On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    T ^^ fl ^ % <^ t ^ * fo whfeh htt w a ^^ l ^ i ^ P ^ oprfetoif > ' « foi * e tfc >^ ia 4 « tJ 6 rt # & * * ' < 4 taie HH beitig * &o g ^ nVjbttttn ^ aftid la ^ fe ftB ^ # ter ( i 6 k ^^; Sfrdul * fak ^ the ^ pfetrtm ^ nt tf £ tt e * k-da * tnetin the purlieus of St . James s-street , he being , in his voettt&ki ' ttf * ^ etifcft ^ &w , * admissible to coteries riorpSndtt-able by the regular known r ^ Jtorters of the journal , tf the fac ts' be not so * EdWard Sferlnig'bkn contradict them , and thus disabuse the frequenters of iritite than one bookseller ' s shop of their errors . But Edward

    Stealing has given evidence , if report speaks truth , that he has infrrfe respect to principle than Thomas Barnest for , when the 'Times * was sold to the Tories , he resigned his office and salary . In ah honourable spirit he refused to sanction with his pen the ftefaridtis violation of principle , which his coadjutors had not boggled a " t . But he is still understood to be a proprietor of the ¦• 'TOfe *^'

    " Edward Sterling-, in his letter to John Roebuck , having * denied all the charges made against him , John Roebuck withdrew them iigtekabl y to the modern cartels of ' honour . ' This wa . 6 don £ by IK ^' ftdWee oF William Molesworth , one of the patriot bsm < i , whose ^ oikthful efforts betoken a spirit which in mature tfgS will rriarshai iM the people to higher objects than they have hitherto sought . tie " must have smiled at the absurdities in ^ hich he was

    con-|* tYarhed to be an actor . These duel farces surely arfc on in ® eve 6 f extinction . 111 The letter of Edward Sterling is a sample of ' res | pe

    ^ foWe yoi no wrong . the firm you belong infamous , you kn ^ i be ^ . ' feharer in the infamy . * If you answer them in the negative , then I have done you Wroh ^/' 1 ' Stteh a letter as this would probably have been replied to by a ^ haflfetrge , but what then ? If John Koebuck has not the moral ttoiir&ge to Tefuse to fight a duel at the bidding of every atigry ' tyufly , then he is not fitted to be a leader of the people .

    I Join * Roebuck , in * the pamphlet on the Stamped Press , rather ttnhecessaTily aptAies hard words ta Albany Fonblamjue , and f 'ASH ^ ttrjf FrtJbkinque fed xinheee ^ sarily * calls him out . ' Mutulal W ^^ t 5 bh ^^ rWrA * Ae , ktfo thfer ^ the m » tter > nd » . Now ftilrely tHis H * Wki ti 6 i ittfedW 1 . " Aib ^ tiy ^ FbiMatt ^ n ^ ri lie ^ hd *^ ^ h cilt ^ Iitee a ' Wtikftoiim ; tires xrf his ^ o ^ w ^^> nv h ^ ^ ttii itV * ilieh all the

    Untitled Article

    § & j ^ 9 mk <^ ^ m ^ hm .

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Aug. 2, 1835, page 552, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2648/page/52/