On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
Pepish God : that we do not worship the God of the Athanasian Evangelians : that we have not a common object of worship with the Anthropomorphite Trinitarians * who , denying that the Father of Israel is their Saviour , and the Most High God their Redeemer , bow the knee to the humanity of God in the person of his crucified Son . "—P . 27 .
Servetiis examines some of the Reviewer ' s criticisms on former Unitarian writers , and hesitates not to avow his dissent from some of their arguments and conclusions . " In another place you seize hold on what you regard as a concession of Mr . Yates , fatal to the Unitarian cause : that he is unable to form a very decided
opinion on the meaning of the phrase * calling on the name of the Lord : '' Acts ix . 14—21 ; 1 Cor . i . 2 . I do not wonder at your seizing this advantage
I only wonder that it should have been given you : and I must again remind you that your bringing forward the opinion of an individual proves nothing , unless you can prove that the general body of Unitarians hold the same : but so far
from being able to prove this , you must in the present instance be fully aware of the contrary . Mr . Yates , and not the Unitarians , is responsible for the doubt and the difficulty . Wakeneld , a competent scholar , I presume , thought the proper renderiug of the words was being called
by the name of the Lord , ' or * taking his name upon them / What , then , is to be done ? We must step out of the ' single text / and take our stand on the broad analogy of Scripture . We there find that the apostles * bowed the knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ . '
It happens , however , that there can be no doubt , and that there is no difficulty . The phrase is neither more nor less than a Hebraism ( for , strange to say , though you and Bishop Horsley imagine that the apostles were insuired to write modern
idioms for the express use of the English nation , they actually employed the language of their age and country ) ; the cauicg on the name , or calling a name "pon them , implies no more than the beiug enrolled as the followers of him by whose name they are called . l
qissent , as much as you can do , from the supposition of Mr . Yates , that * nis passage is purposely left as a trial of our humility ; for if idiomatical usage did not authorise the construction of ' calling « w name upon them / or « being named tL naine / stUl ^ would wot follow ™« , because praying in Christ ' s name « J *< i tefa R baptised into Christ ' s name , wy were sajd to call on Christ ' s name .
Untitled Article
therefore they invoked Christ as himself the object of praj r er . The word £ 7 riKaXs / Aai is the same that occurs in the passage of Acts , I appeal unto Caesar : ' Acts xxiv . 11 . It has , therefore , no necessary and inseparable connexion with religious invocation . "—Pp . 72—74 . 4 C The next charge is more serious : you really appear , for once , to be in the right , in so far as the individual is concerned . Mr . Worsley , as well as Mr . Yates , must ' bear his own burthen / I have not the book before me , and I
cannot , therefore , tell whether you have garbled the extracts or stated them , fairly : but his allusion to the Magi , which you , of course , hold up to your readers as a specimen of the way in which Unitarians treat Scripture , is probably connected with a doubt whether this much-canvassed narrative be Scripture or no . But your chief charge respects the name of the
Lord of Hosts . That political preachers have perverted this title , to consecrate the unhallowed ambition of statesmen delighting in war , is a fact that requires no proof : but it seems strange that Mr . Worsley should both have countenanced this false interpretation by regarding it as the sense of the Hebrew nation , and that he should have overlooked the
occurrence of the name in passages of unequivocal inspiration . By describing the writer , with mock gravity of information , as ' no Deist , but a minister of a Dissenting congregation , who dedicates his
work to the Unitarian Fund , ' you wish to convey the impression that the identity of the Hebrew title Lord of Hosts with that of the God of Battles of the northern nations , is the familiar and approved construction of Unitarians . Your malice
shall be disappointed . 1 shall simply refer the reader to a Sermon , entitled ' The name Lord of Hosts explained and improved , by Joshua Toulmin , D . D . ' It is there expounded as implying dominion over the hosts of heaven , *¦ the moon and the stars which he had made : ' thus
involving at once a reproof and refutation of the Gentile worship of the planetary idols . I mention the definition , because though ' smelling blasphemy afar off , ' in Mr . Worsley ' s mistaken irreverence for the term , I suspect you lie vinder the same mistake as to its import . The
blunder was originally Voltaire ' s . * You will not be able to make much of this discovery . Mr . Worsley is in orthodox company / ' —Pp . 81—83 . Charges of various kinds are pre-* " Dietiounaire Philoso ^ hrqlie , Guerre , p . 108 . " . S 1
Untitled Article
Review . —A Plea for the Nazarenes . 107
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Feb. 2, 1822, page 107, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2509/page/43/
-