On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
*» y A nan brethren . We also have had our share of the abuse . Some of the public journals have abounded with the grossest misrepresentations of our motives and conduct . la a work with which some of this body are said to be intimately connected , I and several of ray friends have had the honour of occupying a very prominent place , and of being exhibited in every possible way to public scoru and reprobation . In the observations with which I am about to trouble
you , I shall studiously avoid every epithet that might irritate or provoke , when I attempt to reply to my eloquent friend Mr . Montgomery—for I will still call him friend , notwithstanding our difference of opinion . ( Hear , hear , from different quarters , and especially from Mr . Montgomery . ) Every one will admit that my task is no sinecure . Such a ilow of powerful and commanding eloquence I never heard : and were the
principles and reasoning as sound and conclusive as the language is beautiful and appropriate , I should , consider the speech of my learned friend absolutely unanswerable , Mr . Montgomery , however , and the greater number of the gentlemen who have joined him ., assume the following principles as the basis of their reasoning , and these , 1 think , a little close and candid investigation will shew to be unsound . They assvjme that the declaration of faith made this and
last year in the Synod , together with the present overtures , are an infringement of civil and religious liberty : that the right of private judgment includes under it the right of public teaching ; that the people of any congregation are the property of the minister who happens to have been ordained amongst them ; that to them he has a prescriptive right ; that when parents have gone to expense in the education of their children for the
ministry o £ the gospel in connexion with this Synod , it is unjust to deny them admission on the ground *? f religious opinion ; and that simple or honest error is neither criminal nor dangerous . You will find all these assumptions in the speech of my learned friend $ and I shall begin to shew how unfounded they are , by simply stating what is the nature of the measures against which my friend
has exerted his eloquence . A » » church , you call upon your members , in the sphif ; of candour , to state openly , not an opinion which you dictafi , but what is their own opinion respecting a most impoiv taut fundamental article of ; religious belief . You do thia because a mo » t Jujurious representation has gone abroad
Untitled Article
that many in your body entertain , upon that subject , very erroneous sentiments ; and that some of them are base enough to cloak , under obsequious and apparently orthodox ' expressions , their real but exceptionable opinions . Now , what infringement of civil and religious liberty is there in this ? What similarity to
the " rack , " the " gibbet , " the torturing irons , and other instruments of inquisitorial tyranny , dwelt upon with such honest indignation by my learned friend ? Did we go to every private individual in the community , and say to him—Sir , you must state to us your religious belief;—and had we the power ,
in case of finding him heterodox , to punish him by any species of bodily torture or civil deprivation , then would there be some basis for the reasoning of Mr . Montgomery ; but to such a measure we have neither the power nor the inclination to resort . We call upon our mem bers to be honest men—to openly state what they privately believe on a subject
which we have commissioned them publicly to preach—and is this tyranny or torture I Alas 1 for the honesty and liberality and candour that feels it to be torture to be brought into the light . Your uniform practice , since you were a Synod , has been to call upon young mea to declare before their people , at their ordination , their views of religious belief ;
and this has never been felt or alleged to be torture . How , then , does it change its character and become inquisitorial cruelty when applied to men who have been for some years , ordained ? Is not every member still under the care of the church ? And does it not possess the right to superintend as well as to appoint ita members ? You do not interfere
with any man's private judgment . He may have and think what he pleases in his private capacity ; but when he chooses to offer himself as a public teacher of the people committed to your care by the Almighty Head of his Church , you first ask him what he proposes to teach—and when you afterwards hear that he has fallen from what you think to be the truth , you call upon him to state his
views of religious doctrine , lest he should teach God's people error . With respect to the overtures , they are simply a precautionary measure against the recurrence of an evil in future , the existence of which you now lament . When our forefathers settled in this country , they were all of tfte same views upon the fundamental doctrines of Christianity ; and it is manifest , . that no man would have proposed or expected to become a mem-
Untitled Article
Intelligence . —Synod of Ulster . 721
Untitled Article
VOL . IU 3 E
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Oct. 2, 1828, page 721, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2565/page/65/
-