On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
argument , in proof of Christ ' s being Jehovah , upon " So gross a mis-quotation '' of the texts 4 verily , ' * had I done so ^ I should have been ashamed ever again ta have put pen to paper ; yet all this the clergyman has been guilty . of ,, and more to the same purpose , as we shall see presently . Let it not be thought front what I have said , that I mean ta accede to the charge , that the
rendering I have proposed , is- indefensible , and not to be elicited from the original : for the justness of it then , I shall appeal from him , and from his supposed society of schoolmasters , to men whose critical knowledge of the ! Greek s neither he nor they are ableutu dispute . What has the learned Mr . Wakefield elicited from the
original of this passage ? Hjsv translation is ^ •* Who , though in a divine form , did not think of eagerly retaining this , divine likeness . " His schoolmasters I ap ~ prehend , , would be puaraled . to make oust a material difference in
stfnse , between ' *• was not tenxtct ^ ous of retaining that likeness t& God , " and < Q did not thmk oj eagerly retaining this divine likeness . " . What has the learned Mr . Pierce , ( befoVe referred to ) elicited from it ? His paraphrase is , Who being in the form * or likeness of God , was not eager in retaining that likeness to God . ? In his notes he -says , eager or
tcnaciousy &c . Dr . Clarke says , u true rendering is as follows , —* Who being in the form of God , did not covet to be ho ,-noured [ was not greedy or fond of , did not look upon it as a prize to be hastily catcht at , of being honoured ] as God . " ' I might go on ; but these authori *
Untitled Article
That the present rendering however is not the true one , we have the united testimony of some of our ablest critics , as well Trinitarian as Unitarian ; Mr . James Pierce observes , " this" ( that is
the present rendering ) u is ? so plai nly disagreeable - to the sense of the phrase , that it has been rejected by Er . Schmidiusy
Grotius , ArchbishopTillotson , Bishop Bull and others / whom no man will suspect of being partial in favour of the notion against which this text is frequently alleged . " il
As for J . M / s probable true rendering of this latter passage , " says the clergyman , u it would verily puzzle the whole society of schoolmasters to elicit such a meaning from the original * I have vainly endeavouTed to discover the Greek words , which J . M .
transmutes into woas not tenacious ® f retaining that likeness to God * Woe would have been to me when a school-boy , had I been guilty of any such transmutation . " Inreipty I would say , Woe , , woe would have been to me , if m this con - troversy with t ; he clergyman , I had been guilty of surreptitiously introducing the word " Jehov&hS '
instead of Elohim , and "the world , " instead of the heavens and , the earthy into the first verse of Genesis ; and then had affirmed from the text so corrupted , u that Moses teaches us , that the world was created by Jehovah . 97 Woe would have been to me if X had
substituted Jehovah for Adon ^ ( Mai . iii . 1 . ) if I had repeatedly affirmed , contrary to truth , and to the clearest evidence , to those who are able to look into the original , that the former and not the latter was the prophet ' s word , arid had built the whole of the
Untitled Article
J . MSs Reply to the Clergyman on the Divinity of Christ . 247
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), May 2, 1808, page 247, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2392/page/19/
-