On this page
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
general struggle , by which . European politics have been confused and landmarks trampled down . That of Vienna was convened for " the settlement of every point in dispute , and the restoration of order throughout Europe . " The Holy Alliance , retaining almost all the unnatural conditions introduced by Louis XIV . and Catherine II ., was a Congress of geographical and political partition , assigning Hanover , Malta , and the Ionian Islands to England ; Warsaw and
the Lithuanian , Volhynian , Podolian ,. and Ukraine provinces to Russia ; Norway to Sweden ; Holland to the old Austrian Netherlands ; the Lombard-Venetian Kingdom to Austria , with Venetian-Dalmatia , and extensive contiguous dominions ; Tuscany , Modena , Parma , and Placentia to branches of the Hapsburgs j half of Saxony , Posen , the Swedish provinces of Pomerarda , a portion of Westphalia and the Lower Rhine to Prussia ; establishing the Grerman
confederation , and distributing the smaller states . This was a real Congress , not only to make peace between belligerents , but to determine the limits of em pires and the political constitution of Europe . Even that of Verona , in 1822 , was an European act , controlling two Mngdomsi Naples and Spain . That of London , in : 1 . 8 S 1 , created the liberal monarchy of Belgium . rkjf the Conferences at Paris remove the actual
grounds of contention between Russia and the AllieSj they will accomplish as much as can be hoped . But to establish a political settlement , to giy « repose to Europe , and to settle the portentous questions agitated between governments , dynasties , and nat ^^ ^ is not the present task of the Plenipotentiaries . Before that great judgment of diplomacy is pronounced , the opposing elements must have been brought into collision . As it is , the war has not elicited one result that touches a principle , or that concerns the lasting interests of mankind .
Untitled Article
of the two great commonwealths , than England is connected with Downing-street itself . When , therefore , we know that the two publics lave taken up the subject of peace or war , we know that they will prevent official meddlers creating some points of honour out of ridiculous treaties from embroiling them in a conflict which would burn the cotton warehouses of New York and bring down our factories . It has been said that the Americans intend to bully us ; this is untrue . The journals from the other side
would prove how glad the public is at any appearance of pacification on this side . Journals , however , always try to keep up excitements . Tt is from the private letters that one looks for the real feeling , and we speak of the feeling in states less immediatel y involved in the excitement than New York , Philadelphia , or Florida . Thoughtful Americans , who are yet thoroughly national , speak with satisfaction at the tone of the press on both sides , as softening towards each other . The best-informed Americans
believe that their Government is acting in good faith , and is doing its best to prevent filibustering in Nicaragua . The confusion in Washington—which the Government might end in a moment , if it pleased , by allomng Congress to elect its own man—has really not interrupted public business , and creates impatience rather than s ympathy . The public certainly looks to business .
It is true that our Government has offered to refer the Central American question to arbitration ; true that an apology-was made for the enlistment ; but if members of our Parliament desire to impose an effectual check upon our Executive , they will ask to see the terms in which the arbitration has been proposed ; and they will ask to have a report upon the
circumstances that have occurred respecting the apology . But , since an apology was made , why was it re-opened ? Knowing as we do the real desire of the Americans to close that question ; knowing that the United States Government is affecting no trespass in Central America , we cannot but believe that a full explanation would make our public understand the matter better . The difference between the two
GoOTrB . RELATIONS WITH AMERICA . B *; good fortune the public , both in the United States and in this country , has taken up the subject of peace or war between the two , and that fact constitutes to us the guarantee for peace . It is also the guarantee for justice . The two peoples of England and America cannot desire to injure each other . We * will not say so much for the two Governments , although it is an undeniable fact , that the Government of the Union is more under the command of public opinion than our own . " We ai * e not
aware that any material interests would be injured in Downing-street by a war between England and America . The only result would be , that Lancashire being reduced to bankruptcy at a blow , would be at rebellion in a week , and Downing-street would explode . But it is difficult to make them believe , in that exalted region , that the American interest has any real influence in this country . The joint interest of the two communities is not
expressed by the amount of imports and exports between the t ^ cg ^ reat as that is . It is not exhausted , when wo remember that the Union not only contains a section of our own family , but comprises multitudes of our brothers and sisters who have recently left our homes . It is the gyeat Protestant constitutional commonwealth laws the as
wh ^> se are sam e ours ; opinions in ^' ,-iWain , ; the same ; objeots in lift ) scarcely different ; and abiding interests so identical , tM&Mp , any great convulsions of the globe , ¦ America ytwxte sustain England against the united despotisms , of the old world . England , in tact , is * n # n ^ tely more bound to the United States b ymbstantiol interests , by family connexions , class connexions , and the heartstrings
vernments in Central America , is this : Adventurers are trespassing upon quondam Spanish States on both sides ; the United States Government repudiates the trespassers , and tries to check them ; our Government countenances the trespassers , and claims the right of protecting them . That really constitutes the whole of the difference involved in the technicalities of the Cla . yton-Bul . wtsr treaty . "Why does not some member get up in the House of Commons and insist upon a complete exposition of the whole matter , even a 3 wo had out the real state of affairs in the Crimea ?
Untitled Article
is calculated to act as a blind for sharp fellows who can get up a deposit , make a show of wealth , and come before believing shareholders as it were , with an official endorsement of their respectability . It has been effectual only for obstruction ; it is totally ineffectual as a real security . The amount and number of shares required prevented any enterprise which did * not start with a capital of £ 200 ; and however
paltry that sum may seem in the eyes of business men , it is a large amount for members of the working class . Thus they saw themselves excluded from many most legitimate objects of associated trade , by the arbitrary will of Parliament , acting under dictation of what they considered the moneyed monopoly . Again , there niay be , and we believe there are , projects that are legitimate , that merit a decided experiment , but that do not command sufficient faith
to call up a deposit as the necessary preliminary for the commencement of business . Why should there be any restriction upon the freedom of the subject in making his compacts and arranging his enterprise ? It would be quite as reasonable to require a man , before opening his shop , to show that he had other handkerchiefs in boxes besides those hung up in the window ; that he had sufficient cash in the till to give the customer change , to pay his wholesale dealer , to liquidate the claims of his
butcher and baker , to pay the wages of his servants , and to keep his wife and children ; to say nothing of the necessity of bringing his marriage certificate and the baptismal register of his offspring . Those who deal with a man may like him to give guarantees and " hostages to fortune , " but we do not require them as preliminaries to entering into business . It is true that trade already exists , and that it is not desirable to make sudden compulsory changes . The citizen is protected by the law , and while he claims its protection , those who administer
the law and live under its rule may exact . from him guarantees that he will act in conformity with its simplest rules . Mr . Lowe ' s Joint-Stock Company ' s Bill secures this gtiarantee by very simple obligations . Men who form a joint-stock company must register themselves ; that is to say , as the public has been accustomed to unlimited liability , it is able to know of particular men who depart from that practice that these men , thus associated , are henceforward to be looked xrpon as limited parties . Since the non-limitation restrains the freedom
of entering upon trading , we are accustomed to believe that those who make a certain figure have the means of overcoming difficulties , and the bill provides against our being deceived by very summary methods of calling the limited joint-stock associations to account . This summary power is conferred on all sides —upon the shareholders as well as upon the creditors . One-fifth of the shareholders can
procure from the Board of Trade an official , though not a public inspection ; that is , oncfifth in number of the shareholders can command such an inspection as will posith r oly secure them against heing deceived by their directors and officers . Is this no guarantee ? Then one-fourth of the shareholders can wind up the company ; so that if a mere minority has been dragged into the enterprise , and sees its money about to be sacrificed to objects of the
Limited Liability Bills of last year proved to be a . failure ; one bill , that for permitting any man . to invest his money in a private firm , was withdrawn ; the other was so hedged in with obstructive encumbrances , that it has scarcely worked at all . The necessity of having a certain proportion of paid-up capital to register has actually hindered many enterprises , has rendered it impossible for the humbler classes to muster the deposit , and therefore to effect the registration . On the other hand , it
MR , LOWE'S PARTNERSHIP REFORM . We believe that if the pxiblic at large understood the nature of the opposition with which $ Lr . Lowe is threatened in the prosecution of his Partnership Reform Bills , he would have a very strenuous support , from enterprising men in trade , from the very numerous class who have surplus means to invest , and who can only do so now under great risk , and albovc all , from the great body of the working class . The
which it does not approve , ' it can dissolve tyrant majority which is using it , withdraw its investment , and then leave the tyrant majority , if it pleases , to form a new enterprise without its reluctant coadjutora . If a debt by the company remains unpaid for three weeks , the unpaid creditor can wind up the company . Is not this sufficient ? It appears to \ in that no company coxild carry on its business under these rules , unless that business were substantial and genuine , and unless its transactions
Untitled Article
156 THE LEAD E R . [ No . 308 , Saturday
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Feb. 16, 1856, page 156, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2128/page/12/
-