On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
• y violent , and , taking up a gun , said he would ne one . After some parleying , he fired the gun air , and laid it aside in the house ; but subselie appeared with the weapon again ( having apreloaded it in the interval ) , and fired it at Mr . t who fell to the ground , seriously wounded , ras t hen made on Moyce , and he was secured , hese proceedings , his sister , a Mrs . Scott , was gly abusive and threatening , and , as she ap-» stimulate her brother ' s violence , she also was ; o custody . On being brought before the Thames te , she was set at liberty on promising to appear Saturday ( to-day ) , until when Moyce was re-The defence of the accused was that he had
• y harshly used by Mr . Hickmott , who had d his mother to death by his violence . —Mr . ; t was unable to attend , being too seriously The gun was loaded -with small shot , which ed his right side . and Conviction fob Forgery . — Joseph ' Wilson , lately a merchant in Leith , was at the High Court of Justiciary , Edinburgh , on with forgery and uttering six forged bills of ; , to the amount in all of 2345 / . 18 s . 4 d ., betober , 1855 and January , 1856 . About the same iveral other bill forgeries were committed in id a merchant there named Jacob Christiansen rehended and convicted in connexion with May , 1856 , and sentenced to be transported for
February or March , 1856 , Wilson had beenexy the Procurator-Fiscal in regard to the foren creating so much uneasiness in Leith , but 3 no evidence sufficient to detain him , and soon Is he absconded and took ship for Australia . In ice he was indicted for trial , and on not apras outlawed by the High Court in May , 1856 . it length , however , apprehended at Folkestone nber last by the superintendent of the Leith r . Grant , having just come ashore in a small i the vessel in the Channel , and awaiting the ty to proceed to America or the Continent , trial of eight hours , the jury brought in a " Guilty , and Wilson was sentenced to transporlife .
pted Poisonings . —William Fogg , a dimmugard-looking man , working as a shoemaker , charged at the Worsbip-street police-court Uowing ox alic acid , and attempting to make lter take the same poison , in which , however , revented by the presence of mind of the girl ' s oung married woman / who did work about the Fo this woman , Fogg had paid improper attenihing her to leave her husband and live with ; she had refused . On the morning of the I poisoning , she had interfered to prevent the ing his daughter with a strap . Fogg himself 4 a large portion of the poison ; but a powerful was speedily administered , and he recovered . emanded .
bh Savage . —Roger Grogan , a ruffianly-looking , has been examined before the Southwark mand committed for trial on a charge of assaulting npting to rob a Mrs . Counsell . The woman ig , late on Saturday night , to her home , in r , Bermondsey , and was walking slightly in > f her husband , when Grogan demanded her ind assaulted her very indecently . Her husiring her cries , came up ; but he too was with great savageness . Another man , however , , and Grogan was overpowered and given into
: rou 3 Assault by an Italian at Cakdiff . — 3 arry , an American sailor has been dangerously by an Italian seaman named Antonio Firpo , in between the two men at Cardiff , where several : om various foreign ports are stationed . On ight at a lato hour , a considerable uproar arose so in Pondoylan-streot , amongst a number of ailors of different nations , in tho course of quurrel took place between Firpo and Barry , in suddenly lifted his arm , his hund apparently » some sharp weapon with which he evidently Jarry , for tho latter immediately afterwards
bleeding profusely from a severe wound in his Firpo and his comrades then run away . Tho as dreadful , both within and without tho house , of tho witnesses describes tho scene ( though , hyporbolically ) ns having tho appearatico of a state of siogo . Tho police had much clillisupprcssing the riot , but thoy u . t length sucapprehemling Firpo and hia nocompHcex , the whom was brought before tho magistrates tho and remanded , that tho police might take the i of tho wounded man , who lies in a very danate , and it is feared will not long survive hid
iit at Dunpkic—Jamas Coylo , a weaver om-Dundco , entered , whilo in u state of intnxioaottago occupied by an old woman , named Quin , and her married daughter . Ho made ous assault on tho latter , to whom ho acted t indecency , and tho old woman , after vainly ¦ ing to prevent him , expressou horaulf loudly ndalous nature of his conduct . Tho young length got him out at the door , but ho
reentered at the window , and so savagely maltreated old Mrs . Burnet that she died very shortly after . The murderer fled , but was subsequently apprehended by a policeman , after a desperate struggle . Extensive Swindling . —Manchester has recently been the scene of some swindling on a very extensive scale ; and several of the wrong-doers have been apprehended within the last few days . Strangk Credulity . —Caroline Ramsden , a woman belonging to Leeds , has been sent to prison for two
months by the Manchester magistrates for obtaining money from a young lady of Ardsley under the false pretence of freeing her from the influence of witchcraft . ^ A revolting-looking elderly man was then charged with administering grains of paradise to the same young lady , in order to procure abortion . She had been to him to consult him about her health , arid the probability of her obtaining a husband . He undertook to procure her a husband , extorted 5 / . from her , seduced her , and then administered the poison with the intent already indicated . He was committed for trial .
Untitled Article
GATHERINGS FROM THE LAW AND POLICE COURTS . A rule having been obtained in the Court of Queen ' s Bench for quashing a conviction under the Game Act , the facts were argued before the judges last Saturday . The question arose out of the case of Swinfen v . Swinfen , tried at Stafford at the Spring Assizes in 1856 , in which the title to estates of considerable value in the county of Stafford came in question . At the trial , a compromise was come to by the counsel for the parties , which Mrs . Swinfen , who was in possession of the estate , refused to ratify , and , ultimately it was decided by the Court of Common Pleas that the agreement was not binding upon Mrs . Swinfen , and the Court refused
to enforce it . On the 29 th of September , 1856 , the day on which the claimant , Captain Swinfen , would have been entitled to have the estate conveyed to him , he gave an authority to a farmer on the estate named Bacon , or any of his friends , to shoot over the Swinfen estate ; and Bacon , availing himself of this authority , went , with six others , on . two several occasions , and killed game , destroying , as alleged by the other side , all the game on the estate , including tame pheasants . The parties were summoned before the magistrates at Lichlield , and were convicted ; but the convictions were subsequently brought up into the Court of Queen ' s Bench , in order to their being quashed as being made without jurisdiction , and being bad on their face . It was alleged that the magistrates had refused to receive evidence of
the right of the defendants to shoot on the grounds , and that one of them had said the accused were " a parcel of blackguards . " Lord Campbell said he was of opinion that the conviction was bad and mu-t be quashed . The terms of the conviction stated that each of the defendants was to be imprisoned in the common gaol for the space of one month , " unless the said several sums [ i . e ., the fines ] and the costs and charges of conveying each of them so making default to the said common gaol shall be sooner paid . " The plain grammatical construction of that was , that " each" was to be imprisoned till the penalty , &c , of " all" was paid . The form of conviction usually adopted pointed out that one should not be liable for the default of the other ; but that form had been departed from in this case . The other judges concurring , the conviction was quashed .
William M'Gowan was charged at the Westminster police-court last Saturday with having written two libellous letters to M . Albert , an attache to the Prussian embassy . One evening , about a fortnight ago , M . Albert , who had previously been more than once accosted in tho street by M'Gowan , was visited by the latter at his private house in Victoria Grove , West Brompton . M'Gowan on this occasion produced a lottcr in which it was stated that M . Albert owed him 100 / ., which ho had borrowed of him under tho name of Charles , Baron do Biorro , twenty years ago at Oxford . M . Albort denied all knowledge of tho affair , and declared that M'Gowan was an utter stranger to him , ami that ho had never assuinod tho title of Baron do Uiorrc . M'Gowan ,
however , persisted in saying that ho was tho Baron , and that ho owed him tho money , By tho advice of his friends , M . Albort at last gave information of tho matter to the police , and ait oflicer afterwards called on M'Gowan and told him that proceedings -would bo immediately taken against him if ho troubled M . Albort any further . Notwithstanding this warning , ho again went to tho hoiiHO of that gentleman , and left an abu » ivo letter respecting hid alleged claim . Wishing tho matter thoroughly invobtigutcd ( for M . Albort was never in thia country until novoit years ago , and wns a boy nt school in Germany in 1887 ) , tho complainant had taken tho
prosout proceedings . In hi * defence , M'Gowan Htated that a man , greatly redoubling M . Albort both in ojipoarauuo und manner , and calling h ! im > clf the 13 a roil do Uiurro , came to Oxford , where M'Gowan wan carrying on burfinoaa an n dnipur , about twenty yearn ago , borrowed numerous suma of money , and swindled aovoral persons , M'Gowan among tho number Tho latter afterwards loat night of tho supported Uaron until two or throe years ago , whim ho inut him at Brompton , and had kept his eye on hint ovor since . Ho Htlll firmly believed in his own heart that M . Albort was tho man , and ho said that hia wife bollovod bo likewise Mr .
Ingham thought that M'Gowan was altogether mistaken as to the identity of the Baron , and adjourned the case for a week in order that the whole matter might be thoroughly investigated . The case of Willcox v . Smith , which had been previously argued on petition in Vice-Chancellor Kindersley ' Court , was last Saturday brought on for judgment . The question raised Was as to the liability to succession duty in a case where a tenant in tail , whose right was created under a deed executed prior to the Succession Duty Act , did not come into possession until the death of the tenant at life . The Vice-Chancellor , after having entered into an elaborate statement of the facts , combined with a verbal criticism of the words of the law ,
observed that the case came , not only within the literal words of the act , but within the meaning and intention of it . The Legislature meant to make the accrual of interest in the survivor the circumstance which was to impose liability to the duty . Several of the sections contained inaccuracy of language . The fifth began by making a future verb apply to a past event . And there were not merely inaccuracies , but considerable ambiguities . The , Vice-Chancellor , however , had not any fair or reasonable doubt as to the intention of the Legislature , that a party in the position of the respondent was liable to pay the succession duty . Some discussion then arose upon the claim of the Crown to costs ; but , this being resisted , the claim was waived .
The legal members of the House of Lords sat on Monday afternoon to consider a petition of Mr . Henry Smith , barrister-at-law , of the Inner Temple , and of Belle Isle , Windermere , Westmoreland , praying for a divorce on the ground of his wife having committed adultery with a M . Leopold Dutertre , a French gentleman , against whom an action was recently brought , when damages were given to the extent of 3000 / . —a sum which the petitioner had been unable to recover . The Lord Chancellor , thinking the adultery had been clearly proved , saw no reason why the bill should not be read a second time . This was accordingly done . —Campbell's divorce bill has been read a third time ' and passed .
The certificate meeting in the case of G . C . Franghiadi , a merchant of Old Broad-street , took place in the Court of Bankruptcy on Monday . The bankrupt traded in partnership with his brother and one Valenti . They had three houses— -one in England , the second at Trieste , and the third at Alexandria . The three bouses were distinct , although consisting of the same individuals . The London house is bankrupt , and the two other houses are insolvent and are being wound up at Trieste and Alexandria . The bankrupt ' s trading commenced on the 1 st of January , 1853 , with a capital or surplus of
12000 / ., and closed with unsecured creditors , 96 , 498 / . ; liabilities , . 41 , 000 / ., of which 25 , 000 / . are expected to become proofs against the estate ; and assets about 24 , 000 / . Mr . Peachy , for the assignees , was-willing that the bankrupt should now receive a first-class certificate . Mr . Abrahams , who appeared for a creditor , prayed an adjournment of three months , to obtain information of the position of the firms at Trieste and Alexandria . Mr . Lawrance ( for tho bankrupt ) pressed for immediate judgment . An adjournment , however , was ordered .
Adolphus Harrison Feistel , a person who has made himself disreputably notorious in connexion with the house of Madame Denis into which Alice Leroy was entrapped a few years ago , and who recently brought an action against tho Marquis of Bath and other noblemen for wine supplied to them at ( tho establishment , appeared in tho Court of Bankruptcy on Monday , under the designation of a wine merchant , of 25 , Bucklorsbury . Tho petitioning creditor is Mr . Benjamin Wood , wine merchant , of Ulackfriars , who , however , did not appear , and tho choice of assignees was deferred . The bankrupt
was sentenced to two years' imprisonment at the timo that Madame Denis left " tho country . Mr . Barrow now applied for his release from prison . Mr . Lucas , for tho Marquis of Bath , opposed , on tho ground that the bankrupt was in custody for the costa incurred in the mischievous action against his Lordship , which ended in Feistel being nonsuited ; and that tho bankruptcy was got up to obtain a release from tho « e costs . The Commissioner said this was not an ordinary enso . Ho should not interfere—certainly not at present . A person who got up such an action ought to suffer . hus boon examined
A man named Joseph Mountain at the Leeds police-court on u charge ' of endeavouring to puss liiniHulf off at the noith-oaat polling booth , during tho Leoda elections , as a voter named William Hartley . Having obtained u voting-paper from Mr . Boeoroft ' a committee-room , tho young man proceeded to the Sir John Falalaff , where tho poll wan hold , and guvo hid number . Ho was askud his name by the returning officer of tho ward , and replied that it was William Hartley , and that ho voted for Bcceroft . However , two of Mr . Milhj ' ts commiUee-mon who wero present , and had witneaaod tho uffair from tho beginning , know that the person who represented himself to bo William Hurt-Icy wad not tho man in qucatlon , and thoy therefore gavo him into custody . Mountain was remanded .
Mr . Alexander Angus Croll , engineer of tho Groat Central Ga « Company ' s works , on Bow-common , appeared boforo tho Thames magintruto on Wednesday to answer a summons taken out by Mr . Kdward I'ulehor inspector of nuisances and aunitary inspector to the Poplar District Hoard of Works , which charged tho do- <
Untitled Article
ere 13 , 1857 . ] THE LEADER . 561
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), June 13, 1857, page 561, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2197/page/9/
-