On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    Christ , not only appears evident from what he has said himself , but is an idea strongly corroborated by a quotation which Dr . P . has made from Jerom , viz . * It is to thi 3 very day , in ail the synagogues of the East , a heresy among the Jews , called that of the Minei , now condemned by the P harisees , and commonly called Nazarenes , who believe in Christ , &e . ; but while they wish to be both Jews and Christians , they are neither Jews nor Christians" * Here Jerom , who

    followed close after Origen in the church , speaks of this people as Origen had done before him , not as all the Jewish Christians , but as an inconsistent faction in the Jewish synagogues , and no part of the Christian church at all , much less the whole or main body of

    Jewish converts to the gospel . That those whom Jerom calls Nazarenes \ vere the Ebionites , Dr . P . has himself professedly proved . But the proof that the Ebionites were not Christians does not depend either upon what Origen has or has not said respecting them ; for should it be granted that he spake of them as the body of Christian Jews , ( which , however , I am persuaded he did not , ) it would only follow that he was in an error , because the description of the Ebionites , or their character , as given by Dr . P . himself , affords abundant

    proof that they were no genuine converts to the gospel , and never made any part of the true Christian church . After saying , 1- " The Gnostics did not reject the Scriptures , &c . ; but , as they did not consider them written by any proper inspiration , thought

    themselves at liberty to adopt what they approved , and neglect the rest , -without disputing' their genuineness ; " Doctor adds , " This , indeed , was not peculiar to them , but seems to have been a liberty taken by other primitive Christians , &c . ; thus the Ebionites

    made no public use of any other Gospel than that of Matthew , &c . It is well known their copies of Matthew ' s Gospel had not the story of the miraculous conception ; and they also added to their history such circumstances as they thought sufficiently authenticated . " In another place the Doctor * Hist . E . O . III . 170 . t Idem , I .. 233 .

    Untitled Article

    says , * "Jt is allowed on all hands that the fibionites made no use of the Epistles of Paul , because of the slight which he seemed to put upon the law /' In another place the Doctor says , -f" Their dislike of the Apostle Paul , we know from ecclesiastical history , continued to the latest period of their existence as a church ; " and this dislike , he tells us a few pages before ,

    " was occasioned by his activity m preaching the gospel to the uncircumcised Gentiles . " A monstrous crime , no doubt , in the eyes of all primitive Christians , who knew any thing of the peculiar spirit and catholic design of the gospel dispensation ! In another place the Doctor says , % " The Ebionites were Jews , and had no

    communion with the Gentiles . " Again , § " The strict Ebionites hold no communion with the Gentile Christians . " || Dr . P . having first assumed that these blind Jewish bigots were all the Jewish Christians , not only appears

    to approve of their low notions of the Evangelists and Apostles as writers , but also to wish to hold them up as examples of what the converts to the gospel originally were , and ought now to be , in their opinions of the authors of the Christian Scriptures . That the

    Doctor himself agreed with the Ebionites on this ground , I need not inform , any one who is acquainted with his writings . ^ " It is their opinion , however , of the person of Christ , that he principally wished to be considered as an example of primitive Christian doctrine . But of what value the opinion

    of such persons can be on any point relating to Christianity , I am a t a loss to imagine . Whatever he might think of their neglecting' some of the evangelic history , and making additions of their own , and rejecting all the writings of Paul , and utterly contemning his apostolic commission , and living in opposition to the catholic and

    pecu-* Idem , III . 216 . f Idem , 187 . X Idem , I . . 283 . § Idem , 286 . || The words marked for italics are not in italics in the Doctor ' s work . I mark them because I wish the reader to take particular notice of them . no of Dr

    ^ f I mean impeachment . P / s character ; so far as I know any thing of it , I am led to believe it will ever appear great and amiable in the eyes of all impartial persons .

    Untitled Article

    Mr . R . Martin on the Difficulties of Unitariamsm . 403

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), July 2, 1821, page 403, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2502/page/23/