On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    time of Mr . Griffiths ' s ministry ; and it is no less evident that the parties giving the money retained a control over it during

    their lives , as they received , according to Mr . John Mander ' s account , the interest from Mr . Hickcox ; and it was ,, not till 1785 , when both of them were dead , that Mr , Hickcox was at liberty to give security for the sum so as to attach it to the

    chapel- Mr . Cole retired in 1781 , and Mr . C . Mander admits that he had changed his religious sentiments , which is ^ further proved by Mr . J . Mander and others having written a letter to him on the subject ; the stock was bought in 1778 and 178 CL

    Mr . Marshall signed the invitation to Mr . Griffiths , which is a sufficient proof of his sentiments , and Mr . Hill lived till 1785 without making any objection to Mr , Griffiths or his sentiments , as far as Mr . Bransby or any of us can tell . Mr . Cole ' s

    invitation to Wolverhampton is dated March 4 th , ] 7 £ 9- He was ordained July 4 th , 1764 : and therefore what Mr . J . Mander means by saying the monies were given before Mr . Cole ' s time is not intelligible . My reply to Verax was therefore well

    founded . But it is rather strange that Mr . C . Mander should let it be known that Verax is Mr . Hanbury # who was elected a trustee with you in 1793 , while the congregation was decidedly anti-trinitarian . How inconsistent are Mr . Charles

    Mander and his allies in their observations ?—in one place he denies the election of trustees in 1793 to have been valid ; and in another , quotes the opinion of Verax as one having authority because he was a trustee .-

    Ouropponents are so profound in their legal knowledge , that not only do they imagine that their Case can be supported with out the arguments used by their legal advisers , but Mr . Charles

    Mander takes upon himself to declare that the deed by which yourself and others were appointed trustees is not a legal deed whereas that eminent lawyer Sir Samuel Romilly declared in court , that you were legally appointed trustees , under the forms * Mr . Hanbury has denied to Mr . Pearson having written the paper signed Verax .

    Untitled Article

    14

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Feb. 2, 1819, page 14, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1709/page/12/