On this page
-
Text (3)
-
February 23, 1856.J THE LEADER. 181
-
NOBLE DISLIKE TO USEFUL LORDS. "What is ...
-
THE NAWAB OF SURAT AND THE EAST INDIA CO...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Tribunals Of Iotujsthy. Mr. Macklnnon's ...
•^^¦ ¦¦¦^¦¦¦ mmm ™^™™*™™^"""^^™^"""" ^^^^^^^^^" " ¦""""¦" j Should any difference arise it goes before the Thames police-magistrate , who has no absolute legal jurisdiction , but -whose arbitration is all but invariably accepted . Not one dispute in a hundred is carried further . The employer of to-day knows that to-morrow he may be the employed , and thus it is the interest of all to establish a systematic moderation and equity in their mutual dealings . These , however , are but imperfect plans . The carpet manufacturers only listen to the arguments of their workmen ; they do not admit their votes . The ship-riggers happen to be a peculiarly equalised body . But the questions between the great capitalists in the northern and midland counties are more involved and serious , and are even now , we regret to -notice , tending towards a general rupture . It is , in fact , impossible that good feeling shall ever be established between the two classes , until the views of the workmen are as fairly considered as those of their employers . It is intolerable that , while every other class of the nation progresses socially , the mechanic and the artisan should never ¦ enjoy a chance of earning more , or better , than the daily bread by which their families live . There is rising in the minds of the vast and intelligent majority a protest against the absolutism of capital— -that capital in the defence of which army , militia , and police are enlisted . But the conviction is spreading also ^ . 1 _ ^ . 1 . * 1 ~'« 1 . 1- AU 1 A Xi- * a v -m ( iK ' n ^ m n j-k ^» iJ A-Mft 1 * 1 f * 1 TJf \ Lilt lUUuauiLia ± \ aic
^^^^ tliai > JilWitJlHJ ; u kjjl * : jlo , * y ^ sought redress by rude and injurious methods . They have lost moral influence by the parade of physical force ; they have enfeebled themselves by strikes ; they have organised few industrial combinations ; their trades are disunited , their strength is dispersed and frittered away in irregular efforts . In the north the principle of association has to a great extent been recognised ; but in the south and west what are its results ? And yet a mighty power is within the reach of the working classesthe same power by which the middle classes «^ mM _ tan . A J-A A 4 J « ta 1 A v ^ S V 4 > ' | 1 ¦ M W / tXA ^ IWk 4 Y rf"V 'V * f ^ f \^ i SI /*^ T uieu iicMuciiLcii tiuuijlccuwu
^ * ^^ ^ *^ ^ ^ * ^^^ git . jjcii , . y xciuajlu . u » trade . It is said that they contemplate a new political movement . But have they an object ? have they a plan ? or are obsolete cries to be revived by demagogues , " damned to everlasting fame , " by brick-bat agitation ? The subject of industrial tribunals is one that must be presented broadly and in detail to the working classes . We have some hopes that it Avill engage their attention , and that when Mr . Magkinnon ' s Committee has published its report , public opinion will be ripe for the discussion .
February 23, 1856.J The Leader. 181
February 23 , 1856 . J THE LEADER . 181
Noble Dislike To Useful Lords. "What Is ...
NOBLE DISLIKE TO USEFUL LORDS . "What is the House of Peers ? Is is a body created by the Crown . Its members originally sat in the Assembly before ifc had a house , because the Crown wanted their support , or feared them ; but , by degrees ' , the Crown extended this summons to others besides the Lords who held their land by a " service of barony . " The King , called to the Assembly Knights of gentio blood , who becanie " Peers , " or " pares baronum . " By Whitelocke ' s time , most of the Peers were created by letters patent , and scarcely any now exist that are not thus created . At the death of Queen Elizabeth , the number of Peers was 59 ; before the reign of the First George had closed , 154 peerages had become extinct ; from the reign of the First James to the First George , 273 Peers were created ; many have subsequently been placed in the House by the Crown ; and so , to deny the prerogative is to deny the sourco of their own oxistence . If the prerogative is not sufficient , why have we any Peers at all ?
the Crown has created their own House , ana that the patent of creation is a ticket of admission . Let them deny the Wensleydale patent , and what becomes of their own patent ? Manifestly the Lords think to stand upon some separate rights of their own , independently of the royal creation ; but what are those rig hts ? In the early days of the Peerage the Peers sat by the right of power , the most indefeasible of all rights . They were under the King , but practically , and in very fact , the Lords" of the soil , the masters of the inhabitants , the governors of counties , and the House of Peers was de facto a council of the officers of the country . They are now the land-owners by an usurpation , actual property having been substituted for the feudal tenure , which was tenantcy acquitted by military services and contributions to tho State . What has become of that tenure now ? The Crown no longer summons the Lords , existing da facto , Imt it has created before it summoned . Have the Pcore , ceasing to bo identified with the
mim ^^ mmmmmmmmmmmm ^^ mmt ^ ammmma ^ mm ^ tm ^^ mi ^ a ^ m ^ m ^ u ^^^^^^^^^ If any particular restriction has been imposed on the prerogative , there should be a record of it . The Crown has exercised its prerogative in a great variety of ways . Dugdale remarks that by the records it appears that the Lords Temporal were summoned in various ways : some were never called above once ; some twice or more times ; some during their lives , but not their descendants . The creation of life Peers has been repeated in the case of women as late as G-eobge the Second , but there have been restraints on the exercise of the royal prerogative in other respects . Originally , the Crown settled the representation of the Commons . Henry the Eighth found only 147 constituencies returning 296 members ; he gave the right of returning members to the county of Chester , to the town of Calais in France , a few towns in England , and a number of Welsh towns and counties . Edward the Sixth created Grampound and other roughs ; " Leverpool" and Westminster figuring in the same list . Queen Mary continued the work , so did Queen Elizabeth ; and it was James the First who gave tbe representation to the two Universities of Oxford and Cambridge . Thus the House of Commons owes its creation to the Crown "; but the royal prerogative , modified by the Revolution and the Acts of Union , has been distinctly superseded by successive enactments , including the Reform . Bill . In like manner , the creation of Peers and their n ^ rvi ^ c ; : nn * .- « + ii q " HYvnao r » f TvOTfls- has been tfw ¦——
dAJLLU-10 * 91 . V / J-fc 91 \ S WAJi . V- ' ^ - » . v ^ v * -v— —— 7 qualified and restricted , but here the qualifications are partial and specific . The Scotch Lords are elected , for the Parliament and are limited in number ; the Irish Lords are elected by their own body to Parliament for life , but the Crown is restr icted from new creations , except in the proportion of one for every three peerages extinct , until the whole be reduced to one hundred in number . These restrictions upon the prerogative are specific and distinct . Dugdale , Prynne , and Whitelocke have amply traced the earlier growth ~ - ~ A ^^ n ^ i ^ n nf ¦ t-Vick Tvr < 3 vr » rrsj ± , i-O'f > T ? K . YNNE SaVS . ^
^^ ' ^ land , acquired some other title in the affections of the country , in being identified with any of our modern institutions , in being of any peculiar use to the people ? In no respect can the Lords establish any such trfcle . The best they can show is simply that they are members of the House of Lords by creation . Their claim upon their country consists in thenbeing where they are , and acting as they do . Place any man where they are , let him act as intelligently as they do , and he would have exactly the same claim upon the public gratitude . Is it possible to pretend that men of equal intelligence are not to be found outsidethe House ? The Opposition propose to limit the selection of able and useful men to the wealthy . A man ' s power of constructing consistent statutes , they say , of counselling the Crown wisely , and of judging upon appeals , depends , not only on his having a good income for himself , but on his being able to settle an income upon his children . This is judging of the capacity of the present legislator by the income of the successor he is going to have . They propose one expedient for getting over the difficulty . The Grown , they say , must grant only hereditary peerages , but if the succession is a difficulty , they add , besides those who can provide heritable property , the Crown can choose those who will have no children . The capacity of the legislator and the Priw Councillor made out of Judge ,
is tested , in the first place , by the wealth of the peer ' s children , and in the second by his incapacity to have any children ! Baron Parke , they say , is just the man to endow with a heritable peerage , not only because he is a rich man , but because he can ' t have any heirs . The very legists who deny the validity of the " Wensleydale peer-age , willingly recognise that part of Lord Wensleydale ^ claim which rests upon his having no son . This is certainly presenting the House of Lords in a new aspect for the respect and confidence of the public .
CHlll yJX CH- » L \ H-iV »» V / A ujlxvj * j- » . a v * « ,-- * " -- , / / "the King may be said to elect the members of the Lords' House , wheresoever he chooseth any person ( as he may whome he pleaseth ) and createth him a baron ; which he may doe by his writ , or by his letters pattents : and the persons so created are thereby elected by the King ( in effect ) to be members of the House of Peeres in Parlement , and shall enjoy the rights and privileges of a Member of that Hotise . " Even the Peers who have resisted the Wensleydale creation have found themselves unable to deny the right of the Crown to give the title and dignity of a Baron ; but evidently they have as little right to deny that
The Nawab Of Surat And The East India Co...
THE NAWAB OF SURAT AND THE EAST INDIA COMPANY . In the palmy days of Islam , the city of Surat was known to Indian Mahommedans as one of the gates of Mecca . Thousands and tens of thousands of devout pilgrims annually sailed from that port for the holy city . The commercial advantages of its situation were , moreover , so conspicuous and great tha t an English factory was established there at a very early period . And these western adventurers availed themselves of an opportunity to render an important service to their Mogul protector , by repelling an invasion of the Mahrattas someuuuuiv ja l gviinv ^ " ~~
limc in xno « « c B , > v ~^ - About one hundred years afterwards , the civil Governor of the town besought the aid of the English in gaining possession of tlie castle and fleet , which by that time had fallen into the hands of the Mahrattas . At first the Bombay Government hesitated to take a step which might embroil them in hostilities with their powerful and turbulent neighbours . But when British subjects also were exposed to insult and outrage , they could no longer hesitate upon a course rendered necessary as well tor their security as for the maintenance of their dignity . The castle and fleet wore therefore seized in the name of the Emperor of Delhi , whose flag floated from Iho walls , and from the masthead of an English cruiser stationed in those waters . It must be admitted , however , that their vassalage was rather nominal than real They not only undertook the military defence of the place , but they also interfered with itn civil government . They allowed the Nuwab , indeed , to retain hia title and semblance of power , but the actual administration
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Feb. 23, 1856, page 13, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_23021856/page/13/
-