On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
1 st . The punishment of death is impolitic , not merely because it only aims at the accomplishment of one of the great ends of p unishment , but also from its utter incapacity to effect even that . The proverbially fre quent occurrence of public executions in England , whilst it would almost seem to justify the assertion of an eminent foreigner ( made in allusion to the subject upon which
I am writing ) that g the English were the most cruel people in Europe / affords also primd facie evidence of the extreme inefficiency of ' Death-punishment , ' as a preventive of crime . But , as it is not necessary to rely merely upon evidence of this description , I shall cursorily notice certain well-authenticated facts , which in my opinion place the matter beyond the reach of disputation . In Tuscany the punishment in question was totally
abolished by the Grand Duke Leopold , during the space of twenty years . At the expiration of that period it was , however , re-established by Napoleon . c Upon comparing three successive periods of twenty years each—in the first , the punishment of death existing—in the second , abolished—and in the third , restored , —it was found that fewer crimes and even fewer murders * were committed during the middle period , in which no executions
took place , than in either the preceding or succeeding one , in which the scaffold was in use ! ' England has also furnished evidence of similar character . The severity of the punishment till lately annexed by our laws , to forgery , sheep-stealing , &c . had , it is well known , a direct tendency to increase the commission of those very crimes which it was instituted to prevent .
And this it effected by diminishing the chances of its application . It was highly probable , in such cases , that the injured party would be unwilling to prosecute , f or the jury to convict . J A milder punishment has since been adopted , and if the result have not proved so satisfactory as could have been wished , § the failure merely proves the inadequacy of the substitute , and not , as some persons argue , the propriety of returning to the old
system . In addition to the chances of escape which criminals of the classes just alluded to , formerly enjoyed , a third has been added for the benefit of burglars and high way-robbers , —viz . the extreme probability that , even in case of conviction , the royal prerogative of mercy will be extended towards them . I say the extreme
* ' Only six : while in the Roman States , not much larger than Tuscany , the number in a quarter of a year was no less than sixty . '—J . Bentium . t When the propriety of altering the laws relating to forgery , was last agitated before Parliament , a banker told the Legislature that he knew of forty instances of the crime , in which though the offender a were detected , no prosecution followed . Another banker said he knew of innumerable instances of the some tor / . Indeed , it would appear that the quakers generally refused to prosecute in such cases , whilst death was the consequence of conviction . —Vide Morning Herald / Oct . 1833 . I Cases in which the prisoner has enjoyed the benefit of a jury ' s * doubt , ' ( not as to the commission of the crime , but as to the propriety of the punishment awarded to it by / aw ) must occur to all who have paid any atttntion to the subject . ^ Vide 4 Kdinbucgh Review , * lor Jau . Ib 34 , AiU' Secondary WuiUhmeals . ' .
Untitled Article
On the Propriety of totally abolishijig Death-Punishment * 333
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), May 2, 1834, page 333, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2633/page/21/
-