On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (4)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
THE £ S. d. OF THE FOUEIGN OFFICE,
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
Tub 4 , 1 SG 0 . J The Leader and Saturday Analy st . 100
Untitled Article
mentary letter , exclaiming " Who'd have thought it ? " . in reply to a " Couldn ' t help it" communication from the latter , and then the ¦ '" Envoy Plenipotentiary . " sat down to give an account of his proceedings to Lord > Ulm rsbt ; ry , This epis : le ( No . IV . in tho series ) is quite a-curiosity in its way—it is more , than a yard fon-o- in large print , and begins with an essay on the manners of the Chinese , and a . history of diplomatic communications with them ; after which it recapitulates a host of details , and ends in expressions of approval of the attempt to force the 1 eihp , accompanied with confessions that the failure must have a very
mischievous effect . .... , , Further letters give ari account of the ignominious * treatment experienced by the American Envoy at Tefcin ,. aml eonvev Lord John Kussell ' s approval to Mr . Bruce ; while the papers wind up with an extract from the Pekin Gazette of the 14 th August , in which an imperial decree appeared , reciting the leading facts of our disaster , and declaring that " the English barbarians , violent , rebellious , and unreasonable as they are , have , on this occasion , received such a chastisement as will not fail to make them aware of the danger of offending the military dignity of China . " - , ,. ' Most assuredly , if all Englishmen were like the . chief actors in this unfortunate ' farce , they would richly deserve the epithet of
*• ¦ unreasonable barbarians . " Prom beginning to end we see nothing but folly and infatuation . The design and the execution were alike bad . Lord Malmesbury , Mr : Bruce , and Admiral Hope , were all alike , in opacity of intelligence and obtusity of perception . They had but one ' idea among them , and that was a mad one—that the Chinese would be frightened , without adequate cause for alarm ; that they might be thrilled with idle threats , and bombarded into submission with empty boasts . As old nurses frighten children by calling out in a gruff voice , " I'm a-< -oming , " Malmesbury ; Bruce , and Hope , by making a noise in chorus , were to terrify our enemies . As might y have been expected , the plan did not succeed ; their " roar" was laughed at ; and the story ought to convey a lesson to John Bull not to permit any " sort pf animal to wear the British Lion ' s skin .
Untitled Article
fpWO Reports have recently been presented by the loreign-I office ^ to both Houses of Parliament , by Her Majesty's command * Both are the . work of Him Majesty's Secretaries of Embassy and Legation abroad : one , a customary report , treats of the manufactures and commerce of the countries in which these gentlemen reside ; the other is a special report on the effects of the late vine disease . Each contains some useful information . It would indeed be strange , if the men whom , for their excellence , we send abroad to represent the nation , should
not be able to instruct us on subjects connected with foreign countries . The public , and especially the parliament , have n right to expect from the&n a groat deal of information , and that it should be carefully and correctly stated . Tt is our intention , however , to show that some of these Secretaries of Embassy and Legation , and the Foreign-office , which supervises their labours and is responsible for them , perform their duty in a very slovenly and careless manner .. In this article we take no notice of the substantial information in these reports , confining ourselves to exposing some of their obvious dejficieneies and errors .
We must say , indeed , of the most elaborate of all the reports — that of Lord ' CiiELSKA , on the " Past history and present state of the wine trade in Franco , "—that ; the greater portion of it is a work of supererogation . His lordship was called on to advert specifically to " tho " eiVeot produced on the commerce of France by die vine disease , from its , first appearance to tho latest moment . " But to this subject scarcely a , dozen pages arc devoted , out of a hundred and twenty-four that his very elaborate report occupies . It consists of extracts from various works on the cultivation of the vine in France , and of " a summary of the principal results of an inquiry instituted in France , in 4 849 , on the effects of home wine duties , laid before the National Assembly , iu June , 1851 . " This cannot , enlighten us ns to tho disease , which first inade its appearance in France in 1850 . Any second-rate literary workman might have done tin ' s work as well as the noble lord , at tho ordinary payment for translation .
The noble lord , however , had an object in translating the French report summarily , and fastening on it twenty-four pages of commentary . '' Sir Emersox Tenxant , Permanent Un ;! e ; Secretary of the Board of Trade , " drew up a report " . purporting to descrilxj " the condition of our wine trade in 1853-4 ., as compared with the ' previous years . " . It \ vas " never presented to parliament , " because , we ' suppose , Sir Emerson ' s superiors , estimating it at its just value , suppressed it ; but the materials were embodied in a work , published by Sir Emerson iii 1855 , under the title of" Wine , its Uses , Taxation , etc . " Now the purpose of Lord Chelsea ' s translation and twenty-four pages of commentary is to criticise and refute Sir Emerson ' s conclusions . Thus we have one public servant going out of his way to criticise the labours of another , and the Foreign-office , instead of suppressing the attack on the work of the permanent Secretary of ¦ the Board of Trade , publishes it in- extefiso at the national expense . This would be an abuse of power and a waste of the public money even if Sir Emerson Teknant's avowedly anti-free-trade production had made an impression on the public . In fact , however , his errors were pointed out when his work was published , and it Avas not reserved for Lord Chelsea and the Foreign ^ ofnce to expose the contemptible shallownoss of the Permanent Secretary , or the futility of his -attempt to justify our present wine duties . Passing from this condemnation of three-fourths of Lord Chkxsea's report to the verbal and other errors of the two volumes , we notice ,, at page 77 , a ' misprint of 1847 for 1 S 57 ;—^ a very trifling error , but it serves to make us suspicious of the many figure ! the noble lord uses , the accuracy of which we cannot test . We notice , too , at page 54 , the omission by the critical lord of some words from the ' last ' sentence of the first paragraph that begins on the page , for want of whichthe _ French winegrowers are represented as complaining of tote prices , when the facts show that ' . they complain of the tax levied on them , whether the price be high or low . These are trifles compared to some errors which avc are about to point out . We must , first ask -Mr . Hamilton , Secretary of Legation at Wurtemberg , to explain to English readers what lie moans by the phrase— " A considerable roll in thin particular industry ik plied by the activity of some Swixs merchants . ''' 'Frenchmen may probably suspect that the hon . gentleman , Usingtheir language instead ' of his own , wrote ' ¦ a considerable role is played ;¦" while the Foreign-office 'Or- tlie printer , not understanding French , converted it into the iionsense we have quoted . Secretaries , of Legation should not forget , though they may converse in French , that they must write in English . Mr . Corbett , Secretary of Legation to Tuscany , informs the Parliament that " corn and other grain" are imported into Tuscany . What he mnans by corn which does not include grain , or by " gl'sun which does not include corn , the Foreign-office must explain . The Yankees mean maize when they say corn— -but their use of the word is not yet naturalized here . Hoping- to learn what Mr . Corhett mig ht mean by corn , we turned to a table , to which he refers , of the price at which corn is imported into Tuscany , and found to our utter astonishment—as maize is a low-priced grain—that this corn costs no loss than . ill l () s . per sack , and the yearly average value of the importation , of such corn into Tuscany is £ 30 , 024 , 794 . A sack of five bushels of the best wheat would not cost more in England than 35 s . Tho value , too , of all the grain and flour imported into our country , with nearly thirty times as many people ns Tuscany , is about ^ 20 , 000 , ()()<; a year . According to the statement put forth by tho Foreiguofiice , Tuscany imports com annually to tho . amount of * £ 10 , 000 , 000 more in value than Great Britain . So , her trade , with something more than one million of people , is put down as of the average value of £ 147 , 308 , D' () 0 . Wo cotild hilt stare at reading such very extraordinary statements , but a little reflection convinced uaJLhnt either Mr . Coiujktt , or tho Foreigiv-ofliee , or the printer , -had converted lire , , » yls , and denierx into £ h . d .., and so represented tho trade of Tuscany , and tho price of corn and other grain , and of all other things in that duchy , ( is thirty times greater than their real price and value , This gro . ss blunder pervades all the monetary statements in Mr . Qouhrtt ' s report ; so that we must divide X 15 ) 8 . 'J | . , 5 O 7 b . V . 'i <> to ascertain that the value of tho straw hats exported from Tuscany iu 1 S |> 5 , put down at thy above amount in the report , was £ 52 7 , 817 . Mr . Lowthkk , her Majesty ' s Secretary of Legation at the Court of St . Petersburg , infonus th « people of England that " their internal trade is looked nnoii as oi secondary importance . Their view wilt . hardly agrees with hiu . They know that their railways , and nil their vehicular coumiunioiition , is to carry on tlioir internal trade . . They will jroireuly believe that whipping carrying cargoes coaatwiae to the amount immiully ol' , ' } 4 , OO 0 , OO 0 tons ' , can bo secondary to any tnide iu tho world . England is no more dependant , aw ho « uys , on her foreign commerce , than on any other branch of her whole wonderful industry ,
Untitled Article
* Wo quote hero the full titles of thoBO reports : — Ist .-- ' RcportB of Her Migcaty ' e Soorotivrjca pf Embasfly and Logution , on the Effcota of the Vino Diaoiuse on th « Commerce of the Countries in ivhioh they renido , " I'hey « onoorn tho United Stutca , Tuaoany , Spnin , AuatriiV ; i 3 urdir ) i « , fimrTrjuice . ' ¦ ' • ¦ tind .- ^ - '' lloportBof Her Mojoaty * B Seoretftrii'B of Embasay and Legation , on the Manufactures tvnd Oommcrco of tlio Countniea in vn \ iv \ i they rcaiflo , " They concern tho NQthcrlnndfl , WurtombwrB , BftdoPi Tuafiany , Snxo Cobourg and Ootlm , Sweden , Iluasia , Bftvariji . Switsserjftnd , Bolgiun ^ Fnuikfbrt , Surdinift , Brxxo Mciningen , Mexico , nnd / A . uatrin . Tl » oy « rc T > resontod to both IJouoeH of Pnrlfamon ^ by com m an d of Ho * M nicety , and are printed by IJnrrUon and Sone ,
The £ S. D. Of The Foueign Office,
THR : ' £ si . d . OF THE FOKEIGN OFFICE .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Feb. 4, 1860, page 109, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2332/page/9/
-