On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
"being equally worthless . Only the middle classes are compelled to think , —by trades requiring thought and observation of men : —only the medium oat will nourish , —only the medium rose will smell . And the cleverest classes are necessarily the classes whose professions are specially intellectual , —the solicitor , the barrister , the physician , the actuary , and the journalist . There are , certainly , instances of clever peers , even of long descent There is the Earl of Derbyj but it is observable he belongs to an Opposition family , and that he was trained as a Whig . Bu * t the instances , ( modern ) of intellectual aristocrats
are very rare : and may generally be pronounced accidents—like seven-legged Merinoes , or modest Frenchmen : —Derbies being possible among earls , just as a Burns is among ploughboys . What would become of the British aristocracy but that wives are repeatedly imported from the city , and that the " blood " peeresses pass winters in Italy and Paris , it would be impossible to say . Probably the Bishops might be occasionally permitted to talk for more than ten minutes per bishop a time . For the sake of its influence on the State , the Church might be disposed to agree that , speaking with reference to physical laws , immorality is desirable for an
aristocracy . General reflections like these are fully borne but by observing that the higher the grade—that is , the longer the descent— -in the Peerage , the less is the intellect . There are more clever barons than viscounts ; more clever viscounts than earls ; more clever earls than marquises ; more clever marquises than dukes—there being only one duke who can speak English , and he ( Newcastle ) being the first born duke who has been able to do so since his ancestor , the managing Pelham , used to make the
tapestry shudder with his blunders . The ducal condition in this country is , indeed , very melancholy . We have several dukes whose houses were first vigorously founded by royal bastards—and an aristocrat ' s bastard is always cleverer than an aristocrat ' s legitimate son , for Falconbridge ' s reasons ; and we have one truly British duke who descends from a solid Dutchman , —the house having supplied two clever men ( younger sons)—Lord William and Lord George Bentinck . But a frightful fate seems to have overcome all our dukes , except the present Duke of Newcastle , who has had family reasons to keep off the usual mental sloth of
the class . Not a duke has openly participated in our political history since the last Duke of Newcastle did what he liked with his own , and since the present Duke of Norfolk , eight years ago , proposed , with an ingenuity which exhibited the characteristics of his order , that tho corn-laws should be tempered with curry powder . The dukes would appear to hide their heads in their coronets ; or , at any rate , to agree with Pultcnoy , that heads of parties are like heads of snakes—best carried on by the tails . A duke occasionally gets " into office ; but we saw , in the recent case of the Duke of Northumberland , what are the notions with which he enters on his
functions , and how absolutely a duke looks to his Stafford " to—ah—in short—in point of factseo after Avhat is going on" ( thus said the duke ) . A duke is , no doubt , rather a tremendous social personage . One travels , if one is of democratic opinions , with great awe through the Dukery—down in the midland counties ; and
one writes , if one is devoted to our glorious constitution , with great vigour to the papers , when , a duke dying-, and his successor is hurrying to the deathbed , tho brutal directors will not absolutely stop an express train , bearing the now duke , at the most convenient , though it bo not a timetabled station . The dukes are humourously rich ; even tho late Duke of Newcastle would have been
rich if ho hadn't done wlmt ho liked with his own ; and the present Duke of Buckingham came into possession of a few counties ami a dozen or two of palaces . ( In a parenthesis it may be remarked , to sustain the theory suggested , that the moment the Marquis of Cliandoa was ruined , ho discovered capacity , and becoming insolvent , was at once detected to be clever . ) Every duke owns a hand of close boroughs : can affect a pack of boroughs ; and indirectly wields enormous social and political influence . You may laugh ut dulcen : all statesmen < lo ; but the first thing every statesman does , also ,
on being Bent for by the Queen , is to send for a duke . No man can undertake to form a Government , unless he can play a couple of dukes : they are the coloured cards of the political game . The Duke of Bedford is a most imposing duke . He can shut up Covent-garden , and he can forma coalition . He could pull down half Bloomsbury : and he did pull down Lord Derby . Wonderful man .
Who is he ? Nobody knows . Did anybody ever see the Duke of Bedford ? Nobody . Did anybody ever hear of him ? Never : until we , self-governed people , were informed , this time last year , that he had altered our history , destroyed the Whigs and destroyed the Tories , and formed a coalition . Surprising person . What should we have done without the Duke of Bedford ? Towards the close of 1852
politics were at a dead lock : Mr . Disraeli had come in with the pantomime season ; but his wand had lost its power , —not one of the tricks would work , — and the last thing men concluded was , that Pantaloon and Clown , in the " shape of Aberdeen and Graham , would have kicked Harlequin Derby and Columbine Walpole- —bewildered with turning—into the gallery . But the Duke of Bedford stepped from the clouds like the Genius who always comes down in a car with a run at the end of the piece : and —• whirr—everybody was dancing with everybody ,
Mr . Osborne was on the top of Lord John ' s head , Sir William Molesworth pitching hysteric summersaults , and the curtain fell on the most exhilarating tableaux of modern politics , —a blue fire serpent squaring a red flame circle . The Duke of Bedford must be a profound man—for a duke . Solomon was shrewd in offering to each mamma the half of the putative child . The Rabelaisian gentleman was knowing who decided the dispute about the oyster by according to each disputant a shell , and himself masticating the fish . But the
Duke of Bedford was the first who acted on the celebrated hint of a perplexed leader—that if the great families would only agree to share , they could both enjoy the plunder of the nation at the same time . But why did lie not , why does he not , come forward for the national thanks?—for isn't the Coalition popular , on the peace-and-quietness principle ? Is he merely the John Doe of the political cause ; or is he a bond fide personage ? And if he is a reality , how is it that he has sueh great political power as to twist European history ? Why a Bedford more than a Norfolk ? He can't be cleverer than Norfolk : a
duke , as a duke , is undistinguishablo from another dulce . Yet on consideration he may be a cleverer man . Is it not a British belief that the house of Russell is " illustrious ? " Is not their name written on the banner of Civil and Religious Liberty ? Ah , yes . Let us not forgct . the glorious traditions of this family—a family which , as Macaulay said , incorporate and incarnate the magnificent principles of Milton and of Locke—a family which gave two martyrs , a neck to a Stuart and a throat to Courvoisier . Certainly the Stuart martyr took French
money , and sneaked out of a party responsibility . Certainly , the family ia rich by the plunder of Church lands , which once sustained the poor . Certainly , the family produced the Lord John Russell , who deluded a trusting people with tho Reform Bill of 1832 , who maintained an alien Church in Ireland , who wroto the Durham letter , and avIio Russianised Europe . Certainly tho family hold an odd number of rotten boroughs ; and from 184 G to 1852 insisted on a monopoly for its chin of the whole patronage of Great Britain .
Certainly the family was intensly Protectionist and therefore depredatory of the people , Tip to 134 ( 5 , and has at this moment sighing souvenirs of a fixed duty . And certainly this illustrious family never producod a better man than the Karl of Bedford , who conducted Philip of Spain to an English Queen ' s arms , a nobler man than tho Lord William Russell , avIio took French gold , or an abler man than the Lord John Russell , who led tho Whiff party into a cul-desac . But it , nevertheless , believes it is an illustrious family—and is believed to be nn illustrious , family ; and that tradition may have some effect in sustaining the intellect of its successive dukes ; not to mention the invigorating animus imparted by a constant fear lest the Pope should recover England , and repossess himself of Woburn . There are circumstances which may distinguish tho Duke of Bedford
from other faineant dukes : and , no doubt , a Duke of Bedford is politically more powerful than , other dukes , so long as he has a brother who leads , not merely a party , but the House of Commons . But should not the fact that there is a Duke of Bedford , of whom we know [ nothing , influencing vitally the movements of- the state machine , suggest caution in our conclusions that we have progressed beyond the day when a Sarah Churchill , or a Mrs . Masham , or any other old woman governed a queen
who governed the country ? We hear , from Great Britons who have no chance of getting a consulship , a good deal about the evils of secret diplomacy . But is the Foreign Office the only one of our Government bureaux , whose agencies , and whose policy is secret and mysterious ? Secret diplomacy is only a branch of reserved . Government ; the evil we suffer from , is the evil of- —Secret History . The moral of the Palmerston episode in the Coalition annals is instructive to those who have
faith in our political system ; the whole incident is ruinous to our political pretensions . In a " recess , " when there is no Parliament , and therefore no Ministerial responsibility even in appearance , and when the people of England know as little of the causes of the war into which they are drifting as the people of Russia know of the causes of the war into which they are dragged , a principal Minister retires from office ; and after a dismal interval , in . which the moanings of curiosity of the leading journals
indicate the measure of our self-government , he returns to office ; and of the reasons of the first step , as of the reasons of the last , and of the meaning of the whole manoeuvre , this great and remarkably enlighted nation is profoundly , not to say elaborately and ingeniously , ignorant . Why ? Because the House of Lords having packed the House of Commons with sons and slaves , to resist the towns , the dukes and great peers can afford—to keep out of sight . We are a clever people—even duller than our own dukes . Non-Electok .
Untitled Article
ULTRAMONTANISM IN GERMANY . ( tiiikd and concludin g abticlb . ) Memento Moki , says the Trappist . Memento Mori ! is the lugubrious refrain that resounds in the ears of the secular power through all the pretensions of the Papacy . The Roman Church is founded on the doctrine of a despotic Universalism ; she calls herself absolute and eternal . The ecclesiastical policy of her pontiffs ia for ever pirouetting round that principle of spiritual feudality which Gregory VII ., Innocent III ., and Boniface "VIII . sought to impose on
secular power . This policy is sometimes masked ; its purpose is never changed . Wherever the Roman Church finds herself , whether by force of treaties or of legislation , subordinate to the State , she will , when she can , re-assert her " rights . " Wherever the hierarchical Machiavellis have obtained these " rights , " they will demand equality between the Church and the State . Accord equality , —and the Church
will invade tho State , as sovereign and master . The Papacy is a power with which neither transaction nor truce nor repose is possible . If tho Catholic Church keeps silence on certain rights " which have been snatched from her by violence , " it is only " because prudential reasons do not render it advisable to urge her claims at the present moment . " ( These arc tho words of a Report by a dean of the chapter on the conflicts between Wessenberg and tho
Government of Baden . ) The right of surveillance exercised by tho State over the Church has existed to a certain extent in Germany ever since the Treaty of Westphalia , aa well in theCatholie as in tho Protestant states . Tho monarchical absolutism which triumphed on the thirty years' war , had begun to introduce into tho ecclesiastical us well as into tho civil administration of JJEtat est iTho French
the dogma " e ' mo" Revolution struck a terrible blow at tho Papacy ; it v sought to shatter the system to its very foundation . Napoleon ' s policy was reactionary , inasmuch as it returned to monarchical traditions and re-established the Church . But Napoleon completed tho subordination of tho Church to tho State . Wherever hia sword penetrated ho realised in a monarchical form tho boim / eoix idea of 1789 , the principle of the preponderance of tho secular power . This mitigated
Untitled Article
^ December 31 , 1853 . ] T HE L EA D E R . 1263
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Dec. 31, 1853, page 1263, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2019/page/15/
-