Current:

Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), March 1813, Edition 1 of 1, Page 207, "- a .^16 A ^ ^Vi^3(Hj|©Jfe ^ Oi ^^^ v ^—>^v< •: ^?f

Page 207
Page 59
59 of 72

On this page

  • Departments (2)
    • "- a .^16 A ^ ^Vi^3(Hj|©Jfe ^ Oi ^^^ v ^—>^v< •: ^?f
    • MmmSL M^m^T "m^^tm ***Atfts v ^d^Miijb;)/- .! ->di tio 1- . » ' 3.-^>ih V ^ ?• /U>,,t... '-.v.v : t)R* .. ... !FAe f ^htiitian y sEutvey xjf the PoliticaI JVorkh
  • Text (3)
  • Transcript

    • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

      Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

      Untitled Article

      Tn ^ events of the l ast month are of great importance % < & t the religious part of the community , ^^ d iheireault . of . them will ) upt easily h&Sk&tfcipatgd by , any of our

      poljjti&iangK i / Fb& Gaxholie question , &s * f i ^ raited ^ ba ^ gone th rough a « xirttpl £ i ; eidiscussion in the House of tGojf&hiDiis ; foe b \ v hat could > re-&&iia ummdfjaMer a four days

      de-&tfie 9 ^ arci ^ d # n by men of the grciatc ^ tatents and el oquence in ^ feisiixrottaipyw It was evident , Sifter tike £ ratj day , that the cause ^ yfe ^ caigpn * haA gained ground , and

      fapi a spirffciOfi -e ^ q ** 1 qfi JiberaJity ^ hadigoajR ^ or ^ i y which was * iat ^ io , be < . jcount ^ racted by the fe > W 6 i \> schimes of sordid sejf-inter-•« Bt ^ ^ Previaus ( o » th ^ , debate , it was generaiiy imagined 5 that

      tol-¦ © ttttiouiwould h ^ v ^» a greate r numt bet i of ^ adw > c 3 ate % 4 jb ^ . fr erQtqfoye , ^ teW s tiU ? 3 toj , b « ^ UGC ^^ ful was tU % em 9 dua chimerical id ^ a .: a re-^ ^ pectaUler jBracffity vw ^ j ^ , ^ ^ i ^ uW ^ fe ^ iexn ^ ted ^ an 4 ithis was

      . Wfe « Mlffie / e 0 i , tb Jfi ^ p > : ^ liv ^ the fclo ^ fi ? ofcthe ^ ieaijdteet ^ that they jtftigtoj byjpitopeiiQPjaiuct , expect atio 3 fnt « te linue ^ somje ^ xpark ^/ of ^ IftcNtemcejandjfaivoJ ^ c ^ f , c Hpus ^

      v- ^ tteuiempOT of-the was ^ an , however , d ^ e ^ yer ^ d , ^ gi ^ it t ^ feilHti ^ wwon wit fi , the . a ( ijpairable *^^ «^^ i iiKrfidjwiih ^ ma , t ^ ni-¦ jj ^ feS »?^ % ^ Mn 2 iQ ^ attaji mi J ^ r . " * l « ft ^^^ f oBy ? , ih ^^ O ^ K ^ fy * aJ > le a ^^ fe r ^ vth ^ a « JUki ^ qtte # l ^^ lii J « t ^ tfefefcciaai ^ ti ^ oi *^ eiky ^ w , ^ afiA ^^^ kna ^ f u ^ Jii ^ mqmber& . dei ^ Q ^ rat ^ d taifcMH ^ Mf ^

      "- A .^16 A ^ ^Vi^3(Hj|©Jfe ^ Oi ^^^ V ^—&Gt;^V&Lt; •: ^?F

      " - a . ^ 16 A ^ ^ Vi ^ 3 ( Hj |© Jfe ^ ^^^ ^—>^ v < : ^? f

      Mmmsl M^M^T "M^^Tm ***Atfts V ^D^Miijb;)/- .! -&Gt;Di Tio 1- . » ' 3.-^&Gt;Ih V ^ ?• /U&Gt;,,T... '-.V.V : T)R* .. ... !Fae F ^Htiitian Y Seutvey Xjf The Politicai Jvorkh

      MmmSL M ^ m ^ T " m ^^ tm *** Atfts v ^ d ^ Miijb ;)/ - . ! - > di tio 1- . » ' 3 .- ^> ih V ^ ?• / U > ,, t ... ' -. v . v : t ) R * .. ... ! FAe ^ htiitian sEutvey xjf the PoliticaI JVorkh

      Untitled Article

      what w ^ re the feelings of those who were < the most interested in the debate . For it must J > e ob »^ r ; vecl that the emancipation of the Catholics is ofc little or no consequence , as far as this island only i& c «) nqej ? oed . rTh x ? y &fm , ^ oq small a part of its populatioa to xrf

      render them the object ^ appre ^ hensi on , ei ther to t \ i e , goyeix \ fg $ pfc or to the establUh ^^ cl ^ gy , Jftw the latter , prob ^ i y ^ wp ^ d ^^ t haveobjected toany favour . gr ^ U ^ f 4 them , if it were , op £ ; fp ^ : tha rfeaf k

      that such conce ^ ions mfght briM on claims from p ^ ef > ^ cb ^ ge $ | ^ Dissenters ^ But ,, i ff Irelai ^ ^ -Catholics form a-jvei ^ greaj ^ ^ majority of tlie papul ^ n , $ a $ & country , and p ^ f ^ s ^ n ^ SBJt siderable political Influence fu _ ^ ji ^ if the Irish meia ^ r ^ s # * y $%¥ & $ * gerin extending th ^ ^ gWt ^ a ^ d of fellowship . to tb gp ^ it dx ^ ^ d not beconp ^ t ^ q ^ jog U ^ t a ^^ p

      up 4 hekm-wmatjRifcv *> l ! : / l ydJ B ut , a great |> jnt ^^ Jf )^ e was Jhej ^ n ^ qt fl ^ ffefi cWI ^^ ^ ip ^ , M figi i # w 4 £ i 9 B ( iB ^ i W * jM ^ t ^ jiifJlitrtfift ^ IHVMiaf 0 jq ^^^ Vfe ^ iqSW ^ Ih ^^ , pL Qeitfjfcfei ; J % i ? fii JF ^ RfifJw : iM them * It is now generally pj fcrleuers

      ? J stood « M , that M « natreasu M ' ry « wcre « ; issed , ^ * h iit this w ais not *^ be con&Upred ^ cabinet question . * side % -d Vti&aM& y ti& ^ Vfcinet IWa ^ Bfe ^^ f o ^^^^ with fhe adnilnist ¥ arid ^ spbke in fa ^ Pof ^ feOdffl ^ f ^^ MM ¦ wWw ^^*^> ¦ fthS t 6 * ir 4 *? a » toft with

  • Citation
    • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), March 2, 1813, page 207, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2426/page/59/