On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
beeadraw * between it and philosophy which enabled eaeMopmw-ttojow fatbtciihout'let-or hindrance Jrom tJu other * But what is now the case ? They WXateoyed-the line , an * d in tha attempt to noake reasonable Christians hare made- nothing . but eminently unreasonable p hilosophers , " And this would be the result o £ Wagner ' s system . He tries to settle physiological ana anthropological problems by reference to Scripture ; and actually asserts thafc Christianity must stand or Ml by the answer given to the question of the Origin of Races . A more complex and difficult problem than-this of thevorunn of the . various races of nma does not perhaps exist . Opinions &re very much divided on it , and are likely to be soon a question thus removed from direct evidence . But whether the whole human family sprang from one pair , or from several separate centres , it has long been felt by the gravest philosophers that the introduction of Scripture can only perplex the argument , and retard a settlement ; for , in the first place , there are those / even orthodox clergymen ) who question whether the language of Scripture is so explicit as to exclude the opinion of various centres ; and in the second
place * , if . Scripture is to be appealed to at all , the labours of ethnologists may « eass at once , for no sooner do we admit the final decision of a question to lie beyond science , than science itself becomes superfluous . If , however , Scripture i& thus used in anthropology , it must also be so used in geology adA astronomy , and all our . men of science will become heretics . The mistake committed by Wagner has produced results such as might &a . ve been , anticipated . Instead of Germany accepting the position , which Wagner really , but confusedly , holds—namely , uniting " the creed of a -charcoal-burner and the philosophy of Bacon" ( i . e . Christianity and-Science)—the indignant philosophers have insisted on a choice being made fcetweenthetwo , and . they exclaim " Either Christianity or Science ! " And even a man . so eminent as Virchow feels called upon to enter his protest Against Wagner , saying that very few men of science will be found who can tkus'separate their religious and scientific individualities . " The majority wilLnotJbeiable to withstand the desire to bring their religious and scientific convictions into harmony , and when science and religion are thus opposed , the choice cannot be doubtful . "
The error is fundamental . Theology belongs to a different order of con--ceptionsy andcannot , therefore , legitimately be employed to control science . TBe attempt to do so always has failed , and always will fail . Men wedded to science will be thrown , into antagonism with religion if their investigations are thus controlled . They will say with Vogt , Moleschott , Biichner , And the rest— " Science tells me nothing of a special soul-substance , it only tells me of nerves , and their functions . " The mass of scientific men will say the same ; although many will further add , " If science tells you nothing of U : thinking principle or of immortality , it is because these lie beyond the ^ G&Kexe of science , and are within the sphere of religion .
Untitled Article
THJB-. FREN 5 CH REVOLUTION , Sidioixe d * la ! JRevoltdxonfVa * 4 aif » . Par Lonia Blanc . "VoL VIII . Paris : Langloiset Leclercq M . Iioms Blanc approaches the climax of his story . The appeal to the people has been discussed , the king is dead , La Vendee is in arms , Pitt has declared the policy , and Burke the sentiments , of the reigning class in England , the stain has been detected on Dumouriez ' s sword , the Gironde is disfiolvedj war without and dissension within protract the agony of France . To traverse this period accurately , it was essential to collate many existing narratives -with the original archives of the Revolution and the personal testimony of spectators . Not only had artists , and lyrists , and the professors of dramatic flattery conspired to draw before the decisive event of 1798 an embroidered veil of illusion—not only had pictures been hung in the
galleries , and apostrophes declaimed in the theatres , even serious annalists had filled their frescoed space with imaginary groups , and had studiously deformed the Revolution . M . ! Louis Blanc , proposing to desoribe the acts , the passions , the 1 crimes and virtues ; the wisdom and the madness of 1789 , ¦ was beset by perplexities ; He had to give new colours to an old epic , to ¦ discredit familiar anecdotes , to deal boldly with names and reputations , to < rite his contemporaries among the authors of fallacy , to be a student , a narrator , and a-critic . His success ha » justified his courage . M .. de Lamartine * it ' was once said , writes a history m which everyone was praised , and 3 VL Louis Blanc a history in which everyone was blamed . Of neither is the observation literally true ; but it is indisputable that M . Louis Blanc has set himself to the ' task of searching out the causes and the errors of the Rovolution ; and 6 f < tryine the accuracy of its historians .. But his severity is ad
generous as it is impartial ; He justifies the execution of Louis XVI ., but he does not deny those better qualities that gave him a claim to the compassion of history . He confutes M . Michelet , but quotes him as a great witer . He proves that many a tale of atrocity , traditionally associated with the Revolution , is false ; yet because he denies invented crimes , he does . not palliate ! crimes'that are-proved by the record .. A master of style , he claims no rhetorical latitude , and moves rigidly within the lines he has traced by oxaot and elaborate research . This is one > of his principal merits . At the same time it-is one of his principal claims to popularity . This is a time for historical ' analysis . Historians who . are merely pictorial , or eloquent , or entertaining , havo ' no chance in the face of the orueal that must follow their thathe contra
ohfcUenge . Thutr , the remarkable charge against Danton , , - dftjtecUand nullified his whole life bya strange declaration in the assemblya 'flhtoqgfe by * whioh' MM . Michelet and Lamartine profited to indulge at larg 0 > i # * tWinoraHties , " is dispoaedof by M . Louis Blanc , not by a fervent coiunitchr ^ lMdiiig , but by the cold method ¦ of alibi , by a proof that Daunon , nof 374 tnt ( M % taMire « k ' > th < yspeech referred to * and . that this ; was notorious to httMO 0 tttnttftttottte «»< . Xil the same way the anecdote of De Sombrouil ' a daughterdrinWon blte » djo » " 'the Abb 6 Udgeworthisaying to the king , " Son of SV . 'Loiii ^ asoettd ^ ttf ^ hMLVOTii" of the terrors amid which the Assembly pronounced * fdr th » WMHHi » toatof . 'Louis , are submitted to . the tost oficontempcffttry evidence * andt ttKpeHtodi fttKn the preoincto of- history . IV » , fjHom v one point of-vkn ^ a > graoelea * task : To strip men of their drattMtkrooataHMH- ^ o ooirortt a majestMmartyrdom into . a soene of struggling
terror—a scene of clouds and darknessand menacing multitudes into an affair of orderly business—to reduce , instead of multiplying , anecdotes—a capacitv is required far above that inventive faculty which decorates a serious recital with the ornaments of the stage , and turns that which is tragically simple into a chimerical melodrama . Yet this has , in part , been M . Louis Blanc ' s undertaking . At the same time , however , he demonstrates that an historical narrative , to be picturesque , need not be meretricious—that its own anecdotes are more imposing than the incidents imagined for effect , or for flattery , or for libel , by writers whose books are all colour or caprice . No account of the French Revolution is more brilliant than that of M . Louis Blanc . Yet none is so moderate , or so judicial . 7
His salient illustration in the newvolume is connected with the execution of Louis XVI . Scsevola with his Hand in the flame , Russell at the scaffold , Joan of Arc at the stake , have suggested touches for the portrait of the ' French king encountering the death decreed by the tuition . What is the popular account- —the loyal myth , which has been reiterated and authorized by successive writers ? That the king , with impassive fortitude , with the mute dignity of a martyr , with angelic serenity , or else with heroic disdain , laid his head under the blade of the guillotine . Little reproach to him if he did not . Every brave man is not a Huss or a Sydney ; but , with one school of historians it is heterodox not to falsify , exaggerate , and confuse events as well as characters .
M . Louis Blanc ' s description of the death of Louis XVI . occupies one of the most remarkable chapters in his book . It is new in style , new in matter . The calm conversations with Malesherbes , the questions on Livy and Tacitus , the serenity of the departure from the Temple , are not forgotten ; but we now first learn that Louis XVI . shouted on the scaffold , struggled with frantic horror with his executioners , was struck with a mad despair when he at last realized his position and gave up his inveterate belief that succour was at hand , that his face was crimson with fear and passion , that he was threatened with a pistol , that he was dragged down to the plank , and that only the stroke of the machine-sword silenced his " terrible cries . " The night
before his execution , a rumour had spread through Paris , and had even reached his cell , that he was to be rescued ; and , from the scaffold , he obviously expected to recognize his deliverers . When , early in . tbe dismal morning , two commissaries of the Commune , two ecclesiastics , and the chief of the police presented themselves in his chamber , he was shaken by a momentary terror , and retreating into his closet , locked the door and knelt down before the Abbe Firmont . Firmont , himself , however , retained some hopes , with which he probably infected the spirit of the king . The procession was formed , the inner court was traversed , and Louis , after lingering near the tower in which this wife , children , and sister were confined , approached the principal outlet from his prison : — -
At the entrance of the great court , a green carriage was waiting , with , two gendarmes holding open the do ' or . Louis entered ; his confessor took a seat by his side , the soldiers mounted in front . The signal is given , and the cortege moves on . It wa 8 a mournful scene . From the prison to the place of death was ranged a double line of pikes or guns , borne by men who , in their immovable silence , seemed like armed statues . The weather was cold and misty . A leaden stillness , only once broken at the gates of the Temple by a cry of "Mercy ! mercy ! " uttered by the trembling voices of some women , reigned along the entire line of march . Here and there a few shops were half open ; everywhere the shutters were closed . For the footpassenger there were no means of issue ; nor was a single carriage in those streets , except that one which rolled on amid universal silence , bearing the miserable man , then called Louis the Last .
While he still hoped—and , reading the service for the dying , meditated wistfully on life—while his confessor counted the minutes , and watched in anguish for some sign of the promised plot , Leduc was petitioning the Convention for permission to bury in his family tomb at Sens the body of the condemned king . He was better informed than the confessor . He hud no expectation of a rescue . At tbe place of execution not more than twentyfive friends of the fallen throne had assembled : — At ten minutes past ten they reached the foot of the scaffold . It had boon erected in front of the Palace of the Tuileries , in the square called after Louis XV ., and near the spot where stood the statuo of the most impure of kings—a king who died
tranquilly in his bed . The condemned man was threo minutes descending from the carriage . Upon quitting the Temple he had refused the rcdingote which CleYy had offered him , and now appeared in a brown coat , white -waistcoat , grey breeches , ami whito stockings . His hair was not disordered , nor was any change perceptible in his countenance . The Abbe" Firmont was dressed in black . A large open space had been kept round the scaffold , —with cannon ranged on all sitl ^ a , —while beyond , as far as the eye could reach , stood an unarmed multitude . The executioner had opened the door of tho coach , and descending , Louis fixed his eyes upon the soldiers who surrounded him , and with a torrible voice cried , " Silence ! " Tho drums ceased to beat , but at a signal from their officer , tha drummers nguin went on . " What treason is this ? " he shouted . " I am lost ! I am lost !"—For it was evident
that up to this moment ho had been clinging to hope . Tho executioners now approached to take off a part of his clothes ; he repulsed them fiercely , and himself removed tho collar from his neck . But all tho blood in his body seemed to be ; turned into firo when they sought to tie his hands . " Tic my hands ! " he shrieked . A struggle was inevitable : it came . It is indisputable , says Mercier , that Louis fought with his executioners . Tho Abbe" Edgowortli stood by , perplexed , horrified , speechless . At last , as his master seemed to look inquiringly at him , he said , " , ii » thla additional outrage I only seo a last trait of the reaembianco between your majesty ana the God who will give you your reward . " At these words , tho indignuti «>« ot the man gave way to the humility of the Chritttian , and Louis said to tho ux » 'ouUonors , his luuand
" I will drain the oup to the dregs . " They tied his hands , they cut off r , then , loaning on the arm of his confessor , ho began , with a slow trend and sinking demeanour , to mount the steps , then very steep , of tho guillotine . Upon tu 0 la 8 t stop , however , ho eoemod suddenly to rouso , and walked rapidly across to I ho otlier side of the scaffold ; when , by a sign commanding silence ,, he exclaimed , " 1 die innocent of tho crimes imputed to me . " His face was now very red , and , according to the narrative of his confessor , his yoke was bo loud that it could be hoard throug h tho Btreots us faros tho Pont-Tournant . Some other expressions were distinctly hounl , " 1 pardon tho authors of my death , and I pray Heaven that tho blood you are about , to « hed may never bo visited uppn Franco . " Ho was nbout to continue , when his voice was drowned by tho renewed rolling of tho drums , at a Bignal which , it is affirmed , wan given by the comedian Dugayon ^ in anticipation of the orders of Santerro . " SHoneo ! bo silent ! " cried LouiB . JLVI ., losing alLflolf ^ oontrol , and stamping violently with his loot-
Untitled Article
7 TBB LBADiEiR . [ No . 884 ., Saturday ,
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Aug. 16, 1856, page 786, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2154/page/18/
-