On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (5)
-
.^ 2 g THE L EAP E B. [No. 300, Saturday
-
. ... . , :....* *y •« uD-ttlMt (ILfl till Til ^-p w«- w**?*?•*???
-
IN THIS DEPARTMENT, AS ALIi OPINION?, II...
-
There is no lparn.ed man but. will confp...
-
WHAT SHALL WE GAIN BY THE WAR? (To the E...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Philosophy Of Anomaly. The British Publi...
33 L ? £ 3 S 2 S % 3 ttrSS £ ! SHE Pri £ ^ Whether he is right or wrong , as a matter oSSc , nd fairness , in the prayer of the ^ memorud , is not the question ; even » Prince Consort . is not exnefited to b 0 infallible , and we are not entitled to be very angry shquld he happen to be very much in the wroner . What rexes us is the anomaly . That is what we cannot endure . We are utterly unused to that To be sure there are some odd things in the constitution . A Sovereign without power ; a State Church , which here only embraces half the ' population , and , in Ireland , not a third of the population ; born legislators j a House of Commons , which represents but a email quota of the people ; free and indethe elections
pendent burgesses , and most of conducted by corruption ; a City of London corporation , which has nothing to do with seven-eighths of London ; neld-marshate who never saw a shot fired in anger , or out of the Park—field-marshals incapable of taking the field . Why , it is lather an anomaly to pay jt Prince on becoming the husband of the Queen , who has no power . It is rather an anomaly to have a Prince Consort , paid on becoming the husband of the Queen , refusing to pay taxes on his farms , taking Rangerships of Parks which he seldom sees and colonel of
never superintends , and becoming regiments which never saw him ; such sinecures—and the word sinecure , not strange to English ears , even in these days , suggesting anomaly—being reserved generally for old and worn out and highly meritorious , and not otherwise greatly over-paid public servants , civilians and soldiers . But we are a practical people . Human nature is an anomaly , and English affairs are anomalous ; and we don't tease ourselves about symmetries and theories when we find a thing works . The British constitution works ; therefore we are content
with the British constitution . ¦ Why not be as unscrupulous , and display as much common sense in respect to the Prinee Consort ? His Royal Highness is a magnificent anomaly , an alter ego means the preternatural ; and we ought to make $ ne / best of tern , in the English way . A Prussian ambassador- to this country once said " " When I was in England a month I thought of writing a book about her ; when 1 had stayed six motions I saw that that would not be very easy ; and ¦ wlien I h ? . d been there a year I saw that I could say nothing positively , for that it was rather a difficult country to understand . " How we must puzzle Prince Albert ? Let us consider his experiences , and
we shall find that the wonder is not that he is found n ^ emprdalising the Queen , on the subject of Guards ' privileges , but that he is not ruling at the Horse Guards , and , as chief there , besides being aa alter ego of the Sovereign , tete d ' arme ' e , establishing his will without reference to ' Line' op inion , or public opinion . The concessions made to him have been such that hail he been less strong minded and less sensible than he is , they would have enabled him without noise , without obtrusion , and almost without notice , to have altered the character of the English Monarchy , mad made Queen Victoria what William the Third wasr-rher own Foreign Minister , and her own Commander-in-Chief .
Hi $ threw moving periods of unpopularity have been i Uiider- these circumstances ,. A fussy Lord Mayor in 1952 , backa 4 by a . popular bishop , proposed a statue to Prince AJbert , to be paid fop by public subscription , to be erected in some part of the metropolis not less conspicuous than that disfigured by the ISfelson column , and to be considered as the commemorative monument of the Great Exhibition of 1851 , the whole credit and merit of whioh were unreservedly assigned to the Prince by his too good natured friends . The suggestion was a silliness as respected the Prince , and was an impertinence to the public . But what happened ? Several thousand Bounds were ranturoualv subscribed , the list beine :
headed by those chief men of his notion who ought to frfiye , been guordiuus of public decency and the first to oh , 8 ok these personal pretensions of private power . T ^ e Prinpe declined the premature derni-diviiuty , . ftfter undergoing a hurricane of praise from publio meetings and a , storm of abuse from public papers , Hjiflb next misfortune was , to bo found out in the fopt that he asslBtftd the Queen in supervising Fox-oign Q $ ce . correspondence , and . that , generally , he was , at h > r side when , . she , twras . p , o 1 < e 4 business with her #$ ula . tprar The roar qf $ w preeB and espeoially of 314 tfKuwv
WV f **"* * pi-nw , — , u » ^ jnocvftpjij grounds , at ty 4 a interference of the crown wifcft the ojigarqh y when t & pdiaaavery had been fully elabqrated , Wfta . terrifying , flifli ^ . tke Prjnoo seems tp have oalled the W $ gp $ 9 the SKQ ue , and , while awaiting a constitutional Oeftniftpn , „ . his rights , to have abandoned Jus wife—so far , 0 , 0-WWtt $ > VP « W ° W constitutional court law in divorce tfiWwii ftUqwing h » B privilege $ o laps © with disuse , LppcT ^ Tohn RusaflH in one House , and Lord Aberdeen Ija the other , with Lord Campbell to edit thom both , ftf ed , I & a , ajamopr , adinjfctad the whole oasto , and rather 9 omnl 48 ap , tly o , na inoitingly complimented , tho Prinoe . ftft > OeiWH content with ffrnqtionp bq limited . What renultedr The clamour died away : the Prince ,
conceding nothing , encouraged to advance in hia constitutional approaches , had gained his point ; and , then , most princes would have taken care to turn Whig politeness to account , and annihilated something of the Dogeship of the British Monarchy . Yet there are no signs that he has altered our system , and the facility with which the Queen gave up the happy coalition which her husband was supposed to have been chiefly instrumental in forming , suggests that his Royal Highness' temper and temperament had not been spoiled either by popular inconsistencies or by administrative adulation . On the next occasion of his appearance before the incoherent public tribunal , he had made a speech at the Trinity House . Lord
Palmerston , not yet steadied into his seat , was struggling with military confusion in the Crimea and popular chaos in Parliament ; and the Prince , with considerate kindness to a new friend , pointed out that a constitutional state carrying on war stands in need of great patience and much endurance on the part of the people , since during war absolutism was rather the best form of government . At the moment , this was perhaps a general notion among the unreflecting mass of the public , and the Prince , only checked here and there , was warmly applauded for his outspokenness . Again he appears to have resisted the temptation . Never was a Parliament more' unruly than Lord Palmerston ' s last session ; and yet the Prince kept his fingers off the bauble , and Mr . Lefevre is
calmly on his way to a Peerage . A Prince who has had encouragements of this kind , and avails himself of none of them , is not likely knowingly to step beyond his proper functions or exceed his just rights when a deputation from the Guards' club waits upon him , to state their grievances and solicit their brother officer to co-operate with them . Did the public which did not disapprove of his taking a regiment on Wellington ' s death , expect him to discard all the duties of his new position , and to resolve to abnegate esprit de corps ? The Prince was wise and honest enough to refuse Wellington ' s offer—and Wellington in that day could have carried it—of the Horse Guards , and doubtless calciilated that the country would not grudge him a colonelcy , with all the duties thereto appertaining .
The public and the Prince must take the consequences of anomalousness in their relations , and be prepared for collisions of this character . When they occur , the public and the press will show most selfrespect by not exaggerating the importance of the point in dispute . A " facetious contemporai-y" naturally takes advantage of the fuas to jeer at the anomaly itself , and to suggest that a field-marshal who never was in the wars , had best pocket his pay , and leave military matters alone . But leading journals should not copy facetious contemporaries . Leading journals do not want to get rid of the anomaly , and therefore must encourage it as best they can . Non-Elector .
.^ 2 G The L Eap E B. [No. 300, Saturday
. ^ g THE L EAP E B . [ No . 300 , Saturday
. ... . , :....* *Y •« Ud-Ttlmt (Ilfl Till Til ^-P W«- W**?*?•*???
dtomt ComttiL
In This Department, As Alii Opinion?, Ii...
IN THIS DEPARTMENT , AS ALIi OPINION ? , IIOWJSTIIi EXTRHJtH , ARE AL 1 OWEB AN EXPRESSION , THE EDITOR KECXSSARILT BOI . DS HIliaKtiH BBBFOKSIB & B VOK NOWbJ
There Is No Lparn.Ed Man But. Will Confp...
There is no lparn . ed man but . will confp ^ B he hath , much profited by reading controversies , his senses awakened , and hi 3 judgment sharpened . If then , it be profitable for him to read , why should it not , at least ; , be tolerable for his adversary to write ?— -. Milton .
What Shall We Gain By The War? (To The E...
WHAT SHALL WE GAIN BY THE WAR ? ( To the Editor of the Leader . ) Sin , —Let us now consider the question of the war with Russia , and its probable results from the same point of view as that taken by the hot-blooded section of the War Party , comprising men who heartily sympathise with the cauBC of freedom , and hope , by the humiliation of Russia , to effect the emancipation of oppressed communities , and down-trodden nationalities . But , in addition to sympathy with the oppressed , there is prevalent in many minds an indignation against Russia , as ngainst some monstrous prodigy of cruelty and crime . Doubtless , great historical crimes do lie at the door of Russia , and if nations are to be
deemed amenable to liuman justico in the samo manner as individuals , punishment may bo righteously indicted pn the present population of Russia . But few , howovor , who can reason on this subject without hysterical exoitemont , will maintain that one generation should bo punished for tho crimes of tho one that has preceded it , or that a whole population should be subjected to every spooioa of miBory in order that some refleoted rays of that misery may faintly fall upon tho heads of their guilty rulers . There is no doubt that the object of , dwelling upon tho orime » of Russia is to foment the martial exoitemont of tho English people . Coo } , motives of solf-intorest , and even earnest wishes for the deliverance of the oppressed inhabitants of mis-governed countries might not avail to etir up the hearts of the multitude . An
effusion of hatred is needed to raise the excitement to bipod heat . In some measure , then , to counteract this influence , and remove the question of the war from the regions of passion and resentment , it may be well to call to mind that Russia , in endeavouring to overflow its or i ginal boundaries , obeyed the common instincts of semi-civilised tribes occupying ungenial and sterile districts which lie contiguous to such as are mild and fruitful . The aggressive tendency of Russia is not then wantonly malignant — ifc is merely vulgarly selfish . We ourselves , proud as we are of our civilisation , have condescended to pursue the same policy wherever it seemed to be worth our while . Let us divest our .
minds of the childish , hobgoblin notion of Russia , sp anxiously propagated by weak or excitable minds . Russia is not demoniacal , she is simply human . Certain territories are likely to prove useful to her . She endeavours to clutch them . If we think that her doing so will be prejudicial to our own safety , we are warranted in crying " Hands off ! " and enforcing our exclamation , if requisite , by as heavy a blow as we can manage to give her . But to preach a crusade against Russia as against some common enemy of mankind , is ridiculous . Her vices are European , and , let us add , her power for mischief by no means formidable . She is neither fco be detested nor dreaded , as some would have us believe . France has overrun
Europe , and might possibly do so again , particularly when Russia shall be reduced to the requisite degree of prostration . But Eussia failed even to penetrate into Bulgaria , though opposed only by the rude soldiery of a nation more barbarous than herself . This is one reason why I maintain that Russia is not to be dreaded . Why she is not to be detested I have partly shown , and must add that , -whatever may be her deficiencies , it is not for us who blandly permitted the atrocities of Juggernaut , who winked at widowburning , who pocketed a revenue extorted , as recent evidence has shown , in many instances , by torture , it is npt for us to throw the first stone at her government , and her people . ,
Having said this much in explanation rather than in defence of Russia ' s aggressive policy , let us dispassionately consider how the cause of freedom can be advanced by the indefinite warfare we are now waging against that power . Who is the prime mover in the present war ? Napoleon III . Who holds the reins ?—who is master of the situation ? Napoleon III , Who has reaped the greatest benefits from the war , and who can and will stop that war the moment it ceases to be beneficial to him ? Napoleon III . Now , if our heartfelt wish is to encourage and uplift the crushed communities of Europe , it is of vital importance to ascertain what are the opinions , and what the real interests of this
extraordinary man , who , thanks to the policy of this country , now stands supreme amidst the sovereigns of Europe , and dictates peace or war according to his own will , and with reference simply to his own immediate interests . Let him speak for himself . He announces himself to be the apostle of order . Change " Varsovie" for " Paris" and we may say , " L ' ordre regne en Paris . " " Facit solitudinem paceni appellat . " He plants an armed heel upon the neck of the French nation , and exclaims with dignity , " L'Empire e ' eat la paix ! " Perhaps , for tjje time being , he was the only safeguard against Red Republicanism ; perhaps he was a necessai'y evil , a grim , inevitable nuisance , like the family apothecary , or the confidential solicitor . Perhaps the
law of self-preservation urged him on , and still instigates his every movement . With this I have nofcLing to do . The fact remains the same that Louis Napoleon is a despot . He rose by despotism , he reigns by despotism , ho lives by despotism . It is his interest to sustain the spirit of despotism throughout the whole globe . Each vibration of freedom , however far off from France , shakes the Imperial throne . It ia with the Emperor a mattor of life and death that the established authorities throughout Europe should remain sacredly intact . Tho case , then , stands thus : —A despot is tho primo mover in tho present war . A despot holds the l-eins , and is master of the situation . A despot has reaped the greatest benefits from tho warand cau stop that war the instant it
, ceases to he beneficial to him . Now , when will the war cease to bo beneftoial to him ? Clearly at the precise moment when it commences tp bo beneficial to the cause of freedom . For instance ^ tho war is certainly unpopular in many jiarts of Franco . So soon as that unpopularity begins to excite a feeling ot impatient disguab , dangerous to tho utability oi tho Imperial ricjime , Napoleon will make poaco . So soon an tho disturbing influences of war inamfoatly begin to permeate- through tho masses on tho Continent , at present restrained by tho vigour of despotic governments , and mischief appears to bo brewing , Napoleon will make peace . So soon as there la an opening for nationalities to rise , and tho hour anil tno man draw near . Nanoloon will make peace . Wooa
say moro to prove that flo far as the cauao of freedom is concerned , the . war with Rustiia is a mockery an" «• Bhara ? I am , nir , faithfully yours , Deo . 17 , 18 C 6 . Arthur H . Er-TON .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Dec. 22, 1855, page 14, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_22121855/page/14/
-