On this page
-
Text (1)
-
jpgJB 19, 1352.] T H E L^ E A D EJR. S75
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
The Week In Parliament. Loed Jomr Russei...
the tieme of ¦' .- ¦ what Can be got . ' ( Cheers and laugh-° \ That was in the true spirit of the peddling instinct ^ hich presided over the Foreign , office . " Stung by ^ e sarcasms of Mr . Osborne , Lord Stan-E rose and declared that Government had no intention of damaging Mr , Mather ' s character ; whereupon ^ . OSBOBNE retorted that " if Mr . Mather was satisfied with that apology at the eleventh hourhe was not the HJan ^ * '' *" ^ * " - ^ * ° the responsible Government— .
« It was the Austrian Government they were bound to call upon to show Lieutenant Forsthuber was justified in his conduct , and , if they failed to do so , then to demand ^ me m ark of their regret for what had occurred ; but the Austrians , so far from expressing contrition , had com-r mended Lieutenant Forsthuber ' s conduct , and he was p-oinff about Florence as a sort of hero , as ' the man who had ciuV down the Englishman . ' ( ' No ; no . ') Yes , he knew it to be the case ; and it Was said lord Malmesbury had give n L ieutenant Forsthuber ' a step . '" ( A laugh . )
The only man who showed well m the case , and kept up the character of the country , was Mr . Mather . « He regretted very much the question had been brought before the House in its present shape , and that he was prevented by some form of the . House from moving a direct vote of censure on Lord Malmesbury for trifling with the honour of the country , and for having disgraced us in the eyes of the whole continent of Europe . " ( Cries of " Move , move ! " )
Passing over Lord Gbanby , who made a mad Protectionist speech , and did not touch upon the Mather question , we find Lord Pai-mebston ; oil his legs , insisting that debates on Protection were a waste of time ; that protection was dead- ^ -that no doubt its death and burial would be duly registered at the ensuing election ; and that Lord Granby ' s speech was a " convenient diversion" of the debate from the damaging topic of the outrage upon Mr . Mather . The noble lord then
continued" I must confess I have read with anything but feelings of satisfaction the papers which have been laid on the table of this House with respect to the affair of Mr . Mather . ( Hear , hear . ) I own , sir , that for the sake of the country—for the character of the country , I wish the whole of this correspondence had been , very different . ( Hear , hear . ) I am sorry to say that that observation applies to the whole case , from the beginning to the end of it ; for I must own it seems to me that it was not a comedy but a tragedy of All in the Wrong . I . must say that I find much to criticise in the-conduct of almost all the parties concerned ^ except Mr . Mather and his son . ( Hear . ) I think the late Government took a wrong view of the
case . (' Hear , hear , ' from the Ministerial benches . ) I think , also , the present Government took a wrong view of it , and I am sorry to say that our ChargS iV Affaires at Florence took a wrong view of it too . What is the course which in the case of a personal outrage committed upon a British subject abroad—what is the course which I think the British Government ought to have pursued ? Why , it is the first duty of the Government to ascertain clearly the facts of the case—to ascertain clearly the character of the injury which the British subject has sustained , and how far he was in the wrong , or if not in the wrong , liow far those by whom the injury was inflicted were to olanae . Well , Sir , haviner done that , if the Government find that
an outra ge has been committed , l-eporation ought to be demanded . That reparation may consist , first , in a demand for the punishment of tho offender , and next also in a demand for compensation to tho sufferer . ( Hear . ) Upon those points it has been always tho practice for the Secretary of State to consult tho Queen ' s Advocate , to lay tho facts of the case before him , to ask him what , according to his viow and his knowledge of tho habits of courts of justice in other countries , what might bo a fit sum to demand for pecuniary compensation ; how far , according to international law , tho Government would bo justified m asking for tho punishment of tho wrong doer . That « oes not appear to have been done by either Government in tlus
case . But tho first question which arises , is what was the injur y inflicted , or was thoro any injury inflicted ? I think no man who has road those papers can hositato one moment in acknowledging that a grievous injury was committed ( cheers ); that a British subjoot was oxposod to a most violent , a most cowardly outrage , for which no fuloq ^ iate , in fact no provocation whatovor , was given . A British subject was accompanying a band of music in tho Btreets of Floronco , and ho was Btruek , first by a sword by one officer , thon by tho fist of another , and then , in a oowar dly manner , was cut down w ith tho sword of the officer who first assaulted him . Now , what is tho fooling oi different countrios with regard to an attack by an arnica { igainst an unarmed man P ( Choors . ) Why , Sir , wo all « now tho old anecdote of tho English butcher , who , w hilo flni
ployod in tho avocation of his profession , was struck by a man with whom ho had words , and whom h « reproached ^ vitli th o good old English scmtimont , ' Why , what a mean , cowardly follow you must bo to utriko a man who has a Kmfo in liis hand , and who cannot rot-urn tho blow . ' ( Hoar , ' and laughter , ) That is tho English fooling . ( Ohoors . ) What is tho Fronch" feeling P ( Hoar . ) Why , ""¦» many of us know that thoro was a distinguished , oflicor in tho British sorvico in tho cavalry , who had lost « n arm , bufc who served in tho Peninsular war , mutilated a « ho then was . In an action in whioh ho was ongagod , j got into " milde , and a Fronch oflicor rode- up to »» 'n , and was going to cut him down . But tho Fvonchttian Baw that his opponent had only one arm , and , seeing hat , ho dropped Inn sabro point ( ohoom ) , and passed on to se ok out an opponent with whom ho might contend on "Jiual towns . That is tho Fronch fooling . ( Cheers . ) * hon , % uUoU t ) 0 toi ( i tnat thfer cobo i & a proof of tho
Austrian , feeling in such matters . Sir , I don't believe any such thing . ( Hear , hear . ) My conviction is that the cowardly conduct of that lieutenant who cut down , without provocation , an unarmed British subject , has met with as much disapproval and disavowal on the part of his comrades in Tuscany , as they in their service dare show by their conduct towards their , officers . I am persuaded that if Marshal Radetzky had known the true f a cts of the case at the time when he said that the officer was fully justified in what he did , —I am fully convinced that such a brave man would have sympathize'd with Prince Sehwarzenberg , who , when appealed , to by the' Earl of Westmoreland , who said to him , ' We are both soldiers , and never raised our sword against an unarmed man , ' replied ,
' No ; such a thing could never have happened to either of us ;'—I am persuaded that had Marshal Radetzk y known the truth or the matter , ho would never have written the despatch which we find among these papers ; for , whatever we may think of the policy which is pursued by the Austrian Government , no man who knows the Austrian people and army can for a moment doubt their generosity and universal courage . " He then declared , as his own opinion , that had the Austrian Government been applied to they would have given ample redress ; And he further animadverted on the fact , that Mr . Scarlett had been left without definite instructions , both by the late and the present Government , as to what kind of reparation he should demand ; and he
condemned as unusual the act of Lord Malmesbury in calling on the sufferer to assess his own damages . Nor was he less severe on Lord Malmesbury for "forcing Mr . Mather to name a sum against his inclination and against his protest , and then showing him up to the Tuscan Government as being exorbitant in his demand . " He censured Mr . Scarlett for the manner in which he executed his office ; and coming to the Stratfords , gave the following interesting exposition of their case : — " But the fact , in regard to these Mr . Stratfords , is , that they were accused of that which was in itself an offencethat is to say , they had in their house a private printing press , which is prohibited b y the law of Tuscany , and it was shown that with this printing press they had printed
papers inveighing against the Government for the purpose of distribution . 5 fp doubt they had incurred the liability to punishment , but they were tried by an Austrian courtmartial at Leghorn . Well , the Government , when I was a member of it , protested against this proceeding . We consulted our legal advisers , and found that by the fundamental law of Tuscany even the Tuscan Government could not establish martial law to the suppression of the ordinary tribunals , much less those of a foreign garrison acting under the orders of a foreign Government . We protested , both at Florence and at Vienna , against the competency of the court , and against , therefore , the validity of the sentence ; and . I presumCj from what I have heard to-night , been
that that protest was insisted . upon , that its force had admitted , and that these two young men were to be liberated in consequence of the incompotency of the court and tho invalidity of the sentence : therefore , their release , while it was no great satisfaction to Mr . Mather , was , dip lomaticall y speaking , not , I think , a fair arrangement , inasmuch as we should have had them released without it . " He contended , that if any pecuniary compensation was to be d emanded , the sum of 5001 . was " altogether inadequate . " One thing , he insisted , that Mr . Scarlett had not done . He had not surrendered , he had only waived the discussion of the principle of the responsibility of the Tuscan Government . And then , said the speaker , —
" I think , if the Government were not satisfied with the amount which the Tuscan Government offered , tho more handy way of dealing with that case would have been to say , ' Wo take the money in our sense ; and remember , that if ever the same thing happen again , we will compel you to g ive us what wo think amplo compensation ; and wo don't care a pin what you say about your non-responsibility—we will make you responsible . ' ' ( Cheers . ) As to suspending relations with Tuscany , or inflicting any punishment on its governors , that would bo making it the whipping-boy of Austria .
"If you wanted to inflict a practical lesson , I think it would have boon better read by applying it to Austria . The practical lesson read to Tuscany was this—and it is applicable to all small States—you say to Tuscany , You possess practically an independence , but you have novortheless let in a foreign garrison , over which you havo no control ; we will toach you to do that again , for wo will make you pay for tho conduct of that garrison . No doubt thoro ' is a moral in that , bufc I . am not suro that greater European good could not have boon accomp lished by roading a lesson to tho other party , and by flaying to groat Powers , If you tako advantage of your superior forco to impose upon a smaller Pawor , and occupy and garrison that small Stato , you shall eontinuo responsible for tho conduct of that garrison , and if that garrison misbehaves itself towards English subjects wo shall como to you instead of to the weak Powor which you havo overruled and overborne . Both lessons are good , but in a European sonfie , that would have been best . " ( Oheors . )
The peroration of his speech is so remarkable at this juncture of affiiiivs , that it is oh well tho reuder should peruse it entire . " I am very much interested , as tho Govornmont naturally aro , hi Mio independence of Tiwcany , and I muflfc Hay thoBO papers do call i ' ov serious attention on tho part of thp GoVornmont to tho unfortunate condition of largo portions of tho Italian States . ( Loud orioH of " Hoar . ) Tho" Italians aro a poopjo endowed with vory great and ominont qualities ; thoy aro gifted wHh great natural ability ; thoy havo shown in former times that thoy avo not inferior as statesmen and in political knowlodgo and capacity to tho pooplo of any ofchor part , of Europe I apprehend their qualitioH roinain tho finmo , though tho cultivation of thoso poworo by tho poHHOBBion of opportunities of employing thorn aro not tho fuuno as thoy possossod in formor poriodo . It is lamentable- to boo tho
present state of Tuscany , the Roman States , and of Naples . It is difficult to say where the greatest . misgovernment prevails . ( Loud cries of " Hear . J At . . nas been said of Austria that they wished the people ot Italy should draw a comparison favourable to them between the condition of the States which they govern and those which other Governments administer ; but , like the ^ gentleman from the sister island , who complained of Ins bootmaker that , whereas he had ordered him to make one larger than the other , the bootmaker bad made it less than the other ( laughter ) , so the Government of Austria , instead of making a comparison in such guise that the Italians should think the Lombards and the Venetians are better governed than the rest , only compels them to think that the other territories are worse governed than the other States . ( Cheers . ) This isI say , lamentable , and
, I do not believe there is another example in modem times of such a system of cruelty , tyranny , and violence of every sort as exists in the Neapolitan and Koman States . ( Cheers . ) It is a disgrace to modern Europe The position of affairs in Tuscany is not so bad ; but the public there are exposed continually to acts of violence from a foreign garrison , for which they have no redress , and which , if committed in England , would arouse the indignation of every man from one end of the kingdom to the other . ( Cheers . ) This occupation of the Italian States , especially of Tuscany , by foreign troops , did not escape the attention of the late Government . It is evident that that occupation cannot cease except by common consent between the Governnent of France and the
Government of Austria . France would not withdraw unl il Austria has evacuated Tuscany and the Legations , which it cannot be expected to do until the French have retired from Rome . We have been told that nothing could be done until the month of May had passed , and there was much force in the arguments and statements then made . ^ But May has now gone by . I do intreat Her Majesty ^ Government to turn their minds to . this question * It is one which really concerns—not merely the happiness and welfare of a most interesting part of Europe—but which also involves great international questions , and which deeply affects the balance of power in Europe . ( Cheers . ) I should hope that Her Majesty ' s Government , being on eood and friendly terms with the two Governments mainly
interested in a decision upon that matter , will exert that influence that justly belongs to the Governme nt of this great country , and will endeavour to persuade the Governments of France and Austria to put an end to the anomalous and irregular state of things which now prevails in so great a part of the Italian peninsula . ( Cheers . ) I shall be told that the condition of the Eoman States is such that , if the French garrison were to retire , a great revolution and disturbance would take place . But 4 et me remind the House of what passed in 1831 and 1832 , when the five powers of Austria , Prussia , llussia , France , and England , gave to the then Pope advice with regard to the improvement of the internal organization of Ms Government , which , if it had been acted upon and carried out , States which
would have secured the tranquillity of the he governs . ( Hear . ) Some such arrangement might now with advantage bo adopted . I shall be told , perhaps , that some steps are already taken with that object , but I feel that they are practically i llusive , and that no practical step has been taken with the view to those improvements which were then recommended , and which are now more wanted than ever . ( Hear , hear . ) I ought , perhaps , to apologize to the House for the time during which I have occupied its attention . ( Loud cheers . ) I am sure , however , that tho subject I havo mentioned is one that must engage the sympathy of every man in this country ; and I auTpersuaded that if Her Majest y ' s Government will take it up in tho spirit in which I think they are disposed to act , great good will result to Europe from their endeavours . ' ( Much cheering . )
Mr . Dishaem then took up the cudgels , and valiantly defended his obnoxious colleague . Ho donicd that the national feeling was involved in the outrage at Florence , and ho added , although " it was an outrageous , n wanton , nnd a cruel act ( cheers ) it was still an accidental one " ; HodefondodLordMalmesbuvyatall points ; and fully adopted tho courso pursued by him , making a merit of tho demand for redress being made to Tuscany , as , if it had been made to Austria , that would havo been a virtual acknowledgment of Austrian supremacy in that stato . " He , in common with the O pposition speakers , applauded Mr . Mathor—to a certain extent .
" I will not say ono word that would cheapen the conduct or character of Mr . Mathor . I have no reason to believe that ho is otherwise than a respectable Englishman , and was placed under circumstances of groat difficulty , and which , from his previous habits of life , ho was unaccustomed to , and had littlo experience of . Ho appears to mo to have conducted himself with discretion and good sonse , nnd any attempt to criticise his conduct or hie character would , I think , bo not only wanting in good tasto but in good feeling . ( Hear , hear . )" tt
And after uttering this eulogy , ho turned round o he HouBe , and asked thom to viow tho case as " mono ! " tho world , and mombors of Parliament . " Ho thought Lord Malmesbury had acted with groat propriety in requesting Mr . Mathor . to stato tho sum at which ho valued tho injury , and in demanding pecuniary reparation . Neither was thoro any "infirmity of purpose" about Lord Malmusbury » conduct—it had boon " porlbetly proper . " , And lie wound up with Bomo remarks in reply to Lord Palmorstou » peroration . ¦ _ __ __ _ _ , . a it _ _ . _ . attention to tho state of
" Tho noble lord has callodour Italy , and ho only does justico to tliefuolingH ot tho Govornmont when ho assumes that thoy look with great mtotort and Homo anxiety to that important country . But no spoko in a tono as if tho Government were responsible tor the Htato of affairs thoro . Tho otato of Italy ib no worse than wo found it . Tho noblo lord haa boon making theso HpooohoB on tho stato of Italy for a considorablo time , and very iust aro his observations , and vory ingonioushiB policy ; but tlio stato of Italy haa not boon improved hitherto by
Jpgjb 19, 1352.] T H E L^ E A D Ejr. S75
jpgJB 19 , 1352 . ] T H E L ^ E A D EJR . S 75
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), June 19, 1852, page 3, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_19061852/page/3/
-