On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
from which weak and sceptical persons draw impotent conclusions against the wisdom , justice and goodness of the Deity , it is strictly appropriate . , Of these things we . are very incompetent judges . " The ways of Providence nre dark and intricate . "
In this respect , "He giveth uot account of any of his matters : his way is in the sea , and his path in the great waters ; and his footsteps are not seen" I He regulates not his conduct by the fancies of foolish creatures , for " though a man labour to seek it out , yet he shall not find it 3 yea , further ,
though a wise man think to know it , yet shall not he be able to find it . " But if the objection relates to the great whole , the ultimate issue of the JDivine plans and operations relative to moral agents , it is nothing to the purpose , or blowing hot and cold with the same breath . The
revolutions of infinite ages can effect no change in his nature and perfections , who is " without variableness or shadow of turning / 1 It is an universally acknowledged and received principle , by all divines and theologians whose sentiments and works
are deserving notice , that the moral attributes of the Deity , though distinct in their origin and exercise , are the grand archetypes and exemplars of similar excellencies and perfections in created natures ; and were there any doubt of this glorious truth from
the suggestions of natural light , revelation hath fully illustrated and confirmed it . The argument J'rom the lesser to the greater is continually employed by patriarchs , prophets and apostles , and especially by the € i apostle and high-priest of our
profession , Jesus Christ ; " and the paternal character of the Deity exhibited in the brightest and most alluring colours , so that "he that runs may read . " Jf you entertain a suspicion that benevolence it * the great Father
of the universe contains in itself any thing strictly contrary to benevolence in inferior agents , you may be led not only to doubt his goodness , but also his power and wisdom , his holiness and justice , liis truth and faithfulness : and what is this , but to furnish
weapons for the Atheist and unbeliever , antl to " build a house upon the sand * \ Npr will the system , of ft rational
Untitled Article
" free-will , " which your Correspon * dent appears to adopt , enable us satisfactorily to account for , or justify the common notion of future punishment to our own minds ; for though this will sufficiently account for the admission of natural and moral evil , in a
partial and limited degree , ( which , indeed , seems unavoidable in such a creature as man , placed in his present circumstances , and endowed with voluntary powers , liable to neglect and abuse , asvwell as capable of improvement and cultivation ;) yet not for that which is final and irreversible .
Doubtless , as Dr . Hartley observes , there is a sense , ( though not as we conceive , in the sense of the Necessarian , because , " vviiat proves too much proves nothing , " ) in which ,
* ' the cause of the cause , is the cause of the thing caused ; ' and though no moral evil , as such , proceeds from the Deity , and though both reason and Scripture oblige us to draw a broad line of distinction between Divine
permission and Divine appointment 5 yet , to give a rational being a power , which , though intended for his eternal good , should , from his own perverseness , produce , or issue in his eternal evil , seems to be utterly inconsistent with all our ideas of the Divine
perfections . It is true , " fore-knowledge had no influence on their fault , which bad no less proved certain , unforeknown ; " yet , having been fore-known by the Almighty , it would have been far more consistent with his goodness , as we must conceive , to have withheld their existence altogether , and
created those beings only , whom he knew would duly improve their faculties , than by giving the former a short and fatal foretaste of happiness here , afterwards to consign them over to remediless misery , or remediless destruction . We need only revert to > the passages formerly quoted from those eminent writers who have
espoused the system of free-will , together witli that of eternal punishments * to perceive how strangely they were embarrassed in striving to reconcile their consciences with their profession , their reason with their faith . " I £
therefore , God has given men freewill in such a measure , as that they may bring upon themselves finite suffering thereby , in the present state , * or in any future , interpritediate one , we
Untitled Article
£ 94 .. ' - ' On Final Restitution .
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), May 2, 1819, page 294, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1772/page/14/
-