On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (3)
-
^- ^^^^ :r ^^^^^ ¦ ¦ : ¦ • ¦ ¦ ^1 ^ i i ...
-
Mt Irk
-
THE OPERAS. I have not much to discourse...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Comte's Positive Philosophy. By G. H. Le...
dual consideration of a series of analogous cases m which the pheno-** ** a become more and inpre simplified ; The science of organized bodies , ^ ich embraces the phenomena the most difficult of access , is at the same w Q ' - ^ ' pniy / qn & -t % ! A % - ' i ^ y ' - peimits the union of the three modes . Astro-^ y on the contrary , is necessarily limited to the first . And observation " ° ther 6 restricted to that of a single sense . All that it does—and it is all that is required- —is to measure angles , and reckon times elapsed , Observat ' on however indispensable , plays the most ihsigpnificant part in astronomy : ' t is ' reasoning that forms incomparably the greatest portion of the science , dthis constitutes the prime basis of its intellectual dignity . It is even ur intelli gence that constructs the greater number of astronomical phenoena actual phenomena though they are . " We neither , for example , see the figure of the earth nor the curve described by a planet .
The combination of these two essential characteristics—extreme simpliitv of the phenomena to be studied , with great difficulty in their observa-,. is what makes astronomy a science so eminently mathematical . On the one hand , the constant necessity we are under of deducing from a small number of direct measures , both angular and horary quantities , which are not themselves immediately observable , renders the continual use of abstract mathematics absolutely indispensable . On the other hand ,
astronomical questions being always problems of geometry or problems of mechanics , naturally fall within the province of concrete mathematics . And finally , not Only as respects the geometrical problems do we have perfect regularity of astronomical figures , but as respects the mechanical , we have admirable simplicity of movements taking place in a medium whose resistances has hitherto been left but of account without error , and under the influence of a small number of forces constantly subject to one very simple law ; and
these circumstances allow the application of the methods and the theories of Mathematics to a much greater extent than in any other case . There is perhaps not a single analytical process , a single geometrical or mechanical doctrine , which is not ultimately niade use of in astronomical investigations , and the greater part of them have hitherto served no other primary purpose . Hence it is preeminently by a proper study of this application of them that we can acquire a just sentiment of the importance and the reality of mathematical speculations .
On reflecting on the singularly simple nature of astronomical researches , and the consequent facility of applying the ensemble of mathematical resources to them in the most extensive way , we understand why astronomy is now placed at the head of the natural sciences . It merits this supremacy—1 st , By the perfection of its scientific character ; 2 nd , By the preponderating importance of the laws which it discloses to us . After referring to several examples of the high practical utility of astronomy , Comte adduces that science to illustrate the fact , that the sublimest scientific speculations often , without premeditation , lead in the end « to the most ordinary practical and useful purposes , and he exposes the folly of those who would , if in their power , interdict all speculations except what have , on the face of them , an immediate practical object in view .
On a closer examination of the present condition of the different fundamental sciences , under the philosophical point of view , we shall have occasion to observe , as I have already hinted , that astronomy is in the meantime the only one which is really and finally purged of all theological or meta physical considerations . As respects Method , this is the first title it has to supremacy . It is there that philosophical minds can effectually study what a true science really consists in ; and it is after this model that we ought to str ive , as far as possible , to construct all the other fundamental sciences , having at the same time due regard to the differences , more or less profound , that necessarily result from the increasing complication of the phenomena .
Those who conceive science as consisting of a simple accumulation of observed facts , have only to consider astronomy with some attention to feel how narrow and superficial ia their notion . Here the facts are so simple , and of so little interest , that one cannot possibly fail to observe that only the connexion of them and the exact knowledge of their laws , constitute the science . What in reality is an astronomical fact ? Nothing else , ordinaril y , than this : that a star has been seen at a particular instant , a under a correctly measured angle ; a circumstance , doubtless , of little Jjnportance of itself . The continual combination of these observations , and the more or less profound mathematical elaboration of them , uniquely cha-Nicte
nze the science even in its most imperfect state . In reality , astronomy ld not take its rise when the priests of Egypt or Chaldea had , with more or less exactness , made a series of empirical observations on the heavens , ut only when the first Greek philosophers began to connect the general phenomenon of the diurnal movement with some geometrical laws . The » ie a »< l definite object of astronomical investigations always being to prec lct witl 1 certainty the actual state of the heavens at a future period , more ° * less distant , the establishing of the laws of the phenomena evidently ords the only means of arriving at this result , while the accumulation of ^ oservations cannot , of itself / be of any practical utility for ntlte purpose , cept as furnishing a solid foundation to our speculations . In one word ,
rue astronomy did not exist so long as mankind knew not , for example , W foresee , with a certain degree of precision , by the aid at least of ^ . Cal Process , and in particular , by certain trigonometrical calculations , a . mt » tont of the rising of the sun , or of some star , on a given day and at thfV 6 U pla < ie " This ' ¦¦ e & tial characteristic of the science has always been Sanae »» ttc © ita origin . All the Uteps in its subsequent progress have
only consisted in definitely giving td these predictions a greater and greater certainty and precision , by borrowing from direct observation the least possible number of given terms for the purpose of foreseeing the most distant future . No part of philosophy can manifest with greater force the truth of this fundamental axiom : every science has prevision for its object j which distinguishes real science - from simple erudition , limited to recount past etents without any view to the future . Not only is the true characteristic of a science more profoundly marked in astronomy than in any other branch of positive knowledge , but we may even say , that since the development of the theory of gravitation , it has attained the highest degree of philosophical perfection that any science can ever pretend to , as respects method , —the exact reduction of all phenomena ,
both in kind and in degree , to one general law , —provided always that we confine the remark to solar astronomy * agreeably to the explanation given above . Without doubt , the gradual complication of phenomena ought to make us conceive a similar perfection as absolutely chimerical in the other fundamental sciences . But it ought no less to be the general type which the different classes of savans Ought constantly to have in view , as being one they must approximate to as far as the corresponding phenomena will allow . It is always there we shall perceive in all its purity what the positive explanation of a phenomenon is , without any inquiry as to the first or final cause of it ; and , finally , it is there we must learn the true character , and the essential conditions of truly scientific hypotheses , no other science having employed this powerful instrument so extensively , and at the same time so fittingly .
I must interrupt the exposition here , and resume it next week . Unwilling as I am to lengthen this series , yet having commenced the task of presenting all the main and necessary points of this system of philosophy , it is better to incur the charge of prolixity than to hurry over the subject and leave the reader tantalized with vague descriptions . *
Comte's Positive Philosophy. By G. H. Le...
* Vnv the Oomto subscription fund I lave to aok » owle #° 10 # . from W . A . II . M O * foS « S cSridgoTfioar that gonorou * » tu <*< mto ^ fcrostiag thwawlm m Cdmte ' 8 favour .
^- ^^^^ :R ^^^^^ ¦ ¦ : ¦ • ¦ ¦ ^1 ^ I I ...
^ - ^^^^ : r ^^^^^ ¦ ¦ : ¦ ¦ ¦ ^ 1 ^ i i - ——^^ " ^ P ^^^** " ^^^^^^^^^^ .. - , ^ — ^ ^ , . _ —^ I ^ B ^—MBB ^ B ^ M ^^ M ^—^ B ^^^^ W ^^^ WW ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ i - ¦ - t- ^*^ - ^^ M *^^ M ^»^^^*^ Ml ^ BJMMWB
Mt Irk
Mt Irk
The Operas. I Have Not Much To Discourse...
THE OPERAS . I have not much to discourse about this week , and am not in the mood to disguise my poverty under magnificent phrases . It is a great art that of writing with , nothing to say ! but an art , like all others , obedient to the moods and caprices of that delicate thing , the human mind . I'll trouble you for a fetuUeton when your liver is inactive ! Let me see what criticism you would write on Cruvelli while your head was heavy with yesterday ' s dinner ! Give me a taste of your quality with a toothache . "Were my mood otherwise , I could tell you something of Cravelli in Brnani . It is , after Fidelio , her greatest part . The music which , taxes other singer falls easily upon her . She is somewhat of a screamer ,
every and Verdi is fond of screaming . Her noble voice , her impetuous style , her bvertragic manner , better suit Elvira ; and she produces a great effect in it . What a feuilleton 1 . could write ... if I could ! But O Harriet ! O Panny ! O dinner , haunting me , as the cataract did Mr . Wordsworth— " Like a tall passion /'
O Love ! O Indigestion— voila de tes coups ! you have done it all ! Were it not for your remorseless pursuit of me , I could do something with the " artist" Ferlotti , who in Carlo V . stamped himself in my estimation as having achieved the most perfect failure " it has ever fallen to my lot to witness , " ( style choisil ) It is more Ferlotti ' s misfortune than his fault that lie has no voice , and is errantly capricious in intonation —( after all why be fastidious , and demand correct intonation from an artist Y )—but if I were criticising him , I . should ask whether it is owing to his being " such an artist , " that he sings defiance in the lackadaisical manner ho selected as the fitting expression of
Lo vt'dremo veglio nudaco So resistermi potrai —• and I would suggest to him in future to be less of an " artist , " and more of a singer . Do I ask too muchP Belletti as Buy Gomez , was everything one could desire , and was not an artist . Oh but a real artist—a man for whom the name should have been invented , had it not existed-a man who by his art makes you forget defects of voice , of intonation , of figure , till you prefer him to all ^ thers-Roncom Giovanni
ina ^ ord . ha ^^^^ He played Don ; he wiU not play it again . But he recovered from the full by playing Papageno in jfi Auto Ma ico-a performance not to be imagined nor defcSd . With him , and with Anna Zorr the triumph of the ovenmg rested . Some day or other when I feel equal to the audacity , I will fling a stone at this idol of an opera , and try to givoa better expanationoi its heaviness than the usuaf excuse , " such a miserable libretto . The ibrotto is bad enough in all conscience , but I believe bettor music- ^ more " ilw . « + ; ™™ ™ . Bflionato . more earnest-would have triumphed over it .
The union of such grandeur as that eminent in the largo phrases of tho priestly music , with such prottiness and triviality noticoaBlo in the , rest , Is to my taste fatal ; tho third act of Othello , ma \ i \ almost ; as well bo miercoffid with Did you ever send V < mr W feto $ mherwell ? Moreover , Xarminjr and flowing , and piquant as the melodies are in a drawing-room , diSV you translr Lm & tto atage their want of depth and earners becomes apparent : they aro ear-catching melodies , graceful and protty , as everything Mozart wrote , but they are not dramatic . a 11 + \\\ k T will some day try to make out more conclusively , x oil woii t agreewith ™ , I ** w «* ' the » p * ara hero to express toy
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), May 15, 1852, page 21, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_15051852/page/21/
-