On this page
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
hearts of their hearers , and the churches also will be crowded . That is , if no attempt be made to drive the people into them . Let grounds be kept free for the public , —let , for example , no Hampstead Heath be built over , by fabricating upon old manorial rights new proprietary rights , and such places will continue to be crowded bj the working class . But it is not to be done by compulsions and prohibitions . Working men will not be driven into church as a pis alter .
Try the same process with any other class , and see if it will succeed . Let any man even of the upper class walk to church in the morning , walk to a rational museum or intellectual garden in the afternoon ; lounge amongst the beauties of nature in the intervals and afterwards ; and he will discover that the enjoyment of life is hungry work , and thirsty work too . Let him , then , when his after-church walk is over , go to the convenient public-house , and be told that it has
just closed , or that there remains ten minutes for him to eat his dinner in , —or rather let him be told that he cannot drink anything " on the premises" at all , but that he can . only buy something , and eat it on the next milestone if he likes , if the policeman does not tell him to " move on ;"—let . him be told these things , and he will discover that tbe > new law relating to public-houses is vexatious and intolerable . Let him ask the reason for these restrictions , and be told that it is
concern for his morals , —that very benevolent persons in authority have resolved that he shall be only rational in his recreations , Sabbath-observing , and sober ; and he will feel , we venture to say , sentiments the most revolutionary towards those authorities , will feel anything but conciliated towards Sabbath-observing or , perhaps , even sobriety . It may be objected that the new law will not be exceptional , would include all classes in its control . Possibly , though we
will not believe till we see . But , at all events , it refers most especially to the inn accommodation of the humble . Will the genteel class really suffer any restriction from the new regulations ?—will the place of dining , the dinner ^ hour , the amount of champagne , or anything else , be subjected to a new stint . Gentlemen , it may be answered , are not addicted to drunkenness , and therefore there is no necessity to restrain them by preventive laws ; they are better educated , and they can
vent the energy of their nature in recreation more varied than drinking ; besides , if they do wish to get drunk , —which happens sometimes , it is said , with Parliament men , —they can do it at home , or on any other day except Sunday . So , after all , the new law is intended to force upo n the working class virtues with which the other * classes may capriciously coquette ; yet the virtue of those other classes is entrusted to the keeping of education and good taste , with the policeman to keep in check only
flagrant excesses . It appears to us that the same influences might suffice also for the working classes : begin with good education ; extend every conceivable opportunity for rational enjoyment ; strengthen the policeman to collar the actual drunkard and prevent brawls within and without the publichouse ; and then leave the worldug classes free to arrange their amusements in their own way . Trust to the benign , iniluences you preach , and to free trade in morals as well as in material goods .
Untitled Article
HOW TO MAKE THE CRYSTAL PALACE SUCCEED . In spite of the episcopal benediction t % e Crystal Palace is not quite a success . To io $ e one simple fact , which is worth a host of arguments , the shares are already at a slight discount . The speculation never won much favour with the clear-headed men who conduct the business of the world in the city of London , and the event has proved that th . ey were not mistaken in their judgment . Of course , if the directors wish us to believe that
their object was to establish a school of art , at any cost and without hope of profit , criticism , must hold its peace in the presence of such unexampled patriotism . But as their avowed intention was to make money , while they claim all the credit that belongs to public benefactors , it is worth while to point but the causes of their disappointment , and an absolute duty to define the exact position which they hold .
What is the actual experience of every one who has paid a visit to the Palace ? No one denies the majestic beauty of the structure , with its gardens , fountains , statues , and courts . It is a wonder of the world No building , in any other country , will bear comparison with it . But , in what sense is ' it a school for the English people ? True enough , thore are splehdidworksotbeauty , ntid it is not an idle boast that you may witness , almost at n glance , the gradual developiiiont of human art . But the English pbonle —and it is to the people that the Palace ia
inscribed—arc ignorant of art : they ^ nllc through their own Palace in silent adiiiir ' ation : they do not understand a tithb of what they see . How should they P They have never boon taught , and it is quite tfnpoaaiblo to ' educate thorn by a rtiero appfcal to sight aud sonso . If tho Crystal Patycf , la to iuspirp ] tho masses with a laye of art ^ th 6 re must i ) o aomo orgo . niaed moans of instruction . Ontn-loguoa will not servo the purpose . Tljerq jnus , fc bo Jiving guides to in ^ er ^ TtyJfcho splendid mystery . Yvo do not . yfjty ^ fin iirijay of peripatetic } bores , but \ yethiutthata , j 3 hW
Untitled Article
PUBLIC REWARDS . Oina of our national misfortunes , which the public porceiv © aa plainly ne those -who Serve tho -public experience acutely , is , that we aro without any organisation for rewarding puMjc aervicoa . When a . gro « t character turns up we give him a Blenheim , or a
Strathfieldsaye , and a grand parliamentary present ; and we can knight Lord Mayors ; and we can get rid of , by sending up to the House of Peers , successful , but exhausted , statesmen . These are the great things we can do ; but we have no machinery for testing our gratitude or our reverence for less conspicuous , but still eminent , men . This is the disadvantage of a monarchy surrounded by republican institutions ; for a monarchy has a small civil list , and a narrow court , and the republican institutions are entirely engrossed in " reforming" themselves—so as to compete with the minor eminent men .
For instance , Thomas Hood , who gave the tone and the im petus to the modern philanthropy of the rich , who are being startled by the horrors of competitive civilisation , died , according to Monckton Milnes ,, in such dire poverty , that that gentleman , a poet too , was under the necessity of seeking in the private munificence of Sir B . Peel the means of deterring bailiffs from clutching afc the bedclothes of the expiring humourist . Still , he
dies : and some years elapsed before a hero-worshipper , seeking the heroics in Kensall-green Cemetery , observes , hastening to communicate his discovery to the public , not yet tired of singing the " Song of the Shirt , " that the Yorick of our time lay in a grave destitute of the slightest memento . The appeal of this discoverer was fortunately responded to , for private enterprise exceptionally undertook to immortalise a great poet- —the State , of course , though it arbitrates in the controversies
between rival printing machines , not seeing the necessity of doing any honour to him who had given so much employment , with so much benefit to the world , to so many such machines . Hood is one of a large class of minor great men who obey their intellectual instincts and
who forego such claims upon the world as may arise from winning a " Waterloo , which in a few years is resultless , or from making a fortune -which blesses mankind only by a politicoeconomical accident . Doubtless great writers are not the less morally great because the y never demand Strathfieldsayes or large pensions : but when they are dead—would a Pantheon cost much ?
Take another instance . Two young officers of our army go forth upon the news of war just as young Englishmen used to do in the last century—chivalrously to complete their education by " a campaign in Flanders . " They seek adventures , not by insulting Turkish ladies within the frontiers of the allies' encampment at Gallipoli , Schumla , or
Varna , hut they ride straight on to the foremost posts of tho Turkish army . They are shut up in Silistrin , and by the * influence of the physical superiority and trained intellect of Europeans , thoy become , if not the accredited generals , the real leaders in the Turkish defence . By their example , and prudent daring , and disciplined skill , they represent within the Turkish fortress the morale of the
British army at their back , and therefore induco a defence which is not only in itself conspicuously splendid , but which in political results is so important that Lieutenants Nasmy th and Butler , whose actions inevitably remiud us of Don Juan and Johnson at the siege of Ismail , may bo said to havo turned the course of political aflaira in a European struggle . Lieutenant Butler dies from the
© fleets of tho wounds received in . his gallant chieftainship . Omar Pasha commands a monument to him . But in England what is it in our power to do unless we appeal to chance private enterprise—in which cubo tlioro would oc far smaller prospect } than for an Albert stfttue ^ -mijo honour th , o . momory pf our young countryman ? Butlor ' 8 companion in arma survives : ¦ cq ^ ual in bravery , au $ in m ^ rit , ho now roproaenta a double sot of ,. chums .
But his laurels have not been gathered in routine service , and what promotion is he likely to obtain ? He will not even be so fortunate as Captain Edwardes , who also suffered from the misfortune of being young , but who did win a battle with the authority of some sort of orders , and -who accordingly got his majority—which amounted , perhaps , to a hundred pounds a year extra pay .
There are still other instances arising out of a week ' s news . The other day there arrived in London two men who had done great service to England—Mr . Hargreaves , the . discoverer of the Australian gold , and . Mr . La Trobe , who had governed with zeal and loyalty , if not with popularity , a colony disorganised and demoralised by that discovery .
Hargreaves had been refused by the colonists a paltry 10 , 000 ? ., which in the first instance it was proposed to vote to him as an award for his felicitous discovery : a discovery creating a new world to commerce , enriching the colony and benefiting every countinghouse in every part of Great Britain . Mr . La Trobe had taken a cold farewell of his
subjects , and as ex-pro-consul does not find on reaching London that the English people have even engaged apartments for him at an hotel . Hargreaves may find some compensation for colonial ingratitude in a soiree at the Geographical Society , when Sir E . Murchison will confidentially tell him that he ( Sir Koderick ) was the real discoverer of the" gold : and Mr . La Trobe will get a knighthood , and then probably sink into whist circles at Bath . Are these the evidences of a civilised , selfgoverned community ? ¦ .. ""; * .
Untitled Article
July 22 , 1854 . ] THE LEADER . 6 g
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), July 22, 1854, page 685, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2048/page/13/
-