On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
LITERATURE, SCIENCE, ART, &o.
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
TOPICS FOR INDIAN STATESMEN . Topics for Indian Statesmen . By John Bruce Norton , Esq ., Barrister-at-Law , Madras ; author of " The Rebellion in India , " " Madras , " &c . Edited by G . II . Norton , Esq . Kichardson Brothers . The author of tins work is by profession a Barrister , and is , we find on reference to the Law List , of some seventeen- years' standing . He was responsible editor during the stirring times from 1854 to 1 S 5 G of the Madras Athenaum , one of the papers sometimes instanced as the respectable exceptions to the run of Indian journalism which Lord Harris , it will be remembered , characterised as on the
whole " disloyal in tone , un-English in spirit , and wanting in principle . " Mr . Norton was invited to assume the editorial office as being a well-known Madras reformer , and round him during the period of his connexion with the Athenaeum , which , it should be stated , was a labour of love , he claims to ¦ have acquired , in addition to all he had before , a very deep acquaintance with the affairs , condition , and prospects of India . When we consider the notorious propensity of Anglo-Indians for public writing , we can hardly doubt that the
worktable of a Madras editor , well-known to be a spirited man and a staunch reformer , must have been a storehouse of very tempting information from all sorts and conditions ot men , or that the editor himself may , if so inclined , have been far better informed upon many public affairs in his own presidency , at all events , than the general run of officials . Let us note for such of our readers as may probably not purchase or have time to study so large a volume , the leading " Topics" Mr . Norton has treated .
They arc : —The character and cause of the rebellion . Was the Government forewarned ? Did they take proper steps to meet it ? How shall we treat the rebels ? Who is to pay the cost ? What is required for the military protection of India ? What shall be the form of the Home Government of India ? Centralisation . How can the constitution of the Local Governments be improved ? Is the Legislative Council properly constituted ? Shall we pursue annexation ? Land Tenure . Shall we redeem the land tax ? Why have not British capital and enterprise invested themselves in India ? Can they be induced to do so ? Do our law courts
require reform ? Is the police to be reorganised ? What shall be the future condition of the Indian press ? Should our future policy in India be retrogressive , stationary , or progressive ? And , herein , of stoppage of public works ; demeanour towards the natives . Education . Prosclytism . It is clearly impossible , within tho space allotted to vis , to condense tho arguments or even sumnxariso the conclusions of the author upon topics so fertile as the least penetrating will admit theabove to be . We must plead to both author and reader
that we fur better serve them by the above condensed table of contents , than b y a few isolated extracts or some bald commonts of our own . It may nevertheless be interesting to mention Mr . Norton ' s opinion , that tho revolt clearly partook of a national , not alone a military character , as being strongly in , opposition to that of at least one other ablo writer , who would allow it the latter only . The cause of the ill feeling against us was our neglect of our duties to our Indian subjects ; and , of tho outbreak , our disregard of ample notice we received .
or even Lord Dalhousie , and a ISTapier to grapp le with events , it boots not now to consider . Whatever might have been , we have to deal -with -what is . The important question which we must now ask ourselves is , whether men who so trifled with the rebellion at its commencement are fit instruments to be trusted with the regeneration of India when order is restored ? A dispassionate judgment must pronounce that they are not . Lord Canning himself has shown no spark of prescience or genius . lie has acted just as might be expected from a man of the most ordinary capacity . The highest praise we can award him is , what was used by Lord Eldon to his father as a sneer , that he is " a respectable gentleman . " But it is not to such that the destinies of India are to be trusted . As for the civilian
Government , whose eyes were shut to what was coming , and who refused to see it when it came , the blood of the murdered cries out against them ; on their heads be the sin . " We have escaped , " again says Mr . Norton , " a national revolution by almost a miracle . " " Our Own right hands , under Providence , deserve the first place in the catalogue of the causes of our safety ; but next , certainly , is the singular coincidence that in two of the most important and vital points of the empire the reins of government were held by educated men . " .. It has been argued that as Nana Sahib , the atrocious soul of the revolt ,
was a highly educated native and the type of what is called " young Bengal , " ' should be very careful how we encourage the spread . education . But the author agrees with Mr . Halliday , the Lieutenant-Goveriior of Bengal , that , in the first place , the Nana , though he lias a smattering of English , is , as to education , in its only valuable signification , as uninstructed as the lowest mutineer ; and , in the second , that to the European-sympathies and training in various branches of useful knowledge , under English superintendence , of Jung Babadoor of Ncpaul , of liolkar , of Scindiah , and of Solar Jung , the-young minister
Metcalfe and Sir John Malcolm , the originator of the proposal , all believe to be a righteous form of taxation , and a lucrative one . lie sees , he says , no other way in which taxes may be imposed at present . It is fancied that the natives have vast hoards of bidden wealth , and that they may be forced to disgorge it . But it is the old story " of the traveller and the sun and the wind . We may induce native . capital to uncloak itself by those gentle and wise suasions which inspire confidence , not by blustering and brute force .
In the inquiry as to the military protection of India , Mr . Norton enumerates the vast questions which must arise in connexion with the necessary reconstruction of the Bengal Army and the future condition of our whole Indian military resources . They are numerous indeed . lie pretends to no peculiar wisdom and no inspiration , but only to state boldlv what manv a fettered man may hardly
have dared to think , much less to express , and what the plain sense of every unprofessional observer inclines him to believe . He considers that to play off the mutual haired of Sikhs , Ghoorkas , and Bengalees , and so to seek an homogeneous army , would be dangerous ; for we shall thus , as we should in the "selection of law-paste men , only be -training up a more formidable foe for sooner or later contest with ourselves . He
is , of course , for an immense addition to our European force , and for the reduction of its native clement to the lowest practicable amount . He would arrange our troops so that , by meaus of railways and telegraphs , they might be massed at will ; he would have civil duties discharged by a police force , that now employ a large number of regular soldiers ; and ,, above all , he would encourage the employment of Eurasians in the army and other situations . This race , whose claims of blood and religion we have heretofore strangely and cruelly disregarded , would make more reliable public
of Hyderabad , we owe a large measure of our safety . With regard to our present duties , Mr . Norton is an earnest defender of Lord Canning ' s clemency , though he deems his celebrated order to have been loosely worded , and incautiously made a public document instead of a private circular . He divides the rebels into four classes . To the Sepoys and the native officials , who had received our pay , and enjoyed the sunshine of our favour and then turned against us he would show no mercy . To the rajahs
servants , either civil or military ^ than any pure Hindoos , and would far better than the latter repay us for the hyper-indulgent fondling we have lavished upon ' the Sepoys of Oude . Into the mysteries of the llvotwarrec , Ainnnep , Zemindaree systems we cannot here follow our learned friend , though we have been well p leased with his admirable essay on the land tenure of India . Let us note our impression , en passant , that no sweeping off of the old systems can for a moment bo coutho
and nobles , many of whom havehad fair cause of complaint , he would accord separate investigation , and the populace he could scarcely treat too leniently . The author has luminous views on the subject of revenue . The question must soon arise how an enormous rcvenuo is to be raised to liquidate our past losses and to bear heavy future military outlay —in fact , who is to pay for the rebellion . Tho amount has not been ascertained ; it can scarcely be approximately guessed at . It has gradually amounted from three millions to ten ; and of course every day adds vastly to the cost , The bent of public inclination for England—as , indeed , is only natural—has been to cast
templated , but that with him we conceive position of the Madrussce ryot can at least be modified . This portion of the work we leave with regret . So we do the paper upon Indian law-courts and their abuses , which essay touches also upon the native ideas of the saleubility of justice , the remarks upon Proselytism , and those upon Press Gagging , which arc written with , the sagacity of a lawyer , and the esprit do corps of a ci-decant , or , for all \ yo know , a present editor . We have , wo believe , said enough to prove the interest we have taken in their perusal , and the anxiety we feel for their popularisation .
Mr . Norton is evidently a man of the world , ot large experience mul great common sense . Ho lms aluwycr-like habit of refusing to take things lor granted , to make whole admissions upon partial promises , or to concedo anything upon ex ptirte statements . JIo lms , we imagine , a keen anil inrsighted perception of jobbery , mid ft tcrnor-liko fancy for probing it to tho bottom when ho lms onco got scent of it . Wo can readily believe him when he says , in his 10 th " Topic : "I do not say that I did my spiriting over-gonUy , lor I am not aware that I over spared any j » L > or mutter
this burden upon India . England would ftiin escape tho loan sho sees looming in the distance $ and if India only could be made to pay there can bo llttlo doubt but that she would be mado . Numerous suggestions with this view have been made . Tax tho countries where rebellion h « s broken out , say some ; tax the merchants , tax tho English in India , levy a poll or property tux , tax anybody , everybody , say others . Replenish the exchequer by the iucdemvtion of tiih ¦ land-tax Bays my namesake , the late Advocato-Gonerul of Madras . Why
not sell Bengal ? says tho " Friend of India , " in italics . Mu | ct the owners of India stock , the fault is theirs , somehow or other , and . at all events make the people of India pay . As to those who have rebelled , it is a just punishment ; us to those who have not , it ia only fair they should paj' for their protection . Wo have recited this list of suggestions , for it is , indeed , n highly important topic , that we may draw attention to JVJr . Norton ' s reply to one and all of thorn , and if possibles provoke u reply to his own recipe by ventilating it .
deserving exposure Wo can also believe the following slutement : •—During the time 1 wrote Lord Harris assured > no turn , ho was fully aware of tho ability and utility of tno journal . I had Lord Dnlhouslo ' u testimony to tho samo effect convoyed to mo by his prlvato secretary- ff- official in the Hoard of Control informed mo Unit tno Atlwnuium was doing good yeomau sorvico i » opposing centralisation and annexation . From tlio j "" " ) Reform Association tho samo assuranoo vouched mo , flattering attestation to tho high character ot iw journal was borne by tho oontomporary press of Juuin . ^ Every essay in tho book before us shows that it& author is a man of acumen and varied knowledge , and deep , earnest conviction . If after tho ion » partial bondage of such u spirit in the letters 01 tho editorial " wo , " its owner now does court 101 a whilo tho full Uburty of publicity , revelling nuu
Some of those proposals ho declares to bo simply impossibilities ; some us impolitic aa others are impossible . Tlio redemption of Jand-tax would bo tho readiest , but tho sum of 1320 , 000 , 0001 / . which it would place in tho public treasury would bo a temptation , ho says—and wo ore disposed to agree with him—to public profligacy . Tho nu' / . zorann , or nno on porpetual successions to freehold fiefs , is tho system which Mr . Norton , with Lord ,
Year after year , remonstrance , warning , evidence , argument , entreaty was poured out before the English nation , whoso lethargy -was as that of tho seven sleepers . Nothing short of the grand crash with which the East India Company ' s system has at last exploded could c . xcito attention and sympathy towards India , or teach us that wo cannot accept only the profits and pleasures of government to tho neglect of its chief obligations . Upon Lord Canning ho bears hard , but if his
dates tiro correct , " not too hard , ior his sloth in admitting or grappling with tho rebellion when it became a fact , though ho holds him as a new man to Indian lifo , loss inoxcusablo for . the disregard with "which ho was induced by supercilious counsellors to treat all jn'cdictions of evil . But our author has over n phial of concentrated wrath in store for the Civil Service , as may bq scon in the concluding linos of tho following passage : — What ) torrents of blood might have boon saved had othor counsels pvovallod j had wo had an Ellonborough ,
Literature, Science, Art, &O.
LITERATURE , SCIENCE , ART , &o .
Untitled Article
1122 THE LEADEB . [ No . 448 , October 23 , 1858 . _ fc ^ fc ^^^ j ^^^^^^^^^^—^ fc ^^^^^^^^^*^^^^^^^^ " ^*^^^^^^^^^^^ ' ¦ ' ¦ ¦ — — ¦ ¦ —^—» - — ^^^^^^—^ m ^^^^^ MMMM ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ W
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Oct. 23, 1858, page 1122, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2265/page/10/
-