On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
defence of the generally-received doctrines of Christianity , still our strong holds are the plain evidence of Scripture , and the concurrent testimony of the primitive Church : —V . 3 . The Bishop begins by mistaking Mrs . Baillie ' s meaning , whose allegation was that the doctrine of the Trinity was " incomprehensible when taken along with the unity of God ; " and he then mistakes his own meaning , which was , the incomprehensibility of the Divine nature , not the incomprehensible nature of the Divine attributes . If the nature of the Divine attributes be a
" cause of unbelief , " there must always be unbelief while God and rational creatures exist . The Bishop means man's impatience , not God's attributes . " Incredulity" is not natural , but acquired ; nor is it necessarily a fault ; nor are ** vain imaginations" prone to it , but the reverse ; they are the most credulous things in the world . The description of the propensity of this incredulity is a curiosity ; but less so than the concluding discovery that " caution" against it is a " defence" of generally-received doctrines . Such is the complicated and unmeaning verbiage addressed to one of the most " highly-gifted" writers of the present age .
Inconclusive Reasoning * " 2 . A knowledge of the Old Testament is necessary to the right understanding of those doctrines in the New , which relate to the nature , dignity , and offices of Christ . You are , I perceive , of a different opinion , and for a . reason which is plausible , but , I think , not well founded . ' To the Old
Testament I do not refer ; for the Jews were the best judges of the peculiar idioms and grammatical distinctions of their own language , and any conclusions founded upon these , which they have at no time entertained or admitted , can be but slight authority . ' ( Viewy p . 5 . ) If our Saviour , and the writers of the New Testament , had made no reference to the Old , your reason for not referring * to it would have had great weight . But the single
injunction , ' Search the Scriptures ; for in them ye think ye have eternal life ; and they are they which testify of me' ( John v . 39 ) , would abundantly more than overbalance the authority of unbelieving Jews . The writings of the Old Testament were , before the publication of the New , the only Scriptures ; and to them Christ repeatedly refers , throughout the Gospel , as proofs that he was the promised Messiah . "—Pp . 6 , 7-
The sophism of this passage stares one in the face . The Author insists upon sending us to the Old Testament now , after we have the far clearer light of the INew , for the singular reason that the Jews were referred to it before the New Testament was written . We are not to walk by ihe light of the Sun , because before the Sun had arisen we were admonished to use a lamp . Christ proved from the Old Testament that he was the Messiah , i . e . a perFect Teacher ; therefore we can only come to a right understanding of his perfect teachings through the imperfect instructions which preceded " The authority of the unbelieving Jews , " in the particular for which < M « l
Untitled Article
Bishop of Salisbury ' s Reply to Mrs . Joanna Baillie . 755
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Nov. 2, 1831, page 755, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2603/page/31/
-