On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    unless he can better defend its Greeds , and uphold its credit , he merits none . Pp . 8—11 . He represents the writer of the

    " Three Letters" as €€ volunteering aa attack , not particularly called for , " upon the Archdeacoa of Cleveland . In the beginning of that appendix , on which Mr . Welibeloved is now animadverting , this remarkable language

    occurs : " The conclusiveness of rny arguments in favour of the divinity of Jesus Christ has been somewhat uneourteously denied by the Rev . C . Wellbeloved : " and in the next sentence the dignitary speaks of " Three

    Letters addressed to him upon the mme subject . " Flow extremely unfair and incorrect this representation is , our readers must be sensible ; since they cannot but have perceived that the examination of Archdeacon

    Wrangham ' s arguruents for the deity of Jesus Christ , occupies a comparatively small portion of the letters , and holds in them professedly a subordinate station . His opponent complains with reason o . f such a ruse tie guerre :

    " You thus keep out of sight , " he says , " the injustice of which you have been guilty towards Unitarians , and of which i may confidently affirm that you have been convicted ; and , at the same time , greatty magnify the improprieties of temper of which you accuse me ; by leading your readers to conclude that they have

    been manifested , not where some excuse might be offered for them , in , tbe repelling of misrepresentation and calumny ajmed at illustrious characters , but where they cannot for a moment be tolerated , ia the investigation of religious doctrines , and the interpretation of sacred Scripture /'— Pp . 11 , 12 .

    Mr . Wellbeloved thiaks it of importance to state , what was really the purport [ purpose ] of the Three Letlers , " and what , if he mistakes not , they have effected : " They were designed to vindicate , and they have vindicated , as they proposed , the doctimea and the advocates of

    Unitarianism ffona many severe , and unfounded , accusations , and have shewn how disingenuous , how disreputable , and how unsafe it is for one orthodox writer after another , to go on repeating charges against aa unpopular and a hated sect , without being * at him pains to examine the foundation on- which these charges rest /'—P p ^ tS , 16 «

    Untitled Article

    THa Archdeacon of Cleveland admits thai he is chargeable with * ' a few errors * incurred chiefly , during the hurry of various occupations by relying upon a memory once good , and still too confidently trusted . " 0 a this unworthy plea our author bestows the animadversion which it deserves :

    ** No one who looks into your last Appendix , can for a moment imagine that a failing and treacherous memory can be pleaded . That memory cannot be otherwise than fuMy stored and tenacious , ( whatever may be thought of the taste of its possessor , ) which can lay under contribution so many writers of all ages , and

    of all descriptions , Christian Fathers and Heathen Philosophers ^ Racovians and Remonstrants , Dramatists and Divines , to furnish a heap of learned lumber , the dust of which cannot fail to * blind the eyes of the quick-sighted / and under the weight of which , it must be next to miraculous , if a poor Unitarian sciolist

    escape being crushed to death *"—P . 17 . Convicted of unfairness * illiberally , and misrepresentation , and proved to have depended implicitly upon Magee ,

    and Nares , and Rennell , and others of the same school , and not only to have retailed but even to have aggravated their blunders , Archdeacon Wraogham pleads , however , that he " no where professed originality . "

    " But /* observes his opponent , ** neither a treacherous memory , no ? the burry occasioned by various avocations , no ? the acknowledged usfi of the works of former controversialists , can justify any one In

    bringing against doctrines which he disapproves , and those who conscientiously maintain them , charges which he has not carefully examined , and which he cannot support , designed to undermine the credit of both /'—Ib .

    Our author ' s grave and becoming remonstrance with the dignitary , on a mode of theological warfare so unsuitable to the serious subjects of religious controversy , contains a fearless challenge and a judicious caution :

    " We do not see for peace , we do not expect friendship ; but we have a right to look for fair dealing and legitimate opposition- Put forth all your energies against our doctrines and our arguments ;

    we have no fear fox * the result ; but meddle not with our motives , assail not our characters , refrain from misrepresentations ; do not seek to destroy our creed , by attacking qwv intellectual ,, literary , ov moral attainments . "—P . 19 .

    Untitled Article

    162 Review . — Wellbeloved ' s Letters t& Archdeacon JVrangham .

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), March 2, 1825, page 162, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2534/page/34/