On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Bm . TjapcT^i^.P^ s^r r Qfe^gfe Smm^Ff 1...
-
;.;. THE SUEZ CANAIi. TtfijtoHjr a stron...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
The Campaign In The Crimea. It Is Just A...
lesson was not lost on the Allies . They had assaulted from a great distance ; beside the fire of the place , the guns of the fleet had inflicted severe losses on the stormers ; and it -was determined that no more risks of that kind should be run . After a l © ng interval , daring which heavy losses were incurred by the Allies in sapping onward to the fortifications , the time for a final storming operation approached * In vain the enemy tried * o frustrate the purpose of the Allies . Severely pressed by the constant fire of the
besiegers ; straitened in his means of supplying the garrison and the external army with food ; discouraged by previous defeats and with no hope of ultimate success , Prince Gobtsohakopi 1 reported in July that he could not much longer hold the city . It was then that the authorities in St . Petersburg , in spite of the objections of Paskiewitoh , ordered that a last desperate assault should be made on the line of the Tchernaya , in the hope that the Russian columns might once
more bivouaek before Balaklava , and by gigantic efforts on all sides compel the Allies to raise the siege . The attack on the Tchernaya failed , as it could not but fail , for the enemy were powerless to break through a position so strong in itself and so stoutly defended . The battle of the Tehernaya was , therefore , the beginning of the end . Nothing now remained for the enemy to do but to resist to the utmost when the assault should be made , and retreat with rapidity when the MalakhofF was won . The MalakhofF was
carried on the Sth of September ; on the 9 th the iEiissian garrison was on the north side of the bay ; and on the 12 th everything that had floated in the harbour of Sebastopol had been destroyed . The Allied flags floated over the ruins , abounding with the deserted maferial of War . . The first half of the campaign in the Crimea has , therefore , run its course , and ended with that triumph in which we have constantly believed . Its military results are too great" for' present comprehension . If the ¦
two ' most powerful nations of Europe have been kept at bay for nearly twelve months , Bussia , the giant military power , whose main business for forty years has been to perfect her military institutions , has offered \ ip army after army in its defence , has drawn profusely upon all her resources- — -men , money , materiel - ^ h ' as risked everything and spared nothing and has yet been ; defeated . The Kussian army has been , beaten in every encounter ,
and , prave as it is , cowers beaten behind J ^ igea of IrikermanJ and the waters of the bay of Sevastopol . The expedition to the Crimea , profoundly conceived , but in its earfier stages imperfectly executed ; , has been proved to be wise by the result : We have supplied our troops with ease ; , the enemy with difficulty . We could transport our regiments to Balaklava and Kamiesch almost without the loss of a man ; the
divisions of ; the enemy marched across desert steppes , destitute of water ; frdnv one extremity of an empire to another . While the length of time that has elnpsed since the siege was begun has only caused the enemy to suffer additional losaefl , the prestige of the Allies , tarnished by the events of 185-1 ) , has been amply vindicated in 1855 . By the campaign in the Crimea we have moire than defended Turkey , we have inflicted , pounds on the enemy which half n century will not heal ; mid the crowning result of our policy is , thatrwe have shaken to its foundations the preponderance of Russia , nob only in the Black Sea , but throughout the East .
Bm . Tjapct^I^.P^ S^R R Qfe^Gfe Smm^Ff 1...
Bm . TjapcT ^ i ^ . P ^ s ^ r r Qfe ^ gfe Smm ^ Ff ,
;.;. The Suez Canaii. Ttfijtohjr A Stron...
; . ; . THE SUEZ CANAIi . TtfijtoHjr a strong fascination in the idea of a ^ hip canal uniting two sens . It supposes
a . change , effected by artificial means , in the configuration , of the earth . ¦ > It iguores the limits of nature , and proposes to create—not to discover—new highways of war and commerce . The engineers of our day design to shorten the East-Indiaman ' s voyage by a process more v direct , if less romantic , than that by which MAGEiiiAir startled the Portuguese in the Phillipines , and by which so many intrepid explorers have sought to penetrate the accumulated winters of the Arctic Pole . In
all ages such projects have engaged the attention of thoughtful and enthusiastic men . In all ages , also , they have been delayed by doubts and objections . The Nicaragua Canal still remains a theory ; that of Suez has not advanced beyond a partial survey and the approbation of a vice-regal government . M . de ] Lesseps , the " minister plenipotentiary" undertakes to persuade English opinion into the approval of his scheme . His method
certainly renders him liable to no suspicion : the case is zealously , if not conclusively , argued . M . de Lesseps appeals with candour to the public opinion of England , and anticipates , though he appears to undervalue , the obstacles to his plan , which may , upon various grounds , be suggested . He cannot conceal that the views of France , in strenuously advocating a ship canal through the Isthmus of Suez , must be more than commercial . Her trade with
India and the further East is not of sufficient importance to warrant of itself any special interest , on her part , in the accomplishment of so vast an undertaking . Her objects , in fact , are not those of a trader . It has been felt , for a long period * by the French , and by other European nations , that the possession of the Cape by England , and the predominance on every ocean of her mercantile marine , constitute the Asiatic seas and shores her peculiar realm . America alone rivals our commercial navv , or participates ,
to any serious extent , in the Indian trade . The opening , indeed , of a water communication through the Nicaragua Isthmus will enhance the facilities enjoyed by the United ^ States for competition with our own flag along the teeming coasts of Hindostan , in the ports of Eastern India , of the Malayan Peninsula , of Siam , Cochin China , Tonquin , and- the Chinese Empire itself ; of . Japan , of the Indian Archipelago , -of"the scattered grouys around it , and even of Australia and New Zealand . Therefore ,
the French are doubly anxious that one race and one language , though separated in polity , should not divide the sway of Asia , except along those frontiers which the Russians already command . The first Napoleon snatched at this scheme of emulation with England . To speak plainly , lie saw , and the . French nation has approved his instinct , that to destroy the geographical linftof demarcation between the Mediterranean and the Bed
Sea would be to throw the Indian Ocean open to all comers , and to compel the establishment , by Great Britain , of an Oriental Malta , similar to . that which gives her , if not supremacy , at least equality in the Mediterranean . The material difficulties wo do not propose to consider . M . be I / esseps appears to depreciate them , while ¦ Captain AiiLEN , in his recent work on the Dpad Sea , exaggerates their importance . That which to
the one writer ia' an insignificant objection , to the other is insuperable . Each , it must be remembered , rides a hobby . of . his own , though M . de Le ^ seps . appeals to a concourse of authorities , while Captftia A ^ i-en has only put" his mark " on the'map , to indicate a proposed canal from the Mediterranean to the Gulf of Akabah , t hrough the Dead Sea , submerging the plain , of Esdraolon , drowning the holy city of Tiberias , i swampingthe spot at which the Jewa expect their Messiah to
rise , overwhelming . a numb . . /; , pf ,. villages ^ driving out a small population , and op & te- ^ rat / ing two thousand square mi je ^ pf ' Ottoman , territory ; According to him , there is na perceptible difference between the levels of , the Mediterranean and the Hed Sea , so that , there , would be no current "to keep the chan * nel free . Thus the principal facility onwhipK , M . IiiNANT once calculated would be lost * Moreover , there would be no powerful rush of water to carry away the earth and rocks loosened by blasting ; the canal would have to be due , and the sand and stone removed
by machinery , or by manual labour . Again * the seas at either end being shallow , enormoiis jetties would be required . But these engi < - neering necessities , fatal as Captain Ali , eis holds them to be , are included , in , M . DEj IjESSeps' calculations , as well as in those , which have influenced Abbas Pacha and are expected to influence the "Sultan of Turkey . The question is not , then , " Between two projects , which is the more fea ^ sible ? " it is rather , "Is it the interest . of Great Britain to favour M . de IjESSEPs ' . scheme , and to connive at the formation of a new sea-passage to India ? " .
For ourselves , we have no sympathy with , the general alarms felt in connexion with this subject . The South-African colonies have no more right to prqsper upon the difficulties of the Indian roiite , than , the West Indies had to prosper upon the labour of slaves . The monopoly of an ocean is not a privilege on which any nation can justly found its claims to supremacy . Such a principle belonged to the age in which Venice held the first rank among commercial powers , in which Spain and Portugal disputed beyond the line the interpretation of a Papal Bull , in which Holland sought by fraud andviolence to close _ the ports of ; insular Asia against Sir Fbancjs Dbake and his successors . The East India
Company long maintained this policy . of exclusion ; but ,, on general grounds , it i 3 not an , objection that can be put . fprward by one liberal state against the plans of another . It is a totally different thing to sanction the construction of a ship canal , under French influence , with the prospect of leaving it under French control . The future has its chances , its dangers , as well as its hopes . The combination of the French and British Governments for a special purpose may not be developed into a lasting alliance of the two nations . At all . eventsj it is an undoubted truth that when the interests of
two nations actually or apparently diverge , no formal or diplomatic bonds can hold them together . No great act of European importance , therefore , ought to be-carried out without a recognition of the contingency which , may arise—of a war between Eng land and France . In that case , who is to guard the canal ? M . de I / Esseps says it muefc be , placed under a guarantee of neutrality . But who is to secure the securities ? In a conflict suph as that which ended in 1815 , what convention would have shut Napoi / eon out of Egypt ? If a British fleet were flying westwards round the Cape to fight another naval
Aboukir , what but an overwhelming 4 force would close the Canal of Suez , and ^ prevent Frenclj squadrons from passing it | and ravaging the undefended coast-towna of ^ ndia ? It ia idle to " rely on the Turks to fortify its approaches ; the fortress of Tinelv must bo a SeuaatopoJ in strength . At Aden , indeed , tho English might construct their guard-house , but whatever landworka they , erected , a- powerful maritime armament , lodged in its harbour could never bo made superfluous . ; We have said that M . db Iijasajapa' manner ! begets no suspicion , but without ignoring a' * I I
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Sept. 15, 1855, page 12, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_15091855/page/12/
-