On this page
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DE REGE INQUIRENDO.
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
THE PROSECUTED ARCHDEACONS . Tke Archbishop of Canterbury has no doubt performed his" distinct duty , in instituting- a prosecution of Archdeacon Denison for the promulgation of erroneous doctrines ; and the similar course taken by the Archbishop of York against ; Archdeacon Wilberforce , for the promulgation of Romish doctrines in a work on the Holy Eucharist , is
equally to the credit of that prelate- In one case , the result is anticipated by the resignation of Archdeacon Wilberforce ; who assigns as the cause more particularly liis dissent from the thirty-sixth canon of the Church , the one asserting the royal supremacy . It is not for us to anticipate in the other what may be the result of the proceeding . That the two Archdeacons hare asserted doctrines
wholly inconsistent -with that of the Church of iEngland , as it is generally -understood , is obvious to the . most ordinary conception . That Archdeacon Denison has also asserted doctrines which are , on their premises , perfectly logical ; we admit as ' ¦¦ ¦ distinctly as We are prepared to maintain that his own conduct lias been illogical . He has insisted upon the necessity of reviving Convocation , in order not only to renew a power of legislation in the Church , but also to remove doubts as to
the interpretation of her standards . The present Convocation , which meets to adjourn , is a mockery ¦ which indeed brings ridicule and . disgrace upon the Establishment . "What should wethink of a temporal Parliament , Lords and Commons , which should meet about the usual time , not to make laws , not to vote supplies , not to exact an account from the responsible Ministers of State , but only to move those adjournments which the skeleton of Parliament performs during the recess . In such case we should declare that such representative Government was worse than
worthless ; that it was a disgrace to the State which tolerated it , and to the members which consented to take part in the farce . At the last meeting of Convocation , it was resolved that some . portion . . ' of the church ' s offices should be revised ;—a work much wanted ; and if we could allow that there is more than a wretched paltering in these very . small steps towards an obvious want , we should be prepared to claim for Greorge Anthony Denison , and for others his associates in sus picion , the credit of having forced Convocation to that step .
It is not the less truo that Mr . Denisou ' s interpretation of those doctrines is inconsistent with the view entertained by the two primates at the head of the Church . If so , however consistent tho two ai'chdeacons may be in their own views as to tho duty of a clergy or the meaning of Christian ordination , ¦ w e must admit that they do not proporly belong to the Church of England . They belong , of course , to some other clrarch ; and
as they have not joined tho Church of Ronao , they must be accounted members of some now Dissenting body hitherto unnamed . But if the Church of England really moans a definitive incorporation , if it has nny standards of faith , it cannot tolerate within its bounds men who deny those standards , or who desert them . The prosecution of two men who aro so distinguished in the ClmroW , but who are suspected of being renegades , was duo , as a , inattor of course , to tho Establishment .
Wo must always be understood to speak ot the Church of England as a dofinito corporation , which at ono time embraced almost tho entire body ot" the clergy , and of tho P ° pt » e of this country . It ; was , indeed , n £ ? , P which . enabled tho Church to enst OU the authority of ltome , while maintaining tor itself an apostolical accession of its bishops irom tho original founders of Christianity ; « HV tho diflioulty wna overcome , and tho
Church of England was at one time an establishment comprising the clergy of the town . As soon as the Independents had asserted equality in citizenship , the identity of the Church , of England with the Church of the people of England ceased , and ,, in recent times , the name has ~ be en no more than a title enjoyed through inheritance and privileged possession of property , by one of the many sects into which the nation is divided . In retaining possession of that property , after it ceased
to be the Church of the people , tlie Church of England , we think , acted in a manner more consistent with the rapacity ordinarily aseribed to ecclesiastical corporations , than with religious virtue or public honesty . The property we still regard as being in truth the property of the English people , set aside for religious purposes ; the parish church ought to be the church which the people of the parish retain for their own use in their religious observances . If the Church property of England were viewed in this liglit by the people , they could Soon recover po ' ssession of it , and the archbishop of one particular sect 1
would cease'to- have the power of arraigning or excelling clergymen ; for departing from the standards of a sect . But the English people is , of all others , the most * careless about its own property , and it suffers the property of the parish to remain the ¦ . property of one sect in the parish . The officer's and trustees of that sect are unquestionably charged with the duty of preserving its own interests , privileges , and . property j they cannot admit other sects within their pi'ivileged corporation , any more tlian the Lord Mayor of London could allow the aldermen of I ) ublin . and the to wn ^ councillors of York to sit and vote in the Guildhall . The
Primates , therefore , were only doing their duty when they challenged men entertaining views so heterodox as those of a Wilberfor . ce or a Denison , to explain their position , to prove that they were still inenubers of the Church , to undergo its penalties if they remained in it—their heterodoxy notwithstanding—or to leave it as Baptist Noel has done , and as Archdeacon " Wilberforce has partly done by becoming a lay member , and inducing his Primate to wink at bis evading responsibility by that irregular retreat into laity and silence .
Untitled Article
September 9 5 1854 . ] THE LEADER . q
European Commission De Rege Inquirendo.
_ It appears to us , however , that an expedient might be adopted for allaying that disappointment , by extending the inquiry , and rendering it yet more instructive . The great English public has been perplexing itself much , of late , with the conduct of Prussiaso weak , so vacillating , so equivocal , so dangerous in its impotency to its allies . Could we know the causes of evil , we should be half way to learning the method of producing good ; could we neutralise Prussia in
something more than name , we should save much bloodshed , much taxation ; for her pettifogging weakness is sure to prolong the war , and to increase our expenditure under both heads . It would be very desirable if we could send out a Commission de lunatico inquirendo , in order to ascertain how the grand trustee of Prussia deports himself in his office . The Commission would ha ve to travel over an extensive ground ; it would have to examine Frederick "William on the reasons
which actuated him in fraternising With his beloved Berliners -when they rose against his own authority / , on his purpose in joining with Austria to put down Hesse " Cassel , which it Ivas his business and policy to defend ;¦ and on the notion he had in trying to carry on an alliance with Austria for the purposes of Russia . But Xing Frederick William's motives would not be enough : we
wantto learn what causes the motives ; and it is possible that the Commission might be compelled to push its investigation into the King ' s wine cellar , into his secret ' correspondence ' ¦ ¦ with . Sti Petersburg ; to inquire into the fact that his branch of the line of Hapsbiirg terminates with himself- —he , that seemed the main line , being genealogically jio better than a " siding" that leads to nothing .
But an . enquiry into Prussia alone would be invidious . Prussia might justly say , I am not worse than my fellows . " \ Vhy ' investigate Frederick "William , and leave Iferdinand of Naples unexamined ? Why ask what has been done with the beloved Berliners , and leave Neapolitans or Sicilians unprotected from enquiry into the insane misappropriations of their resources , of their geographical position , and their influence f
Verily as we travel over the tops of states , the summits of their royal mountains tipped by thrones , it seems that we encounter a population differing from those of the healthier plains , as in many high mountain regions we seem to meet a crotin population—weakly , sickly , malignant from birth . Is it so , or is it not ? A great question of our day . We arc far from adopting the idea of some German revolutionists , that there will be no peace on
earth until thirty tyrants' heads bo cut oft "; although there are good grounds for that interesting problem . But let us first ask , if they are tyrants , or only idiots ? Aro they wicked of malice prepense , or unconscious of crime ? The examples arc in favour of tho latter supposition . There no have touched upon threo thi'ones , and tho lunatic element decidedly preponderates . Are the royal classes efficient ? Arc thoy of a grade of character beneficial to the countries over
. EUROPEAN COMMISSION BE REGE INQUIRENDO . The poor people of Madrid are disappointed in the hope of bringing Queen Christina to trial ; and the newspaper reader , if it had been an open court , ought to be still more disappointed . Let ua imagine her Majesty , wife of King Ferdinand the Seventh , mother of the Duchess de Moaitpensicr , married to the Duke Rianzares after most of their children - were bom , sister-in-law to Don Carlos , and always daughter of the house of Naples —imagine that Italian cosmopolitan under cross-examination 1 Fancy her naked how sho got her property , whore sho lived , and who visited her ? when her children were born , and hov \ r they wore x'ogistcred ? In abort , compelled to tell , undor an Old Bailey pressure , how sho had got her livelihood ; how she had brought up her family , and why eho stood at tho bar ? It ini ^ lit have been a most instructive inquiry , and if some of tho defensive anattor thrown out had let ; ua into the
secret of railway speculations , ol ' pnpal bulls , of Xing Ferdinand ' s melancholy and conjugal eccentricities , tho narrative might have told its more than tho natural history of a Neapolitan princess in a Spanish court . Decidedly , the reader who is fond of " causes celehres " haa a right to reproach Espartoro with having stopped tho moat interesting trial of modern U . wa ,
which they aro placed ? Is their conduct to bo judged by ordinary standards ? Tho trial of Queen Christina has boon stoppod , but why should wo not have this moro extended enquiry ? It would not be impossible , if tho Western Towers know all the ullianooH . tlwifc tlioy might bring to forward their purpose . Wliy nol ;
have an independent commissioner from each of tho chief Statos ol' Europe , under tho patronngo and direction of tho Wcatern Powers ? —the commission to comprise an Englishman , a Frenchman , ft German , a Spaniard , an Italian , an Hungarian , and a representative of every dictinct nationality . Such a eoin > nisPW . i might l > e ^ M out to . PXftmi uo
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Sept. 9, 1854, page 849, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2055/page/9/
-