On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
POLITICAL DISHONESTY.
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
marshals who have yet to see service , to the youngest ensigns who have an ' . esprit " du corps and no particular liking for the Company's troops , are , on such an important mattery very dangerous advisers . • . Marines' especially organized for service in men-of-war are indispensable ; portions of the regular army embarked' in our ships wouldbe out of place v and between them and the sailors there would be perpetual discord . The Marines and the blue jackets , though not always in harmony , act tolerably well together , and accommodate themselves to each other . In fact , it was habit and ¦ use—the accidental circumstance of some regiments having been
more frequently than others embarked—which led to their being so specially employed , and led to the establishment of the Marines . But while they have obtained golden opinions from all classes , the military aristocracy has been accustomed to look on them with some contempt , and though it would shirk their duties , it deems itself competent to dominate over them . Something of the same kind takes place with regard to the artillery and engineers . The peculiar functions of these bodies requiring hard study , they attract few or none of the scions of the upper aristocracy into their ranks . But aristocratic officers of the Guards and the Line obtain the highest places and command their more
efficient brethren . They are undoubtedly of opinion that these other corps ought to be subservient to them ; though they cannot be incorporated with them , the Indian army , they fancy , might be , and their importance proportionablyl increased . But since it is found necessary to organize and train men especially for the marines and the artillery , it is reasonable to conclude that a similar
training and organization of men , to be specially adapted for service in India with an Indian army , is equally necessary . Such a provision is , in truth , only a species of that division of employment which pervades society . The formation of the Anglo-Indian army grew up naturally from the circumstances of the Ihdia Gompany ^ nd the coun t ry ; and now to ab olish it , merely in Reference to ^ 7 some notions of military authority , or the desires of military men * , is to run counter to all
experience . _ - . . ;¦ To enter into the Company ' s army ; is to devote . a life to a particular occupation , Officers and men go to India only ; to return with a fortune or a pension . The service is their life business—they have no other ambition , and they have performed it well . The Royal army , even when acting with the Company's troops , has been disposed to look down on them , and they have not obtained equal rank arid consideration in the nation . Treated as inferior they have not obtained the best men , and have * in consequence , not been quite as admirable as they might have been . Nevertheless ,, they have furnished a succession of very able-oftwer-s , —^ hilft—Gin £ r : il FjLPHINStox , a ioval officer , as
Lord Stanley observed , led . the army into the Gabul scrape , Nott , Pollock , and Sale , Company's officers ' , led it out , and retrieved the national reputation endangered by the royal soldier . So the tide of the mutiny was turned , and Delhi fell by the instrumentality of Sir J . Lawrence and Generals Nicholson , Wilson , and Neil , Company's servants . The great merits of Lord Clyde , Sir Hugh Ross , and above all of Havelock , cannot be doubted ; but the Indian army , though small in number compared to the Royal forces , boasts many distinguished heroes . Where there is one Clyde , or one Havelock in the Royal army , there are scores of Chathams ,
WHiTELobics , Burrards , Neales , Cardigans , and Luc an s . From the majority , who enter the service rather as a pastime than u serious life business , the same devotion cannot be expected as from the Indian officers . Many of the army officers now in India are always wanting to come home . It is quite erroneous , then , to claim for the Royal army , taken as a whole , a more refined sense of duty , a more careful discipline , greater enterprise , greater energy , and greater devotion to its employer than has been displayed by the Anglo-Indian army . Though we all recognise some splendid exceptions to general ineptitude , we feel astonished that on the strength of these exceptions those who
administer our military affairs should chum a great extension of power , when their grievous and proved deficiencies are the subject of just , loud , and universal complaint . . It seems ns it they -thought that they , can Qnly . bo . preaery . ed by . taking all power into their own hands , and so extinguishing at once comparison and competition . They must be despotic , and considered infallible , or they may cease to be . Sir Charles Wood ' s own Council and all competent authorities are against his plan ; and it would he better , as Lord Stanley proposes , to place the Anglo-Indian army on a higher footing under on improved administration , keeping it entirely distinct from the Horse Guards , than surrender it to be monopolised and modelled by our military aristocracy . vT
Untitled Article
IT will be a great relief to journalists when some public men are discovered iu high places whose integrity is unimpeachable ; but while hoping and longing for a purer political atmosphere , we must , perhaps , rejoice at any indications of disturbance which bode the coming of a corrective storm . The origin oi the revolutionary attempt of the House of Lords to overthrow the Constitution , and make itself a taxing power , may be clearly traced to the dishonesty of the Cabinet and the House of Commons-Lord PaLmebston , who can no more live without tricks than a fish without water , was obviously the ringleader of the cabal
against the liberal men of his own party ; and when he found that the legality of the Lords' behaviour could not fail to be brought into prominent discussion , he packed a Committee of Tories and malignant Whigs , together with a slippery Peelite , and a Very small minority of men likely to maintain the dominion of law and liberty against the aristocratic branch of the Legislature and its minions in the Lower House . Having secured a jury of accomplices , the next step was to limit their inquiry , so that it could not lead to a full exhibition of the legal
grounds upon which the privileges of the House of Commons and the rights of the people rest . The inquiry ought to have started from the period at which it terminates , and to have gone back at least as far as the reign of Edward I . Had this been done the House of Commons and the people would have been in possession of a most important series of precedents , clearly leading down to the famous declaration of 1678 , " that all aids and supplies , and aids to his Majesty in Parliament , are the idle gift of the Commons "
This was precisely what the reactionary cabal did not want ; and from the first meeting of the Committee the issue was easily discerned ; After a considerable expenditure of time , a mass of cases were collected , for which the ( Dhainnan of the Committee , Mr . WaxpoIiE , appears chiefly responsible ; and which lays all parties concerned in its concoction open to very grave and serious charges , as it is not a full , fair , and complete statement of the facts whiehu it pretends to describe . Founded upon an imperfect —we fear wilfully imperfect collection of precedents , Mr . Walpole framed an u oily gammon . " sort of report , the effect of which would be to slur over the matter , and leave the virtual victory on the side of the conspirators in the Lords . In oppqsitipritp this , Mr . Bright , who had been well primed by an able
constitutional lawyer , prepared a clear and explicit statement of the law and facts of the case , in which he was supported by Mr . Gladstone and Lord John Russell . Lord Palmerston , of course , supported Mr . Walpole , and then agreed to a compromise which binds him to nothing , although it is evident he wishes to go wrong . If lie finds his tricks exposed , and liable to punishment by loss of office , he can , with —his , admirable facility of vermicular wriggling , easil y turn the other way . Sir James Graham , as of old , repudiates tile " politics of manly honesty for that Jeremy Diddler expediency of which Sir Robert Peel was the chief apostle ; but '; . although , he opposed the constitutional side when his vote might have turned the scale , he too can twist and wriggle if adequate pressure be applied .
In a day or two the Government intentions will be known , and the debates will commence ; but all parties concerned may make up their minds that no compromise will answer , and that all attempts to make matters smooth and pleasant will only lead to further exposure and strife . We observe the Constitutional Defence Committee have advertised their intention of originating an investigation into the whole matter , if * the people are betrayed by the partisan jury to whom Lord
Pal-Mjerston has confided the question ; their words are that they intend to appoint a " sub-Committee for the purpose ol searching all the requisite documents , and making known to the people those laws of public liberty which the accomplices in the usurpation committed by the House of Lords are anxious to conceal , " This is the right course ; and if , upon inquiry , it turns out that the precedents laid before the Houso of Commons Committee were garbled or incomplete , such an incident cannot be treated with mildness or moderation . The matter must be
thoroughly searched out , the guilty parties traced , and in some way suitably punished . A large proportion of the Committee arc Privy Councillors , and if it should unfortunately prove true that they have , by negligence , or culpuT 51 e action , allowed or caused n serious misrepresentation to take plnco , the people ought to combine to lay their conduct before the Queen , and pray that she will dismiss them from the office which they hold . There-are two sorts of falsehood , one the suppre ' ssio veri , and the other the mggestio faUi . In point of morality one is us bad as the other , unless , indeed , the former be considered the more base , because the more hypocritical , orirnc . The conduct of all parties concerned in this dispute should be tried by the
Untitled Article
6 $ 4 The Leader andI SaturdayAnalyst , [ June 30 , 1860 .
Political Dishonesty.
POLITICAL DISHONESTY .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), June 30, 1860, page 604, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2354/page/4/
-