On this page
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
ecclesiastical courts . The courts , therefore , stand utterly condemned ; but what is that Mr . PjaiiiTiiMOBB proposes ? Only to transfer the appointment of certain judges i n those courts from the Bishops to the Lobd ChanceIjXjOB ,. " He proposes to thrust temporal judges into ecclesiastical courts , " says Mr . " G-iADSXOi « rE , " making confusion worse confounded , " The only reason why Government has not succeeded in correcting the evil , said Mr . Wigbam , is . that Government has thrown
over the excellent report that the Commissioners made who were appointed to inquire into the matter . " The courts , " says Mr . Watson , " are not courts of justice , but of injustice . " " The root of the evil , " says Mr . John Geobge Phillimobe , " is the nepotism of the Bishops , " and he did not believe that Mr . Giadstoste was hostile to that system of nepotism . So Mr . Phiilimoee introduces an excessively small measure to correct an
enormous evil , and keeps the House debating upon a bill which will never be carried ; and all the members admit the wrong , while they charge each other and the Government with obstructing the remedy . Now these ecclesiastical courts are continually inflicting great injury , inconvenience , domestic wretchedness , and money loss upon the public , and tliis is the way that the Government and the members of the popular House set about the work of correcting the evil !
It is only an example of misconduct which appears in every branch of Parliamentary business . Mr . Gladstone calls for " something to be done to prevent this incessant introduction of bills without any adequate sense of their importance , " a laxity which "has the effect of deluding the country and of raising hopes which are doomed to be disappointed . " The SoiiiciTOB-GEiTEBAL says that the useful measures are delayed because " the House does not devote itself to the proper charge of its functions , instead of spending so much of its time in what he would venture to
designate unprofitable talk . " "Why , then , asked Mr . Gladstone , do you encourage the form of bills which lead to no result , and still accuse the House of wasting its time in " idle talk ? " He did not say " idle talk , " interposed Lord Palmebston , he said " unprofitable talk , " "in which opinion I certainly beg tp concur . But , " continues the Viscount , " there is nothing offensive to the House or unduly severe in the statement that a great deal of time is passed unprofitably in the discussions of the House . " We shall never get
on , says Lord John Russell , until we adopt some such measure as that introduced by liord Debbt , allowing a bill to be taken up in a subsequent session at a stage which it has reached in a previous session . But members cannot be Drought to agree even upon that ; for Lord John says that he was almost the only person who supported Lord Djsbby in the measure , " which waa generally unpopular . Members waste the time which they ought to employ in the business of the public who sent them there , in unprofitable talk ; they introduce bills which prevent the reforms they profess to carry out ; they leave
" Augean stables , " like the ecclesiastical courts , unpurified , because they consume the time in misleading each other , or in deceiving each other in sophistries ; and they do all this to prevent attacks upon nepotism . That is the portrait of the House of Commons painted by its own members ! But of all the delusions that are put forward in tko shape of bills , those which are most discreditable are the " annual motions . " The Ballot is a measure upon which there may be a variety of opinions . As a temporary protection against intimidation of a limited constituency , it may bo useful . Wo do not propose to discuss it now : but the public ia
perfectly informed on the amount of support which such a measure will get in the House of Commons . We have no doubt that the division of Tuesday nig ht could have been counted within a very small fraction ; and Mr . Bebkeley could have as distinctly told us that he should , have 111 votes , besides the tellers , on the Monday , as he could on the Wednesday . The arguments which he brought forward respecting the degree of intimidation in Massachusetts , where the voters
sometimes go to the ballot with banners flying to show their party , is as familiar to us as the battle of Bunker ' s Hill or the transactions of Peterloo . The question of the ballot has not been in the slightest degree advanced by what passed in the debate ; but the time of the House ivas consumed ; and a process of demoralizing the political feeling of this country was carried forward by this manufacture of cant out of settled opinions . If the ballot is necessary , it is because the English people are not allowed to elect members of
Parliament , but one-seventh of the people is by statute made the privileged class to elect the members for representing themselves . Some of that privileged class are so timid , or so pliant , that they will not select members according to their own choice , because they stand in fear of their landlords , their customers , or their creditors . There is no sufficient number of that class desiring the ballot to render the carrying it in the House of Commons probable : but to " briug it forward" is supposed to be a test of " Liberal
opinions . " The member who can take to himself half an evening for the discussion , stamps himself for that year a " Liberal member , " and secures to himself a return for a Liberal constituency . Now , if he really desired to prevent the misrepresentation of the public , he would at once demand for the whole bodyof the English people the right of voting for their own members . Then the ballot would not be quite so necessary as it is now ; but it would be carried , we all know ; and we should have no more " annual motions" on the subject .
There is one excuse for members in thus trifling with ptiblic interests . It is , that the people are just now not disposed to take up their own interests seriously . If they were , is it possible that we should have great constitutional questions left as a kind of joke or plaything for private members like Mr . Beekeley ? Is it possible , if the English people really resolve to settle these questions , that the representatives of the English x ^ eop le would be able to give each other such a character as they did on Tuesday night , and still ?
remain members of " the People ' s House ' The People ' House , in fact , is itself a dull joke , an established waste of time ; and it will continue to be so until the people think fit to take up the matter in earnest . When that day comes , the members of the House of Commons , to say nothing of some other houses , may , perhaps , bo glad enough if they are permitted to pass Sir Joshua Walmslev ' s Suffrage Bill , the Household Suffrage Bill , or any other bill ; but then it will bo to pass the bill , for the day of bill discounting will have gone by .
Untitled Article
THE CARLTON PARTY . Toryism ia henceforth to have its creed , oath , and articles . There ia to bo orthodoxy at the Carlton . But how to secure it ? Lord Ranelaoh , onco a Carlist sympathizer , has become an analytical politician , and has detected poisonous opinions in the body of the Tory party . His testia—the government of Lord Palme rston . Every member of the Carlton who has at any time joined Lord Palmicbston is to bo expelled . Considering that the leaders of tho Curlton , in 1855 , invitod Lord Pa-LMEbston to join them , it
seems hardly logical that all this fus s shou ld be made about bad company . The Carlton was established , says the Chairman of Assurance tind Land Societies , for the furtherance of particular views ! What views ? The views of Mr . Disbaeli , or Lord Stanley ? Mr . SrooNEB , or Sir John Pakington ? Mr . Whiteside , or the Earl of Deebt ? W e have asked , Where is the Conservative party ? We are now forced to look for the Conservative creed . If Mr .
Spooler be a true Tory , Mr . Disbaeli is not . Let Lord Eattela&h draw up an Act of Conservative Uniformity , specifying what may be believed , and what must be abjured by a sound Tory . It would be torn to shreds at the Carlton . Observe , that not only the Peelites w ho associated themselves with Lord Palmebston when heTormed his Cabinet—Mr . Gladstone , Mr . SidVd y Hebbeet , and Sir James
Gbaham , with the Duke of Abgyll , the Duke of Wellington , the Marquis of Abebcobn , Lord Moires , Lord Ebnest Bbtjce , and Sir Robebt Peel , are to be disqualified for ever from being members of the Carlton ; but the proscription is to extend to those " , either by writing , voting , or stronger adhesion , " adhere to " the party to which the Club is opposed . " ism into
We have long seen Tory withering cant ; but this foolish notion , which puzzles the leaders of the party , is a sign of weakness and irritability that proves , with extraordinary emphasis , what is the real state of things behind that new facade in Pall-mall . The King of Naples , in 1850 , said that the Lazzaronis were so disreputable in appearance that they should be walled-in in their particular quarter . Lord Ranelagh , for thesame reason , proposes to wall-in the Tories , who possess a sort of pride that hurts them liberal Lord Stanle
in the presence of men . y they must endure , for he is Lord Debby ' s son ; but for half his sins they would turn a political commoner into the desert . The ridiculous aspect of their position is , that , wit h out a known set of principles or opinions , without party cohesion , or defined political objects , they are beginning , at the loose end of their career , to insist upon uniformity . What will be the success of the Ranelagh move , it is difficult to foresee . On that topic , as on most others , the party is divided . All we can say is , that unless the Carlton is
become the home of a sect , with distinct dogmas , to expel the Peelite members will be to exhibit the Tory party in an attitude ot ludicrous spite . If there is to be a creed , let it be published , and let us see whether Disbaelt , Stanley , Pakington , JNewdegate , Spooneb , Whiteside , Thesigeb , and St Leonabds , can sign the same articles , and swear by the Shibboleth of the Carlton . Who does not remember Lord Derby talking sedition on a mantelpiece , and who expects the third Sir Robert Peel to upset the Constitution ?
Untitled Article
PRATT ON PALMER . One of tho witnesses in tho monster caso at the Central Criminal Court describes how a gentleman in difficulties can bo " accommodated" into tho most frightful position to winch a man can ever bo driven by money troubles . Tho story is so diutinct from tho great question before the jury , that it may be considered quite apart ; and oven if these sentences should be before the jwy uuiuiu j—j
published uences suouiu ue puunauou «««~ should have decided upon their verdict , oui notice could scarcely aflbct them one way or tho other , so that we do not ily in the luce oi Lord Campbell . Tho evidence is ayailauu . for ua as well as for tho prosecution . Wheiuoi or not it eatablisheB tho charge , in cither east it haw established another kind of charge ; auu
Untitled Article
4 && THE LEADEH [ No . 322 , Saturday ,
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), May 24, 1856, page 494, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2142/page/14/
-