On this page
-
Text (5)
-
April 25 ^ 1g57.j__ THE LEADER. 401
-
Of the twelve articles in the 'current n...
-
We have too long delayed to oifcr a hand...
-
It may be observed that any new phenomen...
-
THE LIFE OF SIR CHARLES JAMES NAPIER. Th...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
The Anniversary Of Shakspeaee's Birthday...
word is as old as the language itself , being found in the translation of Higden ' s chronicle by Trevisa . —a contemporary of Chaucer—who , however , writes before the Canterbury Tales were begun . As this is the earliest prose chronicle in the language , and the passage refers to Richard II ,, whose name is just now on every one ' s lips , we will extract a sentence or two . After describing Bolingbroke ' s landing at Ravensburg , Trevisa says , in explanation of the -welcome lie received , " For the people were so oppressed with the officers of King Richard , that '" almost all the commoners of the land were ready to await on the Earl of Derb y , hoping to be relieved by him . Incontinent tidings came . to King ; Richard , being in Ireland , how he was landed , and that the commoners drew fast to him . Anon he made him ready and came over sea to England , with all his host , and arrived in Milford Haven . "
Sir William ' s letter is further curious from its allusions to the customs and superstitions of the country people ; but having said so much about it already , we must leave its further consideration to the students of Siiakspeare , who will be sure to appreciate it as a valuable contribution to the materials already collected for illustrating the poet ' s era and history .
April 25 ^ 1g57.J__ The Leader. 401
April 25 ^ 1 g 57 . j __ THE LEADER . 401
Of The Twelve Articles In The 'Current N...
Of the twelve articles in the ' current number of the North American Review * the most noticeable are those on cc Ruskin ' s last Volume , " and "Oliver's Puritan Commonwealth . " The writer of the former manages to infuse fresh interest into the well-worn discussion touching Classical and Romantic Art , by extending it beyond the narrow limits to -which it is usually restricted , and connecting it with a philosophical inquiry as to the general relation of Axt to Nature . The discussion . of . the latter point , however , is vague and unsatisfactory , the conclusions arrived at being purely negative . The paper on " Oliver's Puritan Commonwealth" reviews a work which must be a novelty in American literature—an elaborate history of the early Government of Massachusetts , written entirely from the Cavalier and Royalist point of view , in ¦ which the
heaviest charges are brought against the Puritan founders of tlie state . The author naturally seizes on and exaggerates those questionable acts of the old Common wealth men which policy seemed to dictate and-justify ,, but the work being based on a thorough examination of original documents , is valuable as a contribution to tho history of tho period , and may have its use in helping to keep the balance of historic judgment true . Other readable articles of the number are one on " Holidays , " 'a ... genial-account , of national sports , written : in a philosophic spirit ; a Lively sketch and criticism of " Robert Herrick , " doing justice to . the mirth-loving author of theIlesperides ; a paper on " Contemporary French Literature ; " and one on " Tlie British Essayists , " which , however , is scarcely worthy of the subject .
The Irish Quarterly Recieio opens with a paste-and-scissors article , entitled " Odd Phases of literature , " chiefly remarkable for the , . entire- absence of literary art , and for eccentricit y of literary style , of which t-lic following sentence may serve as an example ; " > 1 . IIabtjrt , of the Academy , author of the Temple de la Mort , which is one of the most beautiful pieces of French poetry , changed and rechauged , during three years , the metre of this work , in ordeithat it might attain the beauty , polish , and elegance , which he ambitionecl . "
Two following papers , on " Suicide : its Motives and Mysteries , " and " The Irish Poor-Law , " are much better . The facts given in the latter seem to show that the legal provision for Irish pauperism has not proved bo entirely successful as Sir G . Nicholls , its historian , imagines . The other articles of the number arc a gossiping one on " The French Opera at Paris ; " along and savage attack on Macaulay as an historian , entitled "How not to Do It ; " and a criticism of the " Church Establishment in Ireland , " headed " The English Folly Fort . "
We Have Too Long Delayed To Oifcr A Hand...
We have too long delayed to oifcr a hand of hearty welcome to a young and vigorous contemporary in Paris , in whose success we have felt a lively and attentive interest . The most hopeful and enduring alliances between nations are those of the head and heart , and we rejoice at every fresh attempt to throw down the barriers erected between nations , and to promote the intellectual and spiritual development of our common humanity . When a Francois Victoh Hugo interprets Siiakspeare to his countrymen in a loving and reverential spirit , we feel that something more has been effected towards a cordial and lasting amity between Franco and England than all the full-dress amenities of diplomatists and even the doubtful osculations of royal and imperial cousins arc likely to accomplish . Emperors vanish , and even Garters slip down ; but the language and literature of two great nations outlive many Garters and many crowns . Tho Great Exhibition of ' 51 did
much to draw England and France closer to each other ; the war gave an outward and visible expression to the feeling , and the deep reaction among the intellectual classes of France in favour of free England since the gross darkness prevailing in Franco , has perhaps above all ' quickened and developed the mutual regard . May it be everlasting ! A . happy idea it was of M . Alk-ionse Lero y , one of those young men of high character mid culture , in whose ardent but chastened aspirations resides all the hope of tho France that is to come—a happy thought , we say , it was to create an organ of close and constant communion between the literatures of the two nations , giving to the French reader a glance at ( he intellectual life of England in all its manifold activity , and to the English reader a brief summary of the literary movement in France . This scheme is well and simply expressed by the tide of his interesting publication , VAlliance LUteraire . It is devoted exclusively to
literature and art ; giving selections from French and English writers ; translations from eithei ' , with occasional notices of new French books , Art and Drama criticisms , a compact and lively column of Talk , and a good advertising sheet of English books . "We have no doubt that as M . A . Lekoy proceeds , he will work out his programme more fully and completely ; a very choice selection is necessary to avoid the defect of meagrcness ; and , by all means , let us have more from his own pen ; his article on Madame Ristobi , in a recent number , makes us angry with him for his too frequent silence in the Alliance Litteraire . We wish him . and his very laudable undertaking an increasing and enduring success . It is an example that deserves to be recorded .
It May Be Observed That Any New Phenomen...
It may be observed that any new phenomenon in London periodical literature is pretty sure to be followed at a not particularly respectful distance ( in point of time ) by a similar phenomenon in Edinburgh . The Leader , we believe , has had its Caledonian imitators , but whether they have' been , ( too much ) 'Scotched—not killed , ' we know not . The other day an admirable volume of Edinburgh Essays appeared as a pendant to the Oxford and Cambridge Essays ¦;• and just now we have received a copy of a new Edinburgh Weekly . Review , based apparently upon our Peelite weekly contemporary published in London . The type and the distribution of the articles , the careful abstinence from the vulgarity of news , and from the prejudice of uniform opinions , appear to be closely followed ; perhaps the politics of the
Edinburgh Weekly Review are more clearly liberal and less politely eclectic than those of our nearer neighbour . If we might , at this early stage of its existence , be permitted to " offer a word of Counsel to our Edinburgh contemporary , it would be—to spare its readers too many opinions in the same number ; not to affect a premature cynicism in politics ; not to exhaust ingenuity in the plausibilities of obstructiveness , under the delusion that Hoia not to do it is an essentially statesmanlike proposition ; not to affect a superciliously lofty tone in speaking of journalism collectively , and indeed , of
all other journalists but those of the Review j not to betray an exclusively Common or Combination Room point of view of public affairs ; not to carp with feeble virulence at the greatest . names in our literature ; not to engage in Quixotic expeditions to put down inconveniently stubborn superiorities;—in short , to follow the obvious example of its London prototype , and to be direct , hearty in sympathy , and generous in tone . One more word of caution : a month's reading for a week ' s consumption is too much of a good thing-, and suggests intellectual dyspepsia . Ne quid nimis , even of Peelite politics and scholarly eclecticism .
The Life Of Sir Charles James Napier. Th...
THE LIFE OF SIR CHARLES JAMES NAPIER . The Life and Opinions of General Sir Charles Napier , G . C . B . By Lieutenant-General Sir William Napier , K . C . B . Yols . III . and IV . Murray . This is a defensive and offensive history , but is not the book that posterity will accept as the biography of the Indian general and administrator—the only great man in the Napier family . Besides being written in the style of the conquering hero , it is exaggerated in all its views ; it is unfair , indiscreet , and reckless . Sir William Napier may rest assured that the Napiers , small and large , will have to prove their titles to military and literaiy fame in a court in which the iNapiers will not sit as judges . In . other words , independent narrators and critics will deal with them and their prowess , and some wronct will be done to the hero of Meeanec if he do not find a more
judicious biographer than his stentorian kinsman . He was himself petulant , fiery , and impetuous ; but a noble simplicity was mixed up with his arrogance ; his headlong irritability was tempered by a sense of humour ; his life and opinions , " however , have fallen into the hands of a soldier who imitates in every paragraph the din of battle and the pomp of processional triumph . At the same time , he is by no means careful to conceal the bitternesses that spring up in tho Indian Napier ' s heart , and sprinkles his puges with scatterings of abuse , acrimony , and personal rancour . The book gains in piquancy what it loses in dignity . In fact , we have never met with four volumes of more goodly reading ; they are full-flavoured , varied , intensely characteristic . Of course the indiscretions of the biographer only render the biography the moi'C original and attractive . But some of Napier ' s writings are painfully virulent .
Tne third volume opens with , the administration of Sindli . All this Indian matter has \ X & peculiar interest ; but we prefer to glean among the personal illustrations and allusions . Those come thick and fast : — " The thanks of Parliament ! Who cares for them ? Not I . To be thanked or reprimanded by Parliament is nothing to me . Tho thanks of Joo Hume , par oxemple , after his Greek loan . I want no thanks from the place-huntora who infest St . Stephen ' s . I care indeed for Peel , and the Duke of Wellington , and Roebuck , and half a dozen fellows having either ability or conscience , but not for the mass congregated tliero . " Tho papers , he said , " would abuse the God Almighty , if he came on earth . " lie himself is formidable in abuse , but his satire is sometimes picturesque ; this is a miniature of Wullee , a hill chief : — " lie is exactly like an owl , with white hair , long hooked nose , great beard , and two enormous black eyes which were fixed on mo without a move or wink till I had done speaking : then ho said to the interpreter , Is it true ? May I go ? Yes ! Up he jumped , ilew out of the room like a bird , and never stopped till ho got to hia hilla . "
He talks of vile editors and blackguard proprietors , calls an article in the lldinbun / h a lying production , written by a man who well knew he was telling falsehoods , complains of scoundrelly factious editors , and pauses to philosophize : — " Whence avo come wo know not ; what wo do wo know not ; what is around us we know not . Merciful God ! what are we ?" " But we have a part to perform in this drama ! yes ! so ha 3 tho bug that bites us !
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), April 25, 1857, page 17, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_25041857/page/17/
-