On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    two ^ mkj ^ U ^ . K « pf ^ ^ wsenb € x . # * t v ^ onr ( 4 eSfei ^ ^ , $¥ >* #$ 3 ? P I Jpwv *^ r ^^ Tf * fi TV ^^ ' ^ rSli ^*^ E ** f *\ ^" ' A v "' ^ ¦ * ' ^/ ' ' T . - " ^ ^> i ^ 4 ^^^/?^^^^? ^ ^^« ; ff ^ feifW ^ Ti ^^ iH ^^ SF ^ $ ? 7 l > ^ j&di ^ g 4 ^^ qi jpoflo ^^ prtdicati ^ ii , pot loiuf sii | ce maintained ^ th at tlj e eir

    * Jeysrf ,. exp ^ c ) te < t t ^ ^ fessa ^ fe woittd be God liiii&efF . I am glad , theren fofe , thajtJN ^ r . fifoJlgaifl lias hefo givea greater pjaUlicitfy to Mr , Kemnek s Latia note on the subject . Theremarks on sacrifice are ha ^ y , and that on Geriizim and Ebal is acute .

    Mr . Jemtns on Romans vnL 9 , is strong in liis arguments to prove that the spirit of Christ in this passage does not necessarily imply the virtuous and pious temper of Jesus Christ . But he fails of setting in a

    luminous point of view the true drift an < J ibree of Paul ^ meaning in introducing a sentence about miraculous gifts in this precise connexion . The gloss extracted from Grotius is condistent with the common

    understanding of the passage . Dr * Evans on the Religious World Displayed , has consigned the Rev , Robert Atlatn to a pillory . . The Suggestion to Unitarians by npocrrfkuxos meets my cordial approbatioa . I have no doubt that the

    compilation winch he recommends , ivould be circulated with great zeal in America . la selecting the tracts , and in adapting them to the purpose in q \ iestion , I think as much as possible ought to be omitted ., which has

    not a bearing dl the pure Unitarian state of tfee question . For mstance , a smalt portton of Mr . Belsham ' s Summary View is Hyper- » U » itarianism , am repels jnany thdpaamia of readers ^ who cpul < i not resist the

    influence of that admirable tract , if somewhat modified , and rendered conformable to more general views . The Anaerican Edition of Griesbach is printed in a single volume , with no other notes thau a few lines at the

    bottom of the p # ge , giving ; , hi the most general results , the manuscript authority of each important various readin g * Critical Synopsis of the Repository

    is again unfortunate m its grammar . For instance , " fhe ievv trifling errors which . Mr . Lc Grice has pointed out has affected neither , ^ &c .

    Untitled Article

    Jfc ^ f&fMviere Jn JQd % MM :. Qfl his Sitifemeffi . W $ Sfnife J 6 BP » w'T * u TtfeiTOfefe ^ ot is prqb ^ bl v , pot lafc ^ Mfomea t ^ d ^ tmym ^ m ^ xm ^ tt of * Ff ^ ncliTOaii ' . % M ^^ mJ ( J'wkd ^ t ^ vdcati ^ - ^ ' V' r : ¦ v - ^' . - - / vr - l ^ ' Bm ^ 0 vV ' ^^^ $$ ntrb ^ r ^ ar ^ of s ^^ u # ^ « e ^ b .

    ^ y mi ^ e ;; M ^ v bti - i ^ smmw * fc e ^ rfe ^ p&tft , « ^ tlnucu Js > ^ ddififcati ^ of : tm '; jm ^ k . w ** difficuft t 6 cqme td \ fi j ^ q / pbi ^ lt jjk e ^ tifha&ig the morals j ^ ^ J ^ ge c c ^ mmunity * Hcnv t& ( l to ^ c ^ de ^ 4 m the predse ifto * a | i ^ t ^ pter $ vsn < $ an

    individual ! HoSvtnixCh more so on that of a My J Suppose we wer 6 to gratiit to 0 r . Smith ids favourite faiicy > that the morals of a cocnmtinity decKne in proportion to the spread of Unitarian * , ism . Yet how will he accotmt for

    the circumstance that Caivi&ism has no internal power to resist the progress of wicked Unitarianisra ? If , in Oeneva , in New England , in the Presbyterian Church of England , and elsewhere , there has been developed for the last century a spontaneous and

    unconnected , yet mighty tendency towards Unuarianism , and if , at the same time , Unitariankm leads to immorality , pray , what is gained to the cause of Orthodoxy by Dr . Smith ' s course of argument ? There is something rotten , after all , at the < x > re of his religion . He can only consistently

    boast of it , and rely upon it , when he can shew it to be efficacious against the instrumeat , as well as the substance of immorality . I would as Kef go down to Avernus by one step as by two . Mr . Bakevrell is very strong oh sortie topics in the concluding part of this letter .

    Reply to Difficulties in the Unitarian Scheme of Atonement . This is a neat and happy answer to the questions of your former correspondent , Mv own ha 3 just embarked on the

    ocean , and as far as it has any merit , is in a great measure anticipated by the present communication . Unless it be gratifying and useful to observe a coincidence between distant writers

    on important subjects , 1 beg , after thfc example of H . M ., that in similar cases my observations may be suppressed . Unity of the Godhead asserted .

    Untitled Article

    Crkkyl Synopsis qfike Monthly Repository far October 1824 . 689

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Oct. 2, 1825, page 589, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2541/page/13/