On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
of noting the differences of degree , and thus founding a science of Comparative Psychology , as we at last have founded a science of Comparative Physiology , we have shirked the inquiry , and even indignantly rejected every attempt to appreciate the mental characteristics of animate . For all the phenomena manifested by Man we have a dignified explanation summed up in the word Soul ; for similar phenomena manifested by Animals we have another phraseequally comprehensive and equally
, vague , Instinct : and having thus named them we believed we had explained them , —having marked a difference in the terms we concluded there was an equivalent difference in the facts . How unscientific this procedure is need not be pointed out . Its main source lies in that erroneous method" of beginning Euclid with the twelfth book , i . e ., of always beginning with Man , the most complex and difficult of studies , instead of proceeding upwards from the simpler forms of animal life and intelligence .
Last week we pointed out the ascending complexity of Life , beginning with the Plant , —passing through the Plant-Animal ( Zoophyte ) to the simpler forms of Animals and upwards to Man—in each stage of the ascent the Vegetative or Organic Life ( which forms the basis and starting point of the whole series ) gradually losing its predominance , which is gradually gained by the Animal or Relative LiTe . But in no case does the Vegetative Life disappear ; it forms the basis of Man no less than of the Zoophyte . Now , it is quite clear to us that a parallel series of ascending complexity in the manifestations of Mind should he drawn out
by Pyschologists . Till that is done the philosophy of Mind must fall a victim to the haughty incapacity of Metaphysicians , and their pretensions to " analysis . " They , indeed , will regard such investigation with something of the superb pity felt by John Hunter ' s friends when they heard of his " wasting his time" in the dissection of snails and worms , little suspecting the flood of light which would be let in through that crevice upon the whole study of Man . What we have described as the Ascensional
Method , that is to say , the following of Nature in her varied ascents , from the simple to the complex , from the homogeneous to the heterogeneous , from the general to the specific , is , we believe , a philosophic process which needs application to all departments of science , and a process which scientific men are gradually jearniug to appreciate . As an example we would refer to Professor Agassiz ' s luminous suggestion of a new principle of Classification in Zoology . On comparing the characters of fossil fishes especially with a view of ascertaining their natural relations to the living types , he was struck with the fact that those of earlier ages presented many structural peculiarities which occur only in the embryonic conditions of the fishes of our days .
This led him to infer that embryonic data might be advantageously applied to the correct appreciation of the natural relation of the various members of one and the same family , and , perhaps , also to the determination of the relative position of closely allied types . We refer our readers to Jameson's Philosophical Journal ( vol . 50 , p . 22 / , sq . ) for the striking illustrations there given of einhryological changes as a foundation of natural classification ( and at the same time furnishing irresistible evidence of the doctrine of progressive development ) , our present purpose with the essay being simply to point out its bearing upon the general principle of following nature ' s order , and ascendiny from lower to higher forms , if we would understand the liii / her .
It is well tsaid in Todd and Bowman ' s admirable Physiological Anatomy of Man ( the completion of which ia urgently demanded ) that " a power of perception and a power of volition together con-Htitute our Mimplcst idea of Mind ; the one excited through certain corporeal organs , the other acting on the body . Throughout the greatest part of the animal creation mental power exiata ranging fro in thin itH lowest degree— -u state of the blindest iinstinct prompting the animal to Heareh for foodto the docility , sagacity , and memory of the brute ;
and to itH hi tf heut statu , the reasoning powers of man . " The only way to investigate thi « ascending Horiew i « to trace the upward development of the nervous Hystein . The Plant assimilates , grown , reproduces—but does not feel , and cannot move itself . Sensation and locomotion , the first rudiments of animal life , are been to becomu more and more perfect us the organism becomes more complicated , « . * ., an the nervoua Byntem becomes more elaborate . The earlier forma of mental manifestation we name Instinct : the more
complicated formB , Intelligence ; but as the Nervous system is specifically nervous , whatever may be the amount of concentration in its central masses ( ganglia ) , so Mind is specifically Mind , whatever may be the intensity or variety of its manifestations . Man shares with the brute a twofold life—vegetative and animal ; he also shares with the brute a twofold mental action—instinctive and rational . In the ascending series , we see animal life encroaching on the supremacy of vegetative life , and ia like manner we see Reason gaining predominance over Instinct . The similarities of the nervous systems in animals and man give correponding
qualities ; the differences of their nervous systems give different qualities ; and the physiologist who calmly compares the two , must admit that there is no essential distinction , there is only distinction of degree . To escape this conclusion , we know but one way , and that is with Descartes to assume boldly that Brutes are Machines 1 Mr . Thompson in his Passions of Animals , haa collected a quantity of material for which the psychologist will be grateful ; but we must at the outset declare , that the book is nothing but the merest collection of facts and anecdotes , put together
without any idea of arrangement , and betraying a most unphllo 8 ophical mind . In the Introduction , he indulges himself with a feeble excursion , into speculative fields ^ we warn the read er to diligently skip it . At the commencement he makes a false move by citing Scripture as his authority for the fact , that man was the only being intended to be capable of reason and reflection ; a false move , because it is absurd to make Scripture a test of scientific questions , unless we intend to go whole lengths , and denounce Astronomy and Geology as heresies . But Mr . Thompson is not always so intelligible when left to himself . At page 7 we are told , that " although we can find no indication of intellectual faculties" in brutes , yet we cannot deny
that some of them " possess a surprising degree of intelligence , combined with memory , purpose , and the power of discrimination . " If intelligence is not an indication of an intellectual faculty , of what is it an indication ? If memory , purpose , and discrimination are not intellectual faculties , what are they ? But , in truth , Mr . Thompson himself , when he ceases arguing , and confines himself to the simple statement of facts , repeatedly assures us that animals have intellectual faculties ; not io mention the whole scope of his work , which shows that animals have all the faculties of man ! In giving instances of animals dreaming , he says , they afford ' the strongest grounds for the assertion that animals possess an inward sense , analagous to the faculty of the soul . "
The Passions of Animals is , nevertheless , a fascinating book . There are few persons so dead to the wondrous mystery of life around them , as not to be eager listeners to all that can be told them of Natural History ; and as to the intelligence of animals , their tricKa and contrivances , their instincts and affections , no man finds a more pleased and willing audience than he who can narrate his anecdotes of such things . We listen to Jones when
he relates a story of his dog ' s sagacity , and are far more interested in it than when Jones becomes autobiographical , and enlarges upon his own eminent capacity . Mr . Thompson has here given us a goodly store of anecdotes . He has classified them too under separate heads ; and generally confines himself to the simple narration , without indulging in comment or rhetoric . For those who wish to investigate the subject scientifically , his book will afford an abundance of materials ,
easy of access ; and if read in conjunction with the luminous and truly scientific essay On Animal Instincts and Intelligence ( recently published in " Chambers ' 8 Papers for the People" ) , which will furnish a point of view from whence the facts may be contemplated , we can promise the student a delightful and instructive investigation . Those who only need an amusing book , will find it one of the most amuding . The difficulty of extracting passages from such a book ih to know where to stop ; we will only give two or three here , reserving for our Notes und Extracts several passages to bo given from time to time : —
" Then ; is a notorious instance on record of a dog , which ( dipping its collar at night , roamed round the adjoining lielda und worried the sheep , and" ufterwartlH wanhiijg itn jttw « in a utream , rtriurued honw , r « udjuHti : d ita collar , and keeping within itH kennol , throw off HUHpicioti . Here we have not only impulse , but « lflo a multiplication of actions arising from inward power auMliuttJ . li £ « uc « , unaccompanied by -perception , or tho iteration of uny outward agency .
Aa orang-outang , in Paris , when left * tome 7 ^ T ~ tried to escape , and as he could not reach the ! v ^* his door , lie carried a stool to the spot , whiri , k ? removed , lie took another , * nd motmtrne ™ u 8 newed his efforts . Keason only could hare tmJ . ' * ; tiiis act ; rad , besides , thew a » t have beSTE ? bmation of ideas to have enabled it to get thl * i to assist itself in opening the lock , to copy 4 ^ had seen its keeper do , namely , to unlock the dn « and to move a stool about as it wanted it . " ' Stories of the sagacity of elephants are endless here are two which imply complicated processes of thought : — *
" Another elephant that was exhibited ia Londn was made to go through a variety of tricks and among them that of picking up a sixpence with its trunk ; but on one occasion the coin rolled near a wall beyond its reach . Ab the animal -was stul ordered to get , it paused for a moment as if for consideration , and then , stretching forth its trunk to its greatest extent , blew with , such force on the money that it was driven against the wall , and was broueht
within reach by the recoil . An officer in the Bengal army had a very fine and favourite elephant , which was supplied daily in his presence with a certain allowance of food , but being compelled to absent himself on a journey , the keeper of the beast diminished the ration , of food , and the animal became daily thinner and weaker . " When its master returned , the elephant exhibited the greatest signs of pleasure ; the feeding time came , and the keeper laid before it the former full allowance of food , which it divided
into two parts , consuming one immediately , and leaving the other untouched . The officer , knowing the sagacity of his favourite , saw immediately the fraud that had been practised , and made the man confess his crime . " These axe remarkable facts illustrating—TENACITY OF LIFE . " Among the lower animals this faculty is the most remarkable in the polypi ; they maybe pounded in a mortar , split up , turned inside out like a glove , and divided into parts , without inj ury to life ; fire alone is fatal to them . It is now about , a hundred years
since Trembley made us acquainted with these animals and first discovered their indestructibility . It has subsequently been taken up by other natural historians , who have followed up these experiments , and have even gone so far as to produce monsters by grafting . If they be turned inside out , they attempt to replace themselves , and if unsuccessfully , the outer surface assumes the properties and powers of the inner , and the reverse . If the effort be partially successful only , the part turned back disappears in twenty-four hours in that part of the body it embraces , in such a behind
manner that the arms which projected are now fixed in the centre of the body ; the original opening also disappears , and in the room of feelers a new mouth is formed to which new feelers attach themselves , and this new mouth feeds immediately . The healed extremity elongates itself into a tail oi which the animal has no « r two . It two polypi be passed into one another like tubes , and pierceo through with a bristle , the inner one works its way through the other , and comes forth again in a ew days ; in some instances , however , they g ™ w tofccthcr . feelers surround the > mourn
and then a double row of If they be mutilated , the divided parts grew tet " again , and even pieces of two separate "divid ^ will unite into one DO . , onfnorlive a long time after , the loss of some f ^ f , ™^ tion of their bodies . A Carabus granu a us Jj seen to run without a head ; and a Cerceris , c t . ^ of its head at the moment it was inBertinB t ; nlie j its the cell of a bee , to deposit its eggs , contin attempt , and turned back ^ it after it was placed of opposite direction . Crickets will live to **™ iours days without heads , and will linger for eeverai , ^ when deprived of their entrails ; and wasps w niiuu ucuuvtu ui n »«^»« ^ .. — . . j j
tempt to Kting after their bodies are dwjjjj wC fina " Ascending higher in the animal woru ^ ^^ that reptileB , und many Bpeciea ol fl * . n , erb j , illy the most violent injuries . -kels art- V viUllity difficult to kill ; and the shark V ™*™*^ after every cruelty has been heaped » P . > " \ s heyon A " The tenacious power of life in the w _ h fay thc measure extraordinary ; it is neither am vhcn exhauBtion of an w-pump , n « v : £ n c ritatu * 1 »» frozen into a solid maas . The lriton cr ^ , , the power of reproducing parts und join ^ it ha « been deprived , and even an eye ., pixt ; , nes feet have been known to replace themst b eB in the course of one summer » o that . on 1 | llft be were reproduced . If tho ^ dujnandra U Btand i » g ° deprived of ita head , the trunk remain * a { itn feet , und turiiB on being touched . 1 ftboU
which the brain hu « been aD' 1 * " ^ " ' thoir *» y . *» - for months with cloeed eyes , fee J »* g ^ t a he-dhave survived for twenty-three duyn wxti
Untitled Article
THUS IlKAtJTIBB « ' " ^^ Ln a * W * Tkr / W . J-o . lta . uu . and Collected « f the «*•** % **«• ** . . * volB . iSi ! cona Natioem ) iDioI i IUvino in a former article expreseod our
Untitled Article
1114 1 Rt ) t % t& * bt % * TSAfD ! lDAY
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Nov. 22, 1851, page 1114, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1910/page/14/
-