On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
Such an apprehension has hitherto been rare ; such an appreciation very inadequate . The substance of Christian doctrine is the revelation of a future life of retribution . A . 11 other doctrines , admitted , supposed , or incidentally taught in the gospel , however true , however important , from no part of the new revelation . They were , or might have been , developed by the general , and ought not therefore to be referred to the special , process of education . This one distinguishing doctrine of Christianity is taught by fact .
These propositions , brief and simple as they are , involve considerations of the highest interest and importance ; and modify , to an extent which , perhaps , will scarcely be anticipated , the views of the design of God in giving , and the prospects of mankind in receiving the Christian revelation .
The provision by which the truths of the gospel are made of an inferential instead of an explicit nature confirms its analogy with the process of education . The facts which the gospel exhibits serve as guides to conduct the reason to the noblest objects ; while the act of inference quickens and develops the same faculty .
It has been already observed that by the perception of any new truth , the perceptive faculty itself is invigorated . The more rapid the development of new facts and doctrines , the more speedy will be the growth of the reason which apprehends them . The doctrines of the Old Testament were such only as human reason must have discovered in time by natural means , such as , in fact , have been discovered by individual minds in Heathen countries ; and the grand purpose , therefore , which was to be answered by
that revelation , must have been the more rapid development of the mind of a nation . If this plan was successful while the reason was yet too weak to be much exercised in inference , it must be eminently powerful under the new dispensation , when the universal mind , being prepared for the effort , was exercised in a new method of discovering truth . By the gospel , a stupendous fact was exhibited , which could never have occurred in the course of nature . The minds of the witnesses were impelled to draw an inference from this fact , which inference is a doctrine not ascertainable with
certainty by unassisted reason . This effort was a lesson which taught them how to make other efforts of the same kind ; how to deduce from other facts doctrines which might have been developed in course of time by the general method of education . Many doctrines , some of greater , some of less importance , are conveyed by the new revelation ; but they do not , individually or collectively , characterize the gospel , like that of a future life . They are to be discovered by the same means—by inference from
facts ; and they therefore answer the same purpose of giving a new impulse to reason ; but they differ from the distinguishing doctrine of Christianity inasmuch as that they might , in course of time , have been certainly known by natural means . It is often objected , I am aware , that the dignity of gospel doctrine is lowered by making it a subject of discovery or even of examination by human reason ; but the conditions on which we receive it prove that the objection has no force . These doctrines can only be
received in proportion as they become truths of reason . Before they were revealed , they were mysteries ; being revealed , they are no longer mysteries , but truths of reason ; and they were revealed that they might become so . It is necessary to remember that the distinction between truths of revelation and truths of reason refers to the recipients and not to the thing imparted . The truth remains the same , by whatever name it is called , and under whatever aspect it is viewed ; the difference is in the human faculties by
Untitled Article
The Education of the Human Race . 513
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Aug. 2, 1830, page 513, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2587/page/9/
-