On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
calculated to effect the avowed object « rftke luatiuitton , which the excellent recent publication of Ram mo ha n Roy , entitled , l % e Precepts of Jesus Hie 4 * wi (} & t $ Pe& £# and Happiness , willI » rove tao t&e conviction of many , " ; ; ?
But at leagth he was brought to consent , aad filled the office during" two S ^ ars . This object of Le Griefs anxlety was effected at last , by a letter of' eight pages , addressed to the Baronet , ii * which he was pressed hard to become President by I * . O ., who states * * ' that be did it for the sole purpose
of removing the prejudice he entertained against the Society and against tbe Established Church , and that he tfeoagltf liis acceptance at length was an attestation of his being converted from his error / ' " He triumphed m the thought that he had made a convert < of kirn . "
In this transaction we cannot fail to perceive a sort of double dealing ; well worthy the advocate of established error . He thought , if he could not convince * he should at least silence the foe , and prevent the mischief he
tmgbt be doing . Still it seems that Sir Rose did not blink the question , but weat on avowing his dissent from the opinions of the Church . He is charged with telling the clergymen who had taken alarm . " Mv Msentiwho bad taken alarm Cf y
senti-, rnents are well known ; I promulge them ev $ ry where ; and I will disseminate them by every means in my power *" I » January last , two of the clergy
waited on the Baronet , as they said , In a private , confidential manner , to request hica to resign his office as President ; but as he had not accepted of the honourable post without much solicitation , he discovered his tenacity when invested with it : at least he did
not choose tp resign on the grounds which they offered to his coasideratlon ; because , he observes , ' * that his principles were well known , and that with the knowledge of those principles he has been raised by the clergy into his dignity /* A meeting was called ,
m consequence of his refusal , © f the Goto mit tee of the district , and he soon received a copy of their resolution to displace him , and appoint his friend I * e Orice ii Ms jroom ^ " in consequence of his avowed disbelief of the essential doctrines pf the EstaWisfted Church , aad of his declared defcerim-
Untitled Article
nation to disseminate his opinions by every means in his pbwen * Soon after this , the attention of the public vyas fitst called to the subject , by a long address of five columns of close , small print in a newspaper , under the signature « rf L& ( jnce ; ia which address , not without reason , lie lexpresses ¦ " his dread of the tedious ^ ne $ 8 of the task he had uodertaken ,
and his fear for the patience of the public . " The next week brought out a reply from the Baronet , dated 3 rd February $ that a rejoinder by L . O * ; and this again a long letter from Sir Rose , in which he takes leave of the
controversy , ajad declares , " lie will have no further communication with him on the subject , as it is out of his power to read any reply to this letter . ^ Sir Hose charges Le Grice with betray iag a private eorretpondence , " which , as a man of honour , lie was
forbidden to produce in the support of his opinions , contrary to the true intent and meaning of the contract expressed in his letter , 8 th April , the conversation being private with two clergymen in his own house , who
begged him to understand * that they toaited 0 ) 2 him out of respect , and hoped he would consider it as such ? " Notwithstanding which , L . < x . stated , in his published letter , the substance of the conversation which then passed between them . s
I am much at a loss , Sir , to select the parts of this correspondence which should be laid before your readers . To give it all , or even the substance of it , would be an abuse of your induLgance . I will , however , remark upon those points of the controversy which will be the most interesting to them .
Sir Rose is charged with declaring in the presence of the clergymen who waited on him , that he was a Unitarian : which he denies . He said , He was not quite a Unitarian , that he believed in the doctrine of the
Atonement , which the Unitarians do iiot . " On this point the Baronet seems to be somewbat inisty , and , ia truth , mil find few Unitarians who will , unite with him , if his opinion , which i * given by L . e Grice in these words / lie true : ** I think the atonement wa&
by Christ's obedience to all C&pd ^ commands , and by submitting to an ignominious death ; but mot through his blood , as your church $ uppa&es ^
Untitled Article
352 Summitry of the C $ rmsh € ontmvm $ ^
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), March 2, 1824, page 152, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2522/page/24/
-