On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
Paul blaines Ppter for Judaizing out of Palestine , he not only circumcised Timothy , as being born of a Jewish mother , but performed bis vows in the tempte » and acted as other Jews
did , a conduct more unjustifiable than was the duplicity of Peter upon any other ground than that , whilst the Jewish temple and polity continued , he and every Jew was bound in Palestine to observe the Mosaic ritual .
And if the Mosaic ritual was to be observed during the continuance of the temple and its service , the bap * tism of John by immersion was of course to be continued , because it
was the appointed ordinance by which the man who was convinced by the heraldizing of John or Jesus , or their disciples , gave notice publicly of their change of sqptiment and their union with those who left the Jewish church
to become members of the new dispensation * i . e . in Jewish phraseology , of their being born again , 2 , That this was the case is farther evident from the command Jesus
gave to his eleven disciples to bap . * tize , for he gives the command in connexion with the reception of the Holy Spirit and the continuance of the Jewish age .
The command was given to the eleven disciples only to baptize , and the others baptized as well as they > yet it does not appear that any received the gifts of the Spirit but " such
on whorn they laid their hands - , and those who were baptized , their bap . tism was considered as imperfect and incomplete unless they had received the gifts of the Spirit , for this was the Divine seal or testimony to their
sincerity . My deductions from tjxis are three : 1 . That seeing the ordinance of imnaersiou was appointed as a testimony to the Israelitish nation , who has a right to extend the ordinance beyond the period appointed by its institutor , the political existence of the Jewish
nation ? ~ . Jesus gave the command connected with a promise to be received ° i * obedience to it , the baptism of » - ^ - - ^ ¦*» - *>^ ** m v m . a - % ^ m ^ r vm »_ ^ v * W m . mm ^ . w Athe
Spirit : does it not naturally and necessaril y follow , that unless a new comman d is given for the extension ° * the time , and wholly independent L the promise , that when the period * pircs for which the command was
Untitled Article
given and the proiriised gift cease ^ to be communicated , that of course the ordinance which was to precede the gift ceases also ? 3 . That this command to baptize was given by Jesus to the eleven apostles only ; and the history of the Acts and the writings of Paul shew that
though others did baptize yet the apostles themselves always completed the act by laying on of hands , and conferring the gifts of the Spirit , Who then is the man that has a right to take upon him to perform an office belonging solely to the apostles ? And of what avail can a ceremony be , when it carries not with it the seal
of the Divine approbation to the sincerity of the person or to God ' s approving of the deed ? To confirm this view of the subject of baptism by immersion , that it
never was intended by the institutor of it to be more than an initiatory introduction to Christianity , during the continuance o ! the Mosaic economy and Jewish polity , I observe ,
1 . That it is invariably spoken of in connexion with the gifts of the Spirit , and that our Lord notices to Nicodemus , unless he be ^ b orn of the water and the Spirit a man cannot • «~~ -w « «»««¦*• « j « - *>^ *~ > •* Am m-v % m ulkiaaa V / UtlUV / v
enter into the kingdom of God , to receive both of which baptisms has been impossible since the destruction of Jerusalem ; the apostles alone conferring the latter , and they , perhaps John excepted , dying before that period , and there is no evidence of his baptizing after that era .
2 * Every apostolic allusion to baptism proves the ordinance to lie temporary . 3 . That Paul the Apostle of the Gentiles expressly declares , that he was not sent to immerse , and those few who were immersed by him were most probably not Gentiles but Jews .
4 . There is no direct evidence that any Gentiles but Cornelius tvere immersed , and his immersion might be from the misplaced zeal of Peter , or from his having embraced Judaism , or from his being in Judea . 5 . The multitudes converted and
immersed by Peter appear to have beeu all Jews , as the prejudices of the apostles at that time would not have admitted Gentiles into the church . 6 . The apostolic injunctions were
Untitled Article
Arguments for the NofaPerpetuitg of Baptis m * 603
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Oct. 2, 1826, page 603, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2553/page/31/
-