On this page
-
Text (2)
-
34 The Clergyman's Examination of Rev. F...
-
To the Editor of the Monthly Repository ...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Anecdotes Of Dr. Priestley; In A Letter ...
Having stated these conversations as accurately as I am able , after the lapse of more than twenty years , I leave it to your consideration whether they do not invalidate the statement of the Rev . T . Priestley in the paragraph to which you refer . _Though unconnected with the former part of my letter , I will mention an anecdote which I had from my friend Mr . Norman , of Stow-market . Mr . Tailor , while the dissenting minister of that place ,
introduced Dr . Priestley to Needham Market * Mr . N . often heard Mr . T . predict the future eminence of his friend , not merely from his great application , but from the most undeviating adherence to plan in every thing he did . So exact was he in the division of his time that he accustomed himself to study with a watch on the table and
however interesting the subject engaged in might be , he never suffered on _« branch of literature to encroach upon the period allotted for another . I remain dear Sir your _' s , Sandon _^ Jan . 6 , 1805 , ELIAS FORDHAM .
34 The Clergyman's Examination Of Rev. F...
34 The Clergyman ' s Examination of Rev . F . _Stojie _^ s « Case '
To The Editor Of The Monthly Repository ...
To the Editor of the Monthly Repository Sir , Mr . Stone ' s statement of his case in your October number , ( p . 528 , ) is so very extraordinary a one , that I cannot suffer it to pass unnoticed . He is evidently conscious , that the charge of dishonesty might be brought against him for retaining his benefice , and yet publicly teaching the doctrines usually termed Unitarian . This charge he obviates by asserting _, that
THE CLERGYMAN S _EXAMINATIOIST OF THE REV . F _" STATEMENT OF HIS CASE . " STONE 4
he is , " bound only by two solemn , unconditional , scriptural ¦ engagements made with his ordaining bishop in the form and manner of the ordering of priests ; and that these , being entered into posterior to the subscription to the articles , release him from all obligation to regard them in this important point , ' viz * the divinity of Christ .
Now , Sir , let me ask , would any honest" Socinian dissenter -be satisfied with this quibble , even if it were founded upon truth ? Would an entering into these two scriptural engagements annul a solemn previous subscription to the articles , without an avowed declaration on the part of the candidate for orders _^ that such was his belief ? Can a truly honest man pretend to say , that a fresh subscription wholly invalidates a prior one ; when he must have known , that to ascribe such a notion to the
founders of oyr reformed church would be ascribing to then * downright folly ? Does Mr . Stone really suppose , that eitheT the Church of _Englajid _, or his ordaining bishop , meant to re *
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Dec. 2, 1807, page 634, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/mrp_02121807/page/14/
-