On this page
-
Text (3)
-
December ?5, 1852.] T H E h EADER. U^l
-
TIII<].lATWST,H)vSITl<>N <W THK CyjlAN ,...
-
AMERICAN SOUVENIRS OF NAPOLEON III. When...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Mr. Disraeli And His Colleagues. If Mr. ...
tween rich , and poor , influential and uninfluential , en franchised and unenfranchised , are exactly those which he did not condescend to notice . lie has taken a view of Enffli ^ HsOeieW & ccoi * a in £ ;' tb a scientific ni ^ tiidd , but It , isf artificial ; and the measures which , He has frariaed ' o ' n that view h ^ ve , broken to pieces simply beqause tjiey did not ; a pplj . Th $ r w 6 te nptf toeasives , but toy ' s ^ ; ; It is only ; in this yf & y ¦ tha ^ fte can a ^ c 6 unt ' f ^ r , the peculiar selection ; whieh he mad . e , ' el , rising Statesman , ' iii allying himself to the iProfce'ctip ' riist
party , wMcfj . Was td him a' " territorial" ^ Mocracy / ' although it Was without any , pow ^ r fcut oymir & ti % \ land arid thf kfluejrice of health . The miktake ; ' ' ho ^ eVei ? ,, which to a mind so tech ! nologi ( ial as liisj was" as e ' asity macfe as a slip of the penV'ipvc ^ resii . e sacrifice' bf a political life ;' ~ Bf yirrae of ttidfc mistake , 'he has * c & iried liispeemiar' fadtilfies tO a . ' niaj-ket where they are * n 6 t appreciated . ' Bte lias taken Ms razors into the busi ^ e ^ s 'pfstpne & asbnry , and thb te ^ ult is tB be gathered' ftom thetacoheefiiea evidences of imperfect' alliance * between himself arid his colleagues . The only man of real coniniandirig ability' $ iin ' on & ist them , Ms ' colleagues ? but half tue uiboiuuhuxib
adoptea nun . -iney accepted drawn on ' tie' other' Sidie betWeri him , as " ' ttie ad- ' versWy of' Sir' Robert Peel , - and theriisi elves . Althoujrhiliord ' Berby had' undertakeri to staid ; or fall Vy ^^ firiancial t >< # icy " oflus '' < 3 & vetome'iit , there is "iM % W sMhte ^ % roof 'Wit' lie ^ ks'in intim ' ate rMiiBn ^ iih His Chah 6 e | l 6 r of , We E ^ chetiukrT and man ^ stpriesr ciirreht " $ ; ' the poHticafworld ' ifloieiite / tney % 1 $ reverse ;'' The # uT ? lie may % 'left' to ctfniectTii ' e t » Mr . ' © Israeli ~ # is
" a person' *^ calledm to frame a Budget , afc a carpentef % i ^ be called fn 'fofrariie a | box , md that he / was viewed with ' the same aiierialtibn by the polite circle around himafc t' p . e working man would . ' 'be liT a parfcy , 6 f la ' diesi arid gentlemen . His ownlariguage might be understood to echo that suggestion . In ' apologizing for' his last slashing speech on Friday night , lie threw out a hint that ' helra ' dto bear the brunt of tHe contest alone . With the generous exception of Mr . Wat
pole , and some minor formal tributes to his abilities , there does not appear to have been any hearty support from amongst his late colleagues . The cuts which he levelled at his antagonists were not more bitter than those backhanders which he dealt' at his own friends . He evidently counts Protection ariiongst the '' obsolete pdlicie s / ' and he proclaims itsVunsuccess . Author of the policy by which Ministers were to stand or fall , it does not appear that he was able to dictate the time of their capitulation . lx > rd Darby , who seems
to have . taken no trouble in the matter ; settled the surrender at his own convenience and very little thought seems to have been cast on the loss of the opportunity to that Statesman who had made the opportunity . And yet' it in fcaid that Mr . Bisrach remains faithful to his party—that is to say , that he is still going to work for that party which cannot support him * which cannot appreciate his refinements , wluoh cannot secure Jam his rewards ! He , condeBcends ! to associate with men amongst whomhois a person , " to , take rank under a
, , man who , can resort , to the vulgar bullying of Lord Derby , and to bd almost of less auxsount than that reoklesft "W . B-, " who , does not know how to ihid , e his : pal toy electioneering manojuvres , jor to acknowledge thc ^ m when detected . Disraeli and I ) # rby may bo placed in exact oontraat . In a burst of pasBJon , Pisraeii assailed all roiuid ^ trans ^ yoaa ^ d . the ruloa of parliumewtory decorum , but anado his power feJt at every blow ; then recororing , with an avUatio hoxiho of go () d in
taste , ho performs the latjt , duties of aMunuttnaniuouncixig iiis I resiana , tion with mmphcity and self-poBsepBioxi ,, and cloHiefl with a graceful apology for Juh mi « Uk (> . Ilia Chief inverts that ordor . Indifibront -oiiher to tluv opportunity or ho Ins opponont $ , contributing notlimH io ^ ho MiiUntorial puaition imMujtay jwotlxllingitJiLrcutH that Jjo kIiuII resign ,, ho porforinis hiri laafc aot irt a burHti , of vulgar , anger , and rowndly oonfowBOH Ihat liio rergajedH -. thfi ' nedewHity of wsi ^ nation uh h puraoiial aflroni . i
December ?5, 1852.] T H E H Eader. U^L
December ? 5 , 1852 . ] T H E h EADER . U ^ l
Tiii<].Latwst,H)Vsitl<>N <W Thk Cyjlan ,...
TIII <] . lATWST , H ) vSITl <> N < W THK CyjlAN , ; ¦ ¦ , ¦ . AFFiAil-K . ¦ ' ! ' : ¦ PmsarnibT Fn . r'MOTfui ' H me ^ 4 « o t » tli'W AttwrwMi OongrosM dlHoloHOrt tho aotii ' ul TiOB | lion (> f | , h « Unittxl § lwtii » towitrdW Ojilia ; and ( , | ibH 0 ' . Wur'omAin powers' whibh' haVo l ) C « n endcuVorii ^ ng tl > foreoleeo tho ctoi 6 f t ^ o Ainwlcftua on that i ^ ldttd .
The dispute with the Captain-General , respecting the admission of the Crescent City steamer , was but an episocle in a long-continued question ; and the Presiderit' 6 message shows us that , while that episode'has riot been brought to any satisfactory conclusion , the general question of Cuba remains open , by th ! e express will of tiie United Stated , in drderto itk 6 wri rilterior , freedom of action . It is prWbable tKat the' CY ' eicent ' di ^ episdde mi ^ ht have been closed , if 'the proua Government of Spain hatd cpncedled sufficient authority to its dificer governing the island ; but he oaniiot treat with iorfeij ^ n powers , and thUB the Captain-G-eneral'eannot arrange the admission of steamers with the' President of the United States . So
mueii . the wo ^ se for him arid Government . ' TEe rebuff given to England and France is more serious in its meaning , "Jj ' etus observe that in ' ¦ Speaking' of England , \ V 6 ' qopy that Hcenbe which substitutes ; thb-name of' our country for certain bfiicial people in Downing-street , who are the real parties to the transactions i ^ . Question . Early in thie present year , official nqtes were received from ' thfe ministers of IFrarice ^ rid England , inciting tlie ' Govei ' ninent of the United States to jpiii in disclaiming , , now and for |;! he future , all intention to optfiin possession , of the island of Cuba . ' , Th ' e jriVitatji or ^ ' must be regarded' ' a ^ . a cool brie . France , governea . ' by an usurper , is riot
exactly the State coiripeteial ; to decide between the' ' rights of posdes / sibn or ; l , %$ iniacy ; and En ^ - larid 'ri ^ igHt have known hette ; r . than , to make ' sb ; simple proposition ^ 'Th e' qortfesporidence r '< ! ceri'tly ptLblisfliedj , ^ thoug h not completed bv the apperi ., dix '" whicK we believe ' 'to ' ¦ exist , sliows that ever since 1822 , the continued possession of Cuba "by Spain has been a matter of doubt , and even of discussiori ' l That correspondence , and its appendix , hare bpen closed , and it would have been far better to let the matter rest , than by inviting an
idle 'disclaimer , to provoke the distinct refusal of the American Government . The refusal is rendered the more significant by the very arguments with which Mr . Fillmore accompanies it against the seizure of Cuba . These arguments show that he himself is opposed to the movement which is taking place within his own country .. He is so opposed to it , that he cannot refrain from recording * his arguments in
his last great official document . Yet opposed to it as he is , we see that lie is unable to '« c ^ upon his own conclusion . He is unable to promise for the United States that they shall not take Cuba ; and when we couple that very proper scruple on his bwr i part , with the facts that he is the « cctdental President of the Union , that he is the President of a beaten party , and that he is' about to surrender tho Government to a man elected by a
party entertainin g tho very opposite views , we perceive that 'his pleading proclaims the losing cause . Ho is ' a " reluctant ' witness that the determination to take Cuba is not to be resisted . In England this' subject has been discussed too much from an English point of view . Because , with our convictions at the present mormmfc ; it would be wrong in us- to seize a foreign Statewe ' doing'so , nevertheless , in practice—wo hold
that tho Americans must be equally wrong , and wo presume that they must do ho through sheer grasping and dishonesty . Now the fact is , that a liirgo amount of earnest political zeal , almost a political fanaticism , engages a great proportion of the Americana moving in this matter . Thby arc for extending their institutidns , not only to exfult thtfirown country , but to benefit the people wlu > rcweivo them ; And recent exporienco 1 ms
justified that pTopagnndiHin . The American mniikutions arc a boncifit to the coimtrioa who receive them ; ' and they aro viewed with eyos of dnvy by Stilton more distant than Cuba . The roeently published corresjioiulcnco hIiowh that thorn haH long btjon in Cuba a party desiring unioii -with a Htafco whore every citizen in i ' veo , jiinl Vvh (? ro ' ent'erprino prospers . ' CorrospomloTico now ]> vibliHhod in t / ho New York licraM'YvlhittM fch <> gi'and protekt of many
" . KnglisiHYVciii - for resiHtitig tho univeTcntionof Cuba -M / ho luitioti that il wottld faoilitato tho hIjivo ( imdcj wIhWih tho vwy r ( TvorR ( t is true , linden * tho oxistfHg ' giivornm ' ent of Cuba , tho slavo'ti * tvdn i « now prbeetnlinK nt a rapid piico . Tho forf < 6 itur « of nn Atnei « imn Hhip , in thd lFnit ( i < l 8 tat « ri , for tho crirnoof Holling it to tho Hlavo trado , contrasted with tho dealing of tho Cuban (« ovem - mont , if not the ( lovornniont of Madrid , in that tralWc , Hhowfl on which wido lies tho ttlncero ttesiro for Blavo-tradc extinction . Thoro can be no doubt
that if Cuba were annexed to the United States , the external slave trade would cease from that day . The English arguments , therefore , can have but little weight in America , where their fallacy is perceived and daily illustrated by facts ; and where tne position of our Government can be ascribed to nothing but a desire for hostility with the great Republic , whose alliance would pe the most valuable to us . So President Ei | lmore ' s arguments against propagandise ! of free' institutions read like the lecture of a man retiring into private life , and , conscious that he speaks to deaf ears . In fact , the American Republic is strong ; it has the ambition to make its power more widely felt ; and it only awaits the opportunity .
American Souvenirs Of Napoleon Iii. When...
AMERICAN SOUVENIRS OF NAPOLEON III . When Louis Philippe was at the height of his power , he received , accommodating himself to the situation with his usual ease , a visitor who might have embarrassed other men—an _ American lady , whom he had formerly , but vainly , invited to be Mrs . Louis Philippe , and who must have survived all regrets , if she ever had any , at not being in Queen Amelie ' s place . Louis Napoleon may , perhaps , be called upon to entertain , from the same country , ano ther guest ,. not ' so' easy to bow out . In recalling associations so pleasing , we might have hesitated to allude to this possible visit , had not the cirqii ' mstarices been published by the Brooklyn Daily Advertiser , the editor of which knew Louis" Napoleon during his residence in New York many years ago . The writer is very specific in his recollections : —
" At that time he , " that is , Napoleon III ., now by the grace of God , Emperor of the French , " very poor and "—we write it respecting a royal person with great regret—" very dissipated . " We may , indeed , entertain some doubts respecting this assertion , since it is notorious , not only that royal persons never are dissipated at all , but that they never can have been anything but virtuous , —can have done anything that should throw- discredit on " the grace of God . " We may remember , however , that it is only an American who writes this monstrous assertion ; and
he proceeds , with republican rudeness : — " He , " that is , the Emperor , " was notoriously p rofligate in his habits . He lived in a lodginghouse in Eeade-street , then kept by a gentleman who now occupies a high official position under the French Government . " Such are theups and downs of life S The lodging-house keeper is
now glad to accept the favour of his poor tenant , for the lodging-house keeper is exalted amongst men , and the poor tenant has become the Dictator of a great gtatb . But let us proceed -. — - " Notoriously profligate in his habits , and without the pecuniary ability to indulge to the full bent of his inclination , the culpable propensities which characterised him , he was" —it becomes agonizing to writo these statements respecting a real emperor— " frequently expelled from certain places in which he obtruded himself . " Parisians , who havo witnessed tho most striking of all obtrusions , will hear of those expulsions with surprise ; but this wo must remember , Louis Napoleon was formerly dealing with Americans .
" And more than a dozen times , " proceeds the American editor , "ho was tho occupant of a cell at the old tfaol in tho Park . " Hero the Yankeo libeller betrays the cloven foot . It is true , that writers havo said , even in Prance , that Louis Napoleon was once in a prison at Ham , for a discreditable' and Hanguinsvry riot at Boulogne , where ho coolly and gratuitousl y shot a lieutenant with his own hand ; but wo all know how falso
those things are : Ham is not in France , but is a little village in the neighbourhood of'Richmond , iu England , and there is no prison near it ; and the Htory of Boulogne is about jis true as the victory which Uio English claim at Waterloo . "Wot long prior to his leaving tho United States , " continues our Amorienn editor , " he was eomnnUod bhim
arrested " . for a iniwjemonuoiir y at the . liaroputablo house of a woman whoso establishment he often visited ; and tho wntor of Uli « article was employed professionally by him to save liim from tho threatened oonwquoiM ' -OB of lus reoldoHHiiosfl and indiscretion . " < ) f course hi * Imperial Mmjesty cannot remember those thingri . They havo been cancelled by tho Second of Doc < Mi > l > er . Tho . Iftmpftror dates from . Deeranbor , 1852 , and Loiiih Napoleon was but tho grub of tho Emperor moth .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Dec. 25, 1852, page 11, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_25121852/page/11/
-