On this page
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
THE NEW BEFOBM iBILE . PeecedED by the presentation of six petitions , whose prayer generally expressed a desire for a& extended franchise , the motion for leave , to bring in the long promised Reform Bill was made on Monday night . Just before Lord John Eussell rose , the , Speakeb read a letter he had received from Mr . Heiiiy , the magistrate at Bow-street , announcing that Mr . Feargus O'Connor had been on that day committed to the House of Correction for seven days , having been convioted of assaulting a ppliee-constahle at the Lyceum Theatre on Saturday night .
In moving for leave to bring in . " a Bill to . extend the Bight of Voting for Members of Parliament , and to amend the laws relating to the Representation of the People / ' Lord John Russelii thought the time he had chosen was most apt , as the country was tranquil , and there was no clamorous demand for reform , He vindicated himself from the charge of having made the announcement of last session on the spur of the moment , for mere party purposes , by stating , that he had given ' ¦ ' many" previous assurances to the House of his intention some day to extend the franchise .., In 1 $ 49 and 1851 he had also submitted the question to the . Cabinet , who had decided for postponement . ; Nothing he had ever said , no expectations that he had ever held put ; should induce " extravagant . hopes" on the one side , or " exaggerated fears" on the , other .
So far the preface . The noble lord added . another ^ which he called a " review" of the " measures which have been taken , and the measures which have been proposed / ' on the reform question at various times ; But first he stated-that , " it is now very well agreed that the claim to have the franchise extended to every individual is not a claim which can be supported / ' and then he gave the House this astounding piece of information : . " ; . \ : ' ¦ : ¦¦>• "The object to be gained is good government ; and the niodcpf obtaining a fair representation of ; the people , arid of obtaining a representation which can perform ttxe functions of-the House of Commons , is to'be sought for- 'in any measures that can be adopted . : > : ¦ ¦ > ¦• . ; .: ' ;
Having delivered' himself ofthis' statesmanlike-observation , he proceeded to '¦ ' review" the efforts ; of ia long period from 1785 to 183 Q . Reaching the Rbforini Bill > he stated the basis , on which that was c ^ n ^ tracfced , and defined the " test of disfranchisement" then adopted as being " the number of houses and the 1 assessment to the assessed taxes ; " and the Reform Bill disfranchised only those boroughs which werey onthte test > obviously nomination boroughs . ¦ ¦ . But it wduld fee ^ extremely Wn *
wise to destroy the balance of the constitution , whiclt would be done if none but counties : and' large cities ' returned members . He saw no ground of necessity which would justify a proposition for an arbitrary and ' absolute disfranchisemetvt j the only thing td be done ' was " to disfranchise in any case of proved corruption . **' Having stated this as a general principle of drafrarichisement , he stated what they were prepared to do" inextending the suffrage : —> . ' ¦ ' ¦ ' ¦
" It appears to me 'that there are two grounds , oh which we may propose a considerable extension of the ' Suffrage in the cities and boroughs of the United Kingdom . One ig , that at the time of the Reform Bill / in placing the right of voting in occupants of houses of the value of 10 ? ., we did what I think ia right and prudent to do—we placed the suffrage rather higher than was necessary . It was a time when then ) was , together with a great wish for rcforrn , a great desire that it . should bo safe , and an- nnwillingncsa to place the suffrage in hands that might be unworthy of it . I own that in fixing the suffrage in JOk householders at that time we obtained a safety , as ahown
by the working of our institutions since , the passing of that act , which was described by some as menacing all our institutions with destruction . I think wo might now place the franchise lower . But tiiere is another ground which I confess haa great influence on my mind , and it was that ground which formed n case for the original proposition of reform in 1820 , namely , the growing'intelligence and education of the people . ( Cheers . ) I could prove , if I were not afraid of wearying the House by going into statistics , —I could show by the sale of newspapers and of books , by the great number of schools established 'since 1831 , that a great increase has taken place in intelligence
among the people . ( Hear , hear . ) But I do not think the proof necessary , as the experience of every hon . mem » her is sufficient to induco him to concur in my statement , and to say that the franchise given in 1881 might bo made more extensive at the present time . ( Hear , hear . ) Wo propose , therefore , instead of householders occupying houses or shops of 101 . valuo , to take householders of 5 / . rated value . ( " Hoar , " and cheers from tho Ministerial side . ) Looking to tho gcnwal returns which w have received , I should say that in point of numbers tho house : hojdoraof from . & / . to 10 / ., oe compared with thoBo of 10 / . and upwards , are in the proportion of about six to ten ; ana" it will 1 ) 6 Scon , accordingly , that when we propose to
lower the franchise cfcief fend' Roughs to 57 . rated value we shall adfl fr vfci ^ greM ; number of persons to those who now ex # se the sJfietfve franchise . . For my part , I am persua&a that the franchise may be safely entrusted to these persons . ( Hear , hear . ) - \ - v With respfcdt to the cQunty-fi ^ ta , ha propo ^ tb extend thafr . to all persons qualified to sit onla jujryvtjat is , paying , a rental of 20 Z . % ye ^ anA ^ upwards , tmd ^ cppyholders and Jong leaseholders pdyiug from 10 & to f > £ a year . ¦; . ; . ¦ .:, .. ¦ ' . ¦ . '¦^^¦ \ ¦ ¦"''' "¦>¦ '; ; ' : ; '
" There is another right of voting I have to mentnji ^ which we propose shall be given as a new right of votrag indiscriminately to persons residing either m a county : or in a borough , That is , to say , that if they reside , in ^ a county , without the , limits , of any borough , / ttey may ypte for the county , and if they reside within , . any borpughthey may vote for the borough . Those new voters are persons paying direct taxes ivi the ; diape . of assessed taxes «)» come 4 axtpthe ainbuift o ^ Ministerial side of the houBe . ) Me do not propose , howr ever , that all licences--though they maybe taken as direct taxes—shall give t&r right ; of voting , becausejt is our in that arisedui
bpiniori that abuses might case ; we yrupose that persons who pay 40 s . ; * year m tliese direct . taxes shall have the right of vptmg ; and clauses have been drawn toearrymt this < object ; Now > H ; hte Reason- up ^ wMeh this particular franchise is fouuded js the objection which has constantly beeamade , ' > and : inot mthonfc reasoivihBt while personsrjttoivdg ' jh&old properisfi and othep * iw < ju * pying houi 0 M 4 pfoperti j ., itiX& J&owed . _ the ; franphige ; < ihej » is a large class ,- of wellreducated vjnen A and men likewise of property , % hp r haye not the , quaUfication . de ^ vedv from possessing or occupying a w partic ^ ar . specie § of property ( Hear , hear . ) Mf . mjse , however ,,, by , tb ^ s . jpxovjsipn , ^ enable "th ' epi lojh ' a ^ e ^ yptes ^^ ana' tjms contribute / , tp the representation pf t f he countr ^ . ' .. , , : i ,-.,.. . , % v ^ 'ii- , /
pie ' assertipn that jhribery ; was , most prevalent va . small boroughs ' .-lie . m e ^ - " by the oount ^ r assertion-t ^ at ^ t pre failed as much in larger bor ^ g hsj ^; a iuguoque greatly cheered by , the ' Opppsitlbn . . . B ^ ut agin m ^ ny pf' . the $ e smaU , boroughs , ^ met | ung ,. like ,, ' ^ ormnatipn ^ did jm doubtediy , preva % hjethough ^ that thai ^ as , a reproach ^ choughttob ^^ niawf ayv ^ it ^ rf for ^ . p ^ opp ^ d fe ^ fegfe' ^ , p r <^^ ar ^ , ^ enfie | y , ^ y | ng Q&M habitants of neighbouring towns the rigbj p £ votjng at the elections for such borpugjhs .
" When thrReformxBilUWaS Jifetftlssed in this house , I stated tfiat dn ^ mytopittionr nearly-all ithe ^ droughs sn oul d have / nbt less than- 300 voters eachv i -Wlrilej this is the casfe genbrally , tiere are ^^; smaljei 5 jbowwighs > wbichjhfcwe lea } than that-nnmber of voters ^ , tjtterej . * re upwardso » 3 Qmore ( that , We .. les ^ thaa ; 4 QP . elec ^ pr ^ j , and , there ^ e sevCTjal . mprp . that haye , , le s ^ th , an 5 pO 'Vptcr ? ,,, ;; Y ® K& . < J . speak now ,, of . electors , I alTude ^ to perjnanent , electors ,, nanieiv , those who . are 1 ' OT . Kpusehqld ^ ai ^ d those wHo
are freemen , holding the perpetual right which wa 8 . m $ } ntained "by . thfe { ' Refdrm Bill . " "W 6 pfo ^ se ^ thehi t ^ add places to all the boroughs which , have less ' thanT 500 of suqh electors , ' febhsisting' pf 10 / . 'Kbuseholders ^; utid freefcrieni Thd number of bprbugha to 'which'this ^ principle will ' ^ appb ' cd is 6 * 1 . ( Caries of Hear , heaf , ' and sorae ' 8 «{ h $ ai tion on the Opposition benches . ' An hbn . MfeiipEK ' - ^ In England and Wales ? ' ); Ivain nOw ; Bpeaking ( £ 6 rd John cdntinned ) ' only of Ehgjkn'd andi Wale ' s . " r ' ' ¦ '• w ^ s
... ^ ojp ^ bejnest , ^? d ^ K ^ , , t « preserve the "^ ame general ; baianjce of interest" mM ppos ^ t > « t } pt d j- ^ nfj , ' not disturb : that balance-7-fearful that if . we , did so , we should only provoke a fierce struggle" jin thafc ^ HcAfse , and ^ a very strong opposition in the , Jf ^ uso of j"prds > However , the " property qua ^ ficat ^ pn'' he would abojis ' h , an ^ . reibrm the parliamentary paths , Jteaviivg pi ^ ti , t h ^ word ? , . (* pn , tb , e , trye , fa | t ^ , , ! of . a qiiristia ^ , " , ^^ which , l ^ e prpppsed that , np member of ^ i £ goyernment upon . mei'fl , change of ^ ffic ^ , $ hjould , require i (^ e asserit of his constiifcuentfl .., T ) ip ^ rjsh bprougU-fr ^ c ^ ise is t 9 be reduced to &l ,, axi ^ ,, t )} c county-irancjusc' . t o 201 . \ 1 , _ ,
^ Sir , I trust that when this enlarged franchise is given ; we shall next sec the Government of this country ' , in . whos ^ ever hands it be , consider most BQriourty wd fiacnieatiy the great question of , the education of ,, the peopl *? . ; ( I ^ oud cries of JLIear , hear . ) . Th ] s | question p f . thc iranchiBois not o | ien . fro ; n th ^ fc , ' pthcr ' one of proyi ^ iig tl |« it tlie instruction , tho cdqcfttion pf the people , should be in a bet ' tpr state than it now is . ( Hear , hear . ) '' t « n » ephvinepdj that if after a meagre of thiajkjnd , in another pesaiqn of Parliament , thie Howee shall consider , U » c incana of establishing a really national wstem of ciluciition , \ hey will
cqnfcr one of tlie greatest blcssmgs which can bq conferred upon this country ( hear , hear ); n measure for which , I be-H ( jvo , the people arc , n , owalmo 8 t prepared ( hear , hear ) ; , and which , after further diacuasion , f 4 o trust might be carrip )} with very nearly a general apsenjt . ( Hear , hcar ^ « uj d cheers . ) ( I do not prpppse now ,, however , to en't ^ r further into this subject ; I have stated t \\ k general provisions of the bill that I propose to introduce ; and I rejoice that in this time of quiet and tranquillity ( hear , hear ) wcoan fairly consider tltat we are not acting under compulsion of any sort ( hoar , hoar ) , that we are not obliged by any clamour to introduce this measure ( hear , hear ) , out that wo do it in the bumble and earnest hope that we may contribute
something toJhe jw ^ rt *^ glory of our countrv n , cheers . ) K j ^^ Z * > : / ¦ . , . .-. . ¦/ . '' [ Loxi l Mr ;^ j ^ tsSDB : fowdWdd . Xosd John Russell aft ? *\ . question nad oert * jtat , regretting the " omissio ns" ft the , speech . $ M ifotilelOTdliad not thought fit to to ° ? etthjeVupon'the l ^ p ^ as far ; .-as it ^^ ' lle shpuld support the measure stfopsr W * iM ^ ied , the disciissioii into another cha - M . ¦ : ;"| t ^ ; B ^ gj ^; ) p ^ n ^ stie ^ both its'fttaess in p 6 te % Itiniip , "jM $ & % mi ^ 'tf :: ^ heiweasuTe as the supposed ^ atisnvJ ^ n of anj pp ^ ular jdemai ^ . He deprecated ^! ett
pha nge ^^ a ^ a ^ c ^^ e ^ tmjew ^ old consti tutipn . of ; -England paying passed liway , a despotism w , ould ar ^ se , as , a , co ^ quen ^ pfdemcKJretic institutions Mr . Henet BEEK ^ i ^ T , npt at . all : inclined to follow the ^ axming , disquisitionMSir : Jo ^ n ; Walsh , approved of . the- ^ genexa ^^ fatjjttgpeti&i the ; absence of the baitptj ^ d < 4 ^^^^^ iAt ^ ipn : Pf moving a clause giv ^ g . V # at p ^ ptectioa Jo ,, thef : TOtei % , Mr . ipapup HpV ^» . P warmly ^ apprpved ,-iof # ietbill . . Sir Robebt IifGilS driew , an . elaborate HSpntiraat between the excite . ment of . pL 83 X an 4 thea « i # ude of 1853 ; dealt a stout
bl ^ ja ^< the ! , piropo ^ ed ;; alteration . of .,, tfo paths- and ger ^ r ^ h ^ ss ^ TOved .: of ^ e measiir ^ . 1 ;; frffir $ fai 0 ^ i $ B , C 5 puld ^^; i « S y approve . He cpuJS npfc ^ hp ^ inueb , ; gppd Jth ^^ &igMaQ , The ger ^ t na ^ deffeGt . pf | h » bill , yrm ^ J $ a { &m of any . pro-YJs ^ : % iteK | ngiJie 1 j ? ote by ballot , ^ hk ^ jte not only i ^ , J abo ^ . rj ^ ast ^^ in ^^ ip / cofEcetiheir w ^ rvpepplfii \ : a $ laijdio ^' ao d ^ )^ r ^ . ji } 0 ip ; tQ : ha , ye rempve 4 J > hft otemptation ^ aiid the power from both 0 assei ! . ^ T > evJ ^ vote w-as about ^ as , . mch ^ dej ^ was vp ^ i
brtbe ^^ tp arid ^ | h ^ tensipii p f the franchise , thei Mpble lord wjob bouiid to give the baHpti Mr . Bright -cri ^ g ^ ; &e . hfrmehise qualificatipnsj and complained ^ that ini attempting to maintain th «; balance ;<^ fi pow& / oi ? . iht ^ aasts ; ihe noble lord ^ wteuldonly ^^ maintainithei ? dead Ipcl ^' iinder ^ vhicli his fgoverrtment iwould ? b ^^ ui « We r to march .- "He would not ; get k Hotefe i £ Cbni ^ piBA ? wbJfih- ' represented tlte comitry , -bto ^ a Hb « H 3 e lii a' ^ toilar' position to ; that in which tKeynpVp w ^ -4 ^ ablq fe :: ap ; that ;\^ ch the peopleinsisted on havingdbnfe . ' ¦ ' ti ^ ' coniludmg seiitence ^ r ^ m ^ kabl ^ " . ' W ;* r ? l * M ^ vr ? . - . ^ - -. ; :- , ¦ ¦^
; "^ e wag gjad xthat ither ^ ajl ^ ojt ^ at all—that the noble : lord ; h ^ . pi » ip 6 Sied . ^ n ; Men&ion of political rights to some chisses hitherto unre ^ irfesentfi ^ an ^ - he beUered . inrlu > , cppsei !^ i « , . . ^ t 7 1 that , ^^ W [ o who most ipyeA i hisiounfe ; jawl wajai " W ^ a / iiipus to suppflrt ahefmiuniiun its Mi $ tipus , / 6 M ^^ i < i t ^ n ^ l ^ icidioi lioy in ^ , ' afpme wneii there was no gV 6 al jpolitital ei 6 ite ^ rit , Volunteered a , fiibasure which , although'it did ^ iiot al % ( rt"her ' iye 6 t W ^' views , wdiild yet leaveUtid ' representation : ^' of . thtf , cot ( ntry in ; a better anj more •/ fiatisfactory 7 Jicondltipfi than it was at present . ( Cheers ^^ V ; i- . , •• . ' ^ ¦ ¦ . . ¦ ¦ . ¦ ¦ 11 1 : . ?¦/¦ . « ¦ . ¦ ' ( . ^' .. - .. ; - ¦ ¦ ¦¦ •¦ ¦¦ ¦¦
, 'Mr . Bright did riot pt all damage the Minister in Ins speech ; but he > vasfolldwe 5 M a / epeiaKer from tbe " Tbi ' y cainp ;** who : kttaelced " tKb iheaisure in flank , and , by unsparing liberal criticism from a Tory point of * vie \ y , ! laid bare its' J gto&t ^ dJftfcdWi ^? to& ** A its vast deficiencies . ; MV- - JUfjxin' TMernfcer $ tc ; InvernessnWSv m ^ oV boi ! ev ^ . fe TOiorm'Bill , " in the
extended Btihse ' df * the term , * was either necessary or required ' at the preset Tnbmenii / but the First Minis er had ddcided tile question' . by ' 'decWing that it was desJrjiVlb to increase / ttfe' tiowbr'bf the dern ' ocracy ; ' an " having made that' d 6 cl | ratl 6 n ; ite dught , at least , to Imvi 3 i > eon prepared ib brih ^ fdrward a Measure catoilatcti to give « tttKfUcti 6 n tb tho ^ e who woreJustly atssatisfied with thih ^ us thev ' were . There was ono 1
dofbet which would of itself prevent . this measure trom beepjiqirig porinatient—there ; Was « 0 . provision for Bhortenhig th < j aurat ' Jon of pariiahiiJhts . ' Tlib ' S * tennuj Act ihfllctiid a great blow oh the democracy , inw was ' * 6 s 8 dt >« nlly a Whig mfeiwttre . " By : removing tiw fbar of tlioii * constituents from tho eyes of menibcis , they very bftoh pursueel a very dif&retit course at ^ t » commeriiceineht of a Wew parliamont to what * n jf ndbptqd ufc the ebnehision cf an Pld One . « Hq wighfc ' jif itw ^ necossary , i ^^ atc this by- nnmorous examples , but he should content , hiro& clt . win * staiicing the course noW pursued W th ^ noble lord Jnnis - The noble lord yas aXiberal , W rep resented a inre cohstitiiCncy . , Now , the Hduse would rwnemUer 1 ' for the first four yriars ^ 6 f tho present ParUament , »» « * Mtfhll llift mMnW f « v Mnn ^ nun h » A nlUlliallV brOUg » * " '
with great ability and with great moderation , the q" ^ J of reform , and upon every ocbasion Imd been flrnuy might say ob 8 tinately-4-opposed by t * ie Government . * noble lord would enter into no compromise ; ^/ Jf ^ lLty sparing in his sarcasms upon his hon . friend ana tne r ^ of which ho was tho head . ( hear , hear ); « nd 1 l * . i : Tthfl intimation that a Reform BiU was to bo broug ht in « v of Government . ( Hear , hear . ) Such was the P 08 r t rh | t the question wp to the la « t wttiog of Pnrii « aae »^
Untitled Article
HISTORY OP PARLIAMENT .
Untitled Article
142 : ' t& $ :. ' 3 ^ -A& : $# ^ ::-- G ^ ctrday ,
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Feb. 14, 1852, page 142, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1922/page/2/
-