On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • Untitled
• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Jl He Marquis <Of Laxsdownk Rose To Move...

    though lie did to that which applied to discipline : the first _, be held to be legitimate , and deserving of every consideration _^ the latter he conceived had nothing to do with conscience . It was to the extent only of the principle that he objected . ? ......

    The house then divided ,, when the numbers of Peers present appeared to be equal , viz . 15 for the second reading , and 15 against it . The proxies then produced were , for tlie second reading 6 , against it 12 , making a majority against the Bill of 6 .

    Among the 15 present who voted against the Bill were 8 bishops , the Lord Chancellor , his brother Lord Sto \ _yell , Lord Redesdale , Lord Rolle , and Lord Shaftesbury . In the minority were the Archbishop of Canterbury , Lord Liverpool , and Lord Hairrowby . The Bishop of Worcester , it is understood , did not vote . _.

    On the next day , the 13 th of June , Marquis Lansdowne gave notice that he should very , early in the ensuing session bring the same subject before their Lordships .- ,

    Ar02101

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), June 12, 1823, page 21, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/smrp_12061823/page/21/