On this page
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
Iiouis ISFapoleon can appreciate the federation of States ana a black coat , the sovereignty of the people , and the white waistcoat . ' We understand all the effect produced by the ?' black crow , " but , it is to be observed , that the same effect could not be produced without the contrast . Mr . Sandford is a young man , and , probably , looks distinguS . , Theatrical authors and managers know the effect of placing the principal hero amidst a , crowd of golden nobodies , himself attired in the plainest garb ,- —it is one
mode with a general audience , of emphatically fixing the interest upon ^ personal qualities as contradistinguished from costume and such accessories ; "but then , the most beautiful verse , the noblest sentiments , and the most striking situations , are allotted to the coat without spangles , or to the rustic garb of the tenor . Dress all the persons on the stage on an equality of plainness with the hero , and the distinction ceases . It may even be recovered by the opposite process , and then again , gold and velvet shall make the distinguished statesman .
There is some confusion of cause and effect . A powerful country represented by an ambassador singular for his plainness , affects the beholder by force of contrast ; but a powerful country represented by a man distinguished for his genius , for the nobility of his works , and for the splendour of his costume , would not he less worthily represented . Peter Paul Reubens- ' might ¦ be as admirable a figure , with his chivalrous and magnificent aspect , as Mr . Sandford , in the coat and waistcoat of genteel comedy . " While the golden fashion lasts , the Sandfords
will always have the advantage of a contrast . Carlyle says , that the fashion of a man's apparel is identified by the desire to typify outwardly the bent of his disposition . Venezuela , anxious to be wealthy , anxious to be noble and powerful , although it cannot find a very powerful porter for the purpose , will , notwithstanding , load its ambassador with weapons of state and golden embroidery to exemplify the aspirations of the republic . But the United States desire to show that they are independent of European court influence ; stand apart from them , defy them , are
in no degree bound hy treaty obligations , etiquettes , or ambassadorial embroidery ; and Mr . Sandford in a coat and Avhite waistcoat , embodies that defiance in a very striking manner . Each to his taste . There is an advantage in these varieties . The Oriental ambassadors have always enjoyed the privilege of a special costume , and there is no reason why the Occidental ambassador should not have an equal privilege . It is only a pity that bo much is made of costumes , for evidently our friends in America attach as much importance to this subject as ladies talking over their dress and knick-nacks . Would that
sometiling more really typifying the power of the republic , were devised than the costume in question . The bird of Washington does rightly typify the genius of that State whose power soars over land and water , and can defy the elements in their roughest moods ; but we cannot for the life of us understand how the genius of Americahow the meaning that could speak under the star-spangled banner , is peculiarly embodied in the shape of a gentleman with a white coat and waistcoat , such as might make his appearance in the Belle Assemhlfo . or tlio Gazette den Modes .
Untitled Article
THE GOVERNING CLASSES . JSTo . TJ . LORI ) STKATFOKD JXE REDCXIFFE . * JUST now the British world is canvaHHing tho jwlvantagesand thedisadvantagesof " Hecrot diplomacy : " and just now , therefore , it may be worth while to consider tho character and career of the moat distinguished of
Great Britain ' s very few diplomatists . . Lord Redoliflo and Sir H . Bulweraro the only two of our diplomatistM who have gained anything like European ponition : and Lord Redoliffe only , of the whoJe diplomatic ; Hervice , han Hcen or done anything of . European importance . Ho if ) a representative man of the ny « tein—the nyHleni of secret diplomacy .
What docs " Secret Diplomacy" mean ? It means tho Government of Great Britain , in regard to all affaire not strictly domoHtic , irrespective of the wishes , ideas , or cognizance ; of Great Britons . Great BritonH would not like that definition : hut , on conaiduration , they would admit it is a correct definition , ( . rent
Britons are brought up to believe that tiey are a selfgoverned people : and it is with the utmost difficulty they can be induced to face the facts of their political organization . They are allowed to talk of their political affairs ; and they fall into the error of supposing that , therefore , they manage their said political aflairs . To some extent they do manage their domestic politiqs : that is , of the 30 , 000 , 000 of them , 1 , 000 , 000 are allowed to have votes for Members of Parliament , which votes they dispose of to the richest or most reckless candidate ; that is , they have a press , which
is permitted to be impertinent , and to bark without biting ; that is , they have the privilege of public meetings , and can generally get what they want out of their Parliament , after about seven or ten years of agitation . But in regard to aflairs not strictly domestic , they have nothing to do with the position in which tie governing classes choose to place England in the universe . Their national notion of such affairs is translated in the phrase , " foreign aflairs : " and the Governing Glasses see so well the advantages to be gained by cultivating insular pride and insular indifference ,- —that is ,
ignorance , —that the statesmanship of sublime selfishness in respectTto all other nationalities is not only the statesmanship of the governing classes , hut the statesmanship of the popular tribunes , —the fact being , that Mr . Cobden has been coaxed into most of his recent follies by such subtle managers of democrats as Lord Aberdeen . For many generations in our history , our governing classes , — -the classes who owned the land , — had systems , principles , and persons to sustain or crush abroad : and , perpetually , active intervention , with money , men , or maxims , had to be
resorted to . And , in these times , appeals to the people were necessary , taxes being necessary ; and the ignorant islanders were asked , now to conquer France , their inheritance , now to uphold Protestantism , now to crush an anarchical revolutionary propaganda . But the policy of the governing classes of England beingnow the policy of upholding crowned despotisms , — these classes being travelling classes , and liking easy admission to society in all the capitals , —their cue is to suggest the policy of non-intervention : these classes being tolerably safe in saying , " Let kings and peoples
fight it out , " since they know the kings have the best chance ; and the ignorant islanders easily adopt the cant , and readily sustain the selfish and cowardly cry . The state of the national debt justifies , to a certain point , the terrors which find expression in that cant : and the governing classes , who caused the debt in order to establish continental despotisms , are still perfectly logi al in urging the people , sick from experience or tradition , of the last war , to be careful now to preserve peace—so far as they are concerned , peace being the condition of the continuation of those despotisms .
Hence , despite a reformed House of Commons , and an intelligent , active , and , by interest , liberty-loving press , tho deeply-rooted system of secret diplomacy . The country is not anxious about the details of , the policy of peace , that policy having once been promised by the governing-classes ; and the press and " popular members" attempt in vain to overcome that barricade which the Foreign Office in right to rely on , —public indifference . In a great war , in this day , there could be no secret diplomacy ; the people would not then be indifferent , and the government would have to bo en
rapport with the people . But in '' negotiations , " an the history of the hint six months illustrates , tho Hecrecy of British diplomacy in impenetrable . The Houhc of Commons—thatiH , the few who care to teaHo a Foreign Secretary—has the privilege of asking queHtionn ; but Foreign Secretaries have tho privilege of not answering them ; and though the House has the coiiKtitutional right of explanations when the negotiations are all over , a clever Minister has still the option of withholding more than lie tolln—for the nako of tho public service . A Parliamentary explanation from tho Foreign Oflice
telln only so much truth an is convenient ; and human memory cannot rccal , a blue-book which waH not well edited by a practiBod Foreign Office clerk . Then who reads the bluo-bookti' { Who reads foreign jilFairn debates ? Tho London nownpupora " throw away vast capital in attempting to collect information ; and foreign corroHpondontH are very punctual in notifying to their journals and the British public that '' there is Htill a variety of rumonm here . " In fact , a newspaper correspondent , when sent to a foreign capital , is Hiiuhbod by tho neeret diplomatist representing ; Iuh own country , and in elaborately not known by thu
diplomatists of the country to whose public he is verv irregularly accredited . In London , the Foreign Office ^ has its organs , whom it instructs to mislead ; and the Opposition organs try to generalise their profound ignorance and ludicrous curiosity ; and every now and then they do annoy the Foreign Office with a fact or a theory , which they have neatly translated from a Paris Berlin , or "Vienna journal . Thus '' secretdiplomacy * deludes the nation and las it all its own way and this liberty-loving , and more or less free country finds , year after year , gieat gratification in having to
boast , "We are the only free country in Europe " Certainly , as now , the public arouses itself when it gets frightened ;—when the secret diplomacy , after six months' negotiations to keep the peace , is bothered and breaks down , it is not much wonder that there are a few public meetings , which , of course , contribute greatly to the amusement of Lord Palmerston and a lively circle of governing classes in his country breakfast-room . And Great Britons think that they are very magnanimous in crying , " Let us stand up for Turkey , " when they have positively ascertained that they cannot help themselves . That is , — -taproom
democracy apart , —the majority of Great Britons are decidedly still in favour of letting Lord Aberdeen let Russia do what she likes . A nation of shopkeepers cannot realize national honour : a fact amusin gly illustrated this week in the columns of the shopkeepers ' journal . In one column appears an attack on Nicholas for attacking Turkey : in another , an article to show that what Nicholas is doing in Turkey , Lord Dalhousie , like all other British governor-generals , is doing in Hindostan . The shopkeepers begin to perceive that Great Britain is an empire made up of plunder and oppression of nationalities : and if Nicholas
can get hold of Constantinople , why they wish him "luck . " Such a theory comes immensely to the aid of a Peace Society , and of the Governing Classes . These are considerations which account for the scarcity of great men in British diplomacy ; and for the moderate success and minor position of England ' s , at present , most distinguished diplomatist — Lord Stratford de Kedcliffe . The first thing for a politician to get hold of , said Fox to Canning , is—a policy . Our diplomatists , for the last thirty years , have never been quite sure that they had a policy ; and hence their enormous and successive failures , personal and national .
All our political literature and all our political gossip testify to the consistent and consecutive success of the Russian diplomatists : and a conviction has , oflateyears , been growing up that the -Russians have some special aptitude for the political swindling termed diplomacy . Various reasons have been proffered to account for the phenomenon ; i $ e have beeji told that a Russian combines the Asiatic suppleness with the European tradition , the cunning of tlie savage with tho wit of the salons . May not the reason be , that tho Russian has a consistent policy , direct , clear , universal , to pilrsiie and to strive after . Those who have studied the Russian system , and
have got the key to present Russia ^ politics , contend that the Russian diplomatists are , practically , the most straightforward of men . Diplomacy , when you know what you want , cannot be difficult ; and if you are not awhamed of what you want , your diplomacy is franlc , straight , decisive , an « l not secret . In lato discuiasionH , Cromwell has boon contrasted by Great British idiots with Lord Aberdeen ; and we are informed , "Ah , Cromwell would have done bo and bo , not been long about it . " Those insular gentlomen , who arc always in politicsbecause they always take
wrong , the wrong point of view , ariaing from an cxcuaal ) e belief that this if * a self-governed country , do no Heo that Cromwell had two great ad vantages , as HtatcHuuui , over Lord Abordoen : in the first place , «« knew what ho wanted ; and , in the next p lace , ho mMJ » not ashamed to Hay what he -wanted . Had Lord <> elit fb been in tho Russian norvioe , he would have ho < an high a position among diplomatists as Baron m now holdH ; had he been in tto United States «« rvico ,
... . 1 . 1 1 .., nriwl alllOI ' he would havo been , m rwipooted »« d envied an'O ' fc diplomatists an Mr . Bancroft or Mr . Everett . J ' ' ^ cauwe ho hiui been a Great British dip lomatist , ho v »» ummcceHBful , an unhappy , and a miwchievouH n « Ru « sia ha « « , policy , tho United Stottw havo a jioi J , and either policy can bo proclaimed and purmioa ^ out Hubterfugo . But Great Uritain ha « no P olicy ^ what in tho wuno thing , nho > iw ono policy at one . » and another at another ; and at all timoa th <> »
Untitled Article
998 THE LEADER . [ Saturday , ¦ ¦ j i ' r .- i ' ' . ' i ' . " -i—¦ ' ' ¦ — — ' ' ¦ - ' ' ¦¦ " - ¦¦ — ~< m ^^^ immmmA . Jt ¦¦¦ ¦ - ^ '' ' i "' - ' " ]\ | -- - - - f ' ¦' - .. ¦' . '" . ' : . ¦
Untitled Article
* His lordnltip cmtorH in thiH H < iries of pa ]) cru , in hi » Iphaboticttiuepeol , aa fcjir Stratford Canning .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Oct. 15, 1853, page 998, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2008/page/14/
-