On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
lity , 1 hope the stigma of sanctioning such conduct will not be cast upon persons whose whole behaviour has been directly the reverse of this . Abundant liberality , the three bodies of whom I am writing have uniformly exercised ; but , if asked
when they have boasted of it , I couJd make no other answer than , " So far as I know , never " But when the author of the article iu the Congregational Magazine prououtices that ' Christian freedom , as they practise it , is mere connivance at sin , * ' he gives utterance to what I cannot otherwise characterize than as
an atrocious calumny , which I repel with the utmost indignation that one persou caii be supposed to feel on account of an unjust and cruel attack upon the reputation and usefulness of others . It is added , that abundant liberality is with the Remonstrants and their brethren " only a bigoted intolerance of the orthodox , and opposition to the gospel . " It is really comical to see a charge of this nature fairly set down in print . Bigoted intolerance of the orthodox ! What can
the man mean ? Does he know the meaning of the terms bigotry and intolerance ? Pei haps not . Perhaps he iinagines that argument and reason , when employed to shake the foundations of an unscriptural system , constitute bigotry . Perhaps he imagines that a refusal to countenance the persecution of conscientious men , by those who arrogantly claim for themselves the possession of infallibility , amounts to a bigoted intolerance of the orthodox . If this be the
bigoted intolerance of oithodoxy ai « d its practices , to which the writer alludes , I fear the members of the three bodies must plead guilty to the charge . They have argued and reasoned , and with very considerable success , which aggravates the offence , against the errors of the orthodox ; and they persevere iu the bigoted and intolerant practice , and will
persevere 111 it . They have opposed the plans , they have unmasked the h > pocrisy of those who , under pretence of zeal for Cod , have gone about sowing dLshcuMon , excitiug disturbances , diffusing unhappiuess , and instigating to deeds of oppression . But if the terms bigotry and intolerance be used in their common
acceptation , if the first denotes prejudice and ignorance , the substitution of appeals to the passions of a multitude , iu place of sober argument addressed to their understanding , in combating opinioiih which are supposed to be erroneous ; a refusal to heai what opponents have to urge in defence of themselves and their doctrines ; a disposition to
Untitled Article
cut them off from ihe favour of God , and exclude them from the kind intercourse of men ; and if intolerance imply a disposition and an attempt to put down by authority , force , and terror , opinions which those who hold them think are supported by reason and
agreeable to truth ; and if bigoted intolerance signify the union of all these—verily , the Syuod of Minister , the Piestytery of Antrim , and the Retnonstraut Synod of Ulster , are not guilty of bigoted intolerance ; though it would not be difficult to point out some of their neighbours to whom the charge would apply . They have assailed no man's character on account of
his religious opinions ; they have used no weapons but those of Scripture and reason in their warfare against what they deem error ; they have iujured no man in his fortune , prospects , family , or social connexions ; they have never appealed to passion , fraud , or force ; nor attempted to silence those whom they found themselves unable by argument to couvince . Can the same be said of all their opponents ?
It would be tedious to your readers to go at length into a refutation of ail the incorrect statements in this paragraph . I shall , therefore , content myself with declaring , that if , when he says , " all who deny our Lord's deity , and the sacrificial character of his atonement , are cheerfully embraced in their fellowship , " he intends to insinuate that unbelievers
in Christianity are admitted , or would be admitted , into their church ; or that the rejection of our Lord ' s deity , and the sacrificial character of his atonement , is in any sense or shape made a condition of entrance into their body ; or that persons holding these doctrines would not with the same cheerfulness and readiness
be admitted , he intends to insinuate what is nor . true , and what , from the acq' aintance he has shewn with the stale of Presbyterian ism in Ireland , I can hardly help suspecting he knows is not true . And , under the same limitations , the same remark applies to his next sentence , that " their communion includes Unitarians of every class , from the High Arian down to the Humanitarian . " The
fact stated here may be correct ; and I believe it is . I suppose there are , in the general total of the three bodies , some Unitarians of every class , from the High Arian down to the Humanitarian . But the admission of the fact by no means implies an allowance of the insinuation which is conveyed iu it ; namely , as it seems to me , that others are excluded . The assertion , that immorality passes
Untitled Article
136 Miscellaneous Correspondence *
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Feb. 2, 1831, page 136, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2594/page/64/
-