than to do

      Untitled Article

      so , - wh ? n allTouTd " be their supfi 6 rters : ~ anaS- ~ aiT ; nowmme , ; ¦ .., ¦ - . „ .. ,,,-. . « , ? w .- . . v , J 19 i £ did promise to bring on the mptionVfor . a- £ arle r . bM'the new .-Executive ; Tappointed by P « 8 S ° pher 8 j gave it : as their ^ opinion , ' thatuit would be injudicious , and surely the philosophers wril not now dispute ; the wisdom of their ov ? n officers . ' - : ~ ¦"'; . ' ¦ 20 tb . I d ! 4 tell the Convention , ihat ; i would be prepared to . assist the National , Assembl y ^ anticipating that that Assembl y would be a legal- Assembly , and would fairl y represent the Chartist princi ples . ; but I did not anticipate the gathering of such a body , to misrepresent those principles , and render them odious . " ¦ ¦ ••¦ » ,.

      21 st . The inind of England , might have been looking to me for ttie promised fruits of their long acd incessant labour ; but , for fourteen long years , upto that very period , the mind of Ireland had been marahalled against my principles , and embittered against my person . 22 nd . I adopt every word of the following passage , as my own . MEASURE HIM BY HIS OWN STANDARDEXERCISE YOUR OWN JUDGMEKtS . BE MM . READ , READ , READ ; THINK , THINK . THIHK TRY HI M HOT BY ONE 8 OLITARY . ACT , BUT BY HIS EVERY ACT . AHD THEN DECIDE AS TO WHETHER HE BE ENTITLED TO A CONTINUATION OF YOUR CONFIDENCE ' v

      Now those are the words in the indictment , and upon them I join issue with ray accusers ? I say , try me upon my every act , not durinf the last boisterous season—not Bince Tjoined' the English Chartists—not since I estab'ished ' the 'Northern Star , '—not since I first came into Parliament in 1832 , but since I first joined the Irish people in 1822 , w . hen deserted by their every leader ; when every door , of every relative ' s house was shut against ine , and when I was compelled to fly . my country for thirteen months . " Yes ; try me through my long and continuous struggles with Daniel O'Connell

      and his Irish lickspitlles-iwith the ' . base , bloody . and brutal Whigs ! and iheir bfficiaU- rwith the press and its power—with the middle classes and their deeprooted hatred—with the jury class ,., and ^ their omnipotence , and , though last , not least , with the vermin of Labour , and I assert , without fear of contradiction , that no public man who ever lived in any age , in any country , can boast of the same political consistency for over a quarter & { acenluTv , when promises , pledges , and anticipations held out to the poor , justify them in tolerating their betrayal by their pledged friends . .

      Henry Hunt was prematurely hurried to the cold grave by popular ingratitude , created by folly and madness . He was murdered , and rests in his grave with the consolation of his memory being honoured ; and yet the ordeal through which he passed , was but child ' s play , compared with what I have gone through . John Knight , of Oldham , Henry Hunt ' s friend , told me with his last words , ' that the Luudoners would destroy me if Istopped the supplies / and , no matter what my opposition to the philosophers might have been , if I aided them in the £ 10 , 000 grab , I might have denounced the principles of Chartism as long as I pleased . ¦

      23 rd . Ididsell to the secretary . of the Glasgow Association 1500 cards , upon my tour with Mr Duncombe , the secretary telling me that that number had applied for cards . and when my toady repeated the lie , '—Oh ! how the Lord doth deliver my enemies into ray hands—James Adams , of . Glasgow , stood in front of the platform in the City Hall , and spoke to the sentiment , 'Feargus O'Connor , Esq .. ' when he stated that he could not 'FIND LAN GIJAGE SUFFICIENTLY STRONG to express his admiration of that gentleman . ' Now , vlhat will the honourable delegate say of his abuse of the honourable gentleman ? ... •

      24 th . In 1846 , Mr O'Connor himself advanced a great portion of the funds to keep the movement alive , and surely , when $ he seantiness of tbe receipts at that period is referred to by the ' philosophers , instead of being urged as a charge against me , it should be urged as a charge against the , people . But what do the philosophers say ? Why , that FHILE HE KNOWS , AND HE 18 AWARS THAT GOVERNMENT KSOWS , THAT WHEN THE STRUG 6 LE COMBS , HE CANNOT MARSHAL THE FORCES HE BOASTS HE CAN COMMAND '

      Well , surely , if ever there was a justification for not going to battle with inferior forces , and their inferiority known to the enemy , here it is furnished by the philosophers ; but let it be understood , that if that weakness does exist in the popular ranks , it has been caused by such vermin as those to whose charges I am replying . 25 th ; Mr O ' Connor did much prefer the Free Trade policy of Peel to that of Russell , and Mr O'Connor , when famine stared—not millions of bis own countrymen—but the whole population in the face , and when he was aware that if Free Trade did not pass , the agitators of that country would have saddled English Chartism with all the

      consequences of the famine—would have told them , that , bnt for the Chartists , the streets would have been paved with penny loaves , and the houses thatched with pancakes ; and Mr O'Connor having discovered for many years , that Irish hostility to English Chartism constituted the main strength of the Whig government , he did call a Conference at his own expense , and what other man in Europe would do it—that Conference consisted of the most consistent opponents to Free Trade ; that Conference saw the justice and the policy of the proposition ; that ' Conference submitted its proposition to , a meeting of over 5 , 000 working men in the HaU of Science , at Manchester , and it was ¦ uaanimo \ islv

      received amid the most unbounded applause . < Was this an act of despotism ? First , to have consulted the representatives of Labeur , and then to hate submitted their deliberations to Labour itself . And what Mr O'Connor now says is , that , under . the present system , Sir Robert Peel is the only living statesman who can suggest those changes which Free Trade imperatively demands , and which the dominant parly will accept ; Peel ' s Free Trade means a progressive advance towards reciprocity ; Russell ' s Free Trade means office ; . while Mr O'Connor further contends , and ever has contended , th at the

      only possible means of making Free Trade nationally beneficial , is by the enactment of the PEOPLE'S CHARTER . But Mr O'Connor does not belong to that class of politicians , who under a bad system which creates famine , starvation , and death , considers himself debarred from selecting a choice of evils . And Mr O'Connor ever has and ever will , attribute the present'distress of the country to Lord John Russell ' s Free Trade policy , which might have been much mitigated by the policy of Sir Robert Peel , but never can be wholly eradicated , until the creator of wealth is represented in the House of Commons . ¦

      26 th . I now come to the last charge , that of mis . stating the number of signatures attached to the National Petition . . ; . 1 st . The Convention itself appointed a . Petition Committee , and upon that committee was Mr ADAMS himself . They appointed London men to count the signatures to that petition . On Wednesday I went to the Land Office and asked Mr M'Grath how the petition sheets irere coming in ? He took me down stairs to the eellar , in company with . Mr Nicholson , who w& 9 appointed to take the numbers . Mr M'Grath showed them to me , and told ine he did riot think there was over a million and a half . I admit that I did stamp my foot , and

      that I said in a rage , 'Are these tbe men who want tbe Charter ? ' Oh , Sir , ' said Mr M'Gratb , 'this is nothing , the Convention has reaeived communications from all parts of the country , mentioning large petitions that have not arrived yet ; they have not come yet from any of the' large towns . I replied , ' I stated to'the country that this time there will be five million signatures , and if I cannot state in the House that there are that number , you must get some one else to present it for 1 will not , ' and I left the office . On Saturday , the 8 th , I went to Snig ' s find , ' and between Wednesday and Saturday . I had not a word of conversation relative to the petition . On Sunday I returned to my hotel ; there were present there Mr Cullingham , Mr M'Grath , Mr Clark , Mr Doyle , MrDixon , Mr Harney , and a highly respectable gentleman , well known to and respected

      by the working classes . When the Executive entered i said , ' Well , M'Grath , how goes on the Petition . ' ' Well , Sir , ' he replied , I think your expectation will be more than realised , as they are Hear the in millions now , and tbe men will be engaged all light in counting and rolling the sheets . ' I said , ' Thank God for that . Shall I have such a list as I can read to the house , if the signatures from any locality are questioned ? ' Mr M'Grath replied , Yes , 'Sir , Mr Nicholson has been appsinted to draw np a list from each place . ' On Monday morning I went to the Convention—it was stated to the Convention , not by me , but by one of the Committee , that the signatures amounted to much more than five millions , bnt that as they were still pouring in the men were still rolling it , and the list was not completed . Cuffey , who is now summoned as one of my accusers , waB present in the Convention $ we got into the cars

      Untitled Article

      arove ^ - 'tK-ESna-TOffi theiCommUtee . brought me ; out the lis $ ,,. amounting to 5 , 70 !) , 00 . 0 , and placed the Petition in ^ the , caiv ^ l I stated the-numbera as Represented to me ; arid when impugned- b y the Government ; -on the ; faith of thirteen law clerkspwho I * subsequently showed should have counted at the rate of 150 a miriute , besides discovering all the false signatures . ' . and obscenities , and . without eating Or'ftinking-i made ' the . following speech itf . ' the ,. House ' of Corainons , which wili . be found in page li column 3 , of the 'Star' ef the 15 th of April .:- ; ^ . ; ,

      ' Ob the motion that the report do Ue upon the table Mr F . O'Connor said , thatit ( would be quite Impossible . for any thirteen clerkii to count , i from the time tUe petition was printed , even 1 , 900 , 0 ( 10 signatures , nnd he * should ; therefore , mo ? e for the appointment of % committee to inquire into tho subject . THere was an old saying , « that thosa who hid knew where to find * and he believed that if such abuses did exist , it no doubt wastheactof jomo of the ' government spies . ( ' Oh , oh . ' ) He fully b £ Keyed that the number of signatures he had , represented tne pjtttwn to . contain was correct ,,. He woud apply taf K ? * ° i * * ll Utl ? - - " " P * Hto » wai cohtainea in four or five large bundles , and It took himself , assisted r 2 " i ° n' Hedid not hellete he should hsVe any rtfrf WSS& V H tion u P ° the same . nbS ° rTh » il It W ° - d ? uble or treble that number . ' . ; L ho 3 fl 09 ' ! ™» misreportod it ihetdd ' harebeen t ™ «

      . , , , 5 , 000 , 000 . ] , ; --. . » , » ., » w » ^ Now , then , I ask any sane , man whethei , witii a thorough knowled ge of the omni potence of a Select Committeei in such cases , whether . I / would , be hkely to move for the . appointment of such a tribunal , if I did not conscientiously believe that I haa not been deceived by ., -the PETITION COMMITTEE I What would have been my chance of escape if a petition , which ' -1

      represented to contain five million seven hundred thousand signatures , was found to ' contain only onethird of that number ? With respect to the petition presented by Mr Duncombe , it did : coutain vhe number stated—namely , over 3 , 300 . 000 . Mr Phil p , onej of the' Executive , was superintendent of that petition , and with him rests the responsibility 5 while / with regard to not being counted , every man wno understands the forms of the H 6 ' use , is awar that every petition . MUST BE COUNTED : and Mr

      Puncombe was . not held responsible then if there was any . inaccuracy * because terror then was not so necessary to keep the Whi gs in power , and because HIS destruction then , though a . much abler man , vras not considered as necessary as my destruction in ¦ iK *' perilous days of A pril 5 and I now unhesitatingly declare that the last petition was in . finitely larger , and infinitel y heavier , than the petition presented j > y Mr Diihcombei . There is another fact , of which the philosophers are not aware—namely , that , independently of the

      large muster , roll , during the previous week , 1 had presented 175 other petitions for the Charter , some of them—if I remember right—signed by 12 . Q 00 , some by 6 , 000 , some by 4 , 000 , and some by smaller numbers . - As regards Cuffey , what I stated in the House was not that he was a 'Tom-fool ; but when ColoneLSibthorp ( I think ) called him a f . Tomfool , ' and wished to make me responsible for his every word , I defended Cuffey , and asked if I was to beheld accountable for what every ' Tom-fool ' said ? ¦ "!¦¦ " . : : ¦ , .

      Having thus answered this portion of the charge , let- me now call the reader ' s attention' to the nicet y with which our professing friends scrutinise the signatures to a Chartist petition , a 5 compared with the dashing and unscrupulous , manner in which theirs enemies perform the same work . ¦ I know parties' who signed the petition against Catholic Emancipation every time they passed the place where it lay ; while * it is an indisputable fact ; that for Catholic Emancipation , and against Catholic Emancipation , for Reform , and against Reform , for Free Trade , and against Free Trade , for the admission of the Jews to Parliament , and against th « ir admission , signatures have been

      manufactured , as Mr Newdegate stated , at so much per hundred . But to furnish the reader with the strongest proof of this process being well understood by the House , when the strength of party is 8 ufficienlty powerful to meet the sneer of their opponents , upon the charge of fabricaion , la « t session 1 presented a petition numerously signed from the Colliery districts , in Lancashire , with reference to the Colliery explosion : Sir George Grey subseuently took it off the-table , and not with anger or gravity , but as if it was a common practice , shewed me that nearly every name was written in the same hand . But , as with physical force , so with petitions ; I must bear the weight of both ; I must

      be denounced as the physical force Chartist b y the Press and the enemy , and as a moral force coward by the professing , friend j I must be answerable for the genuineness of every signature to a petitioH , while others pay for ; and boast of , their manufacture ; and when I sew hundreds standing at the Land Office , while . few were signing the peiition , I asked Mr Clark , who was . with ine , why they did not sign . it ? aud he replied that many of them could - not write—and I retorted * You are pretty fellows to get up a petition . ' You should take a lesson in petition manufacturing from the enemy ; and when you find one who cannot write , let another sign his name , and let him ' put his mark .

      But let me now see if I can establish some greater number of signatures than 1 , 900 , 000 , by a sectional analysis of the country . On Wednesday morning , the 5 th of April , the second day of the meeting of the Convention , as reported in page 1 , col . 5 , of the ' Star' of the 8 th of April—1 Mr Adaiis said , from Glasgow , which was a district co ' mpriiiing an immense population , he had brought un one hundred thousand signatures to the petition , and another thirty thousand had since been forwarded . The middle classesh& 4 begun to fraternise ; in fact , the onls parties who refused their aid and subscriptions wer ' those who fatten on 'he vice and dissi pation of the people —the publicans , ' - MrWyld , the delegate from Mottram , said he had brought up 70 , 800 signatures . '

      Now , if the Scotch philosophers will add 70 , 000 to 130 , 000 , they will find that-it makes 200 , 000 , or more than one-tenth of the reported signatures , coming from Glasgow and Mottram alone , while Mr Lightowler reported 70 000 from his dfctrict ; and Mr-Ernest Jones gpoke as foliows : — - ' Mr Ernest Joneshellered that it would be found that the number of signatures really affixed to the petition was underrated rather than overrated . ( Hear , hear . ) There were 200 , 000 signatures now lying at the office he had been advised of 47 , ' 00 which were sent from Halifax en Thursday la « t , which had never come to hand . ' 'Mr Mirsden stated , th . it he had brought 85 , 01 ) 0 sienatnres with him . ' :: - ¦ . ¦¦ ,-. ¦< . -

      Thus we have 392 , 000 signatures , WITH MORE TO FOLLOW , reported by five delegates , more than one-fifth reported , to be affixed to the petition , and not embracing the large manufacturing towns of Manchester , Birmingham , Leeds , Huddersfield , Liverpool , Preston , Bolton , Oldham , and district , Edinburgh , Newcastle-upon-Tyne , Carlisle , Bristol , Bath , and the thousand and one tributary streams . But seeMr Adams ' s wrath at the imputation east upon the petition before hia mind was perverted by the hope of the £ 10 , 000 : — . . ¦ .: ' . <• - ' ' Mr Adams moved , as an amendment , « That the Con . Tention would undertake to procure a greater number of genuine signatures to tbe petition than it was represented to have bad , if the Government were prepared to consider that as an argument in favour of iti consideration . '

      Now then , as is ., my . custom , I , am going to carry the fice 1 into the enemies' camp . Of course every reflection cast upon the ; number of signatures , since the failure of the National Assembly , was known to Cuffey and others ; previous ( o its presentation , but certainly to Mr James Adams > who was A MEMBER OF THE PETITION COMMITTEE , and therefore , if the numbers were falsified , and if in consequence thereof I received insult ' from the House of Commons , and the Chartist cause received damage , I charge the insult , the damage and the falsehood upon James Adams , whose ^ business it was-to have reported truly the number of signatures , and thereby have saved himself from the charge of palpable fraud committed upon Feargus O'Connor and the

      Chartists ; He cannot get over this , even if I was guilty , because he is parlkeps criminis , and stands in the position of Powell and Davis , with this difference ; that in the transaction he is guilty and I am wholly innocent . It is to be understood , howevei , that I merel y charge this information upon his own evidence ,, as at thisimoraent I declare , so help me God . I believe there were over five million signatures to the Petition . However , I leave the question with the Scotch jury , and , truth to gay , they are much better than English juries ; and when the controversy is between me arid the biggest WttCkgnwd that ever wore a head , he ' d be sure to get a verdict , but then there ' s an appeal to a larger tribunal , and that is the WHOLE PEOPLE . '

      So much for Mr Adama ' e views before the anticipation of the £ 10 , 000 ; and now for his previous physical force views when he had * his heart in his hand . ' The reader will find the following in page 5 , col . 5 , of the' Star' of the 8 th of April :-• Mr Adams did not Bee tbe slightest neocflsity for any bravado . Tney were pursuing a peaceful , legal , and constltulional course . He thought that they were wrong in anticipating an onslaught . Such discussion was calculated to provoke feelings of hostility . What right had tlia Government to make an onslaught ? The question had yet to be decided in a court of law , whether we bad or bad not the right . He therefore moved , as an amendment , < That this Convention has no right to anticipate an on . glaught , or tiw arrest of tbe members , on Monday neiV

      Untitled Article

      "• -N 0 W rthen > what ^ ill-the . readet-8 ay ; to thSiSa ! oui pfjthe - datiiotiwith . 'HIS ^ lEART . IN HIS HANI )/ propdsing to appealifrom the- field of . battle to- the , arena of law , andwho now abuses meand the ExecuV ti'l ^ P ' P waging war with the elements on the . lOlh of April ? Thispatriot , with ' his heart in his hand , verymchreraind ' s me of poor Judy Flannigari , [ w W * startled by the sudden ' appearance of tei ° Ji ' " SKM- ' ° B 1 WISHA , DARBY , MY OFWShS ' HEART S IN THE HEEL mvNow , rthirik I havebe » n as good as my word in answering every charge seriatim ; and I think the reader Will see that I have more to dread from the

      rascality of professing Chartists than from the snares of Powell , Davis , arid thek-roasters ; and although I have gone to ' great length , and occupied much space , if the reader thinks it is thrown' away , I am not to blame . Let thoae whom the philosophers assured that there was not an abusive or offensive Word in their statement , judge for themselves ; and letI ' lach ask himself , whether there is another proprietor of a newspaper in the world ( hat would publish such rabiu ) hon 8 ense--Bucb insulting stuff ? The position cf the three tailors of Tooley Street was sublimity itself compared to that of Paddy Brewster ' s three knobstick Chartists , urged to madness by the cherished venom of their master , whom I

      have thrashed twice at Paisley—in his own townonce iu Dunfermline , once in Aberdeen , and once in Glasgow .: and still further , these knobsticks were drivento frenzy by thedisappointraent of Vh « lion ' s Bhare of the LIBERTY FUND . Are these fellows , who declare they did not abuse me in the Convention , aware that the whole of their original correspondence has been placed in ray hands ? Is their irariiaculate coadjutor from Falkirk aware that I am ' alBO in possession of his , original . correspondence , and of the original correspondence , ' during the sitting of the National Assembly , of the Scotch delegates-and their , constituents , and that I . have rievbr published a word of these atrocious letters , though I have been requested to do so ? But I have withheld them in the hope tb at the * philosophers ' would see the error , of their , ways . -

      I shall now conclude with an anecdote strictly illustrative of the position of ' the patriot who carrie ' to London with ' his heart in his hand , ' to fight the battle of the Charter . In the old days of the Spanish wars an enthusiastic volunteer ordered his regimentals , that he mi ght die grand ; but , though panting for liberty , he had a strong affection for his heart , and he told the tailor to put a ¦ strong tin-plate in his coat . The regimentals' came home late at ni ght ; the war-whoop was

      sounded early in the morning—the enthusiastic soldier was' doomed to a place in the front rank—the order to charge ' wa 8 given , when his regiment was routed ; and' ^ heri , scampering over a ditch , a grenadier gave him a poke in ' the posteriors with his . bayonet , which assisted him in the bound . The gallant soldier felt for the wound , and discovered that Mr Snip had put the plate of tin iu the backside of his breeches , instead of inside his coat , and he exclaimed , — 'By Jove ! Snip , knewbetter where my heart lay than I did myself . ' Fea bgus O'Connor .

      Untitled Article

      We have read that part of Mr O'Connor ' s answer to the charges of the GUsgow delegates , and the statements therein made , in which our . names are mentioned , and they are critically and literally true . , ' ' Phiup M'Grath . , ; . William Dixon . Thomas . Clark . I was appointed by the Petition Committee of the National Convention , to take the number of signatures coming from each town and district , and the manner in which I performed the duty was thus s—the delegates who brought petitions with them reported the numbers to me , and I Superintended the counting of those which came by post without numbers affixed , and the duty of counting

      those petitions was assigned by the Petition Com . mittee to London men . After the numbers were impugned in the -House of Commons , Mr Adams , who was the most active of the Petition Committee , and " ! who called upon me every day at dinner hour to ascertain the numbers , accompanied by me waited upon the several delegates auain , to ascertain the number of signatures brought by each ; and upon comparing the list , as furnished by me to Mr O'Ciinnur on the day of the Kennington Comm ; n meeting , with the statements subsequently made by the ; delsgates , there , was little , if any , difference between the numbers stated b y Mr O'Connor in the ; House of Commons , and that subsequently ascertained from the delegates themselves .

      ; I can solemnly declare , that neither Mr O'Connor , nor anypersan authorised b y him , nor any persom whatsoever , directly or indirectl y , attempted to influence me as to the statement ef the number of signatures to the National Petition , and of the truth of the above statement I am prepared , if necessary , to take my oath . > W . H . Nicholson .

      Untitled Article

      Dbath of the Right Hon . Charlks Buixer , — Mr Charles Buller , member for Liakeard and Pr » sident of the Poor Law Board , died at an early hour on Wednesday moraing . About a fortnight ago Mr Buller underwent an operation for one of the most painful , disorders to which man ia liable . Although the operation was Bucc&sfully performed , great dc bility succeeded , the health of the patient not having been , previously very . robust . On Monday , it seems , a low fever supervened , and under it the right hon . gentleman Bunk about half-past sixo ' olookon Wednesday morning ! despite the unremitting attention and skill ofhis medical attendants . Tfaedeoeased has passed . ' away at the comparative prematu e ase of forty-two .

      A Hbroinb . —Albxandria , Not . 23 . —A vessel bound for Aden with coal , having lost her master by death when about twelve days ' sail from her destination , the crew eonspired to take possession aad dispose of her on the coast ; of Arabia However , the captain ' s daughter , Miss Arnold , ' a young voman of the age of twenty , was on board , and she having reoeived tome intimation of the piratical intentions of the men , armed herself with a p « ir of pistols ; secured all the firearms , and getting the mate and another man to join her , bravely forced tho mutineers to work the ship to Aden , where they are now in confinement .

      Sbizubb op an Illicit Dktillbrt .. —On WednendayMrE . Thomas and Mr J . Vanstone , ExoiBO officers , went to a house in Wa ' ter-lanei Hackney , and having gamed admittance at the front door , they proceeded to make an examination of the premises and in the back room of the ground floor found a large copper still , set in brickwork , which had been recently worked off , with a small quantity of illicitly , made spirits , The reBt of the working . had been removed by the men belonging to the place . There wera . about 100 gallons of molaesea wash prepared for distillation , a numberfof tubs , pipeBandthe

      , general stock-in-trade of a contraband distillerr . Two females were found in the house , who gave the capi ' fs of Phoa ' w West , and Ann Brown , the latter of whom was recognised aa an old offender , havinjr b'en detect » d in a similar . transaction in 1847 , when she acfiVred three months' imprisonment ; both womeawero pjiven into . piisfcody . While the Exoiss offioers were in the house preparing to despatoh their teizurc to the Excise wavehouses , a gentle tap was given at the door , which was opened , and a man , bearing a bag of molasKB entered , who was also giTenincharce . ... " ..... .

      DoBHAH—DaiTH feom HTDBopnoEH . —On We * nes . day week , Mr Qjorge Cummingg , Innkeeper and grocer , residing at Shorburn'Hlll , died in tbe greatest agon ; from the « ff * ota of kydrophobio . Abiut nine weeks ago the aeooaied had what U called a ' wife ' s feast * at Ms home , and , during tbe course of the evening , two dogs whloh were In the house began to fight under a table , and , on the deceased attempting to separate them , oneof the dogs fljw at him , and < bi ? hlm sHghtfy upon tBenose , Not muoh ootloewasat first taken of the matter , although some time after it took place deoeased complained of shootlHg pains from the wound up te his head . Oa Monday evening , however , unmletakeable symptoms of tbe dreadful malady exhibited themselves , and they Inoreaaed In vlolenoa np to Wednesday night , when , as staled above , Mr Camming * expired . The dog , effected Its eiospe from toehoase , sndbas not tiaco been seen ,

      Stbaboe Cieccm T 4 KCB . —Aboynamsd Elwln Hayball , of Chard pariah , ono day last , week fell into a mill pond and was lapposed to be drowned ; he wsp , howerer , taken out of the wa ^ : r and the body carried home , Everybody believed the child dead except his mother , whose » fflio Ion waB very great . She took htm . In her arms arid held htm before the fire . After nearly hal ( an hour the child showed symptoms of returning oenjoIousnMB , upon trhlob soiao ohangeintbe pisltion of tbekoey took place , when It was dleoovered ( hat tbe child ' s foot bad been in the fire , and was dreadfully burnt , . A surgeon having been called in did whatwai

      otcesBsry , and the child was getting on very well . About three d » ya after tho mother placed him before tie fire for a moment while she went into the garden j and on her retura was horror-struck to find her child burnt nlmoBt to a cinder . It is a singular coincidence ) that a girl , the cousin of the aboveaamed Edwin Hayball , a short time tlooe fell inte the fire , and one of her breaBtB was almott entirely contained in her agony she ran to the mill pond to allay the pain by bathing -the breast with cold water , when the fell in and was drowned . An Inquest has been held on Edwin Hftjball , and a verdlot of' Accidental dtath' returned .

      Untitled Article

      —————¦¦" "r ^ - ^ rat ^ t ^; E ^ pU ^^ Ai ^ TTg ^| f ; On SjturdayrlasfrjflSpryrRaBkon-. iind- , Robert rlanjiitou ^ er ^ plsie ^ Ohetit ' M the' fligh'Cbwb of Justiciary , ia Edia ^ ufgnTto ~ ae »^*> Judgment of their lordships in fall bej « hVophS Objections whioh had been raised by their / cfottnwHo' ^ o sufficiency of the verdict wMon ' the'jury'abj 6 at ' tfoHilfgh ^ a ^ o ; pronounced in their case ; finding itiem - ' goiftylof ^ setb > tipn . in so far that they iiaed finBaajte' * oaloulatcd to excite popular diBaffectioriand-reoi ' stanceto lawful authority . ; ^ ¦ . vr . -:- ;^ - ; ^ * *¦ :: ><¦ k \\ the Lo : da of Justiciary were ' pres ' ariV except the Lord JosiiceGeneral . ' ' -- ¦ " «^ - . ; ' - Ths Lord Jusiioe Glebe hayins sUiteiJ 'the termii of the jury ' s verdjot , and the explanation with wbioH itw . « accompanied , that they hod 'burnoself left oat _

      the word 'intended , ' in charaqtefiMB ' g the languart - uwd by the ptisonws , at gie ' at length * gate it as hM opinion , that to hold , as oourisel had done ; that ' snob : a Verdict was equivalent to one of not' guilty , yiiA a position opposed to sound reason and common sensei He Bhowed , from avast number of caiw . that it was not essential in an indictrrierit ; for sedition to wefc foxtU the averment that tho words were 'ihteadeo ? I to produce snoh a result an populap disaffection and I resistance to lawful authority , and he contended , that it it was not necessary for the public pro-Ifiecutor n so to 'frame ' the indietm ' snt , it waa nofc necessary for the jury to find Buch an " ' ^^^ tioa . ' Ia a ease of theft ,- for inBtarioe' ; H ' was

      not necessary for the jury to use the words ia the minor proposition of the indiotment ; that 'ha wickedly and theftuously took the articles " aways The worda ' gnilty of theft' ware quite raffisient to csUblieh the obaraoter of the act : and hence , on'the . same winoiiile , the yerdiot ' guilty of sedition was sufficient of itself to characterise' the crime of sedition . The crime of sedition coosista in wilfully , unlawfully , and to the public danger , using language aloulated to produce general disafiectisn , disloyalty , and reBistanoe to lawful authority .- Now , in thil

      ot \ ma be awteuendedthat the law did not look foj or rtquiw the general dole , or legal malicious intention or pnrpese with reference' to the 'prwise intent which tbe words ware calculated to produce . ¦ If such purpose was also proved , the case would be one of a more aggravated kirid ' of seditionl . If this view of the law of the ewe wasoorteot , and he held that it was . then he maintsined that the objections to the verdwt mast fail . He stated in ooridnsiori , that it was saOsfactory tohim that thejnry had left out the ? dT h - ! tMt the £ aM in a IesB 4

      Lords Macktsnzib , ' Mokcbibjf , MEDwr . f , and Wood , Bucwssiwl , ddiwwd their opiniom , whu , h . ! in the team coincided with the riews of the H Justice LJera . ¦ nfS ° M- ? ^ T ! . ? lo l igspeeoh ' « fevoitf of holding the objection relevant , and the verdiot at tantamount to a v 8 rdic » of acquittal . He . held that there could be no sedition unless there was torn director indirect . guiltiness of infentkn ; that e ^ intention was indiBpensable to the commisMon of tlS fh !?« iiS » Q * ? P ll ! Bd . ? , a 11 the tototmenfcS SiJ i 7 « l ate tn ? ° [ the lMt centary . ^ nd he «« W not find one in which the wickedness of mind oitbe accused was not charged , dthonPS tr Tt ^ hT l alW 878 » d KfsknS way . The libel before them contained not onl 7 » general charge of wickedness , but a special chX of what that wickedness oonsistedin . > riiat was th « ease whioh the prisoners werewarned to- meet . ThS oi

      aaeweworasavernngthiashowed that the dm . weutor must have understood that it wasYecesJS for him to embrace them in the indiotment "SdS tain \ ytheint . ntion . wasnotleftoritin tb ^ coffof the trial . But the jury hayinj left out the intentioa in their Yerdurt , the Bubfltsnce of the armS founded on his by their lordships wm , that MtTwai l ^ tt ^ STf- , ^ th 5 » * ¦ " -aSSSS £ , t jf £ ° fi , of iat ? ntioa wa 8 «« ential t ? S offence , it was the province of the jnry to find ft proved ; and K . they had not done so , ft held that itsxpreas what it did not do , and least of all when ESH ^' ' ' ^ e priBoners . and fo ? iS wP « . SlP ?? ? - vn * ' : ! « eonolusion , hU lordsbxp stated , that when the o ' ronmstance essential forthepns . 6 r ' s . convicti 6 n was not found h ?!

      ent led to nave the verdict considered as one of m . (| Ultt&J « There being thus only , oae judge in faTourofaoi . - taming theobieotions raised by the prisoners' eouS inarest rijudgment , the objectionB were 1 twSff aadthe court proceeUo pass aentence . repeuM » LordMouoEiHFPgaid that he was happy to think hat , haTing now sat on thU criminal bench for S teen years , he had not been called npondSsS that time to take any part in a trial for aed&'Su now . A case had however now occurred-and « was impossible net to see that in theo ? cnffi 8 tanceS under which this indiotment was laid there wm « 5 absolute necessity at law requiring thapnbnoauthS ntiea to bung . the matter under the consideratioa J the court . The indictment contained tery Sous charges . The charge of oongpirwy in the Si . libeled waa one of a very > rf «« oharaote , \ ll Sf j

      natcnarge , nowever fnaanot bean proved asainsfc the Mwoners at . the-bar . Thatbeiigthe S ffc was laid aside ; but then they oamg to the « nt'Jl of sedition contained fa the [ iSfraent thl iSSS having found both the prisoner ?* $$ & ft jfi in he P « tionlar terms expressed in « S verdict . The finding ih-m gailty of tha nha «« of seditiw even in . the mJWt . m SproS iin the verdict , fmphed a cerfain nJim ?^ ntentlo * . It . & » jW tt . . fnteuff S SSS words which in the op nian of the w " 3 the jury were seditioas . He would not go thronS any of the partioulaw connected with this caT bnt he would just say that it was impossible fer aay calm and sober-tBindedman to read the Bjweohw dSSSff " and particular ^ to read the whole Vf them as S in evidence befsre the jury , and to look to tho site of thecountry , and notto see that they weraWiS

      in tne onaraoter waicn the jury had given to i W namely , tWt they were calculated toSe popu £ disaffection to government , and to excite LiEf to lawful authority . If they bad 5 nSSfS all that wag their meaning and import . He wH not speaking at present ef the intention of the Dar . tin , bat was stating that that wM themeaS X import of the speeches which Lad been r « 3 in it dence . It would be a sad matter indwd if the deliver of such speeches m large ueaiblica bfpe « oD 8 dS del »'" ed . . aro oln where were aBserribled from 700 to 800 udiTiduh , and another in an openflel dTaUeu Brnntsfield Liaks , were not to ba reearded al rf «« i ;« . ous to-thabasVinfBKat . ofsociet ^ and w ? rf not to be approached by the law . flewMi , al £ ? mS selfte enter into the reasons b > which tWddiSS of these speeches was defended-lie" wonld not ilfow himself to enter into the views of the perEona ' dJ iv « mg them , and tf thejaBsooiation to ' wh . Vh th «

      Deiongeu ; nut , ne would only Bay , that if thei views were accomplished by the- means the " £ & geB | tu u ou i - J 8 IB « Mfc , dangerous to the country and to the best-interests of the subject . While lW ever , heaaid . aUthis , heconld Jhepfeelinw aud it gave him great pain in being railed upon to pronounco gentenoe in this case . He wiBhuH thai he had ^ n saved this duty-it wS nntMlr very painful to have to pronounce senteoee 3 perBonssuoh as those at > the bar , who ; inall othS mpects , appeared to be tespeotable individual " The law , however must be put in force ; theicou ? t must dwoharge its . duty to the conntry . and it 3

      not auowsuon . a tmng to fi o on , when a jury had found them guilty . It was , however , a great oonsh . lation to think that , as this case Jfi 8 ; Tt U undoubtedly a very ^ itigated case of sedition . He would give all weight to the proceedings of the jnry in disavowing the intention , and infndiujr that the angnage which was used , was not intended to exoite in the manner stale , . in the indiotoent . Then , again , he would take into consideration that tha terioui . oharge of conBpiraoy was Bet aside ; and fa theBe oiroumstances , they ought to proneuncTsen ? enoe with all possible leniency . He ^ waa eonviuSd that every person in the commnnit * . whnTjS

      that the prisoners at the bar had Veen fairly and honourably convicted by a jury , would be of 0 £ that theaentence wkoUlw was to pronounce was aa lenientaone as possible . The senUnce which h ! would nropose wpnld be , that the prisonera be in ? priBoned for a period of four calendar monthB ' The w ) bd JDSiicB Ci . BBK . addr « Bing the prisoner ! : said : Henry Ranken , and Robert Hamilton if ™ , retain andcheriBh the sentiments and opiniena which were expressed in the speeches whichThave been proved in evidence against you , it ia quite unneoefc sary for . nw tojay more , in pronouneinjX JSS of the court , than this , that the object efpSS « to deter you and others from oommitUng tKe offeacea n time to come ; and thai , of eo ? i £ faS gardto you in particular , the repeHtion of siSilw offenoes , after punishment has once been pronounoed by this high , court , will operate most prejndiofou *

      BgainstyouintneeveBtofanothercwiViction . Bnfi ri > I weuld fain hope and trust-I express it with , sinoenty . for I havecolleeted it somehow , I cannot , tell hew , in the course of this trial , from your whole manner and demeanour-that it is not likely thatyol ¦ > will again rashly , wantonly , and recklessly use each " language as yon have done on pwviom evasions . M " t } the situation which I hold , I think it is xriv dntt S rtatethatl do not think that the authorities inte ^ ' , fered one day too soon to prevent and itop meetinM ^ at which su « h language bb was proved in eVidisIS * wasopenlyand conetantly nttered ., I have now to deolare thatthe senteme of the court It , that von be ' , ltnprisonedJor a period of four morithfl . ' - 4 u S ^"' ¦ lwta * been "moved from tbe bar . "V the court Mjourned . "'*> . ¦ ¦

      Untitled Article

      A Mobder , the motives of whioh are involved in ' some mystery , took place' on Thursday night week , *' at BoBgival , sear Paris , in the house of M . Odilloa Barrot . That gentleman , being in the department A d Aisne , Mme . Barret , had , for her personal ae » onrity , caused her valet de chambre to fain fai roomadjoiningherown , During the night this Mont was entered , and two pistol shot * were fired aWfar- * - ^ valet de chambre , who , it is said , died itUhe ^ SKrfl 'On of the next day , without being able toatittabBSB ^^ * ounaBtaDces of . the attack . ^ f ^ W -r ^ m ^ pAy 17 >' . »" ' : ! . < A \ r-f-

      Untitled Article

      and in : S pECEKIBEB 2 , 184 b . , 1-n ^ - — ^^^ QBmpr . TAR . . ^ 7

  • Citation
    • Northern Star (1837-1852), Dec. 2, 1848, page 7, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/ns/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1499/page/7/