On this page
-
Text (1)
-
JTOT .U,.U»] THE BEA^EB. «*
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Imperial Parliament... ¦¦¦ ¦ ' • ¦ ¦ R- ...
means than those contained in the bill for remedying Sat defect , a « tfie H *« e o * Peers , « ctmnexron with l 3 b peerages , has the means of thwarting the intentions 5 ? £ r 8 oin .-Mr . BowtBE , wtio , white admitting tfce neeea » ty for refrrra , regarded the P ™* »* t Bi » as » mawof absurdities , mama , as an amendment , that the seeon * reading be deferred for three months : — Tfife was seconded By Mr . Robert PrnnuraicmB , who described the measure as derogating- fironr tne rights of theCbmmons , and Kmitfag the peerage . —Mr . WmrasroB defended the general tenor of the brfl , but reserved His : opinion upon several points of detail . — Sir James Graham disapproved of the measure altoget & er ; It woul * place Lord Ifendeydale m a most amfcgnous an * anomalous position . He would be put m * posftSon of dependence , would be made to bear a marie of infer iority . a » belonging to a class caHed peers , while , nevertheless , he would not be pares ; equal : He would belong to degraded class in the peerage ; The precedent sanctioned by the bill witfi respect to the law might be applied to generate , admirals , and statesmen ; and the House of Lords would thus be swamped . Such a bill ¦ would debauch both the bench and the bar , the detaife of the measure being of a fiind that could effect no good , and would do great harm . The House of Lords was capable of amending its own jurisdiction without the intervention- of the Commons ; and for this purpose he roggeatedadfetributron of the business , in classes , among the Judges . Reform of some fcindV however , was absolutely necessary . —Mr . Roundest Paxmek supported the bSf , as presenting a means of overcoming acknowledge * difficulties less objectionable than any fie had heard proposed . Still ; he thought that many orf the de - tails were feeble and defective ; but he looked to the committee for remedying those objectionable features . If , however , the bill passed in its present form , and there were only two judges with the salary of puisne judges , it would be a miserable failure . —Mr . Colltek supported the bill , which was opposed by Mt . John Philliwoke , who observed that the better plan would be to remove the supreme court of appellate jurisdiction to a court so constituted by the union of knowledge and virtue that it should command the respect of the people . Lord John Russeix did not think the appellate jurisdiction of the House of Lords so great a failure as some people regard it . The present bill would make it worse , instead of better . The House of Lords would become a mere hybrid court . He was sorry that the Government should have taken the unnecessary step of making Lord Wensleydale a peer for life , and that the House of Lords should have refused to allow that nobleman to take his seat . The consent of that House to the presence of four li fe peerages at a time , accompanied by a limitation to that number and no more , was a most indecent and unfit ¦ way for the two Houses to deaf with the prerogative of the Crown . Did they mean thereby to take away or to circumscribe the prerogative ? He saw no pressing urgency for any great reform in the appellate jurisdiction of the House of Lords , and he should therefore give his decided vote against the second reading of the bill . The Sohcitok-Ge * eral defended the bill , and remarked that deputy speakers are not unknown in judicial history . They were appointed from time to time , as necessity arose ; and one of the objects of the present bill -was to make the advantage permanent . The House divided , when there appeared—For the second reading 191 Against it 142 Majority for the bill 49 In reply to Mr . Roebuck , Mr . RAnuca Curiue said he should persist in the motion of which ho had given notice , to refer the bill to a Select Committee . The House then went into committee upon the Encumbered Estates ( Irkland ) Bill , and afterwards proceeded through the other orders . Tuesday , July 8 th . TllK CRIMEAN ISKJUIRYThe Earl of Lucan , in the Houwii of Lords , asked Lord Panmurk when the Government would be prepared to luy the report of the Chelsea Board of Inquiry before the House . —Lord Panbiurk replied that the report had only been signed on tho previous Friday . It would bo laid boforo tho House as soon as possible . BAKON MAROCHKTTI AND T 1 IK SCUTARI MONUMENT . In answer to the Earl of Harrington , who asked some questions with roapect to tho Scutari Monument , the execution of which ho ridiculed , and who complained that favouritism had been shown , and that English artists were ncglocted for foreigners , Lord Panmitke stated thut tho commission for the execution of tho work had been given to Baron Marochotti after due deliberation , and that no doubt existed that a monument worthy of those whom it waa intended to commemorate would bo erected at Scutari . With reference to competition in these matters , generally , ho must be permitted to nay that tho sculptors and artists of this country are divided in their opinion of competition for public monuments . So much is that the case , thut in many instances several of the first artista havo declined to otter plans for public buildings . Heriides , all the allied nations huvo thoir part in tho memorial , and English artists can lay no claim to > preference in its oxecution . aiivowhonb mix . The second reading of this bill wj > b moved by the
Earl of SteAFTBSBUBrr , who- BaitF t & a * its object is tor facilitate the sale of advowsons which' are a * rjiesen * 5 n >« he hand * of many owners ; Tie election ti >~ sueifc pre-- ' sentatwww m attended ? by tiig most dSsgractfa g ttad riotous proceed & igs , causing the greatest ncsu & aT to ww Church , and . this bill had for its object the aaft of tikwe livings , and the application of tiia- purchase-money to * i the benefit of the parish and the-par « b . ion « nr . In a lately iceotesterl electienv the population beingrlaigtv and . erary > neejdent inhabitant hawing * right to -rotej . ther expense : < of © aclutmaaeaeBflfal cawttdste was about lift ©( Wi ,- white Itberexpense of the snecessful candidate could not hawB . beew lass tfcaa 5000 £ . All the public-houses were open , and , dnintoeiMMS 3 s ; prevaaedt » a dreadful extent p in fact , the- whole ; proceedings' were most disgraceful . At tto ' ^ previous , election ( nr 1813 ) ,. there were eodhibitai the same sceifes f and : on future avoidances of tte living ,. there being a large increase in the population , there was ; reason to expect a repetition of them . Some time ago , an election occurred in the populous parish of . Clerifcenwell , and he . ( Lord Shaftesbury ) was almost afraid to * repeat what then took , place , so Indecent and . utterly blasphemous were the whole proceedings . —The hill ( which had come , up from the House of Common a ) , waa read a second time without opposition . The Statutes Not in Use Repeal Bill , the Commissioners of Sup p i ^(? 3 cotland > Bill , the Evidence in Forkigen Suits Bill , the Dwellings eor the La * - bouresg . Classes ( Ireland ) Bill , and the Cambeidge Univeksity Bill , were respectively read a third time ,. ) and passed . PUBLIC- HEALTH BILL . In the House of Commons , at-the morning sitting ,, on the order for going into committee on the Public Health Bill , Mr . Knight moved to defer the . committee for three months , objecting that the bill dLffeBed materially from the bills of 1848 and 1854 ; that the remedial clauses in the latter were omitted ; that it repealed the existing right of appeal ; and that it doubled € he amount allowed to be raised on mortgage . —The amendment was seconded by Mr . Pale . —Aiter a . few words from Mr . Eangton , Mr . CowEBa defended the bill , which , he said , remedied ambiguities in the present law . —Considerable discussion ensued , in the course of which M > . Duncombe severely erit . ioi . sed the Board of Health , and recommended Mr . Roebucky and the Administrative Reformers to inquire into that " nieelittle nest of Ministerial patronage , " the occupants of which do nothing for the money they take from the country- *—The prevailing feeling of the House was against going into committee - T and , although Mr . Cowpeb , on behalf of the Government * offered to surrender all the clauses of the measure to which any -serious objection : bad Been urged , the amendment was carried , to a division , when the numbers were—For the second reading , 61 ; for the amendment , 73 : majority against the bill , 12 . On the House resuming at six o'clock , it waa agreed that it should adjourn , at its rising ,, to three o ' clock an " Wednesday afternoon , in order to give hon . members an opportunity of seeing the entrance of the Guards into London on their return from the Crimea . PAYMENT OF THE DEPUTY SPEAKERS OF- TH 3 B T 3 L 013 SE OTLOBOft The Chanchejior of tote Exchequer read a reBohx * - tion proposing that the Deputy-Speakers of th « House of Lords Bhould bo paid out of the Consolidated Fund , without Hxing any sum . —Mr . Bobbrt Phicj ^ xbrmcb ' : " Then we are distinctly to understand that , by sanctioning this resolution , we do not sanction any fi xed amount of salary , great or small ?"—The Chawcelaoh ot the ExcHSQtTKR- replied in the affirmative . The amount was left open for . the House afterwards to decide upon ; SITE OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY . Lord DRtTMUttraiG brought up the reply from the Grown to the address respecting the site * of the National Gallery , conveying her Majesty ' s assent to the proposal for appointing a Royal Commission to investigate the subject . rosmoN ot naval officers . Chptafn Scobei : l moved a resolution to tne effect that " tho disadvantageous position of tho captains , commanders , lieutenants , and masters in tho Royal Hospital at Greenwich ; of the retired captains under the Orders in Council of 1840 , 1851 , and 1856 ; and of the senior commanders and lieutenants of her Majesty ' s navy , is worthy of tho early and favourable consideration of the Board of Admiralty . "—Tho motion was seconded by Sir Geoikik Pkchkt . t-, and supported by Admiral Walcott , who enlarged on tho injustice of , and tho hardships resulting f rom , withholding half-pny from trie officers referred to in tho resolution . — Sir Ciiaki . eh "Wood observed that Captain Scoboll , in comparing tho emoluments of navnl oflicers with those of tho cliiiplains and surgeons , hnd forgotten tho difference between pay far services actually performed and retired allowances , and that ho laboured also under a misapprehension aa to tho amount actually received by those officers , tlio emoluments of tho captains being 595 A ( instead of 45 fiQ , which witt more than tho half-pay of a vice-mliniral , and those of the others in proportion . Ho thought these were not unfair allowances for officers of their rank . It . was not in tho power of tho Admiralty to grant thorn half-pny . : Sir Crraicr , KH Napier and Mr . Montagu Citamtikrs having- spoken in support of tho motion , Admiral
Brkkk'LiEif against it , and C / rptSwn ScojmeHj to leyty , tfte House dividedV wften fbe motionr was negatived By 88 ¦ t * SV . LTET 7 TENANT COLONELS IN THT AXOKT . Colonel Lindsay moved' "that an address be presented 'to HeirMafesty-, praying that afte ? w ^ ff he pleased to- take ¦ fwto * eoHgwferatitm tfte- rajwry frrfficted- on- those lieutenant-colonels of the army who attained that rank' Before the 204 fr * iy of Jmw , 18-54 , and wlrcr hwve been super-• seded by the retrospectiveaction of the warrant ot the 6 th day of OeteBer , IS & i . " Before he had' concluded ¦ his o & servatiisns' m connexion with : tSbis motion , the ( House was counted'out . " Wednesday July Qfh . CIVIL 8 BBVXCE . \ Lord Godekich having- moved that the House go 'into committee on this subject , the Chancellor qe the ^ EXchbquek said he hoped the noble Lord would not jproceed further with the subject at present . In conse-Iquence orthe address moved by Lord €£ oderich last session , a system of examination had been established , and from the 23 rd'of May , 185 ? , to the 1 st of June , 1856 , no fewer than 1748 persons had been examined—vizi , L 055 in London , and 693 in the provinces . Q £ these , certificates , had been granted to 1070 persons * aad refused to 55 G . The Government and the Civil Service Commissioners would continue the gradual development of a principle the value of which they were prepared to admit . —Lord Goderich expressed his satisfaction , ajad the order for the committee was discharged . TENANT RIGHT . ( jBSLAND ^ . BXLL . Mr , Moore withdrew his bill with relation te tenant right in Ireland ' , on a « MV > ""* nf thp . laftRtiftaa of the session , and of the opposition , of Government . —Some desultory conversation ensued ,, in the course of which Lord Pal-3 IEBSTON remarked that he did : not think the bill was one which ought to pass into a law , and now that it had . reached another stage he certainly thought it right to oppose it- [ Mi . Batnes ; " Why , it ' s , wiflHtoawn . " ] " Oh , very welL" resumed Lord- Palmerston ,. " let us adhere , then , to the old maxim , de mortuis nil nisi bomtas , and ,, as the bill is dead , say no mare abou 4 it . " ( -4 laugh . ' ) " With regard to the future , in the present temper of Parliament , he did not think it was likely that a bHl could be passed on this subject , and therefore he was not disposed to bring one forward ; but if Mr . Moore next session should feel it to be bis dufcy to bring forward another MIL of course it would : receive Hie consideration of the- Government . Some other bills were advanced a . stage , and the House adjourned . Thursday , Jkdy 10 * . SALS OV P 04 SGK 3 . In the HotrsH op Lords , Lord Gampbelti called the attention of the House to tfce facilities which existed for the sale of poisons , and hoped the Government would introduce some measure on- the subject next session . — The Lord Chancellor replied that the subject was under the consideration of the Government . THE MTrnNTT OF THE TEPPERARY MTT . TXIA . Lord Pawmttre , in reply to Lord Donoughmore , said the Government had not received any officiaT intimation of the insurrection of the Tipperary Militia , but that a mutiny had taken place owing to some misunderstanding on the part of the men , with respect to giving up their clothing . —In the Lower House , Mr . Frederick Peel stated that the locality is now perfectly quiet . BISHOPRICS OF LONDOKT AND DUMIAM BILL . The Lord Chancellor brought in this bill , to enable ' the prelates to whom it refers to resign their sees . — Lord Kedesdale opposed the bill , on the ground that tho measure , which tended to remedy an undoubted evil , ought rather to be of a general than a special kind . After some discusiion , the hill was read a first time , on the understanding that a second reading should not take place till Monday next . The Distillation from Rice Bill , tho Dwellings for Labouring Classes ( Ireland ) Bill , and the Court of Exchequer ( Scotland ) Bell , were respectively read a third time , and passed . At the morning sitting of the Housjd of Commons , Mr . Cowpeu withdrew his Vaccination Bkll , observing that the difficulties of the question are very great , and that medical men are not agreed as to the safety of inoculation , especially in the case ; of the poor , with whom tho operation might not bo carefully porfiarmed . !—Sir George Grey withdrew tho Burials Act Amkxdmknt . Bill , on account of tho opposition it ha » experienced .- — Several billa having boon advanced a atn « o , the House adjourned , and resumed at eix o ' clock . NAVIGATION OV TUB OAWUJUC Lord Palmkbsxon , in naw-or to Colonel Dunwm , gave it as his opinion that the unvigaitkm of tho Danubefrom its mouth to as high a point as vessels can reachin open to all nationa , subject to . aucb reflations as tho CommiBeioiwira may enact . Toe monopoly given to an Austrian company ctumo 4 b « maintained under tho treaty . In aiiBwar to Mr . MAuows-thci Soucitok-Gkwbral intimated thut it waa no * , his intention , to prooood flnrfhor with tho Wills and ADMiNiarraAonowB B « x . OURR 1 CNOT OF 1 RT > IA . Replying- to Mr . Ciiuutiiam , Mr . Vkrnon Smith said thut no complaint of tlw want of metalKc specie in India
Jtot .U,.U»] The Bea^Eb. «*
JTOT . U ,. U »] THE BEA ^ EB . «*
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), July 12, 1856, page 3, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_12071856/page/3/
-