On this page
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
would not present risksjaiid difficulties . High as the national spirit ' might rise , much as the efficiency of our armament may have been increased , Russia has almost incomparable fecilities of defence . Whether we fight or negotiate , it is as well to think calmly , to avoid exaggeration and bluster .
Such is the tone of Parliament . In that assembly , the opinion undoubtedly reigns that another campaign would have illustrated more signally than hitherto the powers and resources of the English nation . At the same time , to reject reasonable terms of peace would involve a moraf loss , and give a more favourable colour to the Russian cause . Accordingly
the Houses assent with obvious reserve to the policy of negotiation . Lord Clarendon , who was more explicit than the Premier , acknowledged that the Russian acceptance of the Austrian proposal , was accompanied by the suggestionrof an armistice , and that this had been conceded by the Allies . But he made no reference to the " additional propositions , " contenting himself with stating , simply , that he believed in the sincerity of Russia , that the Allies were themselves sincere , and that nothing -would be exacted to degrade or inflame the Russian Government .
So far , therefore , the representatives of the several Powers will meet on common ground . England is ready , Prance is anxious , for peace . To Austria peace is safety , to Russia relief . It restores the natural relations of dynasties— - Unites the absoliatisins now at war , and leaves the Freribh and lEnglish alliance to depend , as all real alliances must depend , on mutual respect and confidence , instead of mutual aid , which is , at times , the source of jealousy , and which does not always lead to the brotherhood of armies .
Assuming that the negotiations prosper , and that peace is established , there will be some cau ^ e ^ ^ 3 ^^ ngxatu latioTi . We shall ixave "" pTCS ^ ea ^ T ^ ou ^ pr a crisis , in . ^ MfcTi our reputation has heenjjsriperiliea " by the apathy and in eapacity ^<> f' ^ Ti governing class . To them will jfespublic mind be turned , to discover wjiait guarantees may be secured in tlie event ^¦ ¦^ of another war , against the risks we have lately run . We may not always monopolise the offensive in warfare . How , then , can the
national power he so organised that , if unhappy contests should arise , wo may meet its dangers without taking two years to prepare an army and a fleet , without losing prestige and surrendering the predominance to an ally ? In this war we Lave not had one complete success . Our navy has been a mere auxiliary . But we have now prepared the machinery of a real campaign , by land and sea , so that , we repeat , we are not negotiating with Russia from any inability to enforce by arms the objects which will be contended for ab the Congress .
Untitled Article
LORD WENSLEYDALE AND LIFE PEERAGES . A grand debate is announced for next week , on a high constitutional question . As the Morning Herald is the organ for the announcement , we suppose that tie good old Tory party is about to stand up for the British Constitution against tlie innovation caused by the creation of Mr . Baron Parke to be Baron Wensleydale for the term of his natural life .
The Morning Herald states that all the Law Lords are of opinion that this creation of life peerages is unconstitutional and open to tlie gravest abuses . It is difficult to say what is unconstitutional or not , inasmuch as the Constitution is totally undefined , and has be-en nibbled away by modern Acts of Parliament until the law of the country is about as unconstitutional a thing as exists in the world .
The best exponent of the British Constitution , perhaps , consists in the Bill of Rights , with its glorious antecedents , the Great Charter . And yet , if any Englishman were to take the trouble of perusing the Charter exacted for the people when the Orange dynasty was established on the throne , he would find that we have desperately fallen away from that high standard of the British Constitution . A Law
Lord more or less , though , we are not to have the sons of the same to boot , will not make much difference . But the argument , of course , is this , —that if the Crown can appoint life peerages , it will hold in its hands the moans of swamping the real Peers , and will undermine and overthrow the hereditary character of tlie peerage . This is rather true , and it is quite possible that popularity-hunting Ministers might crowd the House of Lords with pro fessionsil men , railway directors , great
contractors , and all the rich and clever outcasts of the Commons , as tenants for life . But , really , there seems to be no reason to suspect such a design in tho present act . It originates in the difficulty of keeping up a sufficient number of Law Lords to do tho business ; and those we have arc most of them getting very old . The judges once sat ns a constituent part oi" the
grand council of the nation—the Parliament . They slipped out of their place in tho reign of KowAitD the Tinui ) , and became " sissialunts . " They had disappeared before tho Revolution , and Lord Somicuh vainly tried to bring them buck into tho House bv . swnmion . s — even scolded them in vain . The ( scanty allowance of Law Lords is eked ovit by making a e « uj > lc of Lay Lords to sit with them and represent
Untitled Article
Italian , upon the outbreak of an European war , might anticipate changes favourable to Italy ; but , without talcing remote probabilities into calculation , Piedmont has reason to suspect an Austrian peace . It is no secret that when Victor Emmanuel was in England he already understood that , if the " Western Powers were reconciled to Russia , he might be
sacrificed to a quietus of diplomacy . Could he , or the nation he governs , be assured that they had not exasperated old jealousies , without securing new friendships ? It was this scepticism that was expressed by the more impatient Liberals in Turin , and we are not sure that Victor Emmanuel went from London better satisfied than when lie came .
If , however , it has created for Sardinia positive claims on England , Count Cavour ' s policy would have been patriotic and wise , even if it had not been inevitable . Has it created such claims ? The question may test the good faith of the British Government , and of the British nation , if ever the nation assert a policy of its own . At all events , right-minded men , in and out of Parliament , must perceive that there was no justification of the policy which dragged Sardinia into the Western alliance , unless her aid is to "be reciprocated by the support of England in her eventual difficulties . It
is impossible to deny that we are morally pledged to- maintain the independence of our Italian allies , so long as they respect the public law of Europe . To give effect to this principle , the claims of Victor Emmanuel's representative must l > e recognised on an equality with the great Powers , at the Paris Congress . It would , indeed , be a reproach upon the British name , if , in our need , we enticed a weak State into war , and left it afterwards to struggle for existence with overbearing enemies . What Sardinia requires is the avowed political sympathy of England . That will be one guarantee—to hex of independence ; to Europe , perhaps , of peace .
Justice and sound policy require that we should remember the circumstances under which Sardinia was drawn into the alliance . She did not occupy an independent position . It may be said , in fact , that she had but the alternative of adopting the cause of the " Western Powers , or suffering for her neutrality . Diplomacy , of course , would be a clumsy process if it left , in written documents , the record of its menacing insinuations ; but , in effect , Sardinia was challenged to choose
between the hazards of an alliance with the Western Powers and the dangers of Austrian hostility , with the jealousy of another Government in the background . The kindlier pressure was probably exerted by England : possibly , indeed , this Italian covenant was sought to aid in counterbalancing the preponderance , visible from the beginning of the war , of French arms and counsels . Had the congress of pacificators been appointed to meet in London , we should probably have heard no whisper of the diplomatic subordination of Sardinia .
The incident in Tuscany , combined with others , had proved to Sardinia that she stood in need of guarantees ; not against Austria only ; since it cannot be for the interest of any absolute Government that free institutions should prosper in Italy . It was therefore partly with the o"bject of providing herself with these guarantees that Sardinia pledged herself to share the exertions and sacrifices of the Western Powers . To those who knew the
state of feeling at Turin , it was obvious that a thoughtful section of the public dissented from the adopted policy because it doubted the good faith of the English governing classes . Count Cavour scarcely procured credit for his patriotism in promoting the alliance ; but his views on the subject are not unknown . When the war commenced , was ho blind to the
possibility of Sardinia being dragged into it ? When the pressure of the British representations was felt in Victor Emmanuel's Cabinet , was Count Cavour ignorant of the risk ? Was the public kept uninformed ? The Diritto , the leading liberal journal , pointed out clearly the perils of tho future ; the Piemonte , with less sincerity , hinted at them .
THE CLAIMS OF SARDINIA . WE trust that no disposition exists in tho British and French Cabinets to assign to the representative of Sardinia a secondary place at the approaching Congress . Whatever may have oeen done by Austria as a mediator , Sardinia has done something as a belligerent . It is now a proper time , therefore , to consider under what circumstances the
Piedmontese government joined its forces with those of tho Western Powers , an < 5 T Avhat aro tho political necessities created by that alliance . It is generally supposed that the premonitory symptoms of peace wore viewed witu ixo gratification at Turin , and it has been imputed to Victor Emmanuel that he desired mSS h tr nVUl 8 i ° ' ° Ufc Of whidl » P ™ ought bq thrown up for Sardinia . Wo have no difficulty m conceiving that any patriotic
We must not forget that Sardinia , when she took the field against Russia , acted with rare courage and magnanimity . She was not a military Power ; her prosperity was insecure ; her armies had recently come out of the exhausting Austrian Avar ; with a population not double that of London , she had considerable frontiers to guard , and was entering upon a prooess of radical internal reform . At such a crisis , with hostilo or suspicious Governments on all sides , did Sardinia engago in a great war , by the sido of England and France .
The war has gained for her the recognition of Europe . It has brought prestige to her army , and importance to her Cabinet . But it has taxed her revenue , wliicsh , alter many disasters , required assiduous cultivation ; it has arrested the course of liberal innovation , and has thus produced only mitigated advantages .
Untitled Article
108 THE LEADER . \^ o . 30 6 , Saturday ,
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Feb. 2, 1856, page 108, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2126/page/12/
-