On this page
-
Text (2)
-
676 Corresponde?ice.— On Mr.Bcnnetfs Ser...
-
Jn fhe last No. p. cox P. 607. col. 1. 1...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Mil. 3. Marten's Reply To Mr. Sturcii, O...
to differ from them in opinion , while they arc the first to be offended at the la _~ h © f others . He begins his observations with contending for that which I have never disputed , viz . the right of an Editor ' s _inserting nothing anonymous which relates to matters of fact ; but how long and how generally this has been the custom in the _Repository , your correspondent has not informed me . I should hope , Sir , for your credit a _.- > an Editor , : hat mine is not Mr . S . has thought proper to ason Mr . Bennett , which _declaiation nion which I have expressed towards that gentleman , who I am _persuaded cannot by this correspondent ' s _mischievous insinuations be made to think that ! entertain against him any motives of personal animosity . 1 have , Sir , only given it as my opinion that Mr . B . was incorrect when he said that he obtained a patient hearing of his sermon , while Mr . S . most dogmatically _averts the contrary . Mr . S . appeals for the truth of his _assertion to the expressions of some of his friends , who ert that my ill becomes a solitary case was to fix a stfgma k and friendly _opiper-uaded cannot design in him after writing th' 2 fran
I suppose Like _himself were present merely during the time of public service , and at the dinner table afterwards : while I equally appeal to a number of my friends who were present during the whole business of the day , and whose disapprobation Mr . Bennett himself was both an eye and an ear wime s to , nor would it be a difficult task to prove , that during the delivery of the sermon there we ' re _visible marks in the congregation both of impatience , interruption and disgust .
If Mr . Bennett is an injured man , to what cause is it to be attributed ? Certainly not to me nor the Assembly , but to him > elf and those of his friends who have rashly advised him to add one improper act to another : nor has Mr . Sturch ' s delicacy towards his friend Mr . Bennett appeared very conspicuous in agitating a subject , which perhaps would have been much better laid at rest . When I wrote my former letter , I was not aware that amongst your numerous readers , there could have existed a _disposition so captious as to have taken an advantage of my words , while the meaning was sufficiently obvious . Was £ t possible
for any one but Mr . S . to have understood me to mean ( notwithstanding some incorrectness of expression ) that each of the passages which I quoted , was repeated thirty or forty times , and not that such like _passages occurred so often in the discourse ? And if I had substituted the word introduction for that of repetition , I might have escaped the talons of this angry critic . Indeed , Sir , were I in my turn to recriminate , I mi _^ ht charge Mr . S . with asserting that Mr . Bennett ' s own passages in his sermon were rrore unexceptionable" than those which he borrowed from
scriptu e , but this would betray a _spirit which every friend to truth ought to deprecate . I am as anxious as any man for the spread of pure and unadulterated Christianity , and the true worship of the one supreme God , but I hope my zeal in the good cause will never betray me into er _^ ors _^ and especially into that great absurdity of defending the measures of any advocate , right or wrong , merely because 1 believe him to be a good man , and much more so , when his conduct tend * to stigmatize a large body of his equally well _meaning brethren .
And as I have never , either directly or _indi guagL with indecency , so I trunk _thelevity tcr is ill timed ; it may indeed suit the feelings of a sneering , or gratify the spleen of an angry critic , but it _deserves by me only to be treated "with silent contempt . I remain , Sir , your ' s & c . Barston _. Dcc . io , 1807 , B . MARTEN . ectly , charged one word of scripture Ian of Mr . Sturch in the latter part of his let
676 Corresponde?Ice.— On Mr.Bcnnetfs Ser...
676 Corresponde ? _ice . — On Mr . _Bcnnetfs Sermon .
Jn Fhe Last No. P. Cox P. 607. Col. 1. 1...
Jn fhe last No . p . cox P . 607 . col . 1 . 1 . from P . 614 . col . I . for u P . 617 . co ! . I . 1 . 23 , 1 m 1 . _a , _" " punctually . , 1 . ao , for _graven " rear ! grave the bottom , 8 , aele < c sin * ' _Ante-Mcrcator _, ' * for " be praised , ' * from the bottom _* ERRATA read _shiti-Mercator _* redd bepraised . for to punctually obey read
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Dec. 2, 1807, page 676, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/mrp_02121807/page/56/
-