On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
rians have actually mistaken the import of the language of the Scriptures . * In such prescriptive reasoning there can be no strength , especially when we oppose to it the result of a pnre and careful examination of the sacred
volume « Some of the grossest errors may boast of considerable arid even hoar antiquity : and the advocates of Transufostantiation itself , appeal to the words of our Lord , as recorded by his evangelists and apostles .
The select preacher does not discriminate between the principle of belief in / acts , and that of belief in opinions ; between historical assent , or the reception of testimony , and verbal interpretation . In the present ease , the only point at issue between
Unitarian Christians and their opponents , -5 s the sense of Scripture which , we maintain , must be determined by Scripture itself , and not by creed 3 and catechisms . We admit no
hypothesis , and certainly not the Socinian , the specific feature of which is so wild and visionary that we doubt , whether in this country it has a single advocate , —Pp . 32 , 33 . By Dr . Spry , Unitarian Christians
are represented as ** a powerful and busy sect . " Its advocates he pronounces to be " neither deficient in
; zeal nor in controversial ability . " their * appeal to the pride of human intellect has at all times been powerful in mischief ; and its deadly influence has perhaps never been greater than at present /'—P . 33 .
There is no argument , as Dr . Spry should be aware , in sentences like these . ^ A fact , we trust , it is , that Unitarian Christians have some zeal for what they consider as scriptural truth : for religious virtue they feel , we persuade ourselves , a yet warmer
zeal . The power by which they are desifous of being characterized , is the power of virtue and of truth : without this , their controversial ability , he it what it may , will not long avail them ; however , they are at least satisfied ,
that they have nothing to fear from either the theological knowledge or the reasoning talents of 4 € one of the select preachers before the University of Oxford for the year 1824 . " N . ( To be continued . )
* Pp . 30 , 31 .
Untitled Article
298 Revieiv . —Bruce s Sermons on the Study 4 > f the Bible *
Untitled Article
Art . 11 . —Sermons on the Stud y of the Bible , &c . By Win . Bruce , D . D ., &c .
( Concluded from p . 227 . ) SER . VIII . "On the Intercession of Christ , " is extremely unsatisfactory . Dr . Bruce does not explain what he means by the phrase , though he opens the discourse with the sween .
ing assertion , " The intercession of Christ is foretold by Isaiah , and occurs every where in the Gospels and Epistles" ( p . 154 ) . The office of intercessor ascribed to Christ may imply no more than that by virtue oi his life and doctrine , his death , and resurrection , he has been our benefactor in
relation to his and our heavenly Father . Our Lord represented to the unbelieving * Jews , ( John v . 45 , ) that Moses was their accuser before the Father , meaning plainly , that the predictions of Moses concerning , himself condemned their unbelief f and in the same manner Christ is the advocate
of his disciples by means of the gospel * which pronounces and ensures their acquittal from the sentence of death and the punishment of sin . The text of this Sermon , Boon . viii . 34 , suggests this explanation . " On Predestination , Election and
Reprobation , " Ser . IX ., Dr . Bruce h very clear and scriptural , and has our entire concurrence . He quotes , in order to oppose , the Assembly ' s Catechism , and other works of Calvinistic divines . His rules for interpreting the
Epistles are judicious and highly important , and , let us add , these alone have guided us in our remarks upon those topics on which we have the misfortune to differ from the worthy preacher .
Dr . Bruce argues boldly and ably , Ser . X ., against the doctrine of " Original Sin . ' * He builds his argument on the solid foundation of the silence of our Lord . " With respect to Adam , or the consequences of his transgression , he says not a single word . We
may , therefore , refuse to treat it as an essential article of faith— J > ( p . 191 )* He proceeds , however , to inquire into the doctrine of the epistles on this subject , arid adopts the scheme of interpretation of Dr . John Taylor and other biblical critics of the same school . He examines some expressions of Calvin and other masters of
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), May 2, 1825, page 298, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2536/page/42/
-