On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
the Globe and Traveller , evening papet , of the same day ; and , on the 17 th instant , the following official paper , from our body , was published in the Times : " The elders and deacons of the London branch of the church of God , commonly known as Freeth inking Christians , having observed that the late conduct of two of their members , in
" Because it is not a service enjoined in the Scriptures , but is an assertion only of the uuscriptural claims of the Church to decree rites and ceremonies . " Because the service implies a re .
protesting against the marriage ceremony , has exposed them to the marked animadversions of a leading daily journal , feel themselves called upon , through the same medium , to submit to the public the grounds and reasons of their conduct .
< c Marriage is regarded by the law of England , and it is held by the Freethinking Christian , to be a civil contract ; and even if the language of the Liturgy be adopted , which represents matrimony as * instituted of God in the time of man ' s first iunocency / it is certain that marriage must then have been performed without the intervention of a priest *
" If in the progress of society it has been thought necessary to superadd a religious solemnization to marriage , in order to increase the sanctions of that state , the very reasons which superinduce such necessity must be defeated unless the solemnization be consistent with the conscience , and accordant with the faith of those who are to be bound thereby .
" By a comparatively recent act of parliament , ( 26 Geo . II cap . 33 , ) a submission to the marriage ceremony , as performed by the Church of England , was , for the first time , imposed on all who sought to obtain a legal sanction to marriage , Jews and Quakers alone excepted .
" Derived chiefly from the Roman ritual and mass books , the marriage ceremony of the Church of England appears to the Freethiuking Christian to be Popish in its doctrines ; superstitious in its forms ; and unsuited in its terms to the refinement of the age , or the occasion on which it is used .
" Bound in all things by the authority of Scripture , and the dictates of conscience , the Freethinking Christian refuses to yield a voluntary submission to the marriage service , which , if the above
representation be correct , it is difficult to suppose can be approved by any serious , well-informed Protestant . The objections of the Freethinkiug Christian , however , to this service , may be categorically stated as follows : —
" Because that service is part and parcel of the religion of the state , and must , as such and of consequence , be opposed to the religion of Jesus .
Untitled Article
cognition of the doctrine of the Trinity and directs divine honours to * the man Christ Jesus . ' " Because performed as a religious service , by a person * in pretended holv orders , ' it carries with it an admission of the claims of the priesthood ; which claims , whether to be regarded as a
separate body among Christians , as the minis , ters of Christ , or the exclusive teachers of religion , are unfounded in Christianity . " Because it is a public outward act of joint and social prayer , and as such is contrary to the spirituality of the Christian religion , and the instructions of him who taught his disciples to pray in secret to their Father .
" Because mo earthly tribunal can possess the right to propose a test for religious opinion , much less to render the violation of conscieace the condition of obtaining a civil right . " Because , in several particulars , it is not accordant with that purity of mind which should at all times characterize the Christian .
" With these objections to the marriage , ceremony , as imposed upon him by the law , the Freethinking Christian offers his protest against that ceremony , or rather against a forced recognition of" that ceremony in his instance . He disclaims all belief in the doctrines he is compelled to subscribe ; he declares it is by an act of compulsive conformity alone , that his submission is obtained to the forms of
the Church ; he disowns the sacred functions of the minister about to perform the service ; and he purges his conscience from all assent to unchristian doctrines aud practices , both iti the sight of God and of man . " This protest he delivers publicly , in the Church , be / ore the * altar , ' and to the
minister . Publicly —because the ceremony is public . In the Church—because iu the Church he is compelled to submit to such ceremony . Before the * altar' —because before the * altar' he is required to
yield an especial homage . To the minister—because the minister is the legal , the immediate , and the willing agent in performing a service which , under the circumstances , must be held to be as great an infraction of conscience as it is a
profanation of religion . " The Freethinking Christian , then , according to his apprehension , delivers his protest at the time , iu the place , aud to the party—when , where , and to whom it is most suitable to be delivered ; ant *
Untitled Article
470 Controversy on a Marriage Protest of < s Freethinking Christians . "
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Aug. 2, 1825, page 470, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2539/page/18/
-