On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
x w that what the noble lord the member for Tiverton tOtJls wn > ng , when he declared he had left us in rela-^ aTamity and security with all the nations of the world . 5 S Ir hear ) The noble lord had , in fact , not shown the foments were unfounded which made the funds go up , T fear they will go down to-morrow . But , comparing i * p noble lord ' s statement now with that which he made 18 iS we may -find arguments to show why there is less danger at present than then of any attack from the French 1 ) 0 He assen ted that we were as safe now as in 1848 from invasion ; that the present measure would be deservedly unpopular ; and that public meetings would certainly protest against it .
" What is it in effect ? A mere fraction of the community are to be drawn away from their business and pursuits to take on themselves the duty of soldiers , and to be But under martial law , —for what ? I say , that if substitutes are allowed to the rich , the burden of defending the country will fall upon a small section of the community chiefly of the poorer classes , that the mechanic , able to earn his 4 s . a day , will be taken from his Workshop and imt under martial law to receive one shilling a day ,
J _ . « *« ! " •¦_ J _? ^"_ . — — . JJ lL . 1 Z £ f w . n » •¦¦ Fill that this will be a great injustice , and that if you will have 150 , 000 of these men for soldiers , they ought to be paid , and well paid , by the country . , It is a most flagrant hardship and injustice . ( Hear , hear . ) I say that there is no necessity on national grounds for this measure . You have ho business to contemplate any invasion of your shores , if the numerous fleets for which you pay so large a sum are properly kept up and disposed of ; You hav in that case no reason to dread invasion , whether by a few
brigands or by a foreign army . " Disposing of the pamphlet of Baron Maurice , as detailing an impracticable scheme of invasion , he turned to another hinted at in the following extract from the United Service Gazette . "' What we have to dread is , not an invasion , but a hostile descent , throwing on some part of our coast a force of 10 , 000 or 12 , 000 men , who , although not strong enough to occupy the country , might do irreparable mischief ^ before they are subdued . A buccaniering expedition might even make its way into the Thames , and demand a Canton ransomjrom the metropolis of the world . '
" Now this is a very grave and serious matter put forth by the editor . ( Hear , hear . ) But , in the first place , I take exception , to it on this ground : —it is a libel on the French army . ( Cheers . ) I don't believe yott could find a French officer to undertake abnccaniering expedition of this kind without a declaration of war ( cheers ); and if you did , then the expedition would be an act of piracy . ( Hear , hear . ) If it ba too- KJgk < m appeal -to make to French , morality and French honour to suppose they would not act in this way , there is still this appeal—that they will be pirates . I am told one of the objects of such an invasion would be
to avenge Waterloo ; but how would it avenge that defeat , if they only came over here to be hanged ? ( Hear , hear . ) Again , I am told they will burn our ships in Liverpool and Bristol . If they did , they would not burn English ships only ; but they would burn American , Dutchmen— vessels unde r every flag in the world ; and the nation that warranted such an act , and the Government that permitted it , would be hunted at least from the face of the ocean by all the ships of every maritime nation of the earth . These are the most serious arguments I have met with for the increase of our defensive armaments . Nay , I have no belief in anything of the kind . "
Ho hoped that the House would refuse the permission asked by the noble lord . When Mr . Cobclon sat down , Lord Pulmcrston and Mr . Fox Maule rose together . The House londly called for Lord Palmerston , and Mr . Fox M aulo gave way . Lord Palmerston took upon himself the credit of having proposed , in 184 ( 5 , the measures now deemed necessary for national defence . As to not mixing ourselvos in continental quarrels , he quite agreed ; but we had interest beyond our own shores , and these it would iiot bo safe to stand quietly by and see destroyed .
Honourable gentlemen talked as if our only danger of rupture was from Franco ; but Franco was not the only country with a largo fleet , and a large disposable army . Our insular position is our weakness , as woll as our Btrongth , the Channel is narrow , and , as Lord Howe mud , the " sea ia a wide place . " Continental nations ftro only approachable by known roads , which can bo fortified , wutched , and defended ; our great extent of coast is open on every side . Aa to the navy , that was irt cfiiciont us it had ever been , if not inoro efficient , in proportion to its oxtont . But it would bo madness to rt > ly only on our navy .
o » r , it ia perfectly impossible for any navy , however active , vigorous , and numerous , to prevent altogether the I yj of u U 09 til ° force , when we consider the short inerval between our own shores and those from which ni » enemy might come , nnd whence an expedition might sail 1 ° ^ ° 8 l > ot of our wide-extending shores , and lund in Jreland , or any less guarded portion of the country . If it J ? ° necoasnry , as I think it is , that we should have a land lorco that we should have armed men to resist armed f ^~ ~? or . na * ° fortiftcationB , it is useless for us to think ot * ° rt « fying more than our arsenals and dockyards , and
such places of vital importance , — -there is no fortification like brave men armed ,-organized , disciplined , and ready to meet an enemy . ( Loud cheers . ) That is the best fortification , and such a fortification yon will always find in the hearts and arms of Englishmen ; but , if it be necessary that we should have armed men to meet the unfortunate possibility of an invasion—I hope not the probability ; and mind , the less probable it will be the more you are prepared for it . ( Cheers . ) Nothing so much tempts as
weakness and incapacity to resist , when to that is added enormous wealth , and a great temptation for political objects . ( Cheers . ) If it be necessary that this country should have aforee capable of defending our homes against an invading army , and of protecting us from the incalculable calamity which would arise from the occupation of any portion of our country , even for a month , by an invading force , why then , I say , something like the mode proposed seems to me the best , if not the only possible mode of
doing so . It was all mighty well for people to talk of the hardship of defending their lives , homes , and property ; fortunately , they did not know what were the horrors of war : but the people of the United States did not consider it a hardship . ( Cheers . ) Austria and Prussia have a similar force ; and even in France the disbanded national guard has been partially reorganized . We alone
had no force of the kind ; and , considering our enormous wealth , there was no country in the world so defenceless . Now , the militia was the proper force to organize for this purpose . And that being so , he could not understand why Lord John Russell preferred the local to the regular militia , which was the old constitutional force of the country . Turning , then , to an obvious omission from Lord John Russell ' s scheme , he fastened on it , and worked it up with great skill .
" The regular militia , too , raised in Great Britain and Scotland , is liable to serve in the whole of the United Kingdom , and I am astonished that in a plan for the defence of the realm Ireland should be left without the protection < said to be essential for the defence of this country . ( Hear , hear . ) The local militia can only be called upon to serve in Great Britain , and why Ireland is not provided for , I am at a loss to conceive . Do the government doubt the loyalty of the Irish people ? ( Hear , hear . ) Why ,
Sir , T would pledge my existence that there is not a man in Ireland who would be called out , and who had taken the oath of allegiance , who would not lose his life rather than not defend his country against invasion . ( Cheers . ) I have the . most complete confidence in the loyalty of the millions of Ireland . I am persuaded they would be true to the Queen and to their oath ; and as to their courage , that is sufficiently well known to need no mention from me . " ( Hear . ) ^ ... .
He concluded that if we were to have a militia , as m his opinion we ought to have , it should be the regular and not the local militia . The House cheered loudly when the noble lord sat down . Mr . Fox Maums in a few words echoed the speech of the premier ; taunted Mr . Cobden with being in favour of a standing anny ; and Mr . Hume for calling the balloting a conscription . Mr . Newdegate admired Lord Palmerston . Mr . Roche asked why Ireland
was omitted , and Lord John Russell defended the omission on the ground of " difficulty , " and that Ireland did not require a militia . Mr . Sidney Herbert supported the views of Lord Palmerston . Sir George Grey was put up to reply to him . He said that the difference between the local and the regular militia was that the former was a defensive and the latter an offensive force . We did not want now what was required at the conclusion of the last war , —a militia which
would enable us to set free every soldier in the country , not for internal defence , but to carry on a continental war . As to tlio objection that the local militia could not bo moved as a body upon any particular point without its being construed by foreign powers into a declaration of war , he would answer , noither could tho general militia . Lord Palinerston replied to the firHt of these assertions by stating , that in 1814 wo bad 82 , 000 militiamen and 56 , 000 troops in the country ; and Mr . Sidney Herbert answered the second by observing that the law expressly provided for tho removal of tho general militia anywhere at any time Mr . Osborne hero struck in , and took up one or two points in Mr . Cobdon ' s speech , which all tho other speakers bad strangely omitted to notice .
" The hon . member said that ho had great confidence in the morality of the French army . The morality of the French army I The morality of any army ! Did the hon ' . member derive his confidence from tho scones lately enacted ? Was it from tho successful fusijlndo ou tho Boulevards P ( hear , hoar ) , or from the execution done by tho artillery in other streets where the cannon wns fired by Frenchmen oh Frenchmen P Did the hon . member suppose that Generals Espinasso and St . Arnaud would hesitate to attack this country when they had not hesitated to break all lawa , human and divine , and place their own Legislature under arrest P ( Cheera . )" In other respects , he defended not only tho measure , but the omission of Ireland from it . The Irish police
were the best Irish militia . Mr . Cobden explained that he meant to say that French officers would not be found to command an expedition sent out without a declaration of war . Mr . Tbeiawney , Mr . Axgock , and Mr . Anstey , supported the measure ; Captain Scobell spoke equivocally . A resolution , that a bill should be prepared and brought in , was agreed to , a report ordered on Friday , and the House resumed . Lord Palmerston the next day gave notice that he should move that the word " local" be omitted , and to insert after the word " amend" the words " and consolidate . " This was received with loud cheering . ST . ALBANS' DlSFKANCHISEMENT .
Sir George Gbey moved on Monday for leave to bring in a bill to disfranchise St . Albans . The ground for the motion was the evidence of corruption elicited by the commission . The characteristic of the debate which ensued was the appearance of Mr . Bell and Mr . Repton . Previously to their rising , some sparring took place between Sir De Lacy Evans and Mr . Ker Seymer respecting Harwich ; Mr . Seymer humorously describing the electors as " not perfectly virtuous , but prudent , and that was their safeguard ; " Mr . Bagshaw denying emphatically that there had been any corruption at Harwich since 1841 , and asserting that
the commission which Sir de Lacy Evans proposed to move for would produce the following wonderful effects . * " The bad odour of the borough , " exclaimed Mr . Bagshaw , with a manifest disregard of metaphorical proprieties , " would at once be obliterated , and it would shine forth in its proper character . " Mr . Roebuck wished to do away with " shams . " If a man who sold his vote for a small bribe was corrupt , what was he who sold his borough for a large bribe ? Mr . Bell was loudly called for , but begged to postpone what he had-to say . Lord Claude Hamilton coupled the Reform Club , " Coppock , " and Mr . Roebuck together , in a way that roused that gentleman , asking whether
he had done his part to prevent corruption . Mr . Roebuck declared that his election cost him nothing , and although a member , he never went to the Reform Club . Mr . Spooner wanted to know whether it was true , as stated by Mr . Coppock , that he had procured government situations for persons who had ]? een serviceable in carrying elections . Sir George Grey was totally ignorant of anything of the kind ; and he satirically observed that he " was glad to find from the warm cheers with which the question of the hon . member was received , that there were no hon . gentlemen in the House who had ever applied to government for places for those who had rendered them services at elections . "
( Cheers and laughter . ) The calls for Mr . Beix now became so imperative , that he rose and said that during the whole of this " unfortunate transaction" he had been persuaded to hold his tongue , that he had consequently " laboured under the weight of an incubus , " and never had an opportunity of explaining or extenuating the charges brought against him . " On the present occasion he was desirous of addressing a few words to the House , when he was particularly requested not to do so , ( loud laughter , and cries of ' hear , hear , ' ) but he had so often regretted not having earlier acted on his own judgment , that he was determined not to be driven from his coarse again . ( Hear , hear . ) As this was the first time of addressing the House on the subject , he felt he ought to state thut the reason why he had
been silent was that a judicial inquiry was pending . Besides , there were others implicated in the proceeding who desired him not to say anything . ( Renewed laughter . ) That judicial inquiry had terminated , and the whole responsibility of anything he might say rested on himself . Before saying anything respecting the borough , he thought it would be proper to clear himself from the extreme degree of culpability which appeared to rest upon him . It would appear from the report that he had gone down to St . Albans perfectly aware of its reputation , and with his eyes open . It was exceedingly easy—with all the proceedings of the case before them—with the whole transactions mapped out after their occurrence—to say where the mistake had been committed , ( laughter , ) where the errors hud arisen . ( Continued laughter . ) He was
sensible that he had committed one great error , that was m going down to St . Albans ut all . ( Loud laughter . )" Ho thought there would bo no opposition , but in that ho was deceived . Mr . Bell represented his simplicity an perfect . " Having pledged himself to go" to tho poll , having rigorously canvassed tho electors —( laughter)—in order to secure their support aa speedily aa'possible , ho felt that ho could not retract . He had no , opportunity of escaping from the dilcmmii in which he found himself . When ho appeared in tho field , rumours arose , and increased , of improper practices in tho borough . Although ho saw no evidence of anything illegal —( laughter , and cries of 'hcur , Lear'
)yet he confessed that he had his suspicions . ( Renewed laughter . ) But he considered that it was not his duty to inquire into all the details of such proceedings . ( Continued laughter . ) He believed it was not usual for parties de-
Untitled Article
Feb 21 , 1352 J T&ti 167
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Feb. 21, 1852, page 167, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1923/page/3/
-